Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
uninterrupted
Jun 20, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

zapplez posted:

I for one love how polarized politics has become that now even the top 5% of countries in terms of freedom or human rights are in fact just fascist.

Its such a hot take, if everyone is fascist then no one is.

Hm, yes, calling the country with active concentration camps fascist is absurd.

I’m glad the pro-US-coup people are finally saying the quiet part loud.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

Mr. Sunshine posted:

One of the common themes among self-proclaimed fascist is that they consider fascism to be a third way between capitalism and socialism, a revolutionary restructuring of a decadent society that needs to be rescued from itself. And I agree that many of the magamen that support Trump would definitely identify with such an ideology. Probably Trump himself, if the idea could be explained to him in a childlike manner.

But consensus among most US politicians (including republicans) and US citizens seem to be that democracy is capitalism and capitalism rocks. The idea that business, trade and economy is the driving force of the nation does not mesh with the fascist view that the state, the people and the nation should be one indivisible entity led by the will of the leader.

It does if that state is a corporation. I mean, when's the last time Pence or his ilk took a principled stance for competition and monopoly-breaking? Also, if you really reckon fascism is anti-capitalist, you're going to have a lot of explaining to do about the economic structure of Nazi Germany.

Darth Walrus fucked around with this message at 16:13 on Mar 21, 2019

Bob le Moche
Jul 10, 2011

I AM A HORRIBLE TANKIE MORON
WHO LONGS TO SUCK CHAVISTA COCK !

I SUGGEST YOU IGNORE ANY POSTS MADE BY THIS PERSON ABOUT VENEZUELA, POLITICS, OR ANYTHING ACTUALLY !


(This title paid for by money stolen from PDVSA)
Not a big fan of Umberto Eco's definition of Ur-Fascism. It's purely surface-level, about what fascism says about itself and its aesthetics. It focuses purely on ideas and has nothing to say about the political and economic roots of fascism, where it finds its mass base, what historical conditions give rise to it.
I recommend reading "Blackshirts and Reds" by Michael Parenti on the topic of fascism: https://cartiparenti.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/blackshirts-and-reds-by-michael-parenti.pdf

Aimé Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism:

Césaire posted:

And then one fine day the bourgeoisie is awakened by a terrific reverse shock: the gestapos are busy, the prisons fill up, the torturers around the racks invent, refine, discuss.

People are surprised, they become indignant. They say: “How strange! But never mind — it’s Nazism, it will pass!” And they wait, and they hope; and they hide the truth from themselves, that it is barbarism, but the supreme barbarism, the crowning barbarism that sums up all the daily barbarisms; that it is Nazism, yes, but that before they were its victims, they were its accomplices; that they tolerated that Nazism before it was inflicted on them, that they absolved it, shut their eyes to it, legitimized it, because, until then, it had been applied only to non-European peoples; that they have cultivated that Nazism, that they are responsible for it, and that before engulfing the whole of Western, Christian civilization in its reddened waters, it oozes, seeps, and trickles from every crack.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy
e: nah

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
hello if you are not posting about venezuela in this thread enjoy your state sanctioned time out

a reminder: we're going up in penalties for every off topic/bad post

if you haven't learned by the time you're hitting a month then I don't know what to say beyond 'post better'

Party Plane Jones fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Mar 21, 2019

SickZip
Jul 29, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
Palingenetic ultranationalism is the best definition of fascism imo and captures why it's so hard to define and amorphous. Fascism doesn't have a coherent universal framework like other ideologies. There are common themes and behaviors but its an idiosyncratic ideology with each instance having different mythologies they seek to retreat to and different pressures driving that retreat into fantasy. Germanic fascism, born of the collapse of the dreams and propaganda of Germanic Empire in WWI, was fundamentally driven to external expansion while the Americans with the most fascist tendency seek isolation and disengagement from the rest of the world.

edit: typed this up before the post above and didn't see it before I hit submit. ill refrain from further comment

vincentpricesboner
Sep 3, 2006

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
What might be the most interesting part of the arrest of the opposition chief of staff is they also arrested some 12 journalists and 2 engineers. Arresting more journalists seems pretty hosed up.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/21/18275688/venezuela-maduro-guaido-marrero-intelligence

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

zapplez posted:

What might be the most interesting part of the arrest of the opposition chief of staff is they also arrested some 12 journalists and 2 engineers. Arresting more journalists seems pretty hosed up.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/21/18275688/venezuela-maduro-guaido-marrero-intelligence

They were all stockpiling guns and empanadas, you see

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

Discendo Vox posted:

They were all stockpiling guns and empanadas, you see

Traces of cyber were found.

uninterrupted
Jun 20, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
In a terrifying echo of Operation Condor, the security forces of Guido detained and beat innocent protestors while Chilean police ignored them.

https://twitter.com/gaaatoso/status/1108420518548525056?s=21

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009
Speaking of the Condor years, Stuart Varney of Fox Business says the quiet part out loud, as is his wont:

quote:

Fox host asks "why not" have the CIA overthrow Nicolás Maduro

STUART VARNEY (HOST): Staying on Venezuela, earlier this week John Bolton on this program said all options on the table when it comes to getting [Nicolás] Maduro out. Doug Bandow with us now, senior foreign policy adviser at the Cato Institute. I know where you're coming from Doug, you don't think we should use military intervention, I got it, but if we take it off the table we have no threat. So you don't take it off the table, but you don't necessarily use it. What do you say?

DOUG BANDOW (CATO INSTITUTE): Well, the problem is if you're going to make a threat you have to be willing to live up to it. So the challenge for us is if we make a threat that we're really not willing to follow through on, then we lose credibility. To my mind you use the military for absolutely essential things, it's a last resort. We don't have that here. It's an extraordinary challenge how to get rid of Maduro. He needs to go, but I think it's far more a political problem, not a military problem.

VARNEY: Should we use the CIA? I realize I'm going back to the late 1950s or something. But I mean why not? Why not? The guy is a corrupt socialist dictator. He's killing his own people in the street. Why can't we have the CIA have a quiet word with a couple of generals, get him out the country, why not?

BANDOW: Well, if it was that simple it'd be nice to do. The challenge, of course, is who replaces him. We can't be certain that whatever follows him is going to be something better. The question is how can we make it easier for the people there to overthrow him. What we're doing now I think has had extraordinary success at building international support. Other Latin American countries are actually willing to push on this. We need to keep this up. He needs to be under pressure, but we want to be very careful about blowing things up in a way that could explode badly for the people there.

I'm glad that the Cato dude thinks an invasion is a bad idea, but boy oh boy, the people who Trump listens to really want him to take Maduro out.

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

That face when the guy from the Cato Institute has to talk you down from your insane CIA wank fantasy.

qnqnx
Nov 14, 2010

uninterrupted posted:

In a terrifying echo of Operation Condor, the security forces of Guido detained and beat innocent protestors while Chilean police ignored them.

https://twitter.com/gaaatoso/status/1108420518548525056?s=21

Nowhere in the video implies that anyone got beat and you drat well know it. Nevermind your insinuations of Guaidó having a secret police on a foreign country.
The language of that post itself is loaded, the usual crap of calling any resistance to Maduro a "coup"

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

zapplez posted:

https://twitter.com/OmeletteRed/status/1108576154917711873

Sure looks like a good random twitter guy source you got there

Why do you have two accounts?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Laphroaig
Feb 6, 2004

Drinking Smoke
Dinosaur Gum

Judakel posted:

Why do you have two accounts?

You fell for obvious agitprop that the guy bragged about because it reinforced the narrative you wanted to hear, without any other sources involved than those conducting agitprop.

In light of this recent post in this thread: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-idUSKCN1R11OE

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet, Former President of Chile and member of the Socialist Party of Chile posted:

Bachelet told the U.N. Human Rights Council that she had information, without elaborating, that the National Police’s Special Actions Force (FAES) had executed 37 people in January in Caracas in illegal house raids in poor areas supporting the opposition.

“... my office documented numerous human rights violations and abuses by security forces and pro-government armed groups, including excessive use of force, killings, arbitrary detentions, torture and ill-treatment in detention, and threats and intimidation,” she said.

The Maduro government is already having SEBIN round up opposition figures, and FAES is conducting extrajudicial killings of the poor in opposition areas to keep them in line. The truth of what the Maduro government, a murderous kleptocracy of armed thugs, will continue to be the truth no matter how much you want pretend otherwise. How many indigenous people, how many poor people, the grassroots of any challenge from the left, should be murdered or starved or die of sickness before you stop supporting the PSUV?

Redczar
Nov 9, 2011

uninterrupted posted:

In a terrifying echo of Operation Condor, the security forces of Guido detained and beat innocent protestors while Chilean police ignored them.

https://twitter.com/gaaatoso/status/1108420518548525056?s=21

Hey this was about a block from where I live! I agree that the cops here are loving assholes, and gently caress with protests tons.

But as far as I can tell (I’m far from an expert), the people in suits look to just be the typical bodyguards (escolta policial) used for the president, congressional deputies, foreign diplomats, etc. They’re part of the cops, who far from ignoring this detention also participated. No other evidence supports the hypothesis that they are Guaidó’s goons.

Also the protest took place over a long period of time, and while those two/three may have been detained, as far as I could witness, there was no large scale repression that the student communist groups usually suffer from. No water cannons or tear gas.

So basically this appears to just be the typical “pacos culiaos” and not international Guaidó conspiracy stuff. I’d unironically love to see some concrete collaborating evidence however! My usual leftist Twitter sources aren’t up in arms like they’d normally be for what you claimed happened.

Redczar fucked around with this message at 21:23 on Mar 21, 2019

uninterrupted
Jun 20, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Laphroaig posted:

You fell for obvious agitprop that the guy bragged about because it reinforced the narrative you wanted to hear, without any other sources involved than those conducting agitprop.

In light of this recent post in this thread: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-idUSKCN1R11OE


The Maduro government is already having SEBIN round up opposition figures, and FAES is conducting extrajudicial killings of the poor in opposition areas to keep them in line. The truth of what the Maduro government, a murderous kleptocracy of armed thugs, will continue to be the truth no matter how much you want pretend otherwise. How many indigenous people, how many poor people, the grassroots of any challenge from the left, should be murdered or starved or die of sickness before you stop supporting the PSUV?

*posts video evidence*
Umm, why didn’t those kids film themselves getting beaten?

*white lady cites anonymous (i.e. made up) sources say Brown Man Bad*
Maduro has Rejected Democracy and Decorum

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

uninterrupted posted:


*white lady cites anonymous (i.e. made up) sources say Brown Man Bad*
Maduro has Rejected Democracy and Decorum
"The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights is a racist!" is certainly a take.

uninterrupted
Jun 20, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Rent-A-Cop posted:

"The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights is a racist!" is certainly a take.

Blindly believing someone because they’re white and have an impressive title is hella racist though, especially when they refuse to cite any sources.

Redczar
Nov 9, 2011

uninterrupted posted:

*white lady cites anonymous (i.e. made up) sources say Brown Man Bad*
Maduro has Rejected Democracy and Decorum

Her name is Michelle Bachelet and she was tortured under Pinochet’s regime. How are you going to claim that she is a Pinochetista/Pro-US intervention?

Also everyone here up to two weeks ago was calling her a Maduro sock-puppet because she didn’t ignore all UN procedure and take an unauthorized trip to Venezuela. Pretty amazing how she went from comeguagua for one side to baby-sledgehammer for the other in the course of a week

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

uninterrupted posted:

Blindly believing someone because they’re white and have an impressive title is hella racist though, especially when they refuse to cite any sources.
More fake news from the failing United Nations!

A big flaming stink
Apr 26, 2010
jesus gently caress who in their right goddamn mind believes that cops don't beat up on protesters??? ACAB, even cops of the revolutionary vanguard (lol at the idea that there is anything revolutionary about Maduro's regime and not yet another oppressive hierarchy that seeks to enrich itself) as well as cops in the employ of international capital.

vincentpricesboner
Sep 3, 2006

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Judakel posted:

Why do you have two accounts?

This has already been discussed in CSPAM but if you have any more questions go make a callout thread somewhere else. I'm not going to respond it in other threads and poo poo them up.

I'm not the first that was caught with a lovely alt and I won't be the last.

Lets keep the rest of this on topic k thanks

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

Rent-A-Cop posted:

"The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights is a racist!" is certainly a take.

The *socialist* who attended Karl Marx University in the DDR is a reactionary racist, clearly.

uninterrupted
Jun 20, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

zapplez posted:

This has already been discussed in CSPAM but if you have any more questions go make a callout thread somewhere else. I'm not going to respond it in other threads and poo poo them up.

I'm not the first that was caught with a lovely alt and I won't be the last.

Lets keep the rest of this on topic k thanks

Pro-US coup folks: blindly believe the virtuous whites and don’t believe the lying browns

Also pro-US coup folks: make sockpuppets so they can argue with themselves in D&D

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

Laphroaig posted:

You fell for obvious agitprop that the guy bragged about because it reinforced the narrative you wanted to hear, without any other sources involved than those conducting agitprop.

In light of this recent post in this thread: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-idUSKCN1R11OE


The Maduro government is already having SEBIN round up opposition figures, and FAES is conducting extrajudicial killings of the poor in opposition areas to keep them in line. The truth of what the Maduro government, a murderous kleptocracy of armed thugs, will continue to be the truth no matter how much you want pretend otherwise. How many indigenous people, how many poor people, the grassroots of any challenge from the left, should be murdered or starved or die of sickness before you stop supporting the PSUV?

I can't believe I fell for that. I just can't believe it.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Redczar posted:

Her name is Michelle Bachelet and she was tortured under Pinochet’s regime. How are you going to claim that she is a Pinochetista/Pro-US intervention?

Also everyone here up to two weeks ago was calling her a Maduro sock-puppet because she didn’t ignore all UN procedure and take an unauthorized trip to Venezuela. Pretty amazing how she went from comeguagua for one side to baby-sledgehammer for the other in the course of a week

I don't really remember much of anything about her, are you sure that was this thread and not like Twitter or something?

otoh sometimes I miss a couple pages

Gozinbulx
Feb 19, 2004

Redczar posted:

comeguagua

To Cubans a guagua is a bus and I was very confused by this at first. In Chile guagua is a baby? Why do they say communists eat babies?

Redczar
Nov 9, 2011

Gozinbulx posted:

To Cubans a guagua is a bus and I was very confused by this at first. In Chile guagua is a baby? Why do they say communists eat babies?

Guagua is indeed a baby. Coger una guagua means something very different here.
I don’t know the exact origin. I think it’s just to make them seem more evil

GreyjoyBastard posted:

I don't really remember much of anything about her, are you sure that was this thread and not like Twitter or something?

otoh sometimes I miss a couple pages

Sorry, I meant in Chile! My mistake for being too vague

Haramstufe Rot
Jun 24, 2016

uninterrupted posted:

Hm, yes, calling the country with active concentration camps fascist is absurd.


PR China doesn't call itself fascist, but the terrorist dude from NZ called himself fascist and said the closest IRL country to these political ideals is China. So I guess you are right.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Redczar posted:

Guagua is indeed a baby. Coger una guagua means something very different here.
I don’t know the exact origin. I think it’s just to make them seem more evil


Sorry, I meant in Chile! My mistake for being too vague

That's actually p interesting then!

as is the fact that she apparently eats buses

Control Volume
Dec 31, 2008

Its controversial to say, but I think Maduro is the legitimate president of Venezuela. Heres the supporting evidence:

1. The military still supports him
2. Hes in a better position to gently caress up the other guy

I dont think Guaido really has a compelling argument for legitimacy until he can actually prove the constitutional argument that he has the ability to drone strike Maduro

Mr. Sunshine
May 15, 2008

This is a scrunt that has been in space too long and become a Lunt (Long Scrunt)

Fun Shoe
Well, legitimacy is about legals status, and there's definitely a legal argument to be made that Guaido is the legitimate (interim) president of Venezuela.
There's no denying that Maduro is the de facto president of Venezuela since, as you point out, he controls the military and the police.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
Can you actually explain that argument that Guaido is the legitimate president? Every time I see that talking point it seems to focus entirely around 'Maduro being a bad president is the same as Maduro abandoning office' which is...not how things work legally.

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

sexpig by night posted:

Can you actually explain that argument that Guaido is the legitimate president? Every time I see that talking point it seems to focus entirely around 'Maduro being a bad president is the same as Maduro abandoning office' which is...not how things work legally.
I believe the argument is:

1. Maduro invented a new legislature from whole cloth to rubber stamp whatever he wants.

2. Maduro handed over control of civil institutions to the Army without the approval of the legitimate legislature.

3. Maduro rigged an election for himself.

4. All of the above represent a coup by the Army and PSUV

5. The face-man of a coup is not a legitimate president.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


sexpig by night posted:

Can you actually explain that argument that Guaido is the legitimate president? Every time I see that talking point it seems to focus entirely around 'Maduro being a bad president is the same as Maduro abandoning office' which is...not how things work legally.

my understanding of the argument is that the national assembly has taken over the powers of the supreme court and have ruled that what maduro's done constitutes abandoning the office of the presidency, which under the constitution means the leader of the national assembly is now president. i'm not sure by what constitutional mechanism the national assembly can assume the responsibilities of another branch of the government, but that seems to be the argument for guaido's legitimacy

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010

Rent-A-Cop posted:

I believe the argument [for Guaido being the legal president] is:
1. Maduro invented a new legislature from whole cloth to rubber stamp whatever he wants.
2. Maduro handed over control of civil institutions to the Army without the approval of the legitimate legislature.
3. Maduro rigged an election for himself.
4. All of the above represent a coup by the Army and PSUV
5. The face-man of a coup is not a legitimate president.

This is more or less true, but points 1, 2, 4 and 5 are not relevant to the constitutional discussion about Guaido being president. Essentially the AN is saying that since the 2018 presidential election was highly irregular*, the office of the president was abandoned when Maduro's term expired from his 2013 election.

So the legal argument has nothing to do with Maduro being a bad ruler, it has to do with there having been no presidential election and Maduro's legal term having expired, i.e. the office is currently unoccupied, which requires the head of the AN to assume the position of acting president.

*(which it was -- which is why the Carter Foundation and many others did not support it or blasted it, including the company, Smartmatic, that made the voting machines, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Venezuelan_presidential_election )

E: IIRC: There are other reasons why the post is unoccupied, for instance the constitution requires the president to be sworn in to office in front of the AN, which he was not. It's also possible I might be confusing this with one of the many reasons why Bouteflika can't run again in Algeria, because he is not able to speak and thus can't be constitutionally sworn in. Ableism at its finest, saying stroke victims who can't speak or move can't be president. I can't wait for Maduro, that bastion of equality, to speak out in support of Bouteflika for the unfairness of the Algerian constitution.

Saladman fucked around with this message at 15:23 on Mar 22, 2019

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there
Simply put,

- Maduro was elected in 2013
- The Nation Assembly elections of 2015 gave a supermajority to the opposition
- during the lame-duck session the outgoing National Assembly confirmed a large number of new members to the Supreme Court in disputed circumstances
- the new Maduro-controlled Supreme Court began invalidating every action taken by the opposition-led National Assembly in disputed circumstances
- in order to further isolate the NA, Maduro convened a constitutional assembly in disputed circumstances
- the subsequent 2018 re-election of Maduro to the presidency took place under, again, disputed circumstances as to the legality and conduct of the election

The National Assembly has declared the vote invalid, that Maduro was not properly re-elected, and that upon the expiry of his 2013 term, there was therefore no legally elected President; the office was legally vacant, and the National Assembly duly declared it as such (which is a power reserved to the National Assembly by the constitution, much like impeachment in the USA).

The rest follows - lacking a validly-elected President, the constitution states the leader of the National Assembly steps in as interim President until elections are held.

Of course given the election board is controlled by Maduro supporters, they have not organized the required election, regardless of the National Assembly ordering it or not.

So here we are. If you agree the 2018 Presidential election was invalid, Guaido is interim President by law. If you don't, he's not.

Rust Martialis fucked around with this message at 15:25 on Mar 22, 2019

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Rust Martialis posted:

Simply put,

- Maduro was elected in 2013
- The Nation Assembly elections of 2015 gave a supermajority to the opposition
- during the lame-duck session the outgoing National Assembly confirmed a large number of new members to the Supreme Court in disputed circumstances
- the new Maduro-controlled Supreme Court began invalidating every action taken by the opposition-led National Assembly in disputed circumstances
- in order to further isolate the NA, Maduro convened a constitutional assembly in disputed circumstances
- the subsequent 2018 re-election of Maduro to the presidency took place under, again, disputed circumstances as to the legality and conduct of the election

The National Assembly has declared the vote invalid, that Maduro was not properly re-elected, and that upon the expiry of his 2013 term, there was therefore no legally elected President; the office was legally vacant, and the National Assembly duly declared it as such (which is a power reserved to the National Assembly by the constitution, much like impeachment in the USA).

The rest follows - lacking a validly-elected President, the constitution states the leader of the National Assembly steps in as interim President until elections are held.

Of course given the election board is controlled by Maduro supporters, they have not organized the required election, regardless of the National Assembly ordering it or not.

So here we are. If you agree the 2018 Presidential election was invalid, Guaido is interim President by law. If you don't, he's not.

the supreme court has said the office is not legally vacant though, and that the national assembly's interpretation is wrong

what is the constitutional basis for the NA to override the supreme court?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Furia
Jul 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer

Condiv posted:

the supreme court has said the office is not legally vacant though, and that the national assembly's interpretation is wrong

what is the constitutional basis for the NA to override the supreme court?

Do you hold the Supreme Court in high authority? Are they legitimate and hold the final word in the legality of actions in Venezuela?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply