Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Guaido with an accent mark over the o that none of us can be bothered to remember how to type

edit: except the guy above me

Did you know that the AR in AR-15 stands for “Assault Rifle”?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Chomskyan posted:

Did you know that the AR in AR-15 stands for “Assault Rifle”?

on the one hand I guess I missed the joke, on the other hand pedantic corrections are part of my brand

Mean Baby
May 28, 2005

elgatofilo posted:

It's super simple and not confusing:

1. If you are a white guy and you find yourself telling people of color what race they are, you are racist.
2. If you are a white guy telling people of color in another country you don't support them because you've arbitrarily decided they are "white" you are racist.
3. If you are a white guy equating the atrocities of segregation in your country to colorism and then using that to create a false moral equivalence, you are super racist.

e: If you are a white guy telling people of color to shut up, sit down, and stop rambling about race in 2019, you are ultra racist.

No one insinuated anything of the sort. Nice meltdown.

Rust Martialis posted:

You keep saying this, but you have not posted anything that says PDVSA will be *privatized*.

You posted something saying that more private participation in the *oil industry* is sought, but that is *not* privatization of PDVSA. There is private participation in the industry *today* that Maduro has approved.

Kindly provide a statement from Guaidó or his party saying PDVSA will be privatized, or else kindly define what you mean by "privatization" and how it will materially differ from current practice. Explain how Sinopec and Rosneft having stakes in Venezuela is somehow not privatization in such a case.


vvv hó hó hó


https://www.mintpressnews.com/us-backs-coup-oil-rich-venezuela-right-wing-opposition-plans-mass-privatization-hyper-capitalism/254194/

quote:

“[C]entralized controls, arbitrary measures of expropriation and other similar measures will be abolished… For these purposes, the centralized model of controls of the economy will be replaced by a model of freedom and market based on the right of each Venezuelan to work under the guarantees of property rights and freedom of enterprise.”

In other words, the nationalised companies will be returned to their former private owners (including telecommunications, electrical, SIDOR, cement, etc), as will expropriated landed estates. It is noteworthy that there is a lot of talk of property and business rights, but no mention is made of workers’ rights, which would certainly be abolished. It continues:

“Public companies will be subject to a restructuring process that ensures their efficient and transparent management, including through public-private agreements.”

What this means, in plain language, is massive dismissal of workers from state companies and the entry of private capital into them: a policy of looting which has already proved to be a disaster in all countries where it has been applied.

elgatofilo
Sep 17, 2007

For the modern, sophisticated cat.

I'm sorry you don't like being called a racist. Stop doubling down on your racism if that's the case.

I would really like to know what it is about Venezuela that turns supposed liberals into MAGA hat wearing Breitbart readers.
(lol, the answer is racism)

patonthebach
Aug 22, 2016

by R. Guyovich

Homeless Friend posted:

You're argument rest solely on this assumption it seems to me.


Nobody has quite explained to me how Maduro steps down as is, it would be an amazing outcome if it could happen. Nor has there been much explanation of what this transition is going to do for people in Venezuela exactly,

What do you think it would do for a country that is in a crisis, has mass hunger, high levels of corruptions and some of the worst violence in the world? Anything is better than the status quo which is one of the worst run countries in the world with the most rapid decline of any country over the past few years.

Of course Maduro stepping down would be ideal, even if it ends up not working fantastically, even a minor change is going to cause a lot of net good.

Mean Baby
May 28, 2005

elgatofilo posted:

I'm sorry you don't like being called a racist. Stop doubling down on your racism if that's the case.

I would really like to know what it is about Venezuela that turns supposed liberals into MAGA hat wearing Breitbart readers.
(lol, the answer is racism)

Can you point to one example of me being racist or are you just going to continue to meltdown?

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

Chomskyan posted:

Did you know that the AR in AR-15 stands for “Assault Rifle”?
It means Argentina and the fact that you would attempt to cover that up makes you a Peronist stooge.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

patonthebach posted:

What do you think it would do for a country that is in a crisis, has mass hunger, high levels of corruptions and some of the worst violence in the world? Anything is better than the status quo

That is where we part. It is wishful thinking, not a plan. It is amazingly optimistic to imply that anything is better than the status quo. If mass hunger was the issue, it would could be easily solved by a nation as powerful as the U.S. No particulars on why corruption would go down. Why would violence be reduced exactly? Just because Maduro is gone? If the material conditions stay the same how will Venezuelans react, I wonder, and how will the new government react to them in turn. How is Guaido going to turn it around? Nobody quite seems to have the answer. Just a great deal of faith.

elgatofilo
Sep 17, 2007

For the modern, sophisticated cat.

Presenting Nipples posted:

Can you point to one example of me being racist or are you just going to continue to meltdown?

Presenting Nipples posted:

I'm seriously confused at your ramblings on race at this point.

I would seriously love to see you tweet this to Ta-Nehisi Coates or say it out loud to any person of color talking about their experiences with race and see what kind of response you get.

Hint: It's not the duty of people of color to educate you on race. If you're confused about something on race, the correct response is not to tell a PoC that they're rambling and having a meltdown.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Homeless Friend posted:

If mass hunger was the issue, it would could be easily solved by a nation as powerful as the U.S.

How do you propose the US gets to deliver food all across Venezuela without contravening the authority of the PSUV and Maduro? Just wondering here.

Mean Baby
May 28, 2005

elgatofilo posted:

I would seriously love to see you tweet this to Ta-Nehisi Coates or say it out loud to any person of color talking about their experiences with race and see what kind of response you get.

Hint: It's not the duty of people of color to educate you on race. If you're confused about something on race, the correct response is not to tell a PoC that they're rambling and having a meltdown.

Ta-Nehisi Coates is a liberal Obama apologist, who the gently caress cares about his opinion.

You seemed to deny that racism existed in Venezuela or say that by simply discussing racism I was reinforcing it? I'm not really sure as it was incoherent.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

fishmech posted:

How do you propose the US gets to deliver food all across Venezuela without contravening the authority of the PSUV and Maduro? Just wondering here.
you mean, the thing they did when they said maduro isn't the legit president? or does that not count?

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

fishmech posted:

How do you propose the US gets to deliver food all across Venezuela without contravening the authority of the PSUV and Maduro? Just wondering here.

Maduro accepted UN aid in december, do it through the UN. If he refuses, smuggle it in. Flood the market. A wasteful plan, but no less wasteful than anything else the U.S. does. What could be the criticism, we harmed a market already done in by price controls? Fed the starving?

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Homeless Friend posted:

Maduro accepted UN aid in december, do it through the UN. If he refuses, smuggle it in. Flood the market. A wasteful plan, but no less wasteful than anything else the U.S. does. What could be the criticism, we harmed a market already done in by price controls? Fed the starving?

Considering the PSUV, associated paramilitaries, and the Venezuelan military already heavily diverts food for resale, I don't see how this does anything to guarantee the food gets to the people who need it.

ChaseSP
Mar 25, 2013



Seems like it'd be more likely to be seized by the military and sold off/given to its own than going to most citizens given how people in this thread have spoken either from experience or via articles.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

fishmech posted:

Considering the PSUV, associated paramilitaries, and the Venezuelan military already heavily diverts food for resale, I don't see how this does anything to guarantee the food gets to the people who need it.

Then we'll have their measure in absolute confidence. In a situation of over abundance, which we constructed, they left people starving. It's useful whether it works or not.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Homeless Friend posted:

Then we'll have their measure in absolute confidence. In a situation of over abundance, which we constructed, they left people starving. It's useful whether it works or not.

This sure sounds like you're proposing at the minimum, the US flagrantly violating all Venezuelan border and airspace controls, in order to accomplish that task!

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

fishmech posted:

This sure sounds like you're proposing at the minimum, the US flagrantly violating all Venezuelan border and airspace controls, in order to accomplish that task!

Ya the US had been intervening In venezuela for a while. What I suggest would be something that would happen by someone intervening in good faith, at the least, rather than flagrant self interest.

Haramstufe Rot
Jun 24, 2016

Homeless Friend posted:

Then we'll have their measure in absolute confidence. In a situation of over abundance, which we constructed, they left people starving. It's useful whether it works or not.

TBH I think anyone who has followed the economic situation in Venezuela already has a pretty good measure of this sort of "socialist" "organization" of the "economy". Sure, some tankies are "socialist labelblind" aka since someone at some point has declared Venezuela to be "socialist", it now means that the country can hath no fault and all woes are solely due to aggressive imperialistic CIA operations.
But for sane people, you couldn't really watch Venezuela news for the last ten or so years and not have a very confident assessment about economic policy there.

imo

Flavahbeast
Jul 21, 2001


Homeless Friend posted:

Ya the US had been intervening In venezuela for a while. What I suggest would be something that would happen by someone intervening in good faith, at the least, rather than flagrant self interest.

is intervening in Venezuela actually in the US's best interest tho

Berke Negri
Feb 15, 2012

Les Ricains tuent et moi je mue
Mao Mao
Les fous sont rois et moi je bois
Mao Mao
Les bombes tonnent et moi je sonne
Mao Mao
Les bebes fuient et moi je fuis
Mao Mao


Flavahbeast posted:

is intervening in Venezuela actually in the US's best interest tho

probably not

qkkl
Jul 1, 2013

by FactsAreUseless

Homeless Friend posted:

Maduro accepted UN aid in december, do it through the UN. If he refuses, smuggle it in. Flood the market. A wasteful plan, but no less wasteful than anything else the U.S. does. What could be the criticism, we harmed a market already done in by price controls? Fed the starving?

Would you support intervention if the US supplied boatloads of free food to Venezuela, and Maduro then filmed himself pissing on all of it and dumping it into the ocean?

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

Berke Negri posted:

probably not

But the question is genuinely a lot more if the people in charge think it is, and that they'll definitely get it right in latin america this time.

qkkl posted:

Would you support intervention if the US supplied boatloads of free food to Venezuela, and Maduro then filmed himself pissing on all of it and dumping it into the ocean?

I would actually take that to be further proof that US intervention of any sort doesn't appear to be productive or beneficial, and assume it would mean we should stop shipping food to Venezuela.

But he wouldn't do that. He'd forward it to loyalist enclaves in a continuation of his food weaponization that's been documented for at least four years.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy
I'd extremely support any intervention that's
a) working closely with the venezuelan people to get food and medicine to the people that need it,
b) is done by people I could trust to not just add more problems on top of the already existing ones.

US isn't any of these, they could already be doing the first if they actually gave a poo poo, and lol at trusting trump's idiot friends to do the second.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Homeless Friend posted:

Ya the US had been intervening In venezuela for a while. What I suggest would be something that would happen by someone intervening in good faith, at the least, rather than flagrant self interest.

Please describe how the US has been intervening in Venezuela in a way comparable to forcing through millions of pounds of goods per month "for a while".

Haramstufe Rot
Jun 24, 2016

Truga posted:

I'd extremely support any intervention that's
a) working closely with the venezuelan people to get food and medicine to the people that need it,
b) is done by people I could trust to not just add more problems on top of the already existing ones.

US isn't any of these, they could already be doing the first if they actually gave a poo poo, and lol at trusting trump's idiot friends to do the second.

I am also against a US intervention but consider

a) Amount of people who die without intervention: Possibly a lot
b) Countries who have no strategic (oil) interest in the 'zela: None


I mean on the one hand, I'd say let China have a go for once. But one the other hand, CCP is happily genociding brown people so they don't have ways to fall moral wise

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

See I read that several times now, and nowhere is PDVSA mentioned. I agree there is mention of reversing the arbitrary nationalization of companies done by the government. Since PDVSA was nationalized over 40 years ago, it would take a galaxy brain I do not posess to believe this refers to PDVSA.

So, where is the reference to privatizing PDVSA?

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007
On my phone, but I basically imagine this scenario of the U.S. being a good faith actor going through the UN (compromised as it is) multiple times. At the very least, any intervention would be a last resort, basically and have some multinational /international legitimacy. Let's be clear, this is basically in the level of Sorkin'esqe fantasy though folks. The US back in the real world has no such intentions.

fishmech posted:

Please describe how the US has been intervening in Venezuela in a way comparable to forcing through millions of pounds of goods per month "for a while".

Theres that time the US was involved in the Chavez coup, that was like 90 billion gdp country switching hands right there.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

caps on caps on caps posted:

I am also against a US intervention but consider

a) Amount of people who die without intervention: Possibly a lot
b) Countries who have no strategic (oil) interest in the 'zela: None


I mean on the one hand, I'd say let China have a go for once. But one the other hand, CCP is happily genociding brown people so they don't have ways to fall moral wise

It's pretty clear China and Russia are closer to just writing off their investments in Venezuela as a loss than they are to "have a go" at intervention. Maduro as been so idiotic as to squander practically all of their assistance under his government. That they are now demanding payment for everything upfront and in hard assets is not a sign of confidence.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Homeless Friend posted:


Theres that time the US was involved in the Chavez coup, that was like 90 billion gdp country switching hands right there.

Got it, you have zero valid examples. OK then. Would you care to think of an example that's actually comparable to the sheer amount of territorial violation required to supply a nation with a population comparable to Canada against the will of its government?

Mean Baby
May 28, 2005

Rust Martialis posted:

See I read that several times now, and nowhere is PDVSA mentioned. I agree there is mention of reversing the arbitrary nationalization of companies done by the government. Since PDVSA was nationalized over 40 years ago, it would take a galaxy brain I do not posess to believe this refers to PDVSA.

So, where is the reference to privatizing PDVSA?

You are really smart. I am amazed at the inability of anyone who is pro US-Coup to do any research on the subject and continue to demand evidence. Once evidence is presented the goal posts get moved again.

The law clearly outlines privatize of a number of industries which is going to quite clearly include the oil industry to anyone who isn’t oblivious to the situation. It’s also all over US press and John Bolton literally salivated at the prospect. A literal child can find this information in 1 minute.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/venezuela-us-backed-coup-leader-immediately-targets-state-oil-company-requests-imf-money/254282/

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

fishmech posted:

Got it, you have zero valid examples. OK then. Would you care to think of an example that's actually comparable to the sheer amount of territorial violation required to supply a nation with a population comparable to Canada against the will of its government?

Yes it'd be a first. The US could be proud.

Giggle Goose
Oct 18, 2009

Presenting Nipples posted:

You are really smart. I am amazed at the inability of anyone who is pro US-Coup to do any research on the subject and continue to demand evidence. Once evidence is presented the goal posts get moved again.

The law clearly outlines privatize of a number of industries which is going to quite clearly include the oil industry to anyone who isn’t oblivious to the situation. It’s also all over US press and John Bolton literally salivated at the prospect. A literal child can find this information in 1 minute.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/venezuela-us-backed-coup-leader-immediately-targets-state-oil-company-requests-imf-money/254282/

I just want to point out that "mint press news" is an assad apologist rag.

Wikipedia posted:


On August 29, 2013, a MintPress article attributed to Dale Gavlak and Yahya Ababneh said that Syrian rebels and local residents in Ghouta, Syria alleged that the Al-Nusra Front was responsible for the chemical weapons attack on August 21. The allegation was based on interviews conducted in Syria. The article's sources claimed that weapons had been delivered to untrained fighters and "some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions."[6] The article was cited by news outlets such as Military.com,[2] the Spanish newspaper ABC, and ConsortiumNews.[7][8]

On September 20, the Brown Moses Blog published a statement from Gavlak saying that "despite my repeated requests, made directly and through legal counsel, they have not been willing to issue a retraction stating that I was not the author. Yahya Ababneh is the sole reporter and author of the Mint Press News piece."[9] The dispute was also covered by The New York Times' news blog The Lede and McClatchy.[10][11]

Control Volume
Dec 31, 2008

Venezuela should intervene in america since it has a corrupt president that is widely hated and dangerous, and used illegal and shady tactics to block legitimate votes in several areas, while the american people freeze to death on the streets. They could support a coup by center left candidate Hillary Clinton

dublish
Oct 31, 2011


Homeless Friend posted:

Yes it'd be a first. The US could be proud.

I'm baffled that you seem to be arguing against intervention in favor of even more massive intervention.

Flavahbeast
Jul 21, 2001


Let's do a compromise that everyone can get behind: new elections in both the US and Venezuela with UN observers and no restrictions on who can run for office

Control Volume
Dec 31, 2008

Flavahbeast posted:

Let's do a compromise that everyone can get behind: new elections in both the US and Venezuela with UN observers and no restrictions on who can run for office

Boring. Make it a caged death match instead, itll even entertain the kids

Giggle Goose
Oct 18, 2009

Control Volume posted:

Boring. Make it a caged death match instead, itll even entertain the kids

I'm liking this idea but I'd put Donnie up against Maduro. One fat man enters, one fat man leaves.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.
See I don't think this thread is really accurately summarizing the situation with food aid to Venezuela. I've watched the news, I've seen the videos. There's no way the government is seizing it and selling it off. No way.

Maduro is just eating all of it himself.

People posting like Venezuela is Iraq

it's really Kirby's Dream Land

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep
I guess that's an added level of on type visual surrealism to the whole waning-years-of-a-dictator imagery of Maduro. An authoritarian starts to look like he's gorged himself and/or stress eaten his way to hypertension, while he presides over a country he's inflicted crisis food insecurity and growing malnutrition on.

For bonus points, have it conclude with that he keeps getting larger for a few years and then keels over with a LAD widowmaker, which will obviously, of course, have been a targeted CIA killing.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply