|
Cease to Hope posted:I mean, the process that led to that racist imagery and the intent of the creator are also a problem on their own. Lucas told Silas Carson to impersonate an East Asian accent. Thought experiment: if instead the actor reading Gunray's dialogue were a native Thai who did not speak English, and was told to imitate English dialogue phonetically, and the performance turned out audibly identical to what's in the actual film... would that still be racist?
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 12:02 |
|
Ray Park's voice was dubbed over with a British accent as well, all this British face going on in Star Wars, Lucas' secret message was right there under our noses the entire time.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:05 |
|
ruddiger posted:George Lucas made Carrie Fisher put on British face when she did that terrible accent in A New Hope, that sick racist bastard. gently caress off with this Son of Sam-I-Am posted:Thought experiment: if instead the actor reading Gunray's dialogue were a native Thai who did not speak English, and was told to imitate English dialogue phonetically, and the performance turned out audibly identical to what's in the actual film... would that still be racist? It moots part of the problem - casting Silas Carson to do an impersonation - but only that part. It would be distractingly similar to a long tradition of racist caricature, something which George Lucas should have been aware of given the whole Flash Gordon thing. It was distracting for me before I knew who Silas Carson was.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:06 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:A viewer cannot select how to view the film, only the toolkit they use through which to analyze their own viewing. A viewer choosing to view a film through an antiracist lens is creating an interpretation of the film, but not an ultimate nor total one. The choice to selectively perceive content doesn't de-legitimize other contextual observations Right, working through the text is key, but this isn’t what Cease to Hope was doing. Instead there’s was a hyper fixation upon a singular element where a character became an other to them. The portrayal of the Republic in the prequels is of a multicultural liberal-democratic society bound together in a galactic market. That english is the language of the Republic and galactic trade traces elements of its history of colonisation along with the further context provided in the portrayal of Naboo. Fixation upon aspects of the text in abstract isolation is what’s being challenged, because in Cease to Hope’s own words they stopped engaging with the text upon hearing the accent. Like, another example of this was the guy from a while back who was confused about the portrayal of droids as people who are slaves and obi-wan’s “if droids could think” line. Specifically that this was a contradiction of the movie, a failure of the text in its portrayal of droids as people and not something that informs characterisation of Obi-wan, the Jedi, the Republic and so on. brawleh fucked around with this message at 19:10 on Feb 18, 2019 |
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:07 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:A viewer cannot select how to view the film, only the toolkit they use through which to analyze their own viewing. A viewer choosing to view a film through an antiracist lens is creating an interpretation of the film, but not an ultimate nor total one. The choice to selectively perceive content doesn't de-legitimize other contextual observations Think about this for a second: you are straight-up saying that anti-racism and racism are equally valid. In fact, anti-racism is worse - weak and “unreasonable” - because it doesn’t defer to presumed majority of racist viewers. Again, you are missing the dimension of truth. Inequality is always bad, no matter how many people say otherwise.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:09 |
|
ruddiger posted:Ray Park's voice was dubbed over with a British accent as well, all this British face going on in Star Wars, Lucas' secret message was right there under our noses the entire time. You do realize power is an essential element of what makes -face a problem right? You're making the same tedious "I am not racist, I make fun of everyone" argument
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:11 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:Think about this for a second: you are straight-up saying that anti-racism and racism are equally valid. In fact, anti-racism is worse - weak and “unreasonable” - because it doesn’t defer to presumed majority of racist viewers. I am saying that the significance of a film is ultimately through the subjective lens of the viewer, but that the viewer is likely to finder a stronger suggestion of racist themes than non racist ones as this one borrows heavily from racist imagery and tropes.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:16 |
|
smg i like your whole redemptive interpretation thing. is that something you developed or is it from some critical tradition?
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:16 |
|
Am I right to think that SMG is arguing that one has a moral obligation to interpret the film in the way which does the much social good?
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:19 |
|
brawleh posted:Right, working through the text is key, but this isn’t what Cease to Hope was doing. Instead there’s was a hyper fixation upon a singular element where a character became an other to them This is such a distant, sterile description of my argument. You've divorced yourself entirely from the films existing in this real world, and having a place in the history of the real world. It isn't simply that the Neiomoidians are otherized. (They also have giant rubber heads, which I don't find objectionable.) It's the particular manner in which they are otherized, and how that manner fits in with film's long history of otherizing actual people.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:21 |
|
I think it's important tor ealize how hosed up media depictions of people are. We've come to the point where an alien speaking in an accent that doesn't exist in real-life but was created by mixing romanian and thai accents causes the same reactions in people as full-on yellow face. That feeling is real and important: we've so thoroughfully dehumanized and othered people that simple accents are enough to get the same reaction.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:22 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:I think it's important tor ealize how hosed up media depictions of people are. We've come to the point where an alien speaking in an accent that doesn't exist in real-life but was created by mixing romanian and thai accents causes the same reactions in people as full-on yellow face. Accents are fundamentally otherizing by definition
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:24 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:We've come to the point where an alien speaking in an accent that doesn't exist in real-life but was created by mixing romanian and thai accents Where exactly did you get this idea that Romanian has anything to do with the Neimoidians?
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:25 |
|
Cease to Hope posted:Where exactly did you get this idea that Romanian has anything to do with the Neimoidians? It's in the article you keep bringing up. They made a game of telephone where the original was speaking a fake romanian accent, then the thai actor tried to imitate thes elines and then the original actor imitated these lines again. As a method of creating an accent that feels real without being real.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:32 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Accents are fundamentally otherizing by definition No they're not. Accents exist in the real world. I speak english with a french-canadian accent.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:32 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:No they're not. Accents exist in the real world. I speak english with a french-canadian accent. And anyone who doesnt is other to you
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:33 |
|
I speak like Jar Jar
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:33 |
|
Cease to Hope posted:Where exactly did you get this idea that Romanian has anything to do with the Neimoidians? Transylvania, home of Dracula, is in Romania.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:34 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:And anyone who doesnt is other to you Lol no.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:34 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I am saying that the significance of a film is ultimately through the subjective lens of the viewer, but that the viewer is likely to finder a stronger suggestion of racist themes than non racist ones as this one borrows heavily from racist imagery and tropes. How is the racist interpretation of the film stronger? Make your argument. Mel Mudkiper posted:Accents are fundamentally otherizing by definition Non-white people existing is not what racism is.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:35 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:It's in the article you keep bringing up. They made a game of telephone where the original was speaking a fake romanian accent, then the thai actor tried to imitate thes elines and then the original actor imitated these lines again. As a method of creating an accent that feels real without being real. Can you quote the part where they bring up Transylvania, or Dracula, or Romania, or any accent but that of a specific unnamed Thai actor? Here's the link.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:36 |
|
As the kids say, 'that's a yikes from me'
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:36 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:You do realize power is an essential element of what makes -face a problem right? No one's being made fun of in Star Wars. Nute Gunray's accent isn't supposed to be funny, it's simply an accent. Accent's alone do not carry intent, which is my point. Lucas has Englishmen put on American accents, Americans putting on English accents, has aliens speaking in REAL WORLD foreign tongues, yet no one's bringing up these examples of Lucas' employment of speech and language, even though they've been there since A New Hope. https://www.k-international.com/blog/6-star-wars-languages-and-their-real-world-counterparts/ quote:6 Star Wars Languages and Their Real-World Counterparts ruddiger fucked around with this message at 19:43 on Feb 18, 2019 |
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:37 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:And anyone who doesnt is other to you i don't think you've even read orientalism lamo
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:38 |
|
ruddiger posted:No one's being made fun of in Star Wars. Nute Gunray's accent isn't supposed to be funny, it's simply an accent. Accent's alone do not carry intent, which is my point. Lucas has Englishmen put on American accents, Americans putting on English accents, has aliens speaking in REAL WORLD foreign tongues, yet no one's bringing up these examples of Lucas' employment of speech and language, even though they've been there since A New Hope. Because there's a great deal of racist history behind people doing impersonations of East Asian people. Not so much with Americans impersonating British people or vice versa.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:40 |
|
Okay accusing someone of racism is one thing, but let's not go down this dark path of questioning one's reading list
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:40 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:Lol no. If they weren't otherized, you wouldn't recognize they have an accent. Identity is negative, not positive
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:44 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:If they weren't otherized, you wouldn't recognize they have an accent. That's a Galaxy Brain take there. Jesus what a stupid thing to say.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:45 |
|
Schwarzwald posted:Non-white people existing is not what racism is. I'm not sure how you got that assumption from my post
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:45 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:That's a Galaxy Brain take there. For someone who thinks I am wrong you sure seem defensive about the implications of what I say.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:46 |
|
just leaving this hereSchwarzwald posted:Well yeah it's intentional that the dialogue in the prequels sounds like it came out a film from the 40s.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:47 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:For someone who thinks I am wrong you sure seem defensive about the implications of what I say. There's not a lot of implications there. You're straigth-up saying people having different accents makes them "other". That's jsut pure xenophobia.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:48 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:If they weren't otherized, you wouldn't recognize they have an accent. what is going on with this post
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:49 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I'm not sure how you got that assumption from my post "Accents are fundamentally otherizing by definition" Not presenting as white is not what racism is. Recognizing that people are different from you is not what othering is.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:51 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:There's not a lot of implications there. You're straigth-up saying people having different accents makes them "other". This seems like arguing you dont see race. Acknowledging the psychological realities of how we construct identity doesnt mean you are advocating for it as a moral imperative. We create the other by assertion of difference from the self. Refusing to acknowledge that doesnt make a bulwark against prejudice. If anything refusal to be honest and critical about the nature of identity is how prejudice seeps in
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:51 |
|
Schwarzwald posted:Recognizing that people are different from you is not what othering is. Please explain how one constructs the other without difference
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:54 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Please explain how one constructs the other without difference in all seriousness, when it comes to accents and the other, you can't really talk about them without talking about place and hegemony and all that. i think thats why people are reacting so strongly against what you're saying
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:57 |
|
Zas posted:in all seriousness, when it comes to accents and the other, you can't really talk about them without talking about place and hegemony and all that. i think thats why people are reacting so strongly against what you're saying Agreed
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 19:58 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:This seems like arguing you dont see race. Not the same thing at all. Otherizing is very different from just noticing people have differences.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 20:03 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 12:02 |
|
It also occurs to me I should clarify that when I say all identity is negative, I don't mean negative in the sense of bad. I mean our identities are constructed in contrast to others.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 20:04 |