|
Faustian Bargain posted:Hillary has done virtually nothing since losing the election but she is still regularly a Garrison villain. Amazing. The fact that you THINK the Clinton's have done nothing is proof that they're running the whole show! And getting away with it! Also something something Rothschilds something Soros etc.
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 11:20 |
|
|
She just shut down the government and Ubermensch Trump had to open it back up by flexing his bulging biceps to scare off the Obamageists, yet you people insist she hasn't done anything. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 18:01
|
|
|
Hillary has always been at war with Trump.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 18:25
|
|
|
Freudian posted:Only the Nixon one, to be clear. So far.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
My wife hyphenated and her name is still shorter than ROBERT SMITH JUNIOR. His is more generic, so I guess he wins this round.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 19:02
|
|
|
Zanzibar Ham posted:She just shut down the government and Ubermensch Trump had to open it back up by flexing his bulging biceps to scare off the Obamageists, yet you people insist she hasn't done anything. Hillary is Nancy Pelosi, there is no other possible explanation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 19:07
|
|
|
Clerical Terrors posted:Hillary is Nancy Pelosi, there is no other possible explanation. You ever notice how you never see Pelosi, Clinton, and AOC in the same room together?! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 19:29
|
|
|
 1 2 3 4 5 6We interrupt this if-global-warming-why-snow/yaycars cartoon for some sarcosuchus tears from Henry  7 8 9 10Incisive Commentary  11 12
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 19:48
|
|
|
 Garrison posted:TATTOOS.  Stiglich posted:Nancy Pelosi assures President Trump that border security, including physical barriers, can be discussed once government is reopened.  Stiglich posted:Only in Philly.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 20:17
|
|
No labels required!
|
Sandpuppy posted:
What the gently caress do the dreamers have to do with this? You know, more than anyone else. So how long has it been since anyone wore this hat?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
 Guardian:  "Ben Jennings on Theresa May facing the opponents to her Brexit deal – Just weeks after seeing her Brexit deal suffer a humiliating defeat and surviving attempts to topple both her leadership and her government, Theresa May will face a fresh round of parliamentary ambushes when MPs hold a series of Brexit votes this week" Telegraph:  MPs may have to work Fridays and weekends to avoid legal cliff edge Matt:  UK weather: England and Wales on alert for heaviest snow of winter Independent:  Times:  Brexit: Jacob Rees-Mogg woos MPs to back Johnson Evening Standard:  Brexit backstop amendment would give May 'enormous firepower'
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 20:35
|
|
|
Ramos posted:So how long has it been since anyone wore this hat? Also how is it supposed to be offensive? Yeah I know it's exclusionary to transwomen, but I'm talking about from the eyes of a right-wing cartoonist. It's just because of the word "pussy", isn't it?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 20:40
|
|
|
So what happened in New York? And how do we get Branco there to do a full term abortion on him?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 20:50
|
|
|
Panty Saluter posted:So what happened in New York? And how do we get Branco there to do a full term abortion on him? They recently passed a law protecting late-term abortions for medical necessity, specifically non-viable fetuses or risk to the mother. What that means, of course, is that every single right-wing clickbait site reported it as allowing late-term abortions for perfectly healthy pregnancies, because that's a thing people actually do, right? Ask me about the stupid facebook slapfight I got into about it over the weekend!
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 20:54
|
|
|
Fister Roboto posted:They recently passed a law protecting late-term abortions for medical necessity, specifically non-viable fetuses or risk to the mother. What that means, of course, is that every single right-wing clickbait site reported it as allowing late-term abortions for perfectly healthy pregnancies, because that's a thing people actually do, right? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:12
|
|
|
Sandpuppy posted:
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck yooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
 Ted Rall posted:Trump to Trans People: We Will No Longer Hire You to Kill People
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
Oh my god rall eat a dick
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:41
|
|
|
Ramos posted:What the gently caress do the dreamers have to do with this? You know, more than anyone else. Don't you know that its their fault for Trump not taking the original deal? Also ted rall hates trans people. What an enlightened individual.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
Lol this is such a douchey way to make this argument for a cis person.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
Yeah, gently caress off, Tood.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:45
|
|
|
So did Rall instruct the artist for his biopic thing to make him look Hispanic or something. Because that's always bugged me. He's white as gently caress irl but the comic makes him look like a young James Duval.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
"You got fired purely for not identifying as your birth gender? Well, let me, a straight white cis dude, explain how that's a good thing because your job was inherently evil, ignoring that other people will carry on doing the same work anyway. Also I'm not going to mention drones despite this being a perfect setup to do so, turns out I don't care anymore now that the president is white." Jesus, Rall. Get a heart wart and die. Somfin fucked around with this message at 21:50 on Jan 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:48
|
|
|
That Rall pisses me off because that’s a real argument that real radical leftist trans activists make and he’s ruining it with his douchebaggery.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:That Rall pisses me off because that’s a real argument that real radical leftist trans activists make and he’s ruining it with his douchebaggery. IIRC that argument is pretty reminiscent of Rall trying to argue against gay marriage "from the left" back in the day, IE "marriage is for normies and gay people shouldn't get married because it would make them less radical" That was also a real argument that real radical gay activists made back in the day, and it was in just as poor taste coming out of Rall's mouth then too because when you're not in a minority group, telling members of that group "actually it's good that you're less normalized in society because it makes you madder and more likely to be agents of other change which I want more" is never a great look At least he drew the trans woman as looking relatively normal (I think??? it's hard to tell because his art is so bad lol)
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 21:58
|
|
|
loquacius posted:IIRC that argument is pretty reminiscent of Rall trying to argue against gay marriage "from the left" back in the day, IE "marriage is for normies and gay people shouldn't get married because it would make them less radical" Yep, I agree with this entirely. For those who want to hear an awesome trans activist discuss this and other issues: https://m.soundcloud.com/citationsneeded/episode-57-a-matter-of-survival-trivializing-trans-rights-as-a-boutique-identity-issue
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:00
|
|
|
Ramos posted:What the gently caress do the dreamers have to do with this? You know, more than anyone else. One of the 'counter offers' from the White House back during the shutdown included protections for DACA\TPS, and by protection I mean a 3 year extension instead of citizenship. It was garbage and got shot down, but that won't stop Payne from being real disingenuous. Raised By Birds fucked around with this message at 22:18 on Jan 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:07
|
|
|
For some reason it was this particular picture that finally helped me figure out whose appearance Roger Stone reminds me of: he's like a low-rent Victor Garber.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:16
|
|
|
that image seems positively turgid with potential for editing.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:27
|
|
|
Raised By Birds posted:One of the 'counter offers' from the White House back during the shutdown included protections for DACA\TPS, and by protection I mean a 3 year extension instead of citizenship. It was garbage and got shot down, but that won't stop Payne from being real disingenuous. Trump promised not to deport DACA recipients for three years. What, is his word not good enough for you?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:28
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Trump promised not to deport DACA recipients for three years. What, is his word not good enough for you? The deal also included banning asylum applications at the border and I think there was some other immigration restrictions as well. It was like a rehash of the last dreamer deal, where Trump wanted wall money and long-term immigration restrictions for dreamer protection. Which really makes it clear that it isn't just "illegal" immigration that conservatives consider a problem.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:56
|
|
|
Alright, first of all: get hosed. Second: Gaybie nomination: most willfully dense Gaybie nomination: least concealed bigotry (LGBT)
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:02
|
|
|
Total Edgelord Dingbat is back to show us sheeple that we are in fact wrong for desiring equality for all. Don't feel obligated to look before you cross the street Ted, I'm sure your catlike reflexes will put any speeding car to shame.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:17
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:that image seems positively turgid with potential for editing. *sigh* *unzips ground pants* 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:20
|
|
|
When we blow up a Yemeni day care do we include a little note that the pilot was transgender so their families can take comfort in the expanded civil rights of their child's killers
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:24
|
|
I apologize for going for the low-hanging fruit here.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
best so far imo StealthArcher posted:*sigh* *unzips ground pants* tyvm for doing the needful
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 11:20 |
|
|
Todd Rool posted:And another thing, the whole trans people in public bathroom debate – who cares, why do you want to use the bathroom in public when a thing that also happened in public was that I, Frederick Theodore Rall III, was accosted by the LAPD, and that's the issue of obvious greater concern.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:52
|
|