|
That seems like normal Pittsburgh behavior to me
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 15:46 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 10:33 |
|
euphronius posted:That seems like normal Pittsburgh behavior to me We didn't hit her or anything, so she can't file an insurance claim against us? Like I said, I'm not sure what we did to provoke the behavior. Edit: basically I'm creeped out by someone taking my picture and I'm probably overreacting.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 16:05 |
|
Tibalt posted:Yeah, but... can she actually get us? You can't find someone using just plates, right? I'm not going to come home to a brick through the window, right? Did you see the Netflix documentary MANIAC where Emma Stone That's all you have to do, so yeah you're in trouble
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 16:17 |
|
Publicdata.com doesn’t have PA available on their DMV lookup by plate number, so that’s nice. You’d be in trouble if you had CO, MS, TX, WV, or WI plates though. Always carry a spare set of plates and swap regularly.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 16:24 |
|
What exactly is she going to get you for?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 18:01 |
|
Tibalt posted:yelled that she's going to get us, and drove off. Was this her, OP?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 18:07 |
Look Sir Droids posted:What exactly is she going to get you for? Based on the concern about finding a home address, I think OP is more worried about being gotten, like, personally.
|
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 18:09 |
|
Bad Munki posted:Based on the concern about finding a home address, I think OP is more worried about being gotten, like, personally.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 19:34 |
|
Tibalt posted:Well, that. Or filing an insurance claim against me, or filing a police report, or suing me. You know... getting me. I'm willing to roll the dice on a curse that makes me get constantly thinner, though. I’d worry more about the Lamia were I you.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 19:44 |
|
Tibalt posted:Well, that. Or filing an insurance claim against me, or filing a police report, or suing me. You know... getting me. I'm willing to roll the dice on a curse that makes me get constantly thinner, though. But like....what did you do to make her mad?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 19:48 |
|
Aside from accosting you for no reason, did the person seem unwell? There was a guy around here a few years ago who was convinced he was being gang-stalked (a paranoid delusion that everyone is following you around for nefarious purposes) while driving. He made several impassioned posts on the local subreddit begging for people to help him take pictures of all the cars that were "following" him wherever he went. Apparently this delusion is becoming more prevalent due to Facebook and Youtube echo chambers. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/aeknya/the-nightmarish-online-world-of-gang-stalking The whole thing is really sad, but it was the first thing that came to mind when I read your post. Maybe you cut her off without realizing it and triggered her road rage. But if she really freaked out for absolutely no reason, something like this would be my first guess.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 19:51 |
Don't worry, they can't get you till next time.
|
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 20:18 |
|
Look Sir Droids posted:But like....what did you do to make her mad? 95% of Americans believe they're an above average driver and all... but I'm pretty sure I would have realized if I had cut her off or almost hit her. I think I'm a defensive driver.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2019 21:33 |
|
Tibalt posted:95% of Americans believe they're an above average driver and all... but I'm pretty sure I would have realized if I had cut her off or almost hit her. I think I'm a defensive driver. That's silly. Close to 50% of us are above average drivers.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2019 01:58 |
No way. 90% of the driving skill is held by 1% of the drivers.
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2019 02:44 |
|
Bad Munki posted:No way. 90% of the driving skill is held by 1% of the drivers. ...Are we certain this isn't the case?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2019 03:21 |
|
We are the 99%
|
# ? Jan 26, 2019 03:23 |
I think the actual number is something like 90% of drivers surveyed considering themselves in the top 10 or 25% of drivers, by skill level, which is lol
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2019 04:09 |
|
Can someone advise on what may be considered “joint property” in the case of my widowed Mother In Law? She’s in Pennsylvania, has been cohabitating with her husband since ~2012 and was married in November. He died New Years Day with no will and two children from a previous marriage. Is there a case to be made that the home they live in, vehicles they had, etc, should be considered joint property prior to the estate probate process? The funds for the mortgage and car payments came from joint accounts, but the cars are in his name and the house is in his name as it was from prior to their relationship. I’ve read up on the standard estate laws, but I’m trying to figure out if anything can be considered joint property while he was alive instead of her having to split essentially everything with his kids.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 00:47 |
|
Paul ReiserFS posted:Can someone advise on what may be considered “joint property” in the case of my widowed Mother In Law? Multiple (but hopefully not adversarial) parties and money at stake. Add that the paperwork and wishes of the deceased are pretty unclear. That is definitely a "get a lawyer" situation. The only big question is whether you will be able to get away with paying one lawyer as a family to straighten out the paperwork. Out of curiosity, have you discussed who is going to be handling the process? Is you mother in law on speaking terms with her husband's other kids? Are you? Munin fucked around with this message at 12:34 on Jan 28, 2019 |
# ? Jan 28, 2019 12:31 |
|
Paul ReiserFS posted:Can someone advise on what may be considered “joint property” in the case of my widowed Mother In Law? Why do you think she has a claim to anything that doesn’t have her name on it.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:39 |
|
Girlfriends are not covered by intestacy Unless the girlfriend is related lmao.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:41 |
euphronius posted:Girlfriends are not covered by intestacy Says they were married in November. Check your local state laws for phrases like "marital share" but more importantly talk to a lawyer in your area.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:50 |
|
How old was the guy when he died
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:51 |
|
Did he add in that they were married ? That wasn’t in the first time I read it.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:53 |
euphronius posted:Did he add in that they were married ? That wasn’t in the first time I read it. drink your coffee man, it's in the quote you quoted :P That said it's technically possible for there still to be valid common law marriages, no state currently has legal common law marriage but it was legal in at least one state up until the 2000's so there can still be some extant marriages from the before time (proving it being the bitch, of course)
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:54 |
|
Huh. Well I’ve had that case except for the getting married at the last minute part. Well I had that case too but in a different case. This case is like a mad jumble of different cases.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 13:55 |
|
She should hire a lawyer and attempt to be the Administratrix of the estate most likely A lot depends on the dollar values and how much the kids hate her
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 14:01 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:drink your coffee man, it's in the quote you quoted :P Texas still has common law marriage
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 15:28 |
|
Common law marriage was abolished in pa if it happened after 1/1/2005 which is not long ago and there must still be some cases of it
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 15:37 |
|
EwokEntourage posted:Texas still has common law marriage Oklahoma, too.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 15:44 |
|
EwokEntourage posted:Texas still has common law marriage Hell yeah we do, cousin
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 16:37 |
|
Another hypothetical, but based on a request that came into my work, today: Legal sent a request to have a disclaimer for 3rd party links on our website changed. Right now it says that links with a particular image "will send" you to an external site. The request is to change that wording to "may send". Despite this being wrong (we only ever put that 3rd party image on links that exist outside our site, I'm trying to figure out what the actual legal risk could be. Like, what damages could someone suffer if they think they're on our site but they're actually on someone else's. I know this is a legal CYA I'm just not sure what legal is covering themselves against.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 17:10 |
null_pointer posted:
Lawyers, like haikus, may not always make much sense refrigerator
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 17:24 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Lawyers, like haikus, Internal counsel Justifying existence Dictated not read
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 17:28 |
|
Haikus aside, is this really something ginned up by a corporate lawyer with too much time on their hands? If I resisted and said "That doesn't make any sense, what risk are we actually mitigating?" would they start to stammer?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 17:52 |
|
null_pointer posted:Haikus aside, is this really something ginned up by a corporate lawyer with too much time on their hands? If I resisted and said "That doesn't make any sense, what risk are we actually mitigating?" would they start to stammer? The process of arguing with somebody about their baseless claim costs money.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 18:26 |
|
null_pointer posted:Another hypothetical, but based on a request that came into my work, today: Legal probably cares more about being 100% accurate, all the time, in every conceivable scenario, than about whether it matters. But god only knows if some recent Court opinion came down where this was an issue, like where the purchaser thought the link they went to was unaffiliated with the original site, and raised a breach of contract claim about a transaction there, but it turns out they never left the domain of the original seller or something.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 18:52 |
|
I have employment questions. I live in Michigan, looking at working remotely for companies in Nashville and Seattle. What laws should I be aware of? I'm very mercenary about jobs because Michigan is "right-to-work". Is that the case elsewhere? Are the extra taxes? Idk what to ask specifically.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 19:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 10:33 |
|
Careful Drums posted:What laws should I be aware of? All the laws
|
# ? Jan 28, 2019 20:21 |