|
Kalli posted:Yeah. If you want a long, long list of articles on just how lovely of a DA / AG she was, here you go: Thanks for this. I'm not all that well-informed about the things she did, in the first place. I just kind of assumed that it was the same thing every other DA / AG did. But if I don't understand what she did then I can't know if it's excusable. Android Apocalypse posted:The big question is if Harris has quantifiable evidence she A: was trying to change things from the inside and B: actual results (or lack thereof) of these initiatives. I will concede the biggest challenge DA's & AG's have is not looking "soft on crime." If a lawyer was running a platform where they were against mandatory sentencing, increased budgets to police, etc., do you think they'll last long in their campaign? Worse yet, if you try to come at policing from a more rehabilitative system instead of a punishing one (drug laws, smaller sentencing, deferrment) then you're going to have to concede those programs cost And, I do believe that these pressures to NOT appear soft on crime were probably more intense for her, as a woman of color. However that can only excuse so much, really. Also, you make a good point on whether she was even really trying to change anything. I gave her way too much benefit of the doubt there, given that her liberal reforms while in office seem somewhat few and far between (and lackluster when they did take place). She very well could be a person who truly believes in harsher punishments for crimes. Just because she's black, a woman, and a Democrat doesn't mean she agrees with me in terms of criminal justice reform. It's too easy to make that mistake Skwirl posted:She was in favor of locking up the parents of truant children, against legalizing recreational weed, her AG office argued to stop legally mandated early parole for non-violent offenders because they wouldn't be able to use them as a source of cheap labor and her DA office hid exculpatory evidence from defendants. These are all things that she could have done very differently while still fulfilling both the spirit and letter of her law enforcement duties. There are several DAs working now that have done such things, it's a position with a lot more latitude than people give it. The more I get into all of it the worse it looks. I think at the very least it's clear that she was pretty comfortable moving forward with the status quo instead of really pushing for reform. Her defense of the truancy thing would be that parents weren't actually charged in the end; but the threat of criminal charges increased attendance by 20%. Still, it's an ugly trade off and morally questionable. It starts with the somewhat reasonable idea that preventing children from getting an education is essentially a crime. But then it goes completely off the rails. Like someone said, when all you've got is a hammer, everything looks like a minority that needs to be jailed. Her position on recreational doesn't both me that much as many people held that opinion, including probably 100% of law enforcement. It's somewhat reasonable to have differing views. To me, being called out on hiding exculpatory evidence is probably the worst thing she's done. Or at least it points in a disturbing direction. It shows a lack of faith in the justice system, it shows a willingness to be corrupt if you think you're right. It shows a blind obedience to law enforcement and a general belief that if someone is charged with a crime, they must be guilty. Fighting against the release of an innocent man deepens that impression. I also remember her refusing to prosecute a particular central valley DA who planted evidence, kept things from the defense attorney and the judge, and bribed jailhouse snitches to provide secondhand confessions. I believe that DA was censured by some federal court judges, but never faced any actual punishment from his boss, Kamala Harris. The implication being that the ends justify the means. If you can't keep law enforcement accountable then you are a lovely AG. And it doesn't look like she tried very hard to do that. All of this points towards someone who was content with the status quo in law enforcement, but that status quo is totally unacceptable to me. The Glumslinger posted:I mean, I'll vote for her if she wins the primary, but I'm not gonna be argued into voted for her during the primary. Seems like the reasonable conclusions here. I'm satisfied that Kamala's positions can't be explained away. The evidence is pretty strong that she has regressive (or at least not progressive) opinions on criminal justice reform. I can't vote for someone like that unless the only alternative is Trump. Thanks everyone for your input
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 03:43
|
|
. Good luck being on a platform that will raise your `constituents' taxes.
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 23:15 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/Zward25/status/1090682467403657217
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 04:58
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WakaFlocka/status/720193932299264001?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 05:12
|
|
|
Officially watching the Superbowl with my father in his hospital room for the second time in three years woooo. I guess it's not as bad as the last time since this is just a rehab facility and it's actually incredibly close to the pizza place we order from every year. Does mean no beer though, and I'm going to feel like a jerk rooting against his Pats under the circumstances. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:Officially watching the Superbowl with my father in his hospital room for the second time in three years woooo. Unless you mean substance abuse rehab, I have always snuck in beer to nursing homes and such with relative ease.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 05:40
|
|
|
swickles posted:Unless you mean substance abuse rehab, I have always snuck in beer to nursing homes and such with relative ease. Nah, not a substance abuse thing. He's got a leg wound that will not heal and he's in and out of this place all the time. Mom informed me that his room is right next to the nurse's station this time so I'm guessing it'll be a little tricky.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 05:58
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:Nah, not a substance abuse thing. He's got a leg wound that will not heal and he's in and out of this place all the time. Mom informed me that his room is right next to the nurse's station this time so I'm guessing it'll be a little tricky. Hydroflask. You look all trendy and healthy, but it's filled with booze. And it's a thermos so it'll stay cool!
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 06:05
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:Nah, not a substance abuse thing. He's got a leg wound that will not heal and he's in and out of this place all the time. Mom informed me that his room is right next to the nurse's station this time so I'm guessing it'll be a little tricky. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jisu6l_Ta0w
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 06:06
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:Nah, not a substance abuse thing. He's got a leg wound that will not heal and he's in and out of this place all the time. Mom informed me that his room is right next to the nurse's station this time so I'm guessing it'll be a little tricky. They probably won't care if you have a beer or two, but they won't want him to have any. At my dad's nursing home I would literally bring in a growler from the brewery down the road and they never cared.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 06:07
|
|
|
maybe no beer for the guy on pain killers whose wound isn't healing
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 06:40
|
|
|
I may not have a functional twitter dot com account but I can still see The Good poo poo https://twitter.com/Ad0rnosPorno69/status/1090819644104019968?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 06:44
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:maybe no beer for the guy on pain killers whose wound isn't healing Let the old man choose when and how he risks his life. He has earned it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 07:27
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:You are gonna be picking up so many dead old people lol So much frostbite 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 08:28
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:maybe no beer for the guy on pain killers whose wound isn't healing Probably a good thing he doesn't drink then. Edit: less snarky version: I was just thinking of myself. It's not really huge deal and I think I'll just forgo it so as not to have that one extra thing to think about. Quiet Feet fucked around with this message at 13:34 on Jan 31, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 13:26
|
|
|
We're going to get a high of -5 today (it's -26 right now). Over the weekend it'll be in the 40s and raining. Surely this is normal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 13:53
|
|
|
Hell yeah dudes, the heater in my car is (mostly) broken  Thank God the seat warmers still work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:31
|
|
|
Dan Crenshaw was the dude who put out that stupid tweet supporting Venezuela because he “was practically Venezuelan” or something right? And it turned out he just visited there a few times?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:36
|
|
|
I just know him as one of the “mad at snowflakes, but the second they get the most inoffensive joke thrown at them they flip out”
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:42
|
|
|
That tweet is a lot more effective if you click through and see what Crenshaw looks like, a thing I definitely didn't do at first.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:48
|
|
|
Lol yeah he’s most definitely gotta be called the one eyed conservative
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:50
|
|
|
I don't get how they figure out windchill like, how do you measure what something feels like
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:53
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I don't get how they figure out windchill well it's really quite simple allow me to explain Wind chill From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search This article is about the meteorological effect of "wind chill". For other uses, see Wind chill (disambiguation). A chart of wind chill values for given air temperatures and wind speeds Wind-chill or windchill, (popularly wind chill factor) is the lowering of body temperature due to the passing-flow of lower-temperature air. Wind chill numbers are always lower than the air temperature for values where the formula is valid. When the apparent temperature is higher than the air temperature, the heat index is used instead. Contents 1 Explanation 2 Alternative approaches 2.1 Original model 2.2 North American and United Kingdom wind chill index 2.3 Australian Apparent Temperature 3 References 4 External links Explanation A surface loses heat through conduction, evaporation, convection, and radiation.[1] The rate of convection depends on both the difference in temperature between the surface and the fluid surrounding it and the velocity of that fluid with respect to the surface. As convection from a warm surface heats the air around it, an insulating boundary layer of warm air forms against the surface. Moving air disrupts this boundary layer, or epiclimate, allowing for cooler air to replace the warm air against the surface. The faster the wind speed, the more readily the surface cools. The effect of wind chill is to increase the rate of heat loss and reduce any warmer objects to the ambient temperature more quickly. Dry air cannot, however, reduce the temperature of these objects below the ambient temperature, no matter how great the wind velocity. For most biological organisms, the physiological response is to generate more heat in order to maintain a surface temperature in an acceptable range. The attempt to maintain a given surface temperature in an environment of faster heat loss results in both the perception of lower temperatures and an actual greater heat loss. In other words, the air 'feels' colder than it is because of the chilling effect of the wind on the skin. In extreme conditions this will increase the risk of adverse effects such as frostbite. Alternative approaches Many formulas exist for wind chill because, unlike temperature, wind chill has no universally agreed upon standard definition or measurement. All the formulas attempt to qualitatively predict the effect of wind on the temperature humans perceive. Weather services in different countries use standards unique to their country or region; for example, the U.S. and Canadian weather services use a model accepted by the National Weather Service. That model has evolved over time. The first wind chill formulas and tables were developed by Paul Allman Siple and Charles F. Passel working in the Antarctic before the Second World War, and were made available by the National Weather Service by the 1970s. They were based on the cooling rate of a small plastic bottle as its contents turned to ice while suspended in the wind on the expedition hut roof, at the same level as the anemometer. The so-called Windchill Index provided a pretty good indication of the severity of the weather. In the 1960s, wind chill began to be reported as a wind chill equivalent temperature (WCET), which is theoretically less useful. The author of this change is unknown, but it was not Siple or Passel as is generally believed.[citation needed] At first, it was defined as the temperature at which the windchill index would be the same in the complete absence of wind. This led to equivalent temperatures that exaggerated the severity of the weather. Charles Eagan[2] realized that people are rarely still and that even when it was calm, there was some air movement. He redefined the absence of wind to be an air speed of 1.8 metres per second (6.5 km/h; 4.0 mph), which was about as low a wind speed as a cup anemometer could measure. This led to more realistic (warmer-sounding) values of equivalent temperature. Original model Equivalent temperature was not universally used in North America until the 21st century. Until the 1970s, the coldest parts of Canada reported the original Wind Chill Index, a three or four digit number with units of kilocalories/hour per square metre. Each individual calibrated the scale of numbers personally, through experience. The chart also provided general guidance to comfort and hazard through threshold values of the index, such as 1400, which was the threshold for frostbite. The original formula for the index was:[3][4] {\displaystyle WCI=\left(10{\sqrt {v}}-v+10.5\right)\cdot \left(33-T_{\mathrm {a} }\right)} {\displaystyle WCI=\left(10{\sqrt {v}}-v+10.5\right)\cdot \left(33-T_{\mathrm {a} }\right)} where: WCI = wind chill index, kcal/m2/h v = wind velocity, m/s Ta = air temperature, °C North American and United Kingdom wind chill index In November 2001, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom implemented a new wind chill index developed by scientists and medical experts on the Joint Action Group for Temperature Indices (JAG/TI).[5][6][7] It is determined by iterating a model of skin temperature under various wind speeds and temperatures using standard engineering correlations of wind speed and heat transfer rate. Heat transfer was calculated for a bare face in wind, facing the wind, while walking into it at 1.4 metres per second (5.0 km/h; 3.1 mph). The model corrects the officially measured wind speed to the wind speed at face height, assuming the person is in an open field.[8] The results of this model may be approximated, to within one degree, from the following formula: The standard Wind Chill formula for Environment Canada is: {\displaystyle T_{\mathrm {wc} }=13.12+0.6215T_{\mathrm {a} }-11.37v^{+0.16}+0.3965T_{\mathrm {a} }v^{+0.16}} {\displaystyle T_{\mathrm {wc} }=13.12+0.6215T_{\mathrm {a} }-11.37v^{+0.16}+0.3965T_{\mathrm {a} }v^{+0.16}} where Twc is the wind chill index, based on the Celsius temperature scale; Ta is the air temperature in degrees Celsius; and v is the wind speed at 10 m (33 ft) standard anemometer height, in kilometres per hour.[9] When the temperature is −20 °C (−4 °F) and the wind speed is 5 km/h (3.1 mph), the wind chill index is −24. If the temperature remains at −20 °C and the wind speed increases to 30 km/h (19 mph), the wind chill index falls to −33. The equivalent formula in US customary units is:[10] {\displaystyle T_{\mathrm {wc} }=35.74+0.6215T_{\mathrm {a} }-35.75v^{+0.16}+0.4275T_{\mathrm {a} }v^{+0.16}\,\!} {\displaystyle T_{\mathrm {wc} }=35.74+0.6215T_{\mathrm {a} }-35.75v^{+0.16}+0.4275T_{\mathrm {a} }v^{+0.16}\,\!} where Twc is the wind chill index, based on the Fahrenheit scale; Ta is the air temperature in degrees Fahrenheit, and v is the wind speed in miles per hour.[11] Windchill temperature is defined only for temperatures at or below 10 °C (50 °F) and wind speeds above 4.8 kilometres per hour (3.0 mph).[10] As the air temperature falls, the chilling effect of any wind that is present increases. For example, a 16 km/h (9.9 mph) wind will lower the apparent temperature by a wider margin at an air temperature of −20 °C (−4 °F), than a wind of the same speed would if the air temperature were −10 °C (14 °F). Graph of degrees of wind chill for wind speed and air temperature Celsius wind chill index Graph comparing "old" and "new" wind chill values by wind speed at 15°C air temperature Comparison of old and new wind chill values at −15 °C (5 °F) Picture of a manual wind chill calculator Wind chill calculator The 2001 WCET is a steady state calculation (except for the time to frostbite estimates).[12] There are significant time-dependent aspects to wind chill because cooling is most rapid at the start of any exposure, when the skin is still warm. Australian Apparent Temperature The apparent temperature (AT), invented in the late 1970s, was designed to measure thermal sensation in indoor conditions. It was extended in the early 1980s to include the effect of sun and wind. The AT index used here is based on a mathematical model of an adult, walking outdoors, in the shade (Steadman 1994). The AT is defined as; the temperature, at the reference humidity level, producing the same amount of discomfort as that experienced under the current ambient temperature and humidity. [13] The formula[14] is: {\displaystyle \mathrm {AT} =T_{\mathrm {a} }+0.33e-0.7v-4.00} {\displaystyle \mathrm {AT} =T_{\mathrm {a} }+0.33e-0.7v-4.00} where: Ta = dry bulb temperature (°C) e = water vapour pressure (hPa) v = wind speed (m/s) at an elevation of 10 m The vapour pressure can be calculated from the temperature and relative humidity using the equation: {\displaystyle e={\frac {\mathrm {RH} }{100}}\cdot 6.105\cdot \exp {\left({\frac {17.27\cdot T_{\mathrm {a} }}{237.7+T_{\mathrm {a} }}}\right)}} {\displaystyle e={\frac {\mathrm {RH} }{100}}\cdot 6.105\cdot \exp {\left({\frac {17.27\cdot T_{\mathrm {a} }}{237.7+T_{\mathrm {a} }}}\right)}} Where: Ta = dry bulb temperature (°C) RH = Relative humidity (%) exp represents the exponential function The Australian formula includes the important factor of humidity and is somewhat more involved than the simpler North American model. The North American formula was designed to be applied at low temperatures (as low as −46 °C or −50 °F) when humidity levels are also low. The hot weather version of the AT (1984) is used by the National Weather Service in the United States. In the United States, this simple version of the AT is known as the Heat Index. References Vincent J. Schaefer; John A. Day; Jay Pasachoff (1998). A Field Guide to the Atmosphere. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 0-395-97631-6. Eagan, C. (1964). Review of research on military problems in cold regions. C. Kolb and F. Holstrom eds. TDR-64-28. Arctic Aeromed. Lab. p 147–156. *Woodson, Wesley E. (1981). Human Factors Design Handbook, page 815. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-071765-6 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19690003109_1969003109.pdf, equation 55, page 6-113 "Environment Canada - Weather and Meteorology - Canada's Wind Chill Index". Ec.gc.ca. Retrieved 2013-08-09. "Meteorological Tables, Wind Chill. August, 2001 Press Release:". National Weather Service. Retrieved 14 January 2013. "Wind Chill". BBC Weather, Understanding weather. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 October 2010. Osczevski, Randall; Bluestein, Maurice (2005). "The new wind chill equivalent temperature chart". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 86 (10): 1453–1458. Bibcode:2005BAMS...86.1453O. doi:10.1175/BAMS-86-10-1453. "Calculation of the 1971 to 2000 Climate Normals for Canada". Climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca. 2013-07-10. Archived from the original on 2013-06-27. Retrieved 2013-08-09. "NWS Wind Chill Index". Weather.gov. 2009-12-17. Archived from the original on 2011-09-18. Retrieved 2013-08-09. "A chart of windchills based on this formula". Weather.gov. 2009-12-17. Retrieved 2017-04-13. Tikuisis, Peter; Osczevski, Randall J. (2003). "Facial Cooling During Cold Air Exposure". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 84 (7): 927–933. Bibcode:2003BAMS...84..927T. doi:10.1175/BAMS-84-7-927. "The Apparent Temperature (AT) - Heat Index". Bureau Of Meteorology, Australia. Bom.gov.au. 2010-02-05. Retrieved 2018-08-01. "The formula for the apparent temperature". Bureau Of Meteorology, Australia. Bom.gov.au. 2010-02-05. Retrieved 2013-08-09. External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to Wind chill. Look up wind chill in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. National Center for Atmospheric Research Table of wind chill temperatures in Celsius and Fahrenheit Wind chill calculator National Weather Service Wind Chill Temperature Index Table of wind chill temperatures in Fahrenheit with frostbite times Real-time map of global wind chill values vte Meteorological data and variables General Adiabatic processes Advection Buoyancy Lapse rate Lightning Surface solar radiation Surface weather analysis Visibility Vorticity Wind Wind shear Condensation Cloud Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) Fog Convective condensation level (CCL) Lifted condensation level (LCL) Precipitation Water vapor Convection Convective available potential energy (CAPE) Convective inhibition (CIN) Convective instability Convective momentum transport Convective temperature (Tc) Equilibrium level (EL) Free convective layer (FCL) Helicity K Index Level of free convection (LFC) Lifted index (LI) Maximum parcel level (MPL) Bulk Richardson number (BRN) Temperature Dew point (Td) Dew point depression Dry-bulb temperature Equivalent temperature (Te) Forest fire weather index Haines Index Heat index Humidex Humidity Relative humidity (RH) Mixing ratio Potential temperature (θ) Equivalent potential temperature (θe) Sea surface temperature (SST) Thermodynamic temperature Vapor pressure Virtual temperature Wet-bulb temperature Wet-bulb potential temperature Wind chill Pressure Atmospheric pressure Baroclinity Barotropicity Pressure gradient Pressure-gradient force (PGF) Categories: Atmospheric thermodynamicsMeteorological indicesUnits of meteorology measurement Navigation menu Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog inArticleTalkReadEditView historySearch Search Wikipedia Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia store Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact page Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Cite this page Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Deutsch Espańol فارسی Français Bahasa Indonesia Portuguęs Русский 中文 15 more Edit links This page was last edited on 30 January 2019, at 19:45 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policyAbout WikipediaDisclaimersContact WikipediaDevelopersCookie statementMobile viewWikimedia Foundation Powered by MediaWiki
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:57
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I don't get how they figure out windchill By putting people in it quote:wind chill models were derived from research by Antarctic explorers during World War II. Those venturing near the South Pole wanted to figure out how much heat the human body loses when exposed to wind. The wind chill index was adopted by NWS in the 1970s and then updated in 2001 to reflect modern understandings of human body temperature. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-wind-chill-and-how-does-it-affect-human-body-180971376/
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 14:59
|
|
|
Ehud that was a beautiful explanation ty
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:08
|
|
|
finish the book Blindside I would love to have a discussion I just started taking nootropics today, looking forward to expanding my mind and understanding new paradigms and regimes and other things
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:11
|
|
|
SHOAH NUFF posted:finish the book Blindside I would love to have a discussion The one about the defensive player that got turned into the real bad movie?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:33
|
|
|
Ehud, you be you, don't let anyone tell you otherwise!
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:35
|
|
|
Crenshaw is the dude who threw a big sad when Pete Davidson made fun of him and then went on SNL so Davidson could apologize to him TV
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:38
|
|
|
I remember growing up in Northern Maine & experiencing -40 temps. It was not fun. Stay safe, Midwest goons. If you're really cold, just set yourself on fire. Just like how the Chicago Metro is keeping their train tracks from freezing over. https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1090645860101304320 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:41
|
|
|
Yeah, Pete Davidson said Crenshaw's eye patch makes him looks like a hitman from a porno movie and everyone flew off the handle because Crenshaw lost his eye to an IED in Afghanistan. Windchill is helpful for making numbers look worse to convince people to stay inside (seriously, people are dumb and need to be scared into it), but it gets real annoying when people confuse it with the actual temperature or act like everything is affected by wind chill.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:44
|
|
|
I’m all about improving my skills
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 15:51
|
|
|
Android Apocalypse posted:I remember growing up in Northern Maine & experiencing -40 temps. It was not fun. If only they did this in DC. The rail broke in 3 places this morning and effectively put things to a standstill while they attempted to reroute all the trains. I just spent 90 minutes on a train that never managed to leave the station before I gave up and headed home.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:06
|
|
|
Anyone have that picture of Mark Davis at, I think, a basketball game? The one where he is wearing super light jeans with a big dumb grin on his face?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:07
|
|
|
SHOAH NUFF posted:finish the book Blindside I would love to have a discussion do nootropics have anything to do with the noosphere, which i recently learned is a real theory and not just something made up by the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. devs
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:12
|
|
|
Blowjob Overtime posted:Anyone have that picture of Mark Davis at, I think, a basketball game? The one where he is wearing super light jeans with a big dumb grin on his face? https://www.google.com/search?q=mar...vBmywqsmzRhp5M:
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:18
|
|
|
Alaois posted:do nootropics have anything to do with the noosphere, which i recently learned is a real theory and not just something made up by the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. devs Possibly, I am not sure
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:24
|
|
|
SHOAH NUFF posted:I’m all about improving my skills Swickles you got any input?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:25
|
|
|
 Thanks! I forgot how white his jeans were.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:26
|
|
|
JIZZ DENOUEMENT posted:Let me know how it goes. I tried them like 8 years ago and I liked them but it was almost certainly placebo. I tried piracetam a few years ago and liked it. I was pulling big words like resiliency and automation out of my rear end when I spoke and could remember memories from my childhood that I had thought forgotten. Now I have upgraded to a “stack” of nootropics consisting of piracetam, aniracetam and fascoracetam. I anticipate I will be much wiser in a month or so
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 23:15 |
|
|
SHOAH NUFF posted:I tried piracetam a few years ago and liked it. I was pulling big words like resiliency and automation out of my rear end when I spoke and could remember memories from my childhood that I had thought forgotten. Now I have upgraded to a “stack” of nootropics consisting of piracetam, aniracetam and fascoracetam. I anticipate I will be much wiser in a month or so Lol this is exactly like the cat Spydar episode of Sunny
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 16:34
|
|
