|
Falcorum posted:If it's any comfort, it happens elsewhere and even with regular non C level coworkers being the source of that dumb poo poo. that sounds like a lovely situation and im glad it also sounds like you were able to defend yourself appropriately jfc as much as id like to work on a aaa game everything i hear from the industry makes it sound like it would drive me toward suicide
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 03:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 01:40 |
|
|
unless you're working contract and being paid for every hour or you get time in lieu, don't work OT and even then, reconsider
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 03:34
|
|
|
Cold on a Cob posted:unless you're working contract and being paid for every hour or you get time in lieu, don't work OT
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 03:38
|
|
|
uh, you should be getting paid at least time-and-a-half before you even think about doing OT
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 03:41
|
|
|
wow cmake is barbaric
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 04:43
|
|
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:eschaton there is no reasonable way to get vim-mode in my xcode. i hold you personally responsible, as an emacs fan you should appreciate the importance of extensibility. it took me a couple months but i don't really miss it too much anymore
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 05:42
|
|
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:wow cmake is barbaric they did it, they made something even worse than loving makefiles, it's unbelievable
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 06:24
|
|
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:wow cmake is barbaric To me the biggest problem with cmake is the general lack of introductory documentation. This site really helped me get started so I could understand what I was doing
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 07:41
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:To me the biggest problem with cmake is the general lack of introductory documentation. This site really helped me get started so I could understand what I was doing thanks this is helpful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 07:56
|
|
|
terrible architecture question: what's a good architecture for when you have an ever-changing database of tasks and a fleet of low spec (preferably no storage) task runners and you want the task runners to automatically acquire tasks and continuously report results? is there a name for such architecture?
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 11:47
|
|
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:eschaton there is no reasonable way to get vim-mode in my xcode. i hold you personally responsible, as an emacs fan you should appreciate the importance of extensibility. nah, Xcode’s source editor works great, like an enhanced version of the Cocoa text system if you really want to pretend you’re using a cheap surplus terminal in the 1970s that’s so rubbish it doesn’t even have arrow keys, just use vi itself, don’t try to twist things into acting like it (I’ve sometimes wondered what the outrage would be like if we implemented vi compatibility and explicitly not vim compatibility)
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 11:50
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:terrible architecture question: what's a good architecture for when you have an ever-changing database of tasks and a fleet of low spec (preferably no storage) task runners and you want the task runners to automatically acquire tasks and continuously report results? is there a name for such architecture? bus or queue? expect someone to repost the “you don’t really want a queue do you”
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 11:53
|
|
|
eschaton posted:bus or queue? do buses or queues require the task runner to consume the published task? i want tasks to be available indefinitely but *access* to tasks to be exclusive to whichever runner acquired it (until the runner dies) realistic example: i may have a task "download the frontpage and verify http 200 every hour" that should only be done by one runner. i don't want the runner to delete the task from the database, just acquire it. i also want the task to become available if the runner dies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 12:21
|
|
|
eschaton posted:bus or queue? somewhere, tef just flinched
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 12:50
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:do buses or queues require the task runner to consume the published task? i want tasks to be available indefinitely but *access* to tasks to be exclusive to whichever runner acquired it (until the runner dies) my gut is this is needs a scheduler like quartz/quartz.net or something similar i wouldn't use a bus/queue/etc for this
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 13:55
|
|
|
Symbolic Butt posted:they did it, they made something even worse than loving makefiles, it's unbelievable actually its much better than makefiles especially if you ever have to do something with multiple build toolchains i really like cmake
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 15:31
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:do buses or queues require the task runner to consume the published task? i want tasks to be available indefinitely but *access* to tasks to be exclusive to whichever runner acquired it (until the runner dies) What is your platform of choice? Honestly, the .NET Orleans platform sounds like it might fit your wants? https://dotnet.github.io/orleans/ Basically, you define a set of Grains (your tasks) and when you need a task runner, you get your Grain client and connect, then use that to GetGrain<IMyTaskGrain>() and perform whatever operation you defined as part of your IMyTaskGrain. The backend is a cluster of Orleans silos that you either gin up in Azure or AWS or whatever (lol DevOps problems) and then when you create your grain client instance, you point it at your cluster and away you go. https://dotnet.github.io/orleans/Documentation/clusters_and_clients/index.html The Orleans framework worries about which silo on which part of the cluster will run which grain, so you don't worry about that part, and if you want to see how your grains are doing, there's an Orleans Dashboard you can set up, too. Last job I had, we ran this in production and it worked quite well. My recommendaton is to make sure to run some basic load testing because you have to be able to reason about the number of grains you're instantiating in the cluster, and make sure you have enough resources dedicated to your grain work. In other words, don't blame Orleans when you spin up a billion grains that all want to talk to a db table and your db dies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 16:23
|
|
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:wow cmake is barbaric I moved all of my C++/C projects over to meson and I am more than happy with it. I have a CMake file that calls out meson though for the express purpose that CLion only supports CMake. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 16:26
|
|
|
When merging in git, is there a way to explicitly tell git that two files are the same file? I'm trying to merge a feature branch in which a file was renamed and then went from 2 lines to 69. Even though the file was originally moved with git mv, git doesn't seem to be able to recognize that they are the same file during the merge. Most of the sites I've seen online suggest using git merge -X find-renames=N, where N is the similarity threshold, but because of the size of the difference here I'd have to set the similarity threshhold to a comically low value. Any ideas?
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 19:54
|
|
|
my understanding of git is that it explicitly doesn’t track files that way and it always uses a similarity score to guess whether two non-identical blobs were the same file
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 20:03
|
|
|
renaming is just used after the fact when presenting it to the user, it doesn't store anything about the rename when it writes it out. git doesn't track it that way. what are you trying to accomplish?
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 20:09
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:When merging in git, is there a way to explicitly tell git that two files are the same file? I'm trying to merge a feature branch in which a file was renamed and then went from 2 lines to 69. Even though the file was originally moved with git mv, git doesn't seem to be able to recognize that they are the same file during the merge. Most of the sites I've seen online suggest using git merge -X find-renames=N, where N is the similarity threshold, but because of the size of the difference here I'd have to set the similarity threshhold to a comically low value. Any ideas? can you commit the rename and the changes in two separate commits?
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 20:11
|
|
|
e: nvm should've read before posting
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 20:11
|
|
|
I got it! I had been on master and running git merge feature, but when I switched to the feature branch and ran git merge master it worked flawlessly. I'm a little surprised that those two operations are not the same, but this is probably one of those weird edge cases in git merging that the darcs/pijul people love to talk about.CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:what are you trying to accomplish? I was trying to preserve the history of the file, so that it "followed" the file back to the beginning instead of just to the move. It wouldn't have been a huge deal in the 2-line file case, but upon further review there was also a 200-line file that was being affected similarly by a significant number of minor changes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2019 20:20
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:Anyone use Veracode because i'm about to start a poc with them please tell me more sadness
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 00:04
|
|
|
sometimes i really hate using git
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 00:31
|
|
|
i am... ambiguous on the subject of cmake. on the one hand, i've had worse experiences with other build systems. on the other hand, i've just returned to c++ after a long period in c# land, and gently caress did i forget how much i hated all of c++'s compilation/linking process and all build systems in general. i will admit that making llvm/clang the first c++ thing i'm touching in a while might be part of the problem here, but still. well actually it's a fork of clang that folks at microsoft messed with to turn into an hlsl compiler for gpu shaders, and they've also sprinkled a fine layer of .cmd scripts and python on top of cmake to do... things. including using text to speech to tell you a build completed/failed which i personally think is the most goddamn annoying thing
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 01:03
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i'm about to start a poc with them please tell me more sadness I have to fix this poo poo to get the application certified  "Buffer overflows"  That repeated set of lines is the for loop statement here (#2438), but of course not every instance that matches, just randomly picking them as far as I can tell.  "Numeric errors"  poo poo. MrMoo fucked around with this message at 02:20 on Jan 9, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 01:45
|
|
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:eschaton there is no reasonable way to get vim-mode in my xcode. i hold you personally responsible, as an emacs fan you should appreciate the importance of extensibility. https://github.com/xvimproject/xvim2 works vaguely okay except for all the things that don't work. just don't look too closely at how it's implemented because extending an editor that doesn't have any official support for plugins is pretty yikes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 01:51
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:https://github.com/xvimproject/xvim2 works vaguely okay except for all the things that don't work. just don't look too closely at how it's implemented because extending an editor that doesn't have any official support for plugins is pretty yikes. yeah, i looked at it but am not motivated enough to figure out if doing the xcode signing workaround is safe.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 03:31
|
|
|
the attack vector that it opens is that if someone steals your private key, they can trick you into loading their code into xcode's process. even that can be prevented by just deleting the private key used immediately after signing xcode + xvim with it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 04:01
|
|
|
obviously don't download one of those "convenient" pre-built xcode+xvim packages because that's how you get ownedd
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 04:02
|
|
|
basically you can either suck it up and do it apple's way or suffer
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 04:25
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:I've been reading a discussion on modern C++ in the PL thread, and it's got me wondering: when is SFINAE actually needed over other template techniques? And when does it provide clearer code? It's something I've never really understood the motivation for. it's all about pattern matching: templates are wildcards, SFINAE lets you narrow them down to more precise criteria. think of SFINAE as a hook into the function overload resolution algorithm: it lets you write customized match/skip conditions. concepts should make it significantly less gross but I haven't really looked into them. I'll cross that bridge when I come to it
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
Stringent posted:basically you can suck it up and do it apple's way and suffer
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 08:56
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:actually its much better than makefiles especially if you ever have to do something with multiple build toolchains idk I don't see the benefit, I have to artisanally handcraft stuff for each toolchain anyway, I ever experience the cmake layer ever helping me out on this. and that's really the gist of it: it's a complicated abstracting layer over the build process that never helps me out, it just adds complexity and I have to spend hours debugging it to understand why the hell it's not compiling with the flags I expected.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 11:13
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:What is your platform of choice? Honestly, the .NET Orleans platform sounds like it might fit your wants? https://dotnet.github.io/orleans/ Just to expand on this a little bit - if .NET isn't where you want to land, the behaviour you appear to be describing fits the actor model pretty well. Orleans is one implementation of it, there are other non-.NET options available too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 16:14
|
|
|
hello thread, my latest book is out: https://twitter.com/mononcqc/status/1083027123777036291
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 19:12
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:hello thread, my latest book is out: congrats 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 19:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 01:40 |
|
|
MononcQc posted:hello thread, my latest book is out: Nice! Congratulations
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2019 19:18
|
|