Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
fabergay egg
Mar 1, 2012

it's not a rhetorical question, for politely saying 'you are an idiot, you don't know what you are talking about'


Mr. Lobe posted:

yes, that is correct, this is why I am a trotskyist



gently caress im a trotskyist now, after being clean for so many years...

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

everybody knows Trotskyists only have sex with awake kids or sleeping women.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Question Friend posted:

What are trots into ideologically

Nuclear war and fascism

Graphic
Sep 4, 2018

It's like Lenin said

Mr. Lobe posted:

as much as I can tell, much the same things as every other far left faction but hey, the narcissism of small differences means that what small points of distinction exist will be amplified into grotesque caricatures between factions in the service of self-differentiation. and somewhere on the internet, there will be some deranged useful idiot to give flesh to the strawmen. see: WSWS w/r/t Trotskyists, or whatever that Austin Redguard blog was regarding Maoists, etc

personally I think anyone who is too concerned with whether someone else calls themselves a trotskyist or a maoist or whatever has lousy priorities. the struggles presented by the actual 21st century political issues are generally decoupled from the grudges of the personality cults of 20th century figures

I honestly think most hardline sectarian socialists are brainwormed to a degree, it's just the Trotskyist brainworm is so specific to that movement thanks to the circumstances of his decline and demise. The majority of organized Trot groups are insular and paranoid of outsiders and decry anyone who doesn't agree with their exact interpretation of Trotskyism as pseudo-left or whatever. The irony in this is that it causes most of them to ignore one of the basic tenets of Trotsky's political strategy: the united front. The movement would be worthy of the man himself if Trotsky had just been forgotten by Stalin and ended up dying from the flu or something instead of being martyred.

The whole western leftist sectarian scene in general is a joke. People forget that all the 20th century tendencies we're all following and the differences between them were born and fleshed out in a time of vibrant socialist struggle, of imminent revolutions, imminent world war, etc. When the revolution was nearly at hand, it was actually a good time to talk about what exactly the goals of it should be and what the aftermath would be. That we're LARPing these same ideological disagreements when we can't even get Walmart unionized is kind of silly. Unite now and we can kill each other over what communism should look like once we actually have a chance of making it through to the other side. And that communism isn't going to look like anything implemented in 20th century peasant societies; communism for 21st century first world countries where 80% of people work retail and service industries will have to be something new. Eventually we're all going to have to let go of our favorite 20th century dude and forge our own Somethingism that works for us.

GunnerJ
Aug 1, 2005

Do you think this is funny?
Anyone know anything about Workers World Party?

https://medium.com/@socialistobserv...ft-a2abc035dde0

Emmideer
Oct 20, 2011

Lovely night, no?
Grimey Drawer

Graphic posted:

I honestly think most hardline sectarian socialists are brainwormed to a degree, it's just the Trotskyist brainworm is so specific to that movement thanks to the circumstances of his decline and demise. The majority of organized Trot groups are insular and paranoid of outsiders and decry anyone who doesn't agree with their exact interpretation of Trotskyism as pseudo-left or whatever. The irony in this is that it causes most of them to ignore one of the basic tenets of Trotsky's political strategy: the united front. The movement would be worthy of the man himself if Trotsky had just been forgotten by Stalin and ended up dying from the flu or something instead of being martyred.

The whole western leftist sectarian scene in general is a joke. People forget that all the 20th century tendencies we're all following and the differences between them were born and fleshed out in a time of vibrant socialist struggle, of imminent revolutions, imminent world war, etc. When the revolution was nearly at hand, it was actually a good time to talk about what exactly the goals of it should be and what the aftermath would be. That we're LARPing these same ideological disagreements when we can't even get Walmart unionized is kind of silly. Unite now and we can kill each other over what communism should look like once we actually have a chance of making it through to the other side. And that communism isn't going to look like anything implemented in 20th century peasant societies; communism for 21st century first world countries where 80% of people work retail and service industries will have to be something new. Eventually we're all going to have to let go of our favorite 20th century dude and forge our own Somethingism that works for us.

drat, it's true

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003

GunnerJ posted:

Anyone know anything about Workers World Party?

https://medium.com/@socialistobserv...ft-a2abc035dde0

WWP split from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) back in the 50s and later the PSL split from WWP about 20 years ago give or take. the only thing I really know about them is that a lot of the criticism they and the PSL have gotten over the years is that the reason/details of their split has never really been made clear which is usually viewed as bad because in a period like this when the labor movement is at a low ebb its not good to split it up even more.

THS
Sep 15, 2017

it’s always insanely petty disagreements between the very small amount of “cadre” and incomprehensible to an outside observer

THS
Sep 15, 2017

or someone slept with someone else’s wife or whatever

THS
Sep 15, 2017

those pep rally conventions that socialist groups throw get pretty horny

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
usually if theres no stated reason or statement put out yeah it is assumed its a personality conflict or something. sometimes when something is put out its still at root a personality conflict but at least then people can point to something that seems reasonable

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

THS posted:

those pep rally conventions that socialist groups throw get pretty horny

I remember someone set out a huge tray of rubbers at the DSA convention in Chicago last year and they were all gone by the second day lmao. So many regrettable twitter mufo hookups I'm sure

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010
Pretty sure it was a sex pest issues in the wwp

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Part of the WWP / PSL split, from my understanding, derived from a strategic disagreement over the use of front organizations.

The WWP essentially controlled ANSWER and used that group as the locus of anti war organizing in the runup to the Iraq War. In addition, they hold a significant amount of power within the IAC - the International Action Center amusingly founded by Ramsey Clark, LBJ’s attorney general.

PSL members felt that activism should occur within organizations controlled directly & unambiguously by the party.

I’m a member of neither organization so take it with a grain of salt but that is the sort of nontrivial disgreement that makes sense as a fissure to me.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
what a weird grainy thing to split over. what anti war activities would any leftist org not be down with

THS
Sep 15, 2017

looks like both approaches fail

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

THS posted:

or someone slept with someone else’s wife or whatever

Inner discord on the organization because of cuckoldry is the true horseshoe between far left and right

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


Graphic posted:

I honestly think most hardline sectarian socialists are brainwormed to a degree, it's just the Trotskyist brainworm is so specific to that movement thanks to the circumstances of his decline and demise. The majority of organized Trot groups are insular and paranoid of outsiders and decry anyone who doesn't agree with their exact interpretation of Trotskyism as pseudo-left or whatever. The irony in this is that it causes most of them to ignore one of the basic tenets of Trotsky's political strategy: the united front. The movement would be worthy of the man himself if Trotsky had just been forgotten by Stalin and ended up dying from the flu or something instead of being martyred.

The whole western leftist sectarian scene in general is a joke. People forget that all the 20th century tendencies we're all following and the differences between them were born and fleshed out in a time of vibrant socialist struggle, of imminent revolutions, imminent world war, etc. When the revolution was nearly at hand, it was actually a good time to talk about what exactly the goals of it should be and what the aftermath would be. That we're LARPing these same ideological disagreements when we can't even get Walmart unionized is kind of silly. Unite now and we can kill each other over what communism should look like once we actually have a chance of making it through to the other side. And that communism isn't going to look like anything implemented in 20th century peasant societies; communism for 21st century first world countries where 80% of people work retail and service industries will have to be something new. Eventually we're all going to have to let go of our favorite 20th century dude and forge our own Somethingism that works for us.

:yeah:

Enjoy
Apr 18, 2009

Graphic posted:

i want to wear the shame of being a trot openly. i want to be humiliated and mocked constantly by the other leftgoons

sign up for fetlife and jump in, trotster

Enjoy
Apr 18, 2009
TrotLife.com

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
I have a lot more respect for people in orgs which I might disagree with than people who split from or endlessly poo poo talk other orgs. since 2016 I've known so many people who have floated around from DSA to PSL to WWP all the while doing jack besides arguing with people about how theyre wrong for holding some position that they themselves held 2 weeks before. I can say I'm a trotskyist and the reason why has less to do with a dead russian guy from 100 years ago and almost all to do with the fact that it was trotskyists who recruited me, and who taught me and gave me the skills to know how how to organize my community, and my workplace.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


apropos to nothing posted:

I have a lot more respect for people in orgs which I might disagree with than people who split from or endlessly poo poo talk other orgs. since 2016 I've known so many people who have floated around from DSA to PSL to WWP all the while doing jack besides arguing with people about how theyre wrong for holding some position that they themselves held 2 weeks before. I can say I'm a trotskyist and the reason why has less to do with a dead russian guy from 100 years ago and almost all to do with the fact that it was trotskyists who recruited me, and who taught me and gave me the skills to know how how to organize my community, and my workplace.

this is true to my experience as well. it was from trotskyists that I gained the vocabulary and conceptual framework of marxism, and the practical experience of organizing. that inspires a kind of ideological loyalty and affinity in itself, and I don't begrudge anyone radicalized by, say, a stalinist tradition instead if they are generally acting in the interests of the working class and not spending their energy hashing out disputes over the facts of the 20th century or stoking the flames of factional disputes.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


I think a lot about something I heard in a talk once, it was a 100 year retrospective on the Russian Revolution. the speaker said that the next time when struggle rises to the point of revolution, it will probably not be images of Lenin or even Marx on the banners at the rallies and the marches. instead there will be the icons the people of that struggle can most relate to, who will either be such figures from more contemporary struggles like Malcolm X, or even more likely figures who have not yet stepped into the spotlight of history yet.

that said, it will be important for the people organizing these movements to be literate in these histories. so debating these legacies is not unimportant, but it should not be central, especially not at this time.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
We need the next evolution. I'm wary of any group or individual that fetishizes the distant past too much. Their brain isn't going to be malleable enough to see the moment when it happens and incorporate the events and actors creating it.

Like there are hardcore armchair left people that think BLM is either marginal boon or a drag on revolutionary potential, and i'm just like, what even the gently caress?

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
in my experience, the people who do what yall are describing the most are the people who try to do exactly what youre advocating, those that are looking towards some "new" idea or formation. usually theyre the ones who are most dismissive of movements or unaware of how to organize in the present and engage with mass movements. just my anecdotal experience.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

GalacticAcid posted:

Part of the WWP / PSL split, from my understanding, derived from a strategic disagreement over the use of front organizations.

The WWP essentially controlled ANSWER and used that group as the locus of anti war organizing in the runup to the Iraq War. In addition, they hold a significant amount of power within the IAC - the International Action Center amusingly founded by Ramsey Clark, LBJ’s attorney general.

PSL members felt that activism should occur within organizations controlled directly & unambiguously by the party.

I’m a member of neither organization so take it with a grain of salt but that is the sort of nontrivial disgreement that makes sense as a fissure to me.

yeah, learning way after the fact that ANSWER was a front for WWP wasn't really helpful to building the party or whatever

christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider
I used to be a liberal but 2016 broke my brain and I joined the DSA like a month ago and I still have some dumb questions about leftism is this a good thread to ask them in?

Graphic
Sep 4, 2018

It's like Lenin said

Mr. Lobe posted:

it was from trotskyists that I gained the vocabulary and conceptual framework of marxism, and the practical experience of organizing.

Trotsky's writings are easily the best intro point for anyone getting into the left IMO. Very easy to read and understand, entertaining, while not losing any depth. He was a great writer. It's a shame that all the drama surrounding him obsscures that to a significant degree.

quote:

If we look back to the historical sequence of world concepts, the theory of natural law will prove to be a paraphrase of Christian spiritualism freed from its crude mysticism. The Gospels proclaimed to the slave that he had just the same soul as the slave-owner, and in this way established the equality of all men before the heavenly tribunal. In reality, the slave remained a slave, and obedience became for him a religious duty. In the teaching of Christianity, the slave found an expression for his own ignorant protest against his degraded condition. Side by side with the protest was also the consolation. Christianity told him:– ”You have an immortal soul, although you resemble a pack-horse.” Here sounded the note of indignation. But the same Christianity said:– ”Although you are like a pack-horse, yet your immortal soul has in store for it an eternal reward.” Here is the voice of consolation. These two notes were found in historical Christianity in different proportions at different periods and amongst different classes. But as a whole, Christianity, like all other religions, became a method of deadening the consciousness of the oppressed masses.

Natural law, which developed into the theory of democracy, said to the worker: “all men are equal before the law, independently of their origin, their property, and their position; every man has an equal right in determining the fate of the people.” This ideal criterion revolutionized the consciousness of the masses in so far as it was a condemnation of absolutism, aristocratic privileges, and the property qualification. But the longer it went on, the more if sent the consciousness to sleep, legalizing poverty, slavery and degradation: for how could one revolt against slavery when every man has an equal right in determining the fate of the nation?

Rothschild, who has coined the blood and tears of the world into the gold napoleons of his income, has one vote at the parliamentary elections. The ignorant tiller of the soil who cannot sign his name, sleeps all his life without taking his clothes off, and wanders through society like an underground mole, plays his part, however, as a trustee of the nation’s sovereignty, and is equal to Rothschild in the courts and at the elections. In the real conditions of life, in the economic process, in social relations, in their way of life, people became more and more unequal; dazzling luxury was accumulated at one pole, poverty and hopelessness at the other. But in the sphere of the legal edifice of the State, these glaring contradictions disappeared, and there penetrated thither only unsubstantial legal shadows. The landlord, the laborer, the capitalist, the proletarian, the minister, the bootblack – all are equal as “citizens” and as “legislators.” The mystic equality of Christianity has taken one step down from the heavens in the shape of the “natural,” “legal” equality of democracy. But it has not yet reached earth, where lie the economic foundations of society. For the ignorant day-laborer, who all his life remains a beast of burden in the service of the bourgeoisie, the ideal right to influence the fate of the nations by means of the parliamentary elections remained little more real than the palace which he was promised in the kingdom of heaven.

Graphic fucked around with this message at 02:40 on Dec 29, 2018

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


christmas boots posted:

I used to be a liberal but 2016 broke my brain and I joined the DSA like a month ago and I still have some dumb questions about leftism is this a good thread to ask them in?

yeah sure why not

do you want literature recommendations? "Meaning of Marxism" was the first text that really laid out Marxism in a way I understood, if you feel like you are still in the early stages of developing ideas

christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider
Yeah, probably a good idea to start with some 101 stuff.

Anything about art would be of personal interest to me too. One question, and I realize that the Left is not a monolith and there's probably as many opinions as there are people, is what value Art has from a leftist perspective? Like if I were to extol the value that art brings to society it sounds pretty... liberal I guess? I'm probably not explain myself very well, but I guess art has this reputation often for being pretentious and bougie (or at least "modern art") and you think of some of the performing arts (which is what I used to study and do, though not professionally) and with stuff like Broadway and Hamilton I can definitely see an argument that there's a large element of classism and elitism there.

But labor is labor, and at the same time art of some form or another seems to be such a universal aspect of human civilization that throwing it all in that category is pretty self-evidently an incorrect way of looking at things, or so it seems to me, and so I feel that there's got to be some sort of value that I just can't quite articulate.


I don't know if any of that makes any sense? I could easily be overthinking it.

Serf
May 5, 2011


yo, what's up with nepal? last i heard the communists won the election there. how's that going?

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010
There's a few left artists in theatre specifically that are still relevant. Check out Bertolt Brecht and Augusto Boal.

A lot of left stuff is going to talk about art per session because most left thought is more about how power works (at least, the left thought that is useful does this) and how class struggle is engaged through the medium of economics and politics, and art doesn't have as much to do with that.

If you're interested in the relationship of art to the economic undergirding relationships of society , try googling about "base and superstructure"

GunnerJ
Aug 1, 2005

Do you think this is funny?

christmas boots posted:

I used to be a liberal but 2016 broke my brain and I joined the DSA like a month ago and I still have some dumb questions about leftism is this a good thread to ask them in?

This is the thread that will tell you why joining DSA means you're still a liberal, but it's up to you to decide if the reasons given are true.

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
The three kinds of liberalism; joining the DSA, voting Democrat, and associating or self identifying as a trotskyist

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
https://deadspin.com/the-strange-career-of-jeff-monson-american-mma-fighter-1831235041

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

christmas boots posted:

I used to be a liberal but 2016 broke my brain and I joined the DSA like a month ago and I still have some dumb questions about leftism is this a good thread to ask them in?

Yes, you can ask them here

Tewdrig
Dec 6, 2005

It's good to be the king.

GunnerJ posted:

This is the thread that will tell you why joining DSA means you're still a liberal, but it's up to you to decide if the reasons given are true.

I thought that was getfiscal’s job:

https://twitter.com/getfiscal/status/1019943633699688448?s=20

DSA in my area wants to be a social club. There was an explicitly non-electoral socialist group too, and they did good work, but it was small (like 10 people) and they didn’t work with anyone else. so after like two campaigns they died out apart from being on facebook.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
I heard a fun comment from someone that DSA reminded him of the Shriner's

Like the old men who wear fezs and ride in funny little cars during 4th of July parades:



It's a social club but also "good works" oriented around community service

Anyways it's a good thing he said because he moved here recently from across the country and could immediately and easily plug in to the left. More like... an interface

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

christmas boots posted:

Yeah, probably a good idea to start with some 101 stuff.

Anything about art would be of personal interest to me too. One question, and I realize that the Left is not a monolith and there's probably as many opinions as there are people, is what value Art has from a leftist perspective? Like if I were to extol the value that art brings to society it sounds pretty... liberal I guess? I'm probably not explain myself very well, but I guess art has this reputation often for being pretentious and bougie (or at least "modern art") and you think of some of the performing arts (which is what I used to study and do, though not professionally) and with stuff like Broadway and Hamilton I can definitely see an argument that there's a large element of classism and elitism there.

But labor is labor, and at the same time art of some form or another seems to be such a universal aspect of human civilization that throwing it all in that category is pretty self-evidently an incorrect way of looking at things, or so it seems to me, and so I feel that there's got to be some sort of value that I just can't quite articulate.


I don't know if any of that makes any sense? I could easily be overthinking it.

art wouldn't be sold on a market in a communist society, if that's what you mean. do you mean like the contemporary art world, damien hirst, jeff koons? or marvel movies? art is a kind of broad category.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Emmideer
Oct 20, 2011

Lovely night, no?
Grimey Drawer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO79DhItC_c

this is art and im going to emptyquote this post on May 1st

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5