|
Rich Uncle Chet posted:I’m going to find this guy and dump his books he sucks real bad
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:28 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 11:49 |
|
Did you hear that speech kamala harcopmas gave about how slavery was good? What a misstep
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:28 |
Oh btw I apologise if anyone truly thought I was out of pocket earlier. My car is hosed up, and I am freaking the gently caress out and there's some other traumatic poo poo going on. I am doing my best y'all.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:28 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:Guys did you know that Kamala Harris is a politician who is 54 years old and has lived through other political eras where the politics of various issues were a little different than they are now? I was shocked too, I know. You say this and all I hear is rigged election.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:29 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:Guys did you know that Kamala Harris is a politician who is 54 years old and has lived through other political eras where the politics of various issues were a little different than they are now? I was shocked too, I know. The fact that she's noticeably out-of-step with the wants and needs of the Democratic party base today is not an argument in her favor.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:30 |
|
This thread needs a pick-me-up https://twitter.com/NYDailyNews/status/1089609092186935300
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:31 |
|
Saw sequels are getting real weird.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:32 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:Guys did you know that Kamala Harris is a politician who is 54 years old and has lived through other political eras where the politics of various issues were a little different than they are now? I was shocked too, I know. look, it was 2014, it was a different time, nobody knew that demanding prisoners not be released on the grounds that the state needed them to work for free was a bad idea
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:33 |
|
LeeMajors posted:If the Starbucks dipshit delivers Trump another victory in service of a loving Business Centrist vanity project.... Then the Democrats deserve to lose for apparently running a campaign so poorly that someone with no natural base of support was able to siphon off enough of their voters to give Trump victory?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:33 |
|
as a california resident who's been following kamala harris since before she was on the national radar i decided i would never support her for higher office after she supported those orange county district attorneys that wasn't a pragmatic political decision made in a different time or however else you want to spin it, that was some thin blue line bullshit. she's pretty bad, like most of the big name democrats in california
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:33 |
|
I’m just glad I found something to base my decision on when I fill out my 2020 ballot and mail it, tomorrow
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:33 |
|
1337JiveTurkey posted:Thank God black people have white people like us to tell them how to interpret black politicians' views on racial inequality. "Slavery wasnt so bad" wouldn't be such a hot take if it was actually confined to the mists of history rather than say, this summer
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:34 |
|
haveblue posted:I’m just glad I found something to base my decision on when I fill out my 2020 ballot and mail it, tomorrow Lol you haven't voted in the next three elections yet? It felt really good voting against Tucker Carlson.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:35 |
|
Seriously though a lot of the usual crew of assholes ITT laying the groundwork to not vote for Harris when she probably wins the nomination (she is the strongest candidate) because, surprise, they’re a bunch of assholes who only care about being able to tout their supposed moral superiority.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:35 |
|
LeeMajors posted:This thread needs a pick-me-up As a staunch 2016 supporter: gently caress no.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:36 |
|
And here we go. Did you guys consider that Harris is 54 years old and thus has been lovely for longer? So you want to hold her being lovely longer against her because she wants to be president?? Like what the gently caress even is this argument? "She has lovely views, please ignore them?" LeeMajors posted:This thread needs a pick-me-up Let me pick my jaw off the floor. I was told by so many D&D geniuses that this was IMPOSSIBLE and I was so dumb to think it would happen! 1glitch0 fucked around with this message at 04:40 on Jan 28, 2019 |
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:36 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Yeah, uber has been out over a decade now, I get that it may have blindsided traditional companies when it launched but it's just pathetic at this point how poorly traditional taxis have organized to make any sort of modernization. If I could just have an app with similar features that summoned a yellow cab I'm sure I'd prefer that to it summoning some weird guy, but that app doesn't exist, or at least, that app exists split over hundreds and thousands of separate apps with wildly different functionality. Like uber operates in 70 countries, while traditional cab companies operate in like, half of a city and may or may have an app. and that app might not have half the features I expected or may not even be in my language or accept my credit card.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:37 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:Seriously though a lot of the usual crew of assholes ITT laying the groundwork to not vote for Harris when she probably wins the nomination (she is the strongest candidate) because, surprise, they’re a bunch of assholes who only care about being able to tout their supposed moral superiority. There's a whole lot of projection and factual inaccuracy going on in this here post...
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:37 |
|
I hope another Democrat announces soon so we can move on to talking about why they suck. I'm getting sick of this Kamala arc.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:37 |
|
LeeMajors posted:This thread needs a pick-me-up Said like Jack Nicholson's Joker sitting at the desk of a recently-murdered crime boss
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:38 |
|
Hah. I thought the last 2 years of Hellworld would let us avoid this, but nope
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:38 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:Seriously though a lot of the usual crew of assholes ITT laying the groundwork to not vote for Harris when she probably wins the nomination (she is the strongest candidate) because, surprise, they’re a bunch of assholes who only care about being able to tout their supposed moral superiority. this is the only possible explanation for thinking "jailing parents for their kids skipping school is a bad idea, and I would not like a person who proposed it to be president"
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:39 |
|
Isn’t there a primary thread you can go poo poo up?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:39 |
|
LeeMajors posted:This thread needs a pick-me-up Don't you put that evil on me Ricky Bobby!
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:40 |
|
Y'all just better keep your nit-picking to the primary. Tear these people apart but you'd better literally, unironically vote blue no matter who. I'm gonna get torn apart for saying that but I really don't think Harris would have let Puerto Rico suffer for months with no aid or forcibly separate kids from their families and stuff them in cages.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:41 |
|
Koalas March posted:Oh btw I apologise if anyone truly thought I was out of pocket earlier. My car is hosed up, and I am freaking the gently caress out and there's some other traumatic poo poo going on. I am doing my best y'all. We're all doing our bezt. Edit: I misspelled best, I'm leaving it. 1glitch0 fucked around with this message at 04:46 on Jan 28, 2019 |
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:41 |
|
RZA Encryption posted:Y'all just better keep your nit-picking to the primary. Tear these people apart but you'd better literally, unironically vote blue no matter who. I'm gonna get torn apart for saying that but I really don't think Harris would have let Puerto Rico suffer for months with no aid or forcibly separate kids from their families and stuff them in cages. If obama would then she probably would too
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:42 |
|
Clinton running can only be a good thing. She'll be quickly booted after gaining no traction. Her eventual endorsement for whichever centrist will be devalued, and possibly a liability.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:44 |
|
Terror Sweat posted:If obama would then she probably would too Do you think Trump is no worse than Obama? Real Q, it would help me better understand your take.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:44 |
|
RZA Encryption posted:Y'all just better keep your nit-picking to the primary. Tear these people apart but you'd better literally, unironically vote blue no matter who. I'm gonna get torn apart for saying that but I really don't think Harris would have let Puerto Rico suffer for months with no aid or forcibly separate kids from their families and stuff them in cages. While I agree, I doubt Harris will balk at drone strikes, deportation, and the continuing status quo on most critical issues. She has an uphill battle to show people she is motivated to implement change, and will follow through unlike Obama.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:45 |
|
RZA Encryption posted:Y'all just better keep your nit-picking to the primary. Tear these people apart but you'd better literally, unironically vote blue no matter who. I'm gonna get torn apart for saying that but I really don't think Harris would have let Puerto Rico suffer for months with no aid or forcibly separate kids from their families and stuff them in cages. Yeah, see: That's not how it works. If candidates know that voters will vote blue no matter who, then they don't need to pander to us even during campaign season. This is the one chance we have to examine their record, get them on record, and then hold them to the record before they go all "don't make the perfect the enemy of the good" on us.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:45 |
|
RZA Encryption posted:Do you think Trump is no worse than Obama? Real Q, it would help me better understand your take. on the subject of "we must deter immigration by caging children," yeah. trump just relished the cruelty while to the obama administration it was a tragic side effect of technocracy that wasn't worth the political capital to correct. remember all those chuds defending the child cages by saying "HEY OBAMA DID IT TOO" they weren't making that up Trump's sole innovation was doing it explicitly out of spite instead of as a simple matter of ~legal deterrence~
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:46 |
|
Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:Trump's sole innovation was doing it explicitly out of spite instead of as a simple matter of ~legal deterrence~ While technically correct, taking bad policy and deliberately weaponizing it to harm and terrorize some of the most vulnerable peoples is a pretty massive "innovation."
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:48 |
|
RZA Encryption posted:Y'all just better keep your nit-picking to the primary. Tear these people apart but you'd better literally, unironically vote blue no matter who. I'm gonna get torn apart for saying that but I really don't think Harris would have let Puerto Rico suffer for months with no aid or forcibly separate kids from their families and stuff them in cages. Obama allowed multiple bills to pass and be signed by him that functionally gave control of Peurto Rico's government to investors from outside, and that absolutely was a major factor why the hurricane destroyed so much. Obama put kids in cages, if you genuinely believe that there's an actual moral difference between 'they were unaccompanied minors' and 'separated kids at the border' I'd love to know why being put in a cage doesn't gently caress one of those kids up but does the other. Harris isn't to the left of Obama.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:49 |
|
Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:on the subject of "we must deter immigration by caging children," yeah. trump just relished the cruelty while to the obama administration it was a tragic side effect of technocracy that wasn't worth the political capital to correct. Well maybe I misunderstood that situation, because I was under the impression that Obama did what he did because they were unaccompanied and it would have been neglectful to just release kids on their own. Not as a specific deterrence. Someone else: what's the truth here?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:49 |
|
"I wish 2016 primarychat would end." *monkey's paw windmills into a fist, punches me in the dick*
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:49 |
|
I am really not liking the "no criticisms allowed after the primary ends" bullshit going on in here. gently caress that. I will crawl over broken glass to vote for anyone the Dems nominate but that won't make the nominee's potential liabilities and weaknesses disappear. This is how we got 8 years of lame dick centrism rather than any real progressive last time we had a shot and moving things forward.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:50 |
|
Skippy McPants posted:While technically correct, taking bad policy and deliberately weaponizing it to harm and terrorize some of the most vulnerable peoples is a pretty massive "innovation." what makes you think it wasn't being deliberately weaponized before. the whole point was to win over Republican voters by demonstrating Democrats could be TOUGH ON THE BORDER too. panned out real good, huh? it's just that the first guy to weaponize it shrugged and said "well, we can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" before ordering a ton of children thrown in cages, as opposed to the most recent one saying "yeah, that sounds good, steve, blood and soil, very good stuff, did i ever tell you about the time in 1993 when i totally could have hosed rhea pearlman"
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:51 |
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:While I agree, I doubt Harris will balk at drone strikes, deportation, and the continuing status quo on most critical issues. She has an uphill battle to show people she is motivated to implement change, and will follow through unlike Obama. Like is that even her intention? Obama did the fake hope and change gimmick. Is that Harris' gameplan? Maybe it is, but sje might just be shooting straight with '3rd Way" bullshit. I don't see why she'd move dramatically to the left.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 11:49 |
|
LeeMajors posted:This thread needs a pick-me-up This seems like the same idle speculation and conservative wish-projection that has made up the other 1000 versions of this article that have been made in the last several months. Until she announces, she isn't running.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 04:52 |