|
I hate disingenuous bullshit straw man memes.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 02:27 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 23:17 |
They’re so worried about people being gender less cause it effects them somehow I guess
|
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 02:30 |
|
I'm the electrical circuitry that can actually be joined male/male female/female.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 02:30 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I'm the electrical circuitry that can actually be joined male/male female/female. That was my first thought
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 02:33 |
|
One assumes that the other guy got annoyed and just set fire to the power plant.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 02:34 |
|
Oh man wait until the religious right finds out about gender changers being sold in every electrical supply store
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 02:52 |
|
OwlFancier posted:One assumes that the other guy got annoyed and just set fire to the power plant. Yeah, there's really no way to read that other than Engineer 1 being a condescending douche to Engineer 2 so she goes off on him sarcastically and he handles that exactly as well as you'd expect.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 06:37 |
|
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 07:48 |
|
the gently caress?
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 07:50 |
|
ratbert90 posted:Boomers polluted so much that rivers caught on fire lol. CuddleCryptid posted:Someone remind me who hair sprayed a hole in the ozone layer The downside of the success of big environmental efforts past, like the Clean Air and Water Acts, and banning CFCs, is climate change deniers looking back and remembering dire warnings of disasters that didn't come to pass. They assume that things worked out ok because those crazy environmentalists just made a big deal out of nothing, not because we took steps to correct the problems.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 13:32 |
|
TerminalSaint posted:The downside of the success of big environmental efforts past, like the Clean Air and Water Acts, and banning CFCs, is climate change deniers looking back and remembering dire warnings of disasters that didn't come to pass. They assume that things worked out ok because those crazy environmentalists just made a big deal out of nothing, not because we took steps to correct the problems. Reminds me of an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia from a year or two ago. Charlie spends all episode moving heaven and Earth so the bar can pass a health inspection, making a big deal about everything needing to be done a certain way, they pass, and the rest of the gang is like "Wow, way to freak out over nothing. That went fine for us"
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 15:11 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I'm the electrical circuitry that can actually be joined male/male female/female. Anderson Powerpole connectors are designed to be genderless entirely.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 15:54 |
|
TerminalSaint posted:The downside of the success of big environmental efforts past, like the Clean Air and Water Acts, and banning CFCs, is climate change deniers looking back and remembering dire warnings of disasters that didn't come to pass. They assume that things worked out ok because those crazy environmentalists just made a big deal out of nothing, not because we took steps to correct the problems. The same thing happens with anti-vaxxers. "They made us all get flu shots, and then there was no flu epidemic after all. I guess it was just a big freak-out over nothing!"
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 18:00 |
Jurgan posted:The same thing happens with anti-vaxxers. "They made us all get flu shots, and then there was no flu epidemic after all. I guess it was just a big freak-out over nothing!" Throw "what did unions ever do for me" people on that pile
|
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 18:05 |
|
CuddleCryptid posted:Throw "what did unions ever do for me" people on that pile Ruth Bader Ginsburg posted:Instead, the Court strikes [Section]4(b)'s coverage provision because, in its view, the provision is not based on "current conditions." Ante, at 17. It discounts, however, that one such condition was the preclearance remedy in place in the covered jurisdictions, a remedy Congress designed both to catch discrimination before it causes harm, and to guard against return to old ways. [...]
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 18:16 |
|
Jurgan posted:The same thing happens with anti-vaxxers. "They made us all get flu shots, and then there was no flu epidemic after all. I guess it was just a big freak-out over nothing!" CuddleCryptid posted:Throw "what did unions ever do for me" people on that pile
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 18:34 |
|
I identify as a transsister. Also if one "wrong" connection sets the power plant on fire, maybe we should change how we build them. :foucault:
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 18:42 |
|
CuddleCryptid posted:Throw "what did unions ever do for me" people on that pile And Y2K as well, when nothing happened despite the freakout. (Because developers put in about a billion hours fixing things before they became a problem.)
|
# ? Jan 3, 2019 18:47 |
|
I literally have 20 of those in a bag in my drawer next to me. They work great.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 14:26 |
|
I've seen this posted unironically like 5 times today already, I really wish I could believe that nobody out there honestly thinks Donald Trump is playing 4 dimensional chess but here we are.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 15:23 |
|
And americans definitely don’t complain about the loss of all these consumer goods, and the businesses that export to Mexico are fine.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 15:43 |
|
A couple of weeks of the US government making GBS threads itself will surely cause the entirety of Mexico to crumble.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:01 |
|
It's great when people say 'shut the border' like that's a thing that can be simply done. There are 330 ports of entry between the US and Mexico, and it is the most heavily trafficked border in the world. 350 million documented crossing annually, and critical to both countries. The border has never been closed, there is probably no real procedure or plan in place to accomplish such a thing. There are millions of people that cross the border daily because they work on one side and live on the other, and you'd have to work out what to do about all those people. If a US citizen lives in Mexico and comes in to work daily, are you going to refuse them entry at the border? If you close the border and a Mexican citizen has been working in the US, are you going to forbid them from leaving? Assuming you figure out a way to actually do this, Mexico exports fuel to the US and imports agricultural products. I bet all those farmers are going to be excited when their corn market collapses right on the heels of the soybean massacre.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:17 |
|
And then the Democratic congress says 'Thanks for the 5 billion dollars, Mr. President! We're gonna spend it on infrastructure, education, and gay abortions instead. Bye, sucker!'
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:21 |
|
Ashcans posted:Assuming you figure out a way to actually do this, Mexico exports fuel to the US and imports agricultural products. I bet all those farmers are going to be excited when their corn market collapses right on the heels of the soybean massacre. "It's fine, trump will just push through more subsidies and... Oh. "
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:22 |
|
Ashcans posted:It's great when people say 'shut the border' like that's a thing that can be simply done. There are 330 ports of entry between the US and Mexico, and it is the most heavily trafficked border in the world. 350 million documented crossing annually, and critical to both countries. The border has never been closed, there is probably no real procedure or plan in place to accomplish such a thing. There are millions of people that cross the border daily because they work on one side and live on the other, and you'd have to work out what to do about all those people. If a US citizen lives in Mexico and comes in to work daily, are you going to refuse them entry at the border? If you close the border and a Mexican citizen has been working in the US, are you going to forbid them from leaving? Yeah. So you see. Trump is holding the gun to his head and threatening to shoot everyone with it. Its explicitly, this will be chaos and I will drag us into it if you dont give me my poo poo.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
Soviet Commubot posted:I've seen this posted unironically like 5 times today already, I really wish I could believe that nobody out there honestly thinks Donald Trump is playing 4 dimensional chess but here we are. It specifically mentions food rotting and I'm pretty sure we haven't sold a single soy bean to China, normally the largest buyer.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:31 |
|
And none of this is even getting into the fact that it's just nakedly using the military to extort money out of a sovereign nation like loving Attila the Hun.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:40 |
|
AnoHito posted:And none of this is even getting into the fact that it's just nakedly using the military to extort money out of a sovereign nation like loving Attila the Hun. “I have a great relationship with the roman people.”-Attila the Don
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 16:54 |
|
AnoHito posted:And none of this is even getting into the fact that it's just nakedly using the military to extort money out of a sovereign nation like loving Attila the Hun. I think a very sizable portion of the US public not only would be completely in favor of this, but continues to be upset because US foreign policy isn't naked enough about the extortion.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 18:07 |
|
AnoHito posted:And none of this is even getting into the fact that it's just nakedly using the military to extort money out of a sovereign nation like loving Attila the Hun. That is generally what you have a military for. Especially one the size of the US's.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 18:27 |
|
Ashcans posted:I bet all those farmers are going to be excited when their corn market collapses right on the heels of the soybean massacre. To be honest, these farmers will probably welcome and applaud it. They are already quoted saying they approved of what Trump did with tariffs AFTER they lost money. Some will say its good that there's no illegal workers now, while staring out on their own fields that are wasting away. happyhippy fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Jan 4, 2019 |
# ? Jan 4, 2019 18:45 |
|
InsertPotPun posted:...sorry but isn't that exactly what's happening to the US under trump's trade war? And on top of that, China didn't seem to have too much difficulty in just finding a new soybean supplier.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 18:56 |
|
Like when the CSA embargoed cotton.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2019 19:51 |
|
This is a year old, but it was new to me
|
# ? Jan 5, 2019 06:14 |
|
Would be fun to replace the confederate statue with a statue of Saddam
|
# ? Jan 5, 2019 14:47 |
|
Galaxy brain: maybe the statue was always offensive and current events have created environments where people want to speak out against it
|
# ? Jan 5, 2019 14:50 |
|
Who gets offended by an rear end anyway?
|
# ? Jan 5, 2019 15:08 |
|
Orange Devil posted:Who gets offended by an rear end anyway? People who are extremely sure about their heterosexual masculinity
|
# ? Jan 5, 2019 15:28 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 23:17 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:Galaxy brain: maybe the statue was always offensive and current events have created environments where people want to speak out against it
|
# ? Jan 5, 2019 15:36 |