|
If you really want to, that's certainly something you could take to small claims. Or if you know who the valet's insurer is, you can try submitting a 3rd party claim directly with them. ..but if it were me, I'd just submit a claim with my own insurer and let their subrogation department handle it.* * I have no idea how such a claim might affect your rates in MA's byzantine insurance system. In places with more sane insurance markets, a small claim like that where I could pretty well prove it was someone else's fault would have a negligible effect.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 05:30 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:19 |
|
I would consider a small claims action depending on how it works in MA. Your insurer, however, will absolutely go after their insurer. They don't make money by not getting the money they are owed.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 05:34 |
|
nm posted:I would consider a small claims action depending on how it works in MA. It’s this. $2k is definitely an amount they will subro for, especially since it’s a company with actual assets and not JimBob Sawyer with $67 to his name. Also, it’s a collision claim, not comprehensive as it isn’t vandalism. Is your deductible different? However, driving history follows the driver, so it’s not on your record.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 14:00 |
|
big crush on Chad OMG posted:it's a collision claim, not comprehensive This depends on the state, and particularly on this, the circumstances. I'm thinking in Texas, this may be covered under UM/UIM as a hit and run, or under comp as vandalism. UM/UIM in TX carries a mandatory $251 deductible (which you get back once they subrogate). UM/UIM also doesn't affect rates much here. UM/UIM here covers a lot more than just getting hit by someone without insurance. It'd probably be best to attempt filing it under UM/UIM first; if it gets denied, then file it under comp, and if that fails, collision (assuming OP carries collision; for a 12 year old car, that may be up in the air). I'm not sure how MA laws work though.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 14:46 |
|
I'm meeting with my insurance agent today. Initially for an unrelated matter, but I'll ask him about it. MA is weird, that's all I know. I've got comprehensive with a $500 deductible. It only costs $63/year.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 15:48 |
|
STR posted:This depends on the state, and particularly on this, the circumstances. Vandalism can not be applied to the operator of a vehicle. Comprehensive has a list of things that make it a comp claim. Usually this is animal strikes, explosions, earthquakes, fire, vandalism, missiles/falling objects, riots, theft, hail/wind/flood. UMPD also has a very specific definition of what the coverage entails. Usually this is damages sustained to the vehicle that the insured is entitled to recover from an operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. Your own car is specifically listed as not qualifying as an uninsured motor vehicle in the contract. Collision is the catch all bucket.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 16:11 |
|
big crush on Chad OMG posted:Vandalism can not be applied to the operator of a vehicle. Comprehensive has a list of things that make it a comp claim. Usually this is animal strikes, explosions, earthquakes, fire, vandalism, missiles/falling objects, riots, theft, hail/wind/flood. They're filing it under collision. I started the claim today. My agent said it shouldn't affect my policy, the vehicle was not in my possession, and was under the possession of a commercial company. They'll cover the claim, then subrogate the company's insurance. Whatever... I'll see what the adjuster has to say when I talk to them.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2019 21:26 |
|
Only clip I've bothered uploading because, seriously. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGxMGiaxKGk
|
# ? Feb 6, 2019 01:43 |
|
I quite enjoyed how they hesitated until the worst possible moment to do their maliciously dumb thing.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2019 02:44 |
|
Shere posted:I quite enjoyed how they hesitated until the worst possible moment to do their maliciously dumb thing. Eh, if they'd waited another half second longer that would have resulted in a collision.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2019 16:57 |
|
I saw the aftermath of some folks that don't realize that school buses stop at railroad crossings, even in the snow. Sadly I was just a little late to see it and all my dash cam captured is my commentary on them being loving idiots.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2019 23:05 |
|
big crush on Chad OMG posted:UMPD also has a very specific definition of what the coverage entails. Usually this is damages sustained to the vehicle that the insured is entitled to recover from an operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. Your own car is specifically listed as not qualifying as an uninsured motor vehicle in the contract. Again, depends on the state. UMPD covers hit and runs here, whether or not you have a description of the other vehicle. It's what paid out when someone hit my car while parked and took off.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 07:18 |
|
STR posted:Again, depends on the state. UMPD covers hit and runs here, whether or not you have a description of the other vehicle. It's what paid out when someone hit my car while parked and took off. Right, not disagreeing. If you can’t locate the other car then the assumption is they’re uninsured. I’m saying your own car cannot qualify as an uninsured vehicle, so it wouldn’t cover anything here.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 13:32 |
|
Yay! Got my first awesome Dashcam video. But whoops, it was when I got rear-ended in traffic: gently caress!.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kq9HRaHAUJY (Does anyone know - should I contact my insurance company? My damage was minor and I don't intend to fix it, and the BMW in front of me was even less but she may want to fix it....)
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 18:44 |
|
Do you have the insurance info of the driver that hit you? File a claim with them - they'll give you a lowball damage estimate that you're free to take as a check and pocket.
|
# ? Feb 7, 2019 19:33 |
|
dexter6 posted:Yay! Got my first awesome Dashcam video. I hope you filed a police report, and I hope the report states that you aren't at fault. I would probably contact my insurance company and tell them I was in a not at-fault accident. Give them the video and have a papertrail that you didn't cause it. If the driver of the car in front of you decides to be a dick, calls their company and says "I got rearended by this person," you'll be a lot better off with some papertrail. Your insurance company will basically tell them to get stuffed instead of calling you and saying "hey so... what's going on." Bottom line is, if any party decides they want to file a claim, there's a fairly good chance it'll come back around and your insurance company will find out about it. Full disclosure goes a long way toward your reputability. EDIT: When I got sideswiped, I called my insurance company the second the cop was done writing the report. When I got home I emailed them the video. Several hours later I got a call back and they told me something like "so we got a call from the other person's insurance company stating you hit them, thanks for calling us asap and sending along a video it's going to make this claim a lot easier." ie. I saved my rear end by disclosing what happened and doing it first. chrisgt fucked around with this message at 01:42 on Feb 8, 2019 |
# ? Feb 8, 2019 01:38 |
|
chrisgt posted:I hope you filed a police report, and I hope the report states that you aren't at fault. The outcome would have been exactly the same if you didn't call. The main factor in determining fault was your video. If there was no video and the damage ambiguous, the fault would be assigned 50/50 Have those cameras rolling, my dudes
|
# ? Feb 8, 2019 16:51 |
|
Nitrox posted:The outcome would have been exactly the same if you didn't call. The main factor in determining fault was your video. If there was no video and the damage ambiguous, the fault would be assigned 50/50 Contacting my company first and giving them the details was nice because they didn't get a call out of the blue that "one of your clients hit my client and damaged their car." They already had the back story. And sure, in that case the order doesn't matter, however when you're dealing with an insurance company why not try to make everyone's life as easy as possible.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 01:25 |
|
Anyone else worry about anyone else watching your dashcam footage for whatever reason? Like I drive off a mountain and they go to review my last hours alive and it's just me berating everyone around me for being idiots and they just sit there with a look on their face.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 02:28 |
|
fknlo posted:Anyone else worry about anyone else watching your dashcam footage for whatever reason? Like I drive off a mountain and they go to review my last hours alive and it's just me berating everyone around me for being idiots and they just sit there with a look on their face. more likely they'll be nodding along and agreeing with you
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 02:35 |
|
fknlo posted:Anyone else worry about anyone else watching your dashcam footage for whatever reason? Like I drive off a mountain and they go to review my last hours alive and it's just me berating everyone around me for being idiots and they just sit there with a look on their face. Yet another reason I leave the audio off.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 06:28 |
|
Y'all don't realize how terrible we all sound when reviewing footage. I muted my bike crash video before sharing it, because I sounded like a raspy teenager. Also, audio was irrelevant. But mostly embarrassing.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 14:02 |
|
Counterpoint: the audio on my dashcam just convinced my insurer that A: I wasn't driving, and B: that the valet did indeed hit another car while backing up with the door open. Video alone wasn't convincing. I also have taught myself to call out plate numbers whenever someone does something dumb. I'd recommend recording it, you can always strip it out later.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 15:45 |
|
Yeah, audio is a good tool for things the camera isn't directly capturing in its field of view. Also stuff like tires screeching and impact sounds. I have it disabled on mine because I take hands free calls over speakerphone while driving on the regular and I live in a two party consent state. I'm not a lawyer or even particularly well-read in the legality of such but I'm assuming it's a no-no and just being safe. I only realized this would be a problem when my wife got stranded on the highway after a botched oil change. The dealership called her, which automatically went through the Bluetooth speakers in her car, and opened the conversation with "How far did you get!?". She told me this since it was truly that ridiculous. I went "oh, I bet the dashcam has the whole conversation!". It did, and I realized that was also probably an issue (and we also couldn't really do anything with it as a result). I'm probably just being paranoid but the likelihood of audio helping is outweighed by the liability of it here, above and beyond being embarrassed by my impotent rage at bad drivers or being caught singing along to bad pop music.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 16:20 |
|
Yeah, I caught a crash on camera and I sent it to the dude who was turning left to try to help him out with his insurance. I don’t know what became of it but he probably got a 50/50 out of it because other dude decided to hit the gas before the intersection and you can hear him do it. https://youtu.be/1ZbfeWbOeb8
|
# ? Feb 9, 2019 18:21 |
|
Shere posted:Yeah, audio is a good tool for things the camera isn't directly capturing in its field of view. Also stuff like tires screeching and impact sounds.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2019 05:24 |
|
The issue is that the interior of a car is not necessary public, as well as the fact that private things like phone calls can happen there.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2019 16:37 |
|
IOwnCalculus posted:The issue is that the interior of a car is not necessary public, as well as the fact that private things like phone calls can happen there. Yeah. The other party can even sue over the recording.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2019 20:39 |
|
My audio is me mostly yelling at people for not driving miatas.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2019 20:53 |
|
Thanks to everyone who chimed in. My instinct was just to tell my insurance company what happened because I’m just that kind of person, so thanks for the re-assurance. The guy at fault had already called his insurance and they already knew about the whole thing so when I called they were like, yeah you’re good he’s at fault let us know if we need to fix anything.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2019 22:39 |
|
IOwnCalculus posted:The issue is that the interior of a car is not necessary public, as well as the fact that private things like phone calls can happen there. California in particular has some weird rules for dashcam audio.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2019 08:34 |
|
fknlo posted:Anyone else worry about anyone else watching your dashcam footage for whatever reason? Like I drive off a mountain and they go to review my last hours alive and it's just me berating everyone around me for being idiots and they just sit there with a look on their face. Pretty sure that the guys at my insurance company had a good laugh over that. melon cat fucked around with this message at 00:28 on Jan 11, 2024 |
# ? Feb 11, 2019 17:16 |
|
melon cat posted:A few years back and after a snowstorm some dipshit decided not to scrape the ice off his car, so the massive ice sheet flew off his car and struck mine on the highway. Caught it all on my dashcam. When I reviewed the footage I heard my dumbass go, "Ice sheet? Awww poo poo. AaaaaaaAAAAAHHHHHHHH" in some weird opera-like crescendo as it flew towards me. If you still have this footage you have no choice but to post it now...
|
# ? Feb 11, 2019 20:32 |
|
The big danger is hearing how awful my singalong voice is. On the other hand, sometimes I like hearing my reaction later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkDoaS6ykds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVjZ2Agm1q4
|
# ? Feb 12, 2019 03:27 |
|
Were you cursing with a child in the car?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2019 14:41 |
|
Heaven forbid!
|
# ? Feb 12, 2019 14:52 |
|
Nitrox posted:Were you cursing with a child in the car? Are you Ned Flanders or something?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2019 15:03 |
|
Nitrox posted:Were you cursing with a child in the car?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2019 22:35 |
|
Nitrox posted:Were you cursing with a child in the car? ironically, the people who get the most upset about children possibly hearing ~~~~the f-word~~~~ are also the ones who drop terms like "towelhead" or "wetback" or worse in front of their kids all day long
|
# ? Feb 13, 2019 01:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:19 |
|
wolrah posted:If you still have this footage you have no choice but to post it now...
|
# ? Feb 13, 2019 01:42 |