Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

avshalemon posted:

we also need to start condemning ocean cruises. they are disgusting.

enforcing emission standards on air and sea travel/transport would be amazing and also immediately make the world economy disintegrate. boats burn the dirtiest goddamn fuel we have and are basically coal power plants.

it's one of the reasons i really want companies like aeroscraft to get huge government grants so they can actually finish their cargo ship designs for airships and we can see if this poo poo is viable or not. having a blimp that can transport 500 tons would be pretty great.

Admiral Ray fucked around with this message at 18:44 on Dec 19, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.
This is so well put:

Climate-change deniers are a danger to our security

Imagine during the Cold War that one political party, in the face of overwhelming evidence that the Soviet Union was engaged in espionage against the United States, had a nuclear arsenal pointed at the United States, kept Eastern Europe under its thumb and imprisoned dissenters, refused to consider the Soviet Union a danger — of any sort — to the United States or other Western democracies. And they would offer no credible evidence to the contrary, but rather assert that it was all a hoax.

...

That is essentially what is going on, only with the parties flipped, in the climate-change debate. Climate-change denial has become as necessary to one’s right-wing identity as aversion to immigration, opposition to most abortions and a disbelief that sexual harassment and assault are widespread. Just as rejecting geopolitical reality became a requirement of inclusion in far-left circles, climate-change denial is a must for those who want to remain in the Trump fold.

More at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/18/climate-change-deniers-are-danger-our-security/

Sogol
Apr 11, 2013

Galileo's Finger
I don’t know. My own experience is that there is a fairly significant emotional landscape associated with coming to accept our current condition as it is. Efforts to then align one’s own actions with that acceptance can be very upsetting to those around you and that also has to be navigated. For people who have conflated things like ability to consume with freedom, for example, they must go through a pretty severe identity crisis in order to make even small efforts at correlating their lives with our current condition. If you prioritize something else and change your life accordingly it is often outright offensive to people, especially those closest to you. They often feel betrayed, angry, etc. because it makes absolutely no sense to them why you might be trying to live this way. Carbon offset, while a good thing, is for me is a type of bargaining in that process of identity shift. It’s basically along the lines of believing that market or technological miracles will eliminate the negative consequences of the global activity producing climate effect, while still allowing (the tiny minority of) us to maintain the "way of life" ideologies producing those very effects. It’s progress of a sort since it isn’t simply the objectification and blaming of some other for the current condition.

StabbinHobo
Oct 18, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

VideoGameVet posted:

This is so well put:

Climate-change deniers are a danger to our security

Imagine during the Cold War that one political party, in the face of overwhelming evidence that the Soviet Union was engaged in espionage against the United States, had a nuclear arsenal pointed at the United States, kept Eastern Europe under its thumb and imprisoned dissenters, refused to consider the Soviet Union a danger — of any sort — to the United States or other Western democracies. And they would offer no credible evidence to the contrary, but rather assert that it was all a hoax.

...

That is essentially what is going on, only with the parties flipped, in the climate-change debate. Climate-change denial has become as necessary to one’s right-wing identity as aversion to immigration, opposition to most abortions and a disbelief that sexual harassment and assault are widespread. Just as rejecting geopolitical reality became a requirement of inclusion in far-left circles, climate-change denial is a must for those who want to remain in the Trump fold.

More at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/18/climate-change-deniers-are-danger-our-security/
what the fuuuuuuuuuuck man, this post has like 3 - 5 layers of stupid reactionary horseshit buried in it I can't even figure out where to start.

1.) that party during the cold war would have been right
2.) "both sides"ism of saying the left rejects "reality" is just being conservative/right-wing rear end in a top hat. you may not feel thats who you are, but its who you're being when you do that.
3.) they somehow manage to get" that it's a totally irrational decision based around tribal identity and yet then also somehow conclude that a logical framing hack will defeat that and cause them to ... become rational?

that whole loving take is like is like a triple reverse axel stunt move of stupid ideology

StabbinHobo fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Dec 19, 2018

StabbinHobo
Oct 18, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
here is the only part of that post that matters

quote:

“overall, 66 percent of Americans now say they’ve seen enough evidence to justify action, up from 51 percent two decades ago.” The results tell us that “85 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of independents, 71 percent of women, 61 percent of men and strong majorities of all racial groups. At least 55 percent agree on the need for action in all regions of the country, and at all age, education and income levels.”
we defeat deniers not by loving debating them, but by using those numbers to overpower them

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

StabbinHobo posted:

what the fuuuuuuuuuuck man, this post has like 3 - 5 layers of stupid reactionary horseshit buried in it I can't even figure out where to start.

1.) that party during the cold war would have been right
2.) "both sides"ism of saying the left rejects "reality" is just being conservative/right-wing rear end in a top hat. you may not feel thats who you are, but its who you're being when you do that.
3.) they somehow manage to get" that it's a totally irrational decision based around tribal identity and yet then also somehow conclude that a logical framing hack will defeat that and cause them to ... become rational?

that whole loving take is like is like a triple reverse axel stunt move of stupid ideology

I don't think that was the purpose of the piece. It was saying "Imagine Republican if someone had said this about the Soviets during the cold war." It's not saying that anyone on the left (ok maybe Gus Hall) said that about the Soviets.

Personally, we were better off with the Soviets around. Even with the "duck and cover" stuff.

avshalemon
Jun 28, 2018



you are welcome in my house, friend. sit at my m&m container. eat of my fig leaf. we are all butterflies here

Macasaurus
Oct 12, 2012

avshalemon posted:



you are welcome in my house, friend. sit at my m&m container. eat of my fig leaf. we are all butterflies here

sorry about ur plant fam

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

avshalemon posted:



you are welcome in my house, friend. sit at my m&m container. eat of my fig leaf. we are all butterflies here

That is a CO2 worm and it is actively destroying the greenery necessary to keep our atmosphere pure and healthy.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




avshalemon posted:

we also need to start condemning ocean cruises. they are disgusting.

Admiral Ray posted:

enforcing emission standards on air and sea travel/transport would be amazing and also immediately make the world economy disintegrate. boats burn the dirtiest goddamn fuel we have and are basically coal power plants.


About that, in 2020 IMO (international maritime organization, part of the UN, a body created by the SOLAS treaty) whole bunch of HSFO is going away. Here's McKinsey on what that's going to do to marine fuel markets

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/imo-2020-and-the-outlook-for-marine-fuels

TLDR is HSFO is going away.

Admiral Ray posted:

it's one of the reasons i really want companies like aeroscraft to get huge government grants so they can actually finish their cargo ship designs for airships and we can see if this poo poo is viable or not. having a blimp that can transport 500 tons would be pretty great.

It's not. A panamax bulker might have 76,000 MT (metric tons) of whatever on board. While marine mode is poo poo for things like sulfer, particulates and NOx, it's by far the most fuel efficient in terms of energy needed to move MT per mile, like it's not even close.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

BrandorKP posted:

About that, in 2020 IMO (international maritime organization, part of the UN, a body created by the SOLAS treaty) whole bunch of HSFO is going away. Here's McKinsey on what that's going to do to marine fuel markets

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/imo-2020-and-the-outlook-for-marine-fuels

TLDR is HSFO is going away.


It's not. A panamax bulker might have 76,000 MT (metric tons) of whatever on board. While marine mode is poo poo for things like sulfer, particulates and NOx, it's by far the most fuel efficient in terms of energy needed to move MT per mile, like it's not even close.

I don't know if I've said so but I like your boatposting.

StabbinHobo
Oct 18, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
when the tankers are actually under power at their "normal" cruising speed, how many kW (MW?) are the screws turning at?

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




StabbinHobo posted:

when the tankers are actually under power at their "normal" cruising speed, how many kW (MW?) are the screws turning at?

It depends on the type of ship. Bulk carriers will be on the slower side 10 to 15 knots. Container ships could be anything between 15 and 25 knots. A hypothetical premium service might aim for 30.

A big containership like the Emma Maersk is 81 MW (109,000 hp). A big slow slow speed diesel might have cylinders a small car might fit in. Basically think of a ships power plant as a shoreside power plant.

Bar Ran Dun fucked around with this message at 05:50 on Dec 20, 2018

Morbus
May 18, 2004

ChairMaster posted:

...
We can physically generate the power we need to run our technological society without burning fossil fuels perfectly well, it's just politically impossible.

No it isn't. As far as power generation goes there are only two political objectives that need to be achieved:

1. Ceasing operation of existing carbon intensive energy infrastructure.

2. Ensuring that any new capacity added is renewable. The most effective way to do this is by discouraging investment in new carbon intensive infrastructure, since that's easier than making renewables cheaper and they are already very cost effective.

Any substantial achievement of #1 obviously helps #2 so really there is only one political objective.

incredible flesh
Oct 6, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo
how can i generate energy from cow poo poo

Plumps
Apr 21, 2010

incredible flesh posted:

how can i generate energy from cow poo poo

put it in a bioreactor and turn it into methane.

you'll rule Bartertown in no time.


it's pretty low tech to set up and you can use it just like natural gas. cook with cow farts

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
Arctic permafrost might contain 'sleeping giant' of world's carbon emissions




quote:

The researchers have been comparing the temperatures of permafrost on land and underwater. About 10,000 years ago, the temperature of both permafrost types was about -18˚C. They found that permafrost on the ground has now warmed up to about -10˚C but under the sea it has reached 0˚C. "That was surprising," Prof. Gustafsson said. "I had no idea that subsea permafrost was thawing so quickly."
...
The team's findings point to much higher levels of ocean acidification than that predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in their report published in 2014, which largely considered the effect of anthropogenic carbon emissions.
"Acidification could be 100 times more severe," Prof. Gustafsson said. "Ocean acidification by permafrost carbon from land is a new mechanism we hadn't thought about much, and we didn't think it was so strong."



Faster.

Than.

EXPECTED
.

Ssthalar
Sep 16, 2007


:stoked:

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

:unsmigghh:

Polio Vax Scene
Apr 5, 2009



I bought an electric car and it arrived today. Hooray!
Now to just convince my state to not get its electricity from natural gas.

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend

Polio Vax Scene posted:

I bought an electric car and it arrived today. Hooray!
Now to just convince my state to not get its electricity from natural gas.

Better than coal at least

StabbinHobo
Oct 18, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
now here's some of that quality direct action we can't talk too much about

https://news.sky.com/story/chaos-at-gatwick-after-drone-sightings-force-runway-closure-11586557

some jerk (hero) with a drone is shutting down a whole airport.

Trainee PornStar
Jul 20, 2006

I'm just an inbetweener

StabbinHobo posted:

now here's some of that quality direct action we can't talk too much about

https://news.sky.com/story/chaos-at-gatwick-after-drone-sightings-force-runway-closure-11586557

some jerk (hero) with a drone is shutting down a whole airport.

If you want more info check the UK Megathread, it's all that's been talked about all day.
Apparently the IT system has gone offline too & they are resorting to paperwork lol

If whoever has pulled this off gets caught they going to get nailed...

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

that article is a wild ride.

the future is gonna be full of so many opportunities!

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

I've always wondered whether container ships are an application where fuel cells might actually be practical, as building the dedicated fueling infrastructure is presumably less of a problem than for personal autos. No real idea if it's ever likely to be workable, but here's an interesting article on the subject:

quote:

The Struggle to Make Diesel-Guzzling Cargo Ships Greener
May 29, 2018

These Dutch vessels mark the beginnings of a much larger energy transformation sweeping the world’s maritime shipping industry. As emissions climb and environmental policies strengthen, shipping companies and engineers are accelerating their pursuit of so-called zero-emissions technologies—a category that includes massive battery packs and fuel cells that run on hydrogen or ammonia. Hundreds of large cargo ships are also switching to liquefied natural gas, which produces less toxic air pollution than the typical maritime “bunker fuel” and is widely considered a stepping-stone on the path to full decarbonization.

...

Among shipping experts, hydrogen fuel cells are considered the front-runner for zero-emissions technologies on larger, long-distance ships. Briefly, fuel cells get their charge not by plugging into the wall, as batteries do, but from hydrogen. With onboard hydrogen storage, fuel cells can produce power for the duration of most trips. Today’s batteries, by contrast, can’t make it very far without stopping to charge—and that’s impossible if a ship is in the middle of the ocean.

Cargo ships are “just too power hungry, and the run times are too large,” Ryan Sookhoo, Hydrogenics’ director of business development, tells me. “When we look at the marine space, we see it as a natural adopter [of fuel cells]. There’s only certain technologies that will be able to deliver.”

Or we could just buy less stuff.

Trainee PornStar
Jul 20, 2006

I'm just an inbetweener

Admiral Ray posted:

that article is a wild ride.

the future is gonna be full of so many opportunities!

Wait until that warms the place up for the real kick in the balls that's coming.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clathrate_gun_hypothesis

I remember reading articles saying the 'gun' will never go off because the warming won't get that bad... :doh:

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


Nocturtle posted:

Or we could just buy less stuff.

Impossible, because capitalism/consumerism.

:sigh:

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
Risks of 'domino effect' of tipping points greater than thought, study says



:thunk:

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
I had a pretty terrifying realization this morning that Conservatives do have a plan for dealing with Climate Change, it's just that said plan is them enabling tin pot dictators and strong men all over the world to commit genocide against climate refugees, ethnic minorities, and other impoverished and at risk populations. They are straight up calculating that their best chance for elites to survive Climate Change is to wipe out all but a few loyal poors and ride it out, hoping that a drastically reduced developing population is enough to buy them a few hundred more years of lovely management.

Someone please tell me this is even too far down the rabbit hole for our worst leaders and that I must be starting to suffer some legit mental illness here.

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
Yeah that's pretty hardcore :tinfoil:

The Real Amethyst
Apr 20, 2018

When no one was looking, Serval took forty Japari buns. She took 40 buns. That's as many as four tens. And that's terrible.
Man, to think a single drone could shut down an entire airport for 24 hours.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/12/london-gatwick-airport-completely-shut-drone-sightings-181220021754308.html
I'm not saying it's an eco-terrorist act...but....y'know. :thunk:

chairface
Oct 28, 2007

No matter what you believe, I don't believe in you.

DrNutt posted:

I had a pretty terrifying realization this morning that Conservatives do have a plan for dealing with Climate Change, it's just that said plan is them enabling tin pot dictators and strong men all over the world to commit genocide against climate refugees, ethnic minorities, and other impoverished and at risk populations. They are straight up calculating that their best chance for elites to survive Climate Change is to wipe out all but a few loyal poors and ride it out, hoping that a drastically reduced developing population is enough to buy them a few hundred more years of lovely management.

Someone please tell me this is even too far down the rabbit hole for our worst leaders and that I must be starting to suffer some legit mental illness here.

Kissinger openly stated this. It is and has been the plan for a half century or more. Operation Endgame proceeds apace.

Shifty Nipples
Apr 8, 2007

DrNutt posted:

I had a pretty terrifying realization this morning that Conservatives do have a plan for dealing with Climate Change, it's just that said plan is them enabling tin pot dictators and strong men all over the world to commit genocide against climate refugees, ethnic minorities, and other impoverished and at risk populations. They are straight up calculating that their best chance for elites to survive Climate Change is to wipe out all but a few loyal poors and ride it out, hoping that a drastically reduced developing population is enough to buy them a few hundred more years of lovely management.

Someone please tell me this is even too far down the rabbit hole for our worst leaders and that I must be starting to suffer some legit mental illness here.

Seems pretty accurate to me.

Conspiratiorist
Nov 12, 2015

17th Separate Kryvyi Rih Tank Brigade named after Konstantin Pestushko
Look to my coming on the first light of the fifth sixth some day

DrNutt posted:

I had a pretty terrifying realization this morning that Conservatives do have a plan for dealing with Climate Change, it's just that said plan is them enabling tin pot dictators and strong men all over the world to commit genocide against climate refugees, ethnic minorities, and other impoverished and at risk populations. They are straight up calculating that their best chance for elites to survive Climate Change is to wipe out all but a few loyal poors and ride it out, hoping that a drastically reduced developing population is enough to buy them a few hundred more years of lovely management.

Someone please tell me this is even too far down the rabbit hole for our worst leaders and that I must be starting to suffer some legit mental illness here.

As comforting as it is to think that there's some kind of grand plan, that forces beyond your control are imposing a kind of order onto this chaotic universe, the truth is that nobody has a loving clue.

That is not to say that there aren't plans - wealthy elites and governments feed large sums into independent researchers, think tanks, and strategic focus groups in order work out how to best prepare against threats to their interests, but the scope of the problem means the effectiveness of all these efforts is not far removed from that of a haruspex examining a freshly slain lamb's liver.

Trainee PornStar
Jul 20, 2006

I'm just an inbetweener

DrNutt posted:

I had a pretty terrifying realization this morning that Conservatives do have a plan for dealing with Climate Change, it's just that said plan is them enabling tin pot dictators and strong men all over the world to commit genocide against climate refugees, ethnic minorities, and other impoverished and at risk populations. They are straight up calculating that their best chance for elites to survive Climate Change is to wipe out all but a few loyal poors and ride it out, hoping that a drastically reduced developing population is enough to buy them a few hundred more years of lovely management.

Someone please tell me this is even too far down the rabbit hole for our worst leaders and that I must be starting to suffer some legit mental illness here.

Mate... I hate to break it you but whether by design or by accident that is pretty much what is going on & it's been happening for ages, it's going to get a lot worse over the next couple decades.

Peace out & all that lol

TheNakedFantastic
Sep 22, 2006

LITERAL WHITE SUPREMACIST

DrNutt posted:

I had a pretty terrifying realization this morning that Conservatives do have a plan for dealing with Climate Change, it's just that said plan is them enabling tin pot dictators and strong men all over the world to commit genocide against climate refugees, ethnic minorities, and other impoverished and at risk populations. They are straight up calculating that their best chance for elites to survive Climate Change is to wipe out all but a few loyal poors and ride it out, hoping that a drastically reduced developing population is enough to buy them a few hundred more years of lovely management.

Someone please tell me this is even too far down the rabbit hole for our worst leaders and that I must be starting to suffer some legit mental illness here.

Their only plan is to make money. Or I suppose I should say that in the general class sense of the wealthy, I'm not sure what your definition of "Conservatives" is but their plan is the same regardless of political label. Individuals like Gates are interested in research into possible technological mitigating solutions though.

TheNakedFantastic fucked around with this message at 21:55 on Dec 20, 2018

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

TheNakedFantastic posted:

Individuals like Gates are interested in research into possible technological mitigating solutions though.

:goofy:

TheNakedFantastic
Sep 22, 2006

LITERAL WHITE SUPREMACIST

Trainee PornStar posted:

Mate... I hate to break it you but whether by design or by accident that is pretty much what is going on & it's been happening for ages, it's going to get a lot worse over the next couple decades.

Peace out & all that lol

Working with dictators? Sure. Climate change and climate induced mass migration are new phenomenon though and if their plan beforehand has been to wipe out the poor third world underclass then uh they've been doing a really bad job.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Nocturtle posted:

Or we could just buy less stuff.

It's all stuff. Basically everything has part of it transported in the marine mode for some portion of its supply chain.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
The towers I'm building have parts from literally every country on earth. Carbon footprint beyond hosed.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply