Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
InnercityGriot
Dec 31, 2008
I can't believe people are actually defending this poo poo. You don't get to destabilize entire countries and create incredibly compelling reasons for people to need to immigrate and then talk about how it's the immigrants responsible for right-wing populism's return. It's neoliberal policy that needs to be repudiated.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Phobic Nest
Oct 2, 2013

You Are My Sunshine
Is there a variation of the Trolley Problem where inaction means that everyone dies, including the operator? Now there's a purity test.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Wilhelm posted:

This is a very utopian well-wishing view that would rapidly lead to mass chaos and riots; giant waves of impoverished people without adequate resources or work will rapidly turn to crime and form ghettos. Unless the solution is Europe forms forced labor colonies or something

There's plenty of resources and work for them in America and before Trump destroyed them there were refugee resettlement support networks in place.

In the final analysis *the wealth of nations is in their people*, and more.immigrants = more people = better than. If they need support then give it to them, it's a worthwhile investment.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


If Hillary was going to put together a committee that would honestly tell her that running for President was a bad idea they would have told her that two times already.

Once of her biggest weaknesses is she values loyalty over competency in her staff.

Eggplant Squire fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Nov 22, 2018

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

Agent Burt Macklin posted:

https://twitter.com/mollyjongfast/status/1065627922466304001?s=21

So he is on right now saying he shut down the border entirely- said he “signed an order” to stop the caravan two days ago. This didn’t actually happen did it? It would be big news to stop people from crossing into the US. He said it several times too?
They announced a "Wait in Mexico" policy where asylum seekers are suppose to stay in Mexico while their application is being considered.

It's being challenged and also has a few... logistical issues.

Capri Sunrise
May 16, 2008

Elephants are mammals of the family Elephantidae and the largest existing land animals. Three species are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

All of them had open borders until WWI

this is also a bad take

like yes sometimes an ethnicity like a pole could cross a border to another polish village or something (before everyone got mostly rearranged into their respective countries by the soviets and others) but formal citizenship etc didn't happen. it's a bit easier when lots of people are subsistence farmers vs depending on a national infrastructure/benefits etc also

and mobility was way less of a thing, if the EU declared 100% open borders and free citizenship tens of millions of people would wave in and lead to chaos unless ~perfect socialist government~ somehow gives all the newcomers well paying jobs and residences and not bad ghettos of unemployed people stealing copper and killing each other

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.

Agent Burt Macklin posted:

https://twitter.com/mollyjongfast/status/1065627922466304001?s=21

So he is on right now saying he shut down the border entirely- said he “signed an order” to stop the caravan two days ago. This didn’t actually happen did it? It would be big news to stop people from crossing into the US. He said it several times too?

Haven’t you learned by now that literally everything he says is a lie?

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Sephyr posted:

Well, at least bashing immigrants will give democratics something to do to fill their time after they legislate their own agenda into political oblivion.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...w8MWmT-qkoimuKM

Looks like centrists will never meaningfully resist fascism no matter what level of support they have from the public and will instead inevitably aid its spread. Oh hey who saw this one coming?

I'm telling you people that you cannot trust sociopaths who are interested only in furthering their own careers to do the right thing when the rubber meets the road. They will always sell you out, and they will always look out only for themselves- and they will always have gone out of their way to prove this to you if you just ignore their rhetoric and judge them purely by their actions.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Wilhelm posted:

and mobility was way less of a thing, if the EU declared 100% open borders and free citizenship tens of millions of people would wave in and lead to chaos unless ~perfect socialist government~ somehow gives all the newcomers well paying jobs and residences and not bad ghettos of unemployed people stealing copper and killing each other

you do realize it's pretty difficult to migrate.

Crows Turn Off
Jan 7, 2008


Trump arguing with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS is hilarious.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

Wilhelm posted:

this is also a bad take

like yes sometimes an ethnicity like a pole could cross a border to another polish village or something (before everyone got mostly rearranged into their respective countries by the soviets and others) but formal citizenship etc didn't happen. it's a bit easier when lots of people are subsistence farmers vs depending on a national infrastructure/benefits etc also

oh please, germany had a welfare state in the 1880s well before militarized borders.

not that a shock that a liberal will parrot the white supremacist talking point about immigrants stealing benefits from the welfare state

Capri Sunrise
May 16, 2008

Elephants are mammals of the family Elephantidae and the largest existing land animals. Three species are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant.

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

There's plenty of resources and work for them in America and before Trump destroyed them there were refugee resettlement support networks in place.

In the final analysis *the wealth of nations is in their people*, and more.immigrants = more people = better than. If they need support then give it to them, it's a worthwhile investment.

You said earlier this would match a labor shortage - the only way this would do so is by having a middle east style system where the newcomers live in camps and make $2 an hour. you're either inherently condemning unskilled immigrants to a shittier life than a US citizen or you're creating a make believe situation where a skilled immigrant program could scale up infinitely

there's a lot more nuance to this than in the 1800s where you could just dump people in a wasteland and hope their functionally independent farm worked out

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Wilhelm posted:

and mobility was way less of a thing, if the EU declared 100% open borders and free citizenship tens of millions of people would wave in and lead to chaos unless ~perfect socialist government~ somehow gives all the newcomers well paying jobs and residences and not bad ghettos of unemployed people stealing copper and killing each other

Citation needed

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

That’s pretty much a fascist take on immigration

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
You could open the borders tomorrow and the nonwhites aren't going to flood into your country, good lord.

America had a more or less completely open border with Mexico until 1965 and there wasn't a mass migration of Mexicans coming to steal white people's jobs and benefits

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Groovelord Neato posted:

you do realize it's pretty difficult to migrate.

Look if you treat every human as if they are worthy of compassion and support then the unwashed masses will destroy society in their ignorant lust to consume free stuff. There just isn't enough wealth in the world to go around to give everybody a chance at a good life

And no this isn't an obviously racist attitude wrapped in a couple layers of privilege- it's just pragmatic honesty.

osker
Dec 18, 2002

Wedge Regret

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

There's plenty of resources and work for them in America and before Trump destroyed them there were refugee resettlement support networks in place.

In the final analysis *the wealth of nations is in their people*, and more.immigrants = more people = better than. If they need support then give it to them, it's a worthwhile investment.

When I do the open borders thought experiment I always end up with a kind of urban-rural divide where there is a brain drain from the Nicaraguas and Venezuelas and we still end up with the current closed border system where anyone that has the capital and education boogies to the first world.

Stexils
Jun 5, 2008

i support the tens of millions of poor immigrants as long as we immediately give them voting rights :getin:

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.

Sephyr posted:

Well, at least bashing immigrants will give democratics something to do to fill their time after they legislate their own agenda into political oblivion.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...w8MWmT-qkoimuKM

Love it when someone comes in with week old news that’s already been discussed in here to death.

Also I wasn’t aware that Hillary, who will never hold elected office ever again, is Queen of a Democratic party that has spent the last 2 years successfully distancing themselves from her.

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Wilhelm posted:

You said earlier this would match a labor shortage - the only way this would do so is by having a middle east style system where the newcomers live in camps and make $2 an hour. you're either inherently condemning unskilled immigrants to a shittier life than a US citizen or you're creating a make believe situation where a skilled immigrant program could scale up infinitely

there's a lot more nuance to this than in the 1800s where you could just dump people in a wasteland and hope their functionally independent farm worked out

Oh so you're an unapologetic fascist. Well allrighty then.

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


if you braved life and limb (and likely gave up any wealth you had) to get somewhere you certainly "earned" the right to live there. far more than those of us that won the womb lottery.

quote:

“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Kerning Chameleon
Apr 8, 2015

by Cyrano4747

Prester Jane posted:

Look if you treat every human as if they are worthy of compassion and support then the unwashed masses will destroy society in their ignorant lust to consume free stuff. There just isn't enough wealth in the world to go around to give everybody a chance at a good life

And no this isn't an obviously racist attitude wrapped in a couple layers of privilege- it's just pragmatic honesty.

There really are humans not ever worthy of compassion and support, though.

They're just called Nazis and conservatives and bigots, not refugees and immigrants.

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Kerning Chameleon posted:

There really are humans not ever worthy of compassion and support, though.

They're just called Nazis and conservatives and bigots, not refugees and immigrants.

touche



Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Love it when someone comes in with week old news that’s already been discussed in here to death.

Also I wasn’t aware that Hillary, who will never hold elected office ever again, is Queen of a Democratic party that has spent the last 2 years successfully distancing themselves from her.

LOL that you're actually kvetching that people are criticizing Hillary Clinton outside of what you have personally deemed as the appropriate/acceptable time frame. And people wonder why I constantly challenge the privileged attitudes evident in this thread.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Stexils posted:

it's telling how all the neolibs who pursue free trade policies for capital get very concerned about the free movement of labor

This is the opposite of my experience. Rather while ideological libertarians tend to be for free movement of people, When I worked with trade unionists in Pittsburgh they were often very critical of both tree trade and immigration. I don't think its an accident Trump did so well with this demographic by opposing both.

Capri Sunrise
May 16, 2008

Elephants are mammals of the family Elephantidae and the largest existing land animals. Three species are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant.

Pablo Nergigante posted:

That’s pretty much a fascist take on immigration

Most of my family are refugees living in western countries so yes unapologetic fascist here - I even got the benefit of being born under a stalinist dictator and having my hometown get massacred in the 1980s

yes putting 0 restriction on citizenship is a workable and easy solution that wouldn't disenfranchise the people it purports to help - even when a country like France has mass unemployment and many of its migrants live on the streets currently. this is assuming it doesn't cause a popular backlash and extremist movements (we can go worse than blonde fat dumb guy populism's current vogue)

This is more of a utopian vs cynical argument; unrestricted immigration is about as pragmatic as just fixing all the impoverished countries into being wealthy and modern

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Wilhelm posted:

You said earlier this would match a labor shortage - the only way this would do so is by having a middle east style system where the newcomers live in camps and make $2 an hour. you're either inherently condemning unskilled immigrants to a shittier life than a US citizen or you're creating a make believe situation where a skilled immigrant program could scale up infinitely

there's a lot more nuance to this than in the 1800s where you could just dump people in a wasteland and hope their functionally independent farm worked out

Citation needed

There are lots of refugee resettlement programs and those programs have expertise settling people in American society and if you listen to NPR for a week they're always interviewing people who have successfully integrated via those programs and now have jobs and lives etc.

Of course those programs need funding but it *could* work, we know how to make it work, if we wanted to.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
everyone in this forum that stan'd for Hillary should have to don a sackcloth, bath in ashes, and shut the gently caress up forever lmao

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Prester Jane posted:

Looks like centrists will never meaningfully resist fascism no matter what level of support they have from the public and will instead inevitably aid its spread. Oh hey who saw this one coming?

I'm telling you people that you cannot trust sociopaths who are interested only in furthering their own careers to do the right thing when the rubber meets the road. They will always sell you out, and they will always look out only for themselves- and they will always have gone out of their way to prove this to you if you just ignore their rhetoric and judge them purely by their actions.

It's still darkly amusing to see how they go about it, though.

"poo poo, looks like we may finally get some margin to achieve something for our base, and if they learn of it they'll start pestering us for health care, rights, and other stuff that irks donors. Let's break our own arms and legs so we can't do anything even _if_ we get the chance. See guys, we -wanted- to help, but you wouldn't force a poor broken person like me to go out there, would you? It's be impractical! Let's stick to reality and compromise on a tax credit."

Remember when the party hopped aboard the Tough on Crime wave and was no longer attacked as soft? Me neither.

Remember when it jumped in with both feet on the War on Terror and no one called it weak on defense again? Drawing a blank here.

Or when it cut the deficit in the Clinton and made a stimulus package that was 32% tac cuts? Surely no one would dare call them tax-and-spend fiscal wastrels anymore, huh? Well, about that....

Or when Obama deported almost 4 million immigrants? It's now impossible to get traction calling him an Open Borders freak, impossible, I tell you!

Immigrants are being demonized and made into scapegoats to fuel the new fascists even in countries with barely any immigration, like Poland and Hungary. It's not just wrong to think that spending political capital in this subject will win any respite, it's MORONIC.

And it's not what motivates them, either. They are far more clear-eyed in dealing with inner-party issues and securing their positions in the machine, so it's not a case of "herpa-derp, gonna go try and win moderate GOP voters in vain for the 64th time to no effect, Do'h!" . This is their actual ideology.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Groovelord Neato posted:

if you braved life and limb (and likely gave up any wealth you had) to get somewhere you certainly "earned" the right to live there. far more than those of us that won the womb lottery.

Just to be clear, I agree with this but that's not an open border policy and there does need to be a global solution to issues around migration.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Wilhelm posted:

This is a very utopian well-wishing view that would rapidly lead to mass chaos and riots; giant waves of impoverished people without adequate resources or work will rapidly turn to crime and form ghettos. Unless the solution is Europe forms forced labor colonies or something

lol gently caress off fascist

tehinternet
Feb 14, 2005

Semantically, "you" is both singular and plural, though syntactically it is always plural. It always takes a verb form that originally marked the word as plural.

Also, there is no plural when the context is an argument with an individual rather than a group. Somfin shouldn't put words in my mouth.

Prester Jane posted:

If all you ever do is choose the Lesser evil that you will never have an opportunity to work towards a better world- you will instead exist in a quagmire of slowly accreting evil. I'm being very serious here, if there is no line at which you will not support the lesser evil than evil is all you will ever know. Because the lesser evil will inevitably give way to the greater evil on a long enough timeline, and meanwhile all that time spent supporting the lesser evil will have surrendered the field to evil without a single shot fired.

The fundamental problem with your entire argument about the kiddie concentration campd is that centrists (the Lesser evil) are never going to take the kids out of the camps now that they are in there. They probably wouldn't have put nearly as many kids in those camps andthey certainly wouldn't have been as blase about it- but they're also not going to fight to close the camps either and our silently acquiescing is the Caps continue to grow. And if you're willing to support the people who won't fight to close the cabs out of some sort of pragmatic lesser evilism- I'm afraid that I'm never going to view that notion with anything but contempt.

Embracing lesser evilism in the face of child concentration camps is not the pragmatic, wise, adult, moral, or correct choice. It's the cowards choice.


Edit: sweet another custom avatar. I love it :love:

Double edit: this makes six av's gotten for criticizing centrists. I'm starting to accrue quite the enviable collection :swoon:

I’ve taken steps I can’t really post in detail here with PoC I know should poo poo hit the fan and our glorious leader try to put other ~undesirables- in camps. I’m no centrist. I understand your meaning, but I firmly disagree that even the most milquetoast Clinton candidate would have ever put kids in camps or would keep them there.

We disagree on political strategy, but that doesn’t mean that when it goes down that I wouldn’t die fighting for your right -and every other human’s right- to be who you (they) are in peace and safety.

E: this is a fair post vv

Prester Jane posted:

Looks like centrists will never meaningfully resist fascism no matter what level of support they have from the public and will instead inevitably aid its spread. Oh hey who saw this one coming?

I'm telling you people that you cannot trust sociopaths who are interested only in furthering their own careers to do the right thing when the rubber meets the road. They will always sell you out, and they will always look out only for themselves- and they will always have gone out of their way to prove this to you if you just ignore their rhetoric and judge them purely by their actions.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



House Republicans subpoena Comey, Lynch for private depositions

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/22/politics/house-judiciary-committee-james-comey-loretta-lynch/index.html

Capri Sunrise
May 16, 2008

Elephants are mammals of the family Elephantidae and the largest existing land animals. Three species are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant.

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Citation needed

There are lots of refugee resettlement programs and those programs have expertise settling people in American society and if you listen to NPR for a week they're always interviewing people who have successfully integrated via those programs and now have jobs and lives etc.

Of course those programs need funding but it *could* work, we know how to make it work, if we wanted to.

again I agree with the sources you go by, I'm more just skeptical it can appropriately scale up - Canada has punched well above its weight vs. the US for refugee resettlement (this is a good thing) but there's still certainly lots of issues & shortcomings. I don't think it can scale infinitely if you're going to administer a successful program

yes the US could probably do 100x-200x more than it's doing currently doing; so yes when you're pick and choosing specific refugees in a tiny program vs the world's wealthiest economy your metrics will be way better

Stexils
Jun 5, 2008

Squalid posted:

This is the opposite of my experience. Rather while ideological libertarians tend to be for free movement of people, When I worked with trade unionists in Pittsburgh they were often very critical of both tree trade and immigration. I don't think its an accident Trump did so well with this demographic by opposing both.

right, trade unionists aren't the ones proposing free trade, and they oppose immigration because they fear companies essentially hiring a bunch of scabs to destroy their union. i'm saying that the neoliberals who push policies like NAFTA or the TPP only care about capital and not labor. you can see this in how those policies destroy labor unions since companies can recruit from wherever they want, undermining union leverage. it also comes through in how they treat immigrants - rather than forcing companies to not hire non union workers leaders like obama simply deport people and restrict immigration, which shows they don't actually care about workers.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
That's the thing though -- once you have America taking on 500k refugees instead of 50, that takes a lot of pressure off Europe.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Mooseontheloose posted:

Just to be clear, I agree with this but that's not an open border policy and there does need to be a global solution to issues around migration.

The global solution to immigration involves not bombing brown people and actually making their worlds better for them instead of better for us.

But that’s really hard so lol

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

Wilhelm posted:

Most of my family are refugees living in western countries so yes unapologetic fascist here - I even got the benefit of being born under a stalinist dictator and having my hometown get massacred in the 1980s

Where are you from???

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

That's the thing though -- once you have America taking on 500k refugees instead of 50, that takes a lot of pressure off Europe.

Obama proposed 40k but by law we can only accept 10k without Congress authorizing more. The rest is history.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stexils
Jun 5, 2008

Wilhelm posted:

again I agree with the sources you go by, I'm more just skeptical it can appropriately scale up - Canada has punched well above its weight vs. the US for refugee resettlement (this is a good thing) but there's still certainly lots of issues & shortcomings. I don't think it can scale infinitely if you're going to administer a successful program

yes the US could probably do 100x-200x more than it's doing currently doing; so yes when you're pick and choosing specific refugees in a tiny program vs the world's wealthiest economy your metrics will be way better

refugee resettlement would actually be extremely easy in the us if the government actually used the tools it has. for example if the feds built a bunch of public housing and an unskilled jobs program for those who couldn't find work you could scale it up more or less indefinitely.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply