|
T-shirts are taxable income? Lmfao. that's such a blatant rear end lie.
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 00:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 17:16 |
|
|
got any sevens posted:fox news gets a fresh version every few months There’s only 3 or 4 women on Fox News and they just change their outfits several times a day and sometimes switch out blonde wigs as they run from one studio to the next. Prove me wrong.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 06:02
|
|
|
The Nastier Nate posted:There’s only 3 or 4 women on Fox News and they just change their outfits several times a day and sometimes switch out blonde wigs as they run from one studio to the next. Does it still count if they're clones of the same 3 or 4 women? I've definitely seen them have more than four on at once.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 06:18
|
|
|
That's just an editing trick, like how they got a hundred Agent Smiths on screen in the Matrix, or Lindsay Lohan played both kids in The Parent Trap
Crazycryodude has issued a correction as of 06:42 on Dec 19, 2018 |
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 06:39
|
|
|
Crazycryodude posted:That's just an editing trick, like how they got a hundred Agent Smiths on screen in the Matrix, or Lindsay Lohan played both kids in The Parent Trap that’s fitting since Fox News kind of is a parent trap
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 06:58
|
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:T-shirts are taxable income? Lmfao. that's such a blatant rear end lie. That's technically true I believe because the tax code if followed perfectly is designed to gently caress workers. If you babysit your friends kids for free or for say a free dinner or something you need to include either the value of the non monetary favor you received. If you receive nothing you are supposed to include the approximate amount you would have been paid. No one does this of course
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 06:59
|
|
|
Sedisp posted:If you receive nothing you are supposed to include the approximate amount you would have been paid. wouldn’t you just count it under the gift rules?
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 10:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 13:02
|
|
|
"Associate my brand with a sinking ship please"
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 14:59
|
|
|
well, it was the only good part of the movie, so...
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 15:03
|
|
|
Truga posted:well, it was the only good part of the movie, so... I doubt the propeller goes DONG when struck.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 15:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1075416926774530048?s=19 Paying to kill your whistleblowing employee for reporting your exploited labor is as Late Stage Capitalism as it can get.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 17:48
|
|
|
Wow police coming after job creators now. What an authoritarian state smh
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 18:28
|
|
|
closing threads is dumb but this isn't GBS so instead of just starting another one I'll answer this in here;quote:but won't we still need supertankers? raw materials and global trade are necessary to create the massive amount of consumer goods under capitalism and that's not going to change. The supertankers only exist because it is marginally cheaper to produce raw materials overseas and ship them around. There is no actual reason we need as many supertankers/transports as we have now. For example, people buy scrap steel in the USA then ship it to China where it can be melted/recycled/reforged and then shipped back to the USA where it is sold as regular steel again. That's stupid as hell actually from pretty much any angle but it makes sense financially because it is just cheaper to do that than it is to reforge the stuff locally. So that's what happens with steel and many many many other items.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 18:31
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:closing threads is dumb but this isn't GBS so instead of just starting another one I'll answer this in here; I'm going to guess that the cost to reforge steel in the US is much higher because of the EPA and OSHA regs, so the cost of transport*2 + Chinese reforging is less than that. Which is stupid and is murdering the planet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 19:03
|
|
|
Also in the 2000's companies started to massively overbuild their cargo ship fleets thinking that freight would continue to exponentially grow forever, and now that a bunch of the ships are online and stuff slowed down there's a huge surplus of cargo capacity. There was a point where you could send an entire full-sized cargo container around the world for like $400. With freight so incredibly cheap it makes a lot of stupid production routes (like shuttling ore back and forth around the world for each step of some process) affordable. We could probably scrap like a quarter to a half of the cargo ship fleet, especially the older less efficient ships, and not even feel it on a personal level.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 19:28
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:Also in the 2000's companies started to massively overbuild their cargo ship fleets thinking that freight would continue to exponentially grow forever, and now that a bunch of the ships are online and stuff slowed down there's a huge surplus of cargo capacity. There was a point where you could send an entire full-sized cargo container around the world for like $400. With freight so incredibly cheap it makes a lot of stupid production routes (like shuttling ore back and forth around the world for each step of some process) affordable. But see capitalism is the most efficient way to distribute resources and furthermore *faaaaaaaaart*
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 19:34
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:Also in the 2000's companies started to massively overbuild their cargo ship fleets thinking that freight would continue to exponentially grow forever, and now that a bunch of the ships are online and stuff slowed down there's a huge surplus of cargo capacity. There was a point where you could send an entire full-sized cargo container around the world for like $400. With freight so incredibly cheap it makes a lot of stupid production routes (like shuttling ore back and forth around the world for each step of some process) affordable. The ubiquitous unified shipping containers are often built in China with the intent of being filled with cheap Chinese goods, and then never intended to be returned to China. It's actually cheaper to just build a new container than it is to be sent back. Not like they don't get a use in the US, but it's apparently very easy to just flat out buy a shipping container that hasn't been anywhere but that specific one way trip. Then again there's a place near me that just has a massive pile of used shipping containers just rusting away. I like to think it was a ton of fun unloading a freighter in the 70's before they were invented and you'd literally never know what you would find, or where you would find it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 19:42
|
|
|
OhFunny posted:https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1075416926774530048?s=19 yeah under early capitalism the police wouldve done it for free
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 19:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 21:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 21:57
|
|
|
wanna see that dude's opinion of work clothes after a day of working at farmer john's
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 22:15
|
|
|
I do change into a different person. Adopting different identities in different situations is normal and expected of you
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 22:23
|
|
|
Who builds a tree house in the morning before going to work 
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 22:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TheAtlantic/status/1075209895304138753
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 22:37
|
|
|
hackbunny posted:I do change into a different person. Adopting different identities in different situations is normal and expected of you I'm not even sure if there is a "real me" which could be distilled out of any relationship to the outside world.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 22:57
|
|
|
Definitely a white guy thing to wonder why people act differently in different situations
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 23:03
|
|
|
All social media is AIDS I literally saw something on ESPN in a hotel that said BREAKING NEWS: (sports player) tweeted "LEGGGO" at (sports players) then deleted it"
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 00:15
|
|
|
sorry I wear a work uniform at the lumber mill because gently caress you im gonna ruin my nice clothes and shoes at work.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 00:55
|
|
|
nobody tell him "fancy clothes are fun but fragile" or he'll have an existential despair.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 01:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 01:53
|
|
|
I feel like those people do not understand the proper usage of quotation marks
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 02:50
|
|
|
I really cant imagine why people aren't wearing the Sunday best to the mechanic shop
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 02:57
|
|
|
getting really worked up over a tank girl quote
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:02
|
|
|
gonna need a sample to see if it works
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:19
|
|
|
so! they laugh at my boner, will they? I'll show them!
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:22
|
|
|
T-man posted:gonna need a sample to see if it works  Before & After
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:31
|
|
|
buck ain't even got a drat boner. how's he know it works.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:32
|
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:I really cant imagine why people aren't wearing the Sunday best to the mechanic shop I'm pretty sure he's saying the exact opposite. And to be fair, attaching societal value to certain outfits is absolutely capitalist as hell, especially when the distinguished outfit tends to require more money to buy and upkeep.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 17:16 |
|
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:I'm pretty sure he's saying the exact opposite. And to be fair, attaching societal value to certain outfits is absolutely capitalist as hell, especially when the distinguished outfit tends to require more money to buy and upkeep. When non‐capitalists cultures do it, it’s called “ceremonial” wear.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 03:53
|
|