Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Best Not WWE Name
This poll is closed.
Up North 70 41.92%
New York 21 12.57%
Titan 12 7.19%
Stamford 18 10.78%
The XXX Porno Wrestling on the Other Channel 46 27.54%
Total: 167 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
coconono
Aug 11, 2004

KISS ME KRIS

I went with Filming Owen's Funeral on the narrow nod they brought all that production equipment and didn't get permission from the family.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MassRafTer
May 26, 2001

BAEST MODE!!!
https://twitter.com/NY64Tournament/status/1075814381076791297

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~
I voted for contract tampering and immediately regretted it. Doing lovely business poo poo to other business who are mostly also doing lovely business poo poo isn't as bad as trying to get someone fired from their livelihood.

Sockser
Jun 28, 2007

This world only remembers the results!




Both of those are pretty small in the grand scale of this tournament but pretty equally lovely within this matchup. Went with contracts just because there’s been so much of it and it’s been so bad and they’ve done a lot of damage to the whole industry by being really good at it

mkay0
Nov 7, 2003

I crawled the earth, but now I'm higher
2010, watch it go to fire

Rarity posted:

I voted for contract tampering and immediately regretted it. Doing lovely business poo poo to other business who are mostly also doing lovely business poo poo isn't as bad as trying to get someone fired from their livelihood.

If this is only based on Dave, and only based on them trying to gently caress with his job at The National, it’s honestly small potatoes in the context of this tournament. The National was only a paper for like 18 months and Frank Deford never actually fired Dave over the WWF manipulation. Vince couldn’t have know that at the time, of course, but it’s really not on par with 40+ years of contract fraud to me.

mkay0
Nov 7, 2003

I crawled the earth, but now I'm higher
2010, watch it go to fire

Sockser posted:

Both of those are pretty small in the grand scale of this tournament but pretty equally lovely within this matchup. Went with contracts just because there’s been so much of it and it’s been so bad and they’ve done a lot of damage to the whole industry by being really good at it

Agreed. This is the first matchup so far that I felt that neither one would have a deep run. The hate crimes against Kanyon are going to beat the winner of this 3 to 1 in the next round.

Charles Gnarwin
Jul 31, 2014

I joined the #RXT REVOLUTION.
:boom:
he knows...


This is a tough one. While tampering is widespread in all sports real and fake, WWE really leverages its position as a near monopoly to just do whatever it wants with no pushback to the detriment of the whole industry. On the other hand, tying to get a reporter fired is a lovely attack on a fundamental part of society.

After typing it out and considering the current climate, I'm voting for journalism. Meltzer did nothing wrong and he had an entire company trying to get him fired.

CopywrightMMXI
Jun 1, 2011

One time a guy stole some downhill skis out of my jeep and I was so mad I punched a mailbox. I'm against crime, and I'm not ashamed to admit it.
In going to vote Dave, just because it’s still continuing. I still think the WWE manufactured the outrage over the Peyton Royce incident earlier this year in an attempt to discredit Dave.

MassRafTer
May 26, 2001

BAEST MODE!!!
It's funny how off my expectations were on this one. While I didn't expect Contract Tampering to get out of the round of 32 I did think it'd win this one easily, and the vote is currently 50/50.

CarlCX
Dec 14, 2003

I think a mass of fans aren't as upset about contract tampering and underhanded dealings because they've basically been the industry standard for the entire time we've been fans.

mkay0
Nov 7, 2003

I crawled the earth, but now I'm higher
2010, watch it go to fire

MassRafTer posted:

It's funny how off my expectations were on this one. While I didn't expect Contract Tampering to get out of the round of 32 I did think it'd win this one easily, and the vote is currently 50/50.

Honestly shocked that it’s this close. Dave and Vince have been at war for years. I didn’t realize so many people ride for this particular element of their story.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

CopywrightMMXI posted:

In going to vote Dave, just because it’s still continuing. I still think the WWE manufactured the outrage over the Peyton Royce incident earlier this year in an attempt to discredit Dave.

Did they? I mean obviously they piled on in that transparent twitter copy and paste way but didn't he like actually say something gross and misogynistic?

And wasn't the defense from his readers/fans basically "eh, that's what Dave does, he's an awkward weirdo who speaks bad"?

Did I miss a turn in that story?

UltimoDragonQuest
Oct 5, 2011



WWE tampering generally means a worker agreeing to a pay raise. It's the least offensive of the contract entries in the tournament.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

UltimoDragonQuest posted:

WWE tampering generally means a worker agreeing to a pay raise. It's the least offensive of the contract entries in the tournament.

I mean, I think you could make the case that practices like that which might benefit one wrestler at one time overall hurt the industry and more wrestlers in the big picture.

But its definitely not getting to the Sweet 16 even if it gets past the Meltzer thing.

MassRafTer
May 26, 2001

BAEST MODE!!!

mkay0 posted:

Honestly shocked that it’s this close. Dave and Vince have been at war for years. I didn’t realize so many people ride for this particular element of their story.

Except it's not a war, WWE pretends it is a war and in this case framed it as a war to try and get a publication from not covering the story closely. I'm sure they hoped it would make other papers covering it think twice as well.

Lurks With Wolves
Jan 14, 2013

At least I don't dance with them, right?
The way I see it, this round is a battle between WWE trying to be a scummy all-controlling monopoly on a macro level (I know there's other picks in the bracket about WWE trying to buy out everything, but there was no way I was voting for the NXT UK contract fuckery when it was against the Ring Boy Scandal) and WWE trying to be an all-controlling monopoly on a micro level regarding Meltzer's reporting on them. At the end of the day I had to go for the contracts, but I'm happy with either of these winning because they both boil down to the same basic problem.

Lurks With Wolves fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Dec 20, 2018

coconono
Aug 11, 2004

KISS ME KRIS

UltimoDragonQuest posted:

WWE tampering generally means a worker agreeing to a pay raise. It's the least offensive of the contract entries in the tournament.

WWE is ignoring other company's contract stips about being able to make competing offers. Its usually "this is the offer, if you tell anyone about it, its null and void" so it actually robs a worker of being able to bargain from a position of strength.

luchadornado
Oct 7, 2004

A boombox is not a toy!

Trying to influence the media and coverage of the organization is the secret to getting away with all the other poo poo in this tournament. Voting for Meltzer.

mkay0
Nov 7, 2003

I crawled the earth, but now I'm higher
2010, watch it go to fire

CopywrightMMXI posted:

In going to vote Dave, just because it’s still continuing. I still think the WWE manufactured the outrage over the Peyton Royce incident earlier this year in an attempt to discredit Dave.

Urging the wrestlers to pile on Dave when he’s legitimately bad is not inappropriate at all, imo.

CopywrightMMXI
Jun 1, 2011

One time a guy stole some downhill skis out of my jeep and I was so mad I punched a mailbox. I'm against crime, and I'm not ashamed to admit it.

STAC Goat posted:

Did they? I mean obviously they piled on in that transparent twitter copy and paste way but didn't he like actually say something gross and misogynistic?

And wasn't the defense from his readers/fans basically "eh, that's what Dave does, he's an awkward weirdo who speaks bad"?

Did I miss a turn in that story?

Dave said something about how Peyton was a better worker when she was “lighter” in a euphemism for her breast implants. So it was kind of skeevy and he probably should have just outright said what he meant but I still found the response to be a quite coordinated and somewhat insincere.

Aye Doc
Jul 19, 2007



please do not misquote or misconstrue Dave Meltzer's strange rear end comments. the man sounds weird and disconnected enough on his own

quote:

Meltzer: “I thought [The IIconics] had a thing in NXT, but on the main roster I don’t get a thing out of them. I don’t think their promos are really good, their wrestling isn’t good. I think even Peyton Royce’s transformation to look more attractive..I don’t know, I don’t want to say.

Alvarez: “She was more attractive on NXT?”

Meltzer: “I thought so, yes. To me, yes I would say so but that’s neither here nor there.”

Alvarez: “No one is saying she’s unattractive, by the way everybody.”

Meltzer: “I know, no poo poo. I didn’t say that at all. But she doesn’t stand out to me, when she was in NXT she did…. She was a lot lighter.”

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

STAC Goat posted:

Did they? I mean obviously they piled on in that transparent twitter copy and paste way but didn't he like actually say something gross and misogynistic?

And wasn't the defense from his readers/fans basically "eh, that's what Dave does, he's an awkward weirdo who speaks bad"?

Did I miss a turn in that story?

He kind of did but not really. Bix covered it all better then I can, https://deadspin-com.cdn.ampproject...blow-1828409695

MassRafTer
May 26, 2001

BAEST MODE!!!
Since this one is razor thin I'm going to post this decision here too:

If there are any draws in the tournament both move on and the next match up is a three way.

Also Trump is a draw:

https://twitter.com/NY64Tournament/status/1075840210817175553

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Best way to explain the Meltzer/Peyton Royce thing is that Meltzer said something dumb and thoughtless but what he intended was obvious, WWE then decided to make him sound far far worse by painting it as fat shaming and that he called Peyton fat and ugly when that obviously isn't what he said.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

CopywrightMMXI posted:

Dave said something about how Peyton was a better worker when she was “lighter” in a euphemism for her breast implants. So it was kind of skeevy and he probably should have just outright said what he meant but I still found the response to be a quite coordinated and somewhat insincere.

Oh, obviously WWE's concern was disingenuous as gently caress and the coordinated twitter response was laughably transparent in parts. But like, that doesn't make Meltzer's comments any less gross. And it seems sketchy to try and weed through which wrestlers were sincerely offended on behalf of a friend/colleague and how many were just following some company attack strategy.

davidbix
Jun 14, 2016

Wow, Bix. First K.Rool, then Steve and now SEPHIROTH? Your dream game is real!

Gumball Gumption posted:

He kind of did but not really. Bix covered it all better then I can, https://deadspin-com.cdn.ampproject...blow-1828409695
Headline wasn't mine, BTW.

mkay0
Nov 7, 2003

I crawled the earth, but now I'm higher
2010, watch it go to fire

Gumball Gumption posted:

Best way to explain the Meltzer/Peyton Royce thing is that Meltzer said something dumb and thoughtless but what he intended was obvious, WWE then decided to make him sound far far worse by painting it as fat shaming and that he called Peyton fat and ugly when that obviously isn't what he said.

It’s only obvious to people who listen to Dave enough to realize that half of what he says is coded language. To the layperson, he’s calling her fat.

Regardless, saying ‘he didn’t mean she was fat, he just meant she looked and worked better without fake tits’ isn’t a huge upgrade.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

I actually didn't realize there was a confusion where some people thought he was calling her fat. For what its worth it was him judging her breasts that I thought was gross and worthy of derision.

Low Desert Punk
Jul 4, 2012

i have absolutely no fucking money
wrestlers absolutely love dogpiling people on twitter to get the rub and feel like they're important, see the response to Lio Rush's joke

They don't need guidance to be stupid as poo poo on Twitter

sticklefifer
Nov 11, 2003

by VideoGames
Dave said it in a not so great way, but I get his meaning: main roster basically makes women get nose/boob jobs to make them more attractive to audiences (insert famous Kevin Dunn quote), but Royce didn't need that and it actually made her worse in the ring.

Low Desert Punk
Jul 4, 2012

i have absolutely no fucking money
WWE essentially forcing women wrestlers to get plastic surgery for a callup or a push is something that could easily be on this tournament

luchadornado
Oct 7, 2004

A boombox is not a toy!

mkay0 posted:

It’s only obvious to people who listen to Dave enough to realize that half of what he says is coded language. To the layperson, he’s calling her fat.

Regardless, saying ‘he didn’t mean she was fat, he just meant she looked and worked better without fake tits’ isn’t a huge upgrade.

STAC Goat posted:

I actually didn't realize there was a confusion where some people thought he was calling her fat. For what its worth it was him judging her breasts that I thought was gross and worthy of derision.

The average layperson isn't listening to a podcast about wrestling. For anyone that cares enough to know who Meltzer and discern the context, he's lamenting the fact that women in WWE feel the need to get breast augmentation.

sticklefifer
Nov 11, 2003

by VideoGames
On one hand, I want to see what a worst person tournament would dredge up in its brackets, but on the other hand, it's so obviously Vince that the whole thing seems unnecessary.

also lol at this twitter douche

El Gallinero Gros
Mar 17, 2010

sticklefifer posted:

On one hand, I want to see what a worst person tournament would dredge up in its brackets, but on the other hand, it's so obviously Vince that the whole thing seems unnecessary.

also lol at this twitter douche

Warrior might have a punchers chance.

TTBF
Sep 14, 2005



STAC Goat posted:

I actually didn't realize there was a confusion where some people thought he was calling her fat. For what its worth it was him judging her breasts that I thought was gross and worthy of derision.

Peyton was mad at him for calling her fat, and he was mostly attacked by WWE stars for fat shaming. I agree with you about what Dave said not being OK but the fact that they got mad at him for something he didn't say (because focusing on the implants would raise discussion of "Why does a female athlete need breast implants in WWE when she didn't in NXT?") makes it easy to believe the outrage was instigated (not necessarily fully carried out) by WWE.

e: I want to clarify that I think most of the outrage was genuine and a reaction by people who didn't hear the clip but did hear what was purported to be in it.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

TTBF posted:

Peyton was mad at him for calling her fat, and he was mostly attacked by WWE stars for fat shaming. I agree with you about what Dave said not being OK but the fact that they got mad at him for something he didn't say (because focusing on the implants would raise discussion of "Why does a female athlete need breast implants in WWE when she didn't in NXT?") makes it easy to believe the outrage was instigated (not necessarily fully carried out) by WWE.

e: I want to clarify that I think most of the outrage was genuine and a reaction by people who didn't hear the clip but did hear what was purported to be in it.

Ah, ok. I obviously didn't follow the social media drama that closely. I guess I heard the outrage, found out what he said, and just assumed the rest. My bad.

But yeah, while I don't doubt WWE would try and jump on it it just seems like since Meltzer genuinely said something hosed up and Royce had a reason to be upset that its just best form to give the benefit of the doubt not to WWE but the individual peers and friends of Royce who ostensibly wanted to support her. Maybe it wasn't true for all of them but like... Meltzer shouldn't have said it so sometimes you just gotta take the hit.

Which, in fairness, according to that Bix article it sounds like Meltzer tried to do.

rare Magic card l00k
Jan 3, 2011


Most of the dogpiling happened after Meltzer took the hit.

People who support the dogpiling are why Hogan went "Hey brother I'm sorry I got caught".

ThePariah
Feb 10, 2014

TTBF posted:

(because focusing on the implants would raise discussion of "Why does a female athlete need breast implants in WWE when she didn't in NXT?")

To which she can respond "because I wanted to get them" and to which WWE can respond "we're entertainment, not a sport." The pressure to get implants (both direct and indirect) is bad, but women can get implants if they want to.

sticklefifer
Nov 11, 2003

by VideoGames
Honestly the treatment of women through the entire Divas era could fill a whole tournament.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

rare Magic card l00k posted:

Most of the dogpiling happened after Meltzer took the hit.

People who support the dogpiling are why Hogan went "Hey brother I'm sorry I got caught".

I don't follow your point at all. Is this some kind of "I was only racist because the sjws made me do it" idea? Sorry, I'm lost on that one.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5