|
Palemdromes posted:This is what I took off of it too. The answer to “do sex workers give friends and family discounts” is clearly no, because they don’t offer their services to friends and family. I had a stripper as a housemate and she got me free entry to where she worked 
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 14:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 02:01 |
|
|
TheMostFrench posted:I had a stripper as a housemate and she got me free entry to where she worked Nice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 14:29
|
|
|
canepazzo posted:Father's apparently already contesting eccessive use of force, and "we don't know what happened between them". What about his son's excessive use of force on the woman who apparently wronged him? He should address that too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 14:32
|
|
|
Picnic Princess posted:What about his son's excessive use of force on the woman who apparently wronged him? He should address that too. How much money can he get for that?
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 14:33
|
|
|
Brother Entropy posted:his family could probably sue Not when he actually did it. The best argument you could make for wishy-washy language is that it interferes with court proceedings against the accused, but there won't be any because he's dead.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 15:12
|
|
|
EvilGenius posted:Not when he actually did it. It’s still basic newspaper style.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 15:14
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:It’s still basic newspaper style. It's also a simpler guideline: "always write alleged until the court has made a final call," rather than requiring each journalist to weigh the merits and evidence in a given case when they report on it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 15:36
|
|
|
Whenever anyone says "I'm sure you've done worse" what they really mean is "I've done worse".PurpleXVI posted:It's also a simpler guideline: "always write alleged until the court has made a final call," rather than requiring each journalist to weigh the merits and evidence in a given case when they report on it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 18:32
|
|
|
Tiggum posted:Whenever anyone says "I'm sure you've done worse" what they really mean is "I've done worse". Not being classified as a criminal until convicted is a pretty fundamental part of law and should never, ever be changed. I dunno, I just feel like there's a difference between something being witnessed and established as having happened and proving something happened beyond all reasonable doubt in a court. If the latter needs to happen or is in the process of happening, it's an accusation. Otherwise you may as well claim it happened, or even 'probably' happened. As someone else pointed out though, news outlets probably don't have time to make that call. EvilGenius has a new favorite as of 19:05 on Dec 31, 2018 |
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 19:00
|
|
|
 It's like that Britta-from-Community gif but "I can excuse colonialism but draw the line at financial deregulation."
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 19:28
|
|
|
Newspapers aren't courts, the first amendment protects commentary on events, they use "allegedly" to minimize legal exposure. But also, media coverage can make jury selection harder when the defense excludes everyone who saw or heard about the headline "YouTube GymBro Stabs The poo poo Out Of Innocent Lady, Holy gently caress."
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 19:32
|
|
|
Katt posted:It's fine they fixed it. What that bodybuilder did was whack. But
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 19:46
|
|
|
TinTower posted:
Weird. What happened in 1980? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 20:13
|
|
|
Tetracube posted:it's star citizen for republicans but star citizen is already for republicans
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 20:22
|
|
|
Zesty posted:Weird. What happened in 1980? yeah uh that's not the shocking part like you know what happened in the 19th century right  that's just the tip
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 20:26
|
|
|
1stGear posted:Yeah, news stories always use "allegedly" when discussing people accused of crimes, even when they were caught red-handed or the evidence is overwhelming. You didn't commit a crime until you've been convicted of it. I'm no lawyer but I think there's even legal standing for that; like if he got acquitted somehow he could sue them for slander or something as they said he committed a crime that he was acquitted of. Even if the police catch him in the act and immediately arrest him he's technically still innocent until he is convicted or pleads guilty. It would be a horrible idea to change that. I mean if the police literally caught him in the act and had to taze him to make him stop it's probably an open and shut case but if the trial hasn't even started yet then he's still presumed innocent.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 20:47
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:he's technically still innocent until he is convicted or pleads guilty
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2018 21:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 01:47
|
|
|
It’s like drew toothpastes gimmick somehow came to life. https://twitter.com/drewtoothpaste/status/1005511442479702017?s=21
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 01:51
|
|
|
The account is suspended now but it's quite likely they were riffing off that and failing to get the humour part down.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:04
|
|
|
 Canada's shame
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:10
|
|
|
Sedge and Bee posted:
lol why did an Islamic Center book him?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:10
|
|
|
It’s got a catchy tour title at least. Said nobody.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:15
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:lol why did an Islamic Center book him? Because they're basically well-meaning and didn't look into him. And there's a lot of Canadian Muslims who are in the middle class and are basically white protestants in their outlook. They haven't necessarily had the clean break with conservatism like what happened in the US post 9/11. So he sometimes targets them, before falling back onto anti-muslims dogwhistling.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:18
|
|
|
So does this dipshit live in Ottawa or is he just visiting? He looks familiar and I already hate him.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:23
|
|
|
Arcsquad12 posted:So does this dipshit live in Ottawa or is he just visiting? He looks familiar and I already hate him. nah, he's in Mississauga
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:30
|
|
|
Sedge and Bee posted:nah, he's in Mississauga Oh good, that means his chances of being hit by a crazed driver have jumped exponentially.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
So is the BLM part of his talk also a dogwhistle, or does he for some reason believe in BLM while calling Antifa terrorists?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:34
|
|
|
Admiral Joeslop posted:So is the BLM part of his talk also a dogwhistle, or does he for some reason believe in BLM while calling Antifa terrorists? He's saying both are terrorists.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 02:36
|
|
|
The swastika is a nice touch for that shithead
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:07
|
|
|
So I guess John McAfee raped a whale https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1079863420458074112?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:15
|
|
|
The Nazis, well known for being antifascists
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:17
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:So I guess John McAfee raped a whale It gets brought up more than you’d think it would. If it was anyone other than John ‘Whale Fucker’ McAfee, that is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:23
|
|
|
But you gently caress one whale...
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:24
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:So I guess John McAfee raped a whale I swear to god this guy's insane rantings are like something out of a dril tweet, but longer and more terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:32
|
|
|
Imagined posted:You butt gently caress one whale...
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:36
|
|
|
John Mcafee and the Quest for the Holy Slam Whale.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 03:37
|
|
|
Cythereal posted:He's saying both are terrorists. The way that is laid out, I thought those were two separate thoughts. I thought he was saying black lives do matter, but Antifa are terrorists.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 04:53
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:So I guess John McAfee raped a whale No, he didn’t rape the whale, but he tried to get in on a whale-raping party. He’s a failed whale rapist. Veni Vidi Ameche! posted:The way that is laid out, I thought those were two separate thoughts. I thought he was saying black lives do matter, but Antifa are terrorists. I think you’ll find that that gentleman is a complete idiot, so garbled syntax is only to be expected.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 05:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 02:01 |
|
|
AlbieQuirky posted:No, he didn’t rape the whale, but he tried to get in on a whale-raping party. He’s a failed whale rapist. Sir I will not have you libel Mr. McAfee. https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1010682321106821125?s=21
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2019 05:38
|
|
