|
Gripweed posted:The Best Picture Oscar winner is not always the best movie released that year well...yeah. its almost always whoever the highest bidder was that ends up winning that.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 01:12 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 05:38 |
|
The last actually decent best picture winner was Gladiator. Everything since then has been total crap.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 01:15 |
|
Yes but Forrest Gump
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 01:22 |
|
I liked No Country For Old Men.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 01:24 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:I liked No Country For Old Men. I did too Its just a shame they couldn't be bothered writing an ending
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 01:25 |
|
CrRoMa posted:Yes but Forrest Gump lmfao
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 02:48 |
|
bradzilla posted:lmfao this is so wildly out of left field that I'm not sure if this is a "lol forrest gump is terrible" or a "lol i adore every oscar winner since 1994" but either way its a hard disagree from me
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 08:28 |
|
spit on my clit posted:you would have to be an absolute moron to kick the star off of your team over something as little as "supports the president" or "he didn't kneel when the other guys did" Or just a decent human being who hates neo-nazi pandering shitwads.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 11:02 |
|
People throw around the word nazi too much thesedays. I get that everyone is miserable and angry and racked with mental health issues but referring to people as Nazis doesn't even sound that extreme anymore.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 12:13 |
|
CrRoMa posted:People throw around the word nazi too much thesedays. I get that everyone is miserable and angry and racked with mental health issues but referring to people as Nazis doesn't even sound that extreme anymore. Do you have a better term for white supremacists that are quite literally throwing latinx children into camps in the desert?
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 12:56 |
|
Knobheads
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 12:58 |
|
.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 12:58 |
|
Master Twig posted:Do you have a better term for white supremacists that are quite literally throwing latinx children into camps in the desert? They should invent a new one.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 13:00 |
|
The only reason far more chuds aren’t self-identifying as nazis or fascists is that WW2 was canonized as The Good War and so, in the US/UK/Russia/etc, being a nationalist who calls themself those words breaks the accepted national narrative.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 13:09 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:The only reason far more chuds aren’t self-identifying as nazis or fascists is that WW2 was canonized as The Good War and so, in the US/UK/Russia/etc, being a nationalist who calls themself those words breaks the accepted national narrative. more of them are cool with being nazis than you'd think
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 13:30 |
|
American politicians are really weird. They're obsessed with politeness and cooperation. Like, someone from the opposition is talking and they just sit there and listen. And they're always going on about "bipartisanship" like as though that's a good thing; like "let's just focus on the things that are completely uncontroversial, we wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of our opponents." What are you doing? What do you think your job is?
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 15:42 |
|
Tiggum posted:What are you doing? What do you think your job is? To perpetuate the system
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 15:46 |
|
Tiggum posted:American politicians are really weird. They're obsessed with politeness and cooperation. Like, someone from the opposition is talking and they just sit there and listen. And they're always going on about "bipartisanship" like as though that's a good thing; like "let's just focus on the things that are completely uncontroversial, we wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of our opponents." What are you doing? What do you think your job is? They need votes to do stuff.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 15:53 |
|
Tiggum posted:American politicians are really weird. They're obsessed with politeness and cooperation. Like, someone from the opposition is talking and they just sit there and listen. And they're always going on about "bipartisanship" like as though that's a good thing; like "let's just focus on the things that are completely uncontroversial, we wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of our opponents." What are you doing? What do you think your job is? I remember seeing footage of the UK parliament for the first time as a teenager and being blown away by how lively it was compared to Congress. All the booing and clapping and sick burns on the opposing side (or at least attempts at them)
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 15:57 |
|
sassassin posted:They need votes to do stuff. Yup. There's also issues with things like the filibuster; you need a lot of votes to say "no you can't filibuster that" in the Senate but neither party has enough. America is also so insanely polarized right now that you have people just declaring "everything the other side does is inherently bad so vote no on absolutely all of it no matter what." Whether you like it or not you need at least some cooperation from the other side to do anything. Politics in general also runs on a lot of unspoken agreements and stuff like "well if you vote with us on this thing we'll vote with you on this other thing." Increasingly it's just "do whatever we want or you hate America and babies and kittens and are also probably a Nazi."
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 16:01 |
|
sassassin posted:They need votes to do stuff. ToxicSlurpee posted:America is also so insanely polarized right now that you have people just declaring "everything the other side does is inherently bad so vote no on absolutely all of it no matter what."
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 16:12 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Yup. There's also issues with things like the filibuster; you need a lot of votes to say "no you can't filibuster that" in the Senate but neither party has enough. America is also so insanely polarized right now that you have people just declaring "everything the other side does is inherently bad so vote no on absolutely all of it no matter what." Whether you like it or not you need at least some cooperation from the other side to do anything. Politics in general also runs on a lot of unspoken agreements and stuff like "well if you vote with us on this thing we'll vote with you on this other thing." Increasingly it's just "do whatever we want or you hate America and babies and kittens and are also probably a Nazi." The Republicans cleverly figured out that if you control the government, you can just do what you like and it doesn't matter what your opposing party wants. That has baffled Democrats, who think that the West Wing was a documentary and politics is about winning arguments and compromising.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 16:14 |
|
Gripweed posted:The Republicans cleverly figured out that if you control the government, you can just do what you like and it doesn't matter what your opposing party wants. That has baffled Democrats, who think that the West Wing was a documentary and politics is about winning arguments and compromising. What they did was weaponize procedure to be petty jerks about everything. Personally I'm utterly disgusted with both parties at the moment.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 16:16 |
|
America is a one-party system that pretends to be a two-party system. "The other side is completely evil and irredeemably bad and must be opposed at all costs, no matter what."- Republicans "The other side is misguided, but we believe in our hearts they want the best for the people so we have to be grown-ups so we'll support some of the truly evil, heinous things they propose and then act shocked when they never ever reciprocate our attempts to not burn everything down as quickly."- Democrats Henchman of Santa posted:To perpetuate the system The one party and the system are both called Capital. There, American politics makes sense now.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 18:23 |
|
Master Twig posted:latinx this is violence against the spanish language
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 18:43 |
|
Crimpolioni posted:this is violence against the spanish language It emerged in spanish
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 18:52 |
|
languages with gendered nouns are violence against common sense
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 18:55 |
|
How is it actually pronounced in speech?
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:09 |
|
I thought it was “latin@“ and would actually be interested to know if “latinx” is the fashion now, why?
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:11 |
|
Tubgoat posted:How is it actually pronounced in speech? Latin X burial posted:I thought it was latin@ and would actually be interested to know if latinx is the fashion now, why? latin@ was trying to be too clever. And only works when written down
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:15 |
|
Gripweed posted:Latin X You have answered all of my curiosities in an extremely succinct manner. You will now receive several AWESOME POINTS. Feel free to spend them on finger traps.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:19 |
|
Latin@ is pronounced “latinau”, also some spanish speakers use latine because it’s still neutral but sounds more natural in spanish.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:26 |
|
Luhteenks Also kill capitalism
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:31 |
|
I feel like you shouldn't be allowed to be called Latin X unless you're a Latin American cyborg.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:42 |
|
christmas boots posted:I feel like you shouldn't be allowed to be called Latin X unless you're a Latin American cyborg. What if I’m a roman robot?
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:44 |
|
it's actually latin-eh
spit on my clit has a new favorite as of 19:53 on Feb 7, 2019 |
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:44 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:What if I’m a roman robot? Yeah, OK.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:44 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:What if I’m a roman robot? Paging that goon that has the "Rome did not have robots, idiot" red text.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 20:43 |
|
i just don't see the appeal of blackface
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 21:56 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 05:38 |
|
Gripweed posted:i just don't see the appeal of blackface Are you white?
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 22:16 |