|
"All I Want For Christmas" is my favorite Christmas song, and I don't care that people hate it.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 01:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 05:52 |
|
Adding a syncopated beat to "Hippopotamus for Christmas" makes it infinitely worse, not better.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 03:06 |
|
CrRoMa posted:Wait so you think its an actual fitness advantage to raise genetic material you are unrelated too? You raise children because you love them , not to pass on your genes you primitive ape. Here's one: going to Mars is an insanely dumb idea that will amount to nothing since it's incredibly dangerous and there's really nothing concrete to be gained. I get annoyed with MULTI PLANET SPECIES space dorks who pretend to care about the purely abstract idea of the "survival of the species" in the event of runaway global warming. How about caring about the survival of actual people alive today? Shibawanko has a new favorite as of 16:13 on Dec 16, 2018 |
# ? Dec 16, 2018 16:07 |
|
Santa Baby is the best Christmas song, because it's the only one that express the universal human desire to be hosed by Santa Claus
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 16:11 |
|
True love is monogamous and polyamory is just a form of immature hedonism practiced by people who can't form proper attachments to others. The scene in Jurassic Park where Newman is sitting on the terrace talking about smuggling the dinosaurs is the only really memorable bit from that movie. Shibawanko has a new favorite as of 16:38 on Dec 16, 2018 |
# ? Dec 16, 2018 16:28 |
|
The only good Christmas songs are made by the Carpenters or Mannheim Steamroller. Everything else is garbage. Just listen to the Carpenter's Christmas Collection on repeat through the season. The Carol of the Bells and Merry Christmas Darling on that album are the best things about Christmas and I am including gifts and glitter in that.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 16:42 |
|
Shibawanko posted:space dorks who pretend to care about the purely abstract idea of the "survival of the species" Shibawanko posted:True love is monogamous and polyamory is just a form of immature hedonism practiced by people who can't form proper attachments to others. Why do you assume that anyone who has different preferences or priorities to you is only pretending?
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 17:17 |
|
Tiggum posted:Why do you assume that anyone who has different preferences or priorities to you is only pretending? Because caring for an abstract concept like the survival of the human species does not involve any real attachment to actual living beings. It's an intellectual conceit popular among Elon Musk fanboys who think global warming is OK as long as we can have a handful of astronauts surviving on another world or something even if most people on Earth will die. https://www.cnet.com/news/elon-musk-humans-should-be-multi-planet-species/ I'm talking about this poo poo
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 17:25 |
|
Tiggum posted:Why do you assume that anyone who has different preferences or priorities to you is only pretending? That applies to opinion 2 waaaay more than opinion 1. One is a relationship preference and one is BEEP BOOP ADOPTION IS ILLOGICAL, EMOTIONS DO NOT COMPUTE. WHY DOES THE HOO-MON EXHIBIT PREFERENCE FOR THE YOUNGLING NOT OF ITS GENETIC LINEAGE? This ties in with my PHUO that Elon Musk is the first and least succesful of a series of genetic hybrids sent by malevolent robots to assimilate us.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 17:29 |
|
Shibawanko posted:Because caring for an abstract concept like the survival of the human species does not involve any real attachment to actual living beings. Edgar Allen Ho posted:One is a relationship preference and one is BEEP BOOP ADOPTION IS ILLOGICAL, EMOTIONS DO NOT COMPUTE. WHY DOES THE HOO-MON EXHIBIT PREFERENCE FOR THE YOUNGLING NOT OF ITS GENETIC LINEAGE?
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 17:40 |
|
Tiggum posted:So? People care about tons of stuff that doesn't involve any real attachment to actual living beings. Like, fictional characters. They're not real people, but that doesn't mean no one cares about what happens to them. Caring about though forms is actually more noble than caring about the few living beings you actually meet. You are tapping in the mystical, the flame imperishable, rather than the crude transient flesh.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 18:14 |
|
Tiggum posted:So? People care about tons of stuff that doesn't involve any real attachment to actual living beings. Like, fictional characters. They're not real people, but that doesn't mean no one cares about what happens to them. Caring about Frodo and caring about things that will affect society are not comparable. I'm glad Frodo got to go to Tol Eressëa, for example, but Frodo and his cronies getting divine honours while the rest of the shire-dwelling hobbits fade into extinction is still bad. I would want the Shire to thrive in the Fourth Age and for all Hobbits to get their fair shake, even if it meant adopting a degenerate Stoor when I'm a worldly and enlightened Fallohide. Or would be, were I a hobbit. But I am a human from earth, you see?
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 18:36 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:Caring about Frodo and caring about things that will affect society are not comparable. The Hobbits become intermingled with Man, they don't go extinct.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 18:39 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:Caring about Frodo and caring about things that will affect society are not comparable. I have no idea what any of this means.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 18:45 |
|
Kanye West is a terrible lyricist. Maybe not the worst but not good at all. Tyler the Creator is probably the best rapper in the game right now, and Golf Wang is a far better clothing line than Yeezy, although I feel like it’s probably pretty low quality stuff. The shoes seem solid though, and aren’t completely played out the way 350s are. That all being said, Kanye’s fits are really solid for what they are: “getting the mail” outfits made high fashion. Drake probably has strong feelings about the word “ephebophile.” Nicki Minaj loves sex criminals. 6ix9ine is gonna be murdered in prison almost immediately. This has been your yearly installment of “white boy’s opinions on rap music”
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 18:59 |
|
Tiggum posted:I have no idea what any of this means. Sorry, that is a popular opinion.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 19:25 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:Caring about Frodo and caring about things that will affect society are not comparable. Tiggum posted:I have no idea what any of this means. Tol Eressëa is an island just off the coast of Valinor; a land of elves and angels. Ar-Phârazon, the last king of Numenor, was corrupted by Sauron and tried to invade Valinor to gain eternal life, and God broke apart the world so that no mortal can cross the sundering seas unless given special permission. Frodo and Sam received said permission due being Ringbearers and as a reward for their part in defeating Sauron.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 19:36 |
|
Ar-Phârazon was no joke btw, when he sailed to Mordor Sauron saw he could not win and surrendered, and when he sailed to Valinor the Valar asked God for help. *forgot to mention, god also destroyed the continent of Numenor as punishment, Aragorn is descendent of the few people who left before that happened doverhog has a new favorite as of 20:00 on Dec 16, 2018 |
# ? Dec 16, 2018 19:47 |
|
CrRoMa posted:Wait so you think its an actual fitness advantage to raise genetic material you are unrelated too? Genes don't care who they belong to. They're not "your" genes. You are merely a vessel for them to propogate themselves and those genes would sacrifice you and your progeny in a heartbeat if it served their purposes.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:21 |
|
Genes are not sentient.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:24 |
|
Richard Dawkins was a mistake. He seemed edgy and cool back during the Bush administration when saying, "Church? more like brainwashing factory!" was literally the most anti-establishment sentiment anyone could conceive. But he always sucked.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:34 |
|
Dick dorkins drove me to be more religious because I just can't resist being a contrarian.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:36 |
|
River Out of Eden is a good book to explain how genes work, dunno what else he did.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:37 |
|
Did he insult god on twitter? That's a mistake, twitter is a mistake.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:40 |
|
Dick didn’t need twitter to be bad
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:49 |
|
The best thing he ever wrote was on twitter
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 22:58 |
|
I've no emotional investment in him, just found that book informative.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 23:13 |
|
Chris Hitchens just liked making people mad.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 23:28 |
|
The Hitchens brothers had very different outlooks on the world but they're both very tedious people. I can't figure out why Peter Hitchens - who is so right-wing he claimed to believe that David Cameron was a Trotskyist - likes (or at least liked) Jeremy Corbyn so much, though. It is very confusing.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2018 23:48 |
|
Gripweed posted:Richard Dawkins was a mistake. He seemed edgy and cool back during the Bush administration when saying, "Church? more like brainwashing factory!" was literally the most anti-establishment sentiment anyone could conceive. Infinity percent this. American Atheists, through their virulent Islamophobia, actually drove me to embrace folks' religious beliefs. A wizard made the world? Neat. Turtles all the way down? poo poo yeah. They just happened to make a world where mathematical constants seem to apply, but that's all part of their grand design. I don't give a gently caress what people believe as long as it doesn't contradict science and doesn't victimise strangers. I'd rather have friendly neighbors who pray toward the east multiple times a day than assholes who are code:
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:03 |
|
Mu Zeta posted:Chris Hitchens just liked making people mad. For a long time I confused Dawkins with Hitchens since they were talked about in similar tones, and was confused, but they are actually different people. One is a professional rear end in a top hat, the other a biologist. You may not notice the difference if you don't read books but let me assure it's there.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:07 |
|
Tubgoat posted:American Atheists, through their virulent Islamophobia, actually drove me to embrace folks' religious beliefs. I can scarcely imagine a sadder reason to embrace magic than this.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:09 |
|
Oh, I'm still an atheist, but I'm not ever again gonna tell anyone that their religious beliefs are factually incorrect. And I'm sure not making any more donations to the GOP (American Atheists is at CPAC).
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:15 |
|
Tubgoat posted:Oh, I'm still an atheist, but I'm not ever again gonna tell anyone that their religious beliefs are factually incorrect. I'm not, I'm a mystic now. Though whether I believe magic is a placebo I use on myself, or if it is has a real effect on things, couldn't tell you. If someone tells me their religious belief, and it is abhorrent, like the genital mutilation of girls, I will say your belief is incorrect and your god is poo poo if he supports it. I do not care if god demands it, gently caress god if he does so.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:23 |
|
Genital mutilation is not a religious belief, it is an extreme sign of mental illness. Wait, so you're a mystic specifically because of my disowning America Atheists? Or "now" after one or more unexplainable/life-changing phenomena? PHUO: Science is misapplied magic, and magic is misunderstood science.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:30 |
|
Tubgoat posted:Genital mutilation is not a religious belief, it is an extreme sign of mental illness. It's pretty common, look up female and male circumcision. I'm a mystic due to a long process, just mentioned it now to, uh, show off I guess.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:34 |
|
doverhog posted:For a long time I confused Dawkins with Hitchens since they were talked about in similar tones, and was confused, but they are actually different people. One is a professional rear end in a top hat, the other a biologist. You may not notice the difference if you don't read books but let me assure it's there. Follow Dawkins on Twitter and it's clear he's just an rear end in a top hat too
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:43 |
|
doverhog posted:just mentioned it now to, uh, show off I guess.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:44 |
|
Mu Zeta posted:Follow Dawkins on Twitter and it's clear he's just an rear end in a top hat too Ok, but he at least wrote a book about genes and evolution in 1995 before becoming a twitter rear end in a top hat.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:50 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 05:52 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:a gritty live action Scooby Doo tv reboot
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 00:53 |