|
Is there any update on the Information Commissioner's investigation into Joan Ryan? [edit] 398BC was - according to Wikipedia, a pretty boring year
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 08:13 |
|
|
At multiple instances over the course of the debate there was a good old fashioned circlejerk at how productive all this was and how this is how the house should have been conducting itself for the last two years.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:03
|
|
|
Sex Robot posted:At multiple instances over the course of the debate there was a good old fashioned circlejerk at how productive all this was and how this is how the house should have been conducting itself for the last two years. I mean, compared to how the house has actually been conducting itself over the past two years this isn't wrong, even if they had spent the same proportion of time circlejerking in those two years
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:06
|
|
|
jabby posted:Liz Truss is on Peston. Well this was meant to be a starting point to narrow down the options wasn't it? Even more of these votes to come. SNP now seem to be demanding an election but I can't see the Tories going for that. If they do though, perfect grounds to call for a long extension I suppose.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:06
|
|
|
These votes have been closer to any progress tha... ... nah actually this is The Fast and The Furious rules: Doesn't matter if you win by an inch or by a mile. Unless they put forward a customs union agreement that'd be voted on in a referendum.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:07
|
|
|
correct me if i'm mistaken but poo poo still needs to go through house of lords right
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:07
|
|
|
Nuclear Spoon posted:correct me if i'm mistaken but poo poo still needs to go through house of lords right No. Our process of withdrawal from the EU is already an act of law that was passed before which states under section 13 that the government is to bring forward a motion to be passed only by the house of commons. The amendment made on Monday made it so the house could do this instead as well as bypassing Standing Order 14 which gives government priority over business in the house.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:09
|
|
|
gently caress all this Brexit nonsense THEY'RE GETTING RID OF TOOTY FROOTYS? This truly is hellworld
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:09
|
|
|
Nuclear Spoon posted:correct me if i'm mistaken but poo poo still needs to go through house of lords right Ultimately yes, any deal that is passed needs to go through the Lords.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:10
|
|
|
Lord Stimperor posted:Please start a patreon so we can sponsor you becoming the official UKMT full time cartoonist Having an in-
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:12
|
|
|
Was Boris Johnson driving an old Renault espace just then on the news? Bit europey.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:13
|
|
|
Nuclear Spoon posted:correct me if i'm mistaken but poo poo still needs to go through house of lords right mehall posted:Ultimately yes, any deal that is passed needs to go through the Lords. Ah, we're talking about new deals. Hmm this gets complex. Azza Bamboo fucked around with this message at 00:17 on Mar 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:13
|
|
|
JRM looking very discombobulated on Peston. He clearly thought the DUP were going to come on board, and now he's trying to defend the PMs deal but also say he'll still vote against it unless the DUP come on board. Because they still might, apparently (they won't). https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/1111043206525997056
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:14
|
|
|
Azza Bamboo posted:Ah, we're talking about new deals. Hmm this gets complex. My understanding is the PMs deal would still need to progress through the Lords as well. e; though theoretically as a campaign manifesto pledge, would potentially be relatively untouchable. Also the Lords might just want to avoid any issues if the commons finally approved something.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:15
|
|
|
Surprise T Rex posted:Images to match your gaping orifice, you say? I've got just the thing... Want some goon prolapse pictures in your PM's?
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:15
|
|
|
marktheando posted:Well this was meant to be a starting point to narrow down the options wasn't it? Even more of these votes to come. SNP now seem to be demanding an election but I can't see the Tories going for that. Those further votes won’t take place if today’s events have scared enough MPs into voting for May’s deal on Friday. SNP & TIG definitely should have voted for customs union today.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:15
|
|
|
Oh boy, there's a Labour backbencher nobody Noel Edmonds look-a-like who keeps shouting anti-semitic abuse at poor Ed in the HoC
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:16
|
|
|
Is Brexit still happening in 2 days?
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:17
|
|
|
mehall posted:My understanding is the PMs deal would still need to progress through the Lords as well. I think making new legislation to be brought before both houses would avoid the legal question, but attempts to determine new deals with Europe as any government may be able to do to satisfy section 13 could potentially expedite the process and cut the lords out of it. What I'm saying is there's already an act of law that determines our withdrawal process and in theory its provision to bring forward a withdrawal agreement to the commons only for a final vote doesn't necessarily have to be met by Theresa May's deal. As I understood it there's an opportunity to intercept this process with a new agreed deal with the EU. A new referendum probably would need new legislation, however. Also this is legally questionable and as I have said before: new legislation would avoid the question. Azza Bamboo fucked around with this message at 00:29 on Mar 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:18
|
|
|
Nissin Cup Nudist posted:Is Brexit still happening in 2 days? no
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:19
|
|
|
Nissin Cup Nudist posted:Is Brexit still happening in 2 days? Nope - April 12 probably not
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:19
|
|
Gunder posted:Those further votes won’t take place if today’s events have scared enough MPs into voting for May’s deal on Friday. SNP & TIG definitely should have voted for customs union today.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:20
|
|
|
Removed forgot to check date. Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 00:24 on Mar 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:20
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Meanwhile in other news... Check the date on that
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RobDotHutton/status/1111019642699595778?s=20
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:21
|
|
|
Coohoolin posted:Check the date on that Thanks - forgot to check. Normally do. Have removed post. Mind you he still said it!
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:entirely unrelated, this is a great twitter account Fun fact, the Italian Navy used commercial Enigma machines without customisation, meaning GC&CS had worked out a way of breaking them 12 years before the war even started, using a purely manual method. (Also there's some disagreement whether Italian Naval traffic was being broken at Bletchley at the time of Matapan - it's often described as their first big triumph of the war, and it definitely *was* broken by GC&CS, but at the time Bletchley was entirely concentrating on German Naval Enigma and it's likely the low-tech method used to break the Italian traffic was probably actually being done directly at the Admiralty or one of the GC&CS offices in London)
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:28
|
|
|
god i wish these people were at risk of losing their loving seats https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1111042517284413446?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:29
|
|
|
jabby posted:JRM looking very discombobulated on Peston. He clearly thought the DUP were going to come on board, and now he's trying to defend the PMs deal but also say he'll still vote against it unless the DUP come on board. Because they still might, apparently (they won't). He's still reeling from being owned on Tudor Parliamentary history.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:29
|
|
|
 my PhD advisor is English and I was looking forward to giving him poo poo for a day Ratjaculation posted:Nope - April 12 probably not I can hope
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:31
|
|
|
I've just realised I'll be safely out of the country on April 12th so go ahead and dither the country into a state of non-existence for all I care.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:33
|
|
|
Nissin Cup Nudist posted:
maybe check he doesn't know anyone at risk of dying from medicine shortages or anyone living on the irish border yeah?
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:34
|
|
|
Aye me too. Maybe I can apply for asylum in Colombia. Join a nice gang. At least they can make and execute a plan unlike the bandits running this shitwhoe
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:34
|
|
|
Nissin Cup Nudist posted:my PhD advisor is English and I was looking forward to giving him poo poo for a day
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:35
|
|
|
mehall posted:My understanding is the PMs deal would still need to progress through the Lords as well. The PM's deal absolutely would not need to go to the Lords. the European Union (Withdrawal) act 2018 already passed the Lords and Commons and provides for the government to vote on its Withdrawal Agreement in the commons only. Basically we have an act of law that already passed the Commons and Lords. The way it works is that it specified a leave date and then said "on that leave date all this poo poo happens". We already put in there the stuff we don't need to ask the EU for like repealing the EU communities act and ending EU precedence over UK law. Also it agreed to keep all EU laws we adopted so far as domestic laws in order to avoid a complete ballache when the date comes. Then this act of law allows us to come back to the commons and vote on the Withdrawal Agreement made with the EU. No doubt the leave date has been amended. If we revoked Article 50 we'd also revoke this act. Azza Bamboo fucked around with this message at 00:43 on Mar 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:39
|
|
|
Just finished watching Waterworld for the first time in almost 25 years. Still better than whatever Parliament achieved in the past 2 hours.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:40
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Just finished watching Waterworld for the first time in almost 25 years. It's actually a pretty solid film taken in isolation, IMO. Story's a bit dumb, but it's well-acted and absolutely beautifully shot.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:42
|
|
|
Dead Goon posted:He's still reeling from being owned on Tudor Parliamentary history. What happened?
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:43
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:It's actually a pretty solid film taken in isolation, IMO. Story's a bit dumb, but it's well-acted and absolutely beautifully shot. Kevin Costner= well acted ...Buddy (Dennis Hopper is way too good for that movie)
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 08:13 |
|
|
TulliusCicero posted:Kevin Costner= well acted Eh, he plays someone who can't really relate to humanity and is stiff and uncommunicative, it's the role he was born to play.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2019 00:47
|
|