Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Martian Manfucker
Dec 27, 2012

misandry is real

PT6A posted:

Accelerationism is real dumb, yo.

incrementalism is worse

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Cheshire Cat
Jun 10, 2008

Fun Shoe

Baronjutter posted:

The greens are kinda all over the place but honestly not that much worse than the NDP, who are also all over the place and sometimes extremely bad.

But in general, Greens bad because:
-"Not left, not right, forward". Although we generally associate environmentalism with the "left" the greens can be radical centrists on a lot of non-environmental issues.
-In my experience a lot of greens are pretty anti-union. Crusty hippies and rich saltspring cabin owners don't really need unions.
-Some of them are PHD's in environmental science, some of them are fwfwfwfwfw wifi causes autism and their various environmental policies reflect this.
-The BC Greens have been really dragging their feet and resistant to any sort of taxes on rich housing speculators because so far in BC the greens that have been elected are housing speculators representing ridings full of rich old home owners who's main environmental passions are based on how climate change might damage their waterfront homes or cabins.

Basically the issue with the Greens is that they're the classic "socially liberal, fiscally conservative" people that hate the problems but love their causes.

ARACHTION
Mar 10, 2012

Ok convinced that Greens are bad except for that list that Postess posted which made me remember some of E-May’s pretty solid trolls over the years.

It’s so baffling that the NDP hasn’t picked up on how down so many people seem to be for Eco-Socialism but then again as has been said in the thread, I should stop being surprised, they are not socialists.

I mean during the Québec provincial election i was convincing boomer suburbans and Anglos to vote for a socialist sovereignist party based pretty solely on their environmental transition plan.

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

infernal machines posted:

I'm not sure if linking JJ McCullough's opinions on anything can be considered a point for or against

They aren't opinions, they're meticulously sourced facts. This is an opinion

https://twitter.com/JJ_McCullough/status/977274538059743232?s=19

EvidenceBasedQuack
Aug 15, 2015

A rock has no detectable opinion about gravity
I think the 'concern for waterfront properties' nails it. In my experience, green supporters and candidates (my politically inclined friends or I personally met) drive large cars/trucks and do little besides the occasional "we should protect the environment" musings. Especially if they ride fancy bikes, splandex-clad, at their local provincial/national parks. Or like birds.

James Baud
May 24, 2015

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
Caring about the environment is pretty high in Maslow's hierarchy of needs... Until it isn't.

Oops, too late.

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos

EvidenceBasedQuack posted:

I think the 'concern for waterfront properties' nails it. In my experience, green supporters and candidates (my politically inclined friends or I personally met) drive large cars/trucks and do little besides the occasional "we should protect the environment" musings. Especially if they ride fancy bikes, splandex-clad, at their local provincial/national parks. Or like birds.

First wave environmentalism.

Health Services
Feb 27, 2009
Anyone seen a missing Supreme Court justice?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justice-clement-gascon-missing-1.5128783

bunnyofdoom
Mar 29, 2008
THE HATE CRIME DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON
Yeah



Can I preemptively blame Scott Moe?

Jordan7hm
Feb 17, 2011




Lipstick Apathy

Uh.

Last seen today at 1:20pm.

What an odd story. It’s gotta be threatening suicide or something, right?

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009


What the gently caress

James Baud
May 24, 2015

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
He's retiring from the SCC at 59-60 which is rather early. Likely has a serious health issue.

Jordan7hm
Feb 17, 2011




Lipstick Apathy

James Baud posted:

He's retiring from the SCC at 59-60 which is rather early. Likely has a serious health issue.

Or he did some poo poo.

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

Abrupt retirement plus sudden disappearance, yeah that's a man in some kind of trouble.

bunnyofdoom
Mar 29, 2008
THE HATE CRIME DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON
The description from the police said he had a beard but the photos they showed on CBC didn't have one

Legit Businessman
Sep 2, 2007


flakeloaf posted:

Abrupt retirement plus sudden disappearance, yeah that's a man in some kind of trouble.

It's brain trouble for sure. :smith:

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

lol this is the dumbest take

RealityWarCriminal
Aug 10, 2016

:o:
fire the :females:

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes
The problem isn't housing affordability, it's that you think you should be able to afford a house. As usual, the solution is simply an adjustment of perspective.

quote:

The head of Canada’s housing-market watchdog says this country places too much value in the dream of homeownership.

“In places like Paris and Sydney and Hong Kong and Buenos Aires [and New York], people rent. Whereas here [in Canada] we glorify homeownership. We think it’s the only vehicle for savings,” Evan Siddall, president and CEO of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), said in an interview with BNN Bloomberg’s Amanda Lang on Wednesday.

“This party ultimately comes to an end, and the people who are going to get hurt are young people.”

He said the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive is meant to address this very issue by helping young people buy homes without pushing prices too much higher.

The incentive, for which Ottawa has set aside $1.25 billion over three years, was introduced in the 2019 federal budget and is funded in part by CMHC. It’s meant to reduce the monthly mortgage load for buyers and is available only to first-time buyers with household incomes of less than $120,000 a year.

“It is deliberately designed to be a surgical response to people being excluded from the market,” he said.

He estimates that the incentive will have a 0.02 per cent to 0.04 per cent “maximum impact” on house prices across the country.

“It’s not inflationary,” he said.

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/this-party-ultimately-comes-to-an-end-cmhc-ceo-says-homeownership-too-glorified-1.1255808

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002



People rent in Sydney? Possibly the most expensive housing market in the world? Really, I wonder why they choose to rent instead of buying??

infernal machines
Oct 11, 2012

we monitor many frequencies. we listen always. came a voice, out of the babel of tongues, speaking to us. it played us a mighty dub.

Postess with the Mostest posted:

They aren't opinions, they're meticulously sourced facts. This is an opinion

https://twitter.com/JJ_McCullough/status/977274538059743232?s=19

I feel like he answered his own question though.

Albino Squirrel
Apr 25, 2003

Miosis more like meiosis

ARACHTION posted:

Would someone remind me why the Greens are bad again?

I know they are afraid of wifi, into homeopathy, don’t like nuclear, but what else?

Are they boomer neo-Liberal environmentalists who just think the right mix of carbon taxes will save the planet?

Because otherwise, I’m willing to have my taxes pay for diluted bee venom if it means I get a Green New Deal.
The nuclear thing alone is sufficiently disqualifying to me. Eliminating fossil fuel-based power/transportation is probably impossible in this climate without nuclear power, and climate change is a much more pressing existential issue than ATOMZ.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Albino Squirrel posted:

The nuclear thing alone is sufficiently disqualifying to me. Eliminating fossil fuel-based power/transportation is probably impossible in this climate without nuclear power, and climate change is a much more pressing existential issue than ATOMZ.

Is the NDP any less anti-nuke? Just less vocal about it?

thehoodie
Feb 8, 2011

"Eat something made with love and joy - and be forgiven"

ARACHTION posted:

Would someone remind me why the Greens are bad again?

I know they are afraid of wifi, into homeopathy, don’t like nuclear, but what else?

Are they boomer neo-Liberal environmentalists who just think the right mix of carbon taxes will save the planet?

Because otherwise, I’m willing to have my taxes pay for diluted bee venom if it means I get a Green New Deal.

Most recently in BC, they confirmed they are anti-union by threatening to take down the government if they scrapped secret ballots for union certification.

But generally, yeah, they're neoliberals who believe in climate change. Their policies will do little to address structural inequality and will therefore ironically fail to address the root cause of climate change.

HackensackBackpack
Aug 20, 2007

Who needs a house out in Hackensack? Is that all you get for your money?
Justice Gascon has been found, by the way. La Presse reports he turned up in an Ottawa hospital, but is otherwise okay.

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

Alberta.tweet

https://twitter.com/sarahcrgr/status/1126312783157628929?s=19

UnknownMercenary
Nov 1, 2011

I LIKE IT
WAY WAY TOO LOUD


They should've brought guillotines as well https://twitter.com/LukewSavage/status/1126495294244388865?s=19

BGrifter
Mar 16, 2007

Winner of Something Awful PS5 thread's Posting Excellence Award June 2022

Congratulations!

They actually started singing a flawless rendition of “gently caress Tha Police”. They may not look scary but they’re gangsta as fuuuuuuuuck.

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes
who said journalism was dead

quote:

Why are we celebrating Red Army conquests in the streets of Toronto?

Paul Philip Willis: The Swastika and the Hammer and Sickle both represent pure evil. There ought to be no place for them here

“Twenty-two Hoeringstrasse. It’s not been burned, just looted, rifled. A moaning by the walls, half muffled: the mother’s wounded, half alive. The little daughter’s on the mattress, dead. How many have been on it? A platoon, a company perhaps? A girl’s been turned into a woman, a woman turned into a corpse … The mother begs, ‘Soldier, kill me!’ ”

The late Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote this profoundly disturbing narrative in a poem called “Prussian Nights” in 1945, as he witnessed his fellow soldiers in the communist Soviet Red Army engaging in mass looting and raping in Eastern Germany as they advanced on Adolf Hitler’s Berlin.

It is a well-known historical fact that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.), for most of its dark reign covering half the planet from 1917 to 1991, represented an evil force that committed well-documented atrocities including, but not limited to, the genocide of millions of Ukrainians in the 1932-33 Holodomor, mass imprisonment and unspeakable tortures visited upon political prisoners in the Gulag Archipelago, enslavement of most of Eastern Europe under the leadership of complicit and brutal puppet regimes, and countless other crimes against humanity perpetrated all over the globe for the greater good of communism.

The U.S.S.R., for most of its dark reign … represented an evil force that committed well-documented atrocities

Imagine my surprise then, having arrived a year ago at Toronto’s Nathan Phillips Square to attend an event ostensibly organized to celebrate Victory in Europe Day (VE Day — May 8, 1945), the date Western allied countries commemorate the surrender of Nazi Germany, spotting a small contingent of former Soviet Red Army soldiers, numerous Soviet display booths and even a participant waving the Hammer and Sickle flag. They were celebrating Victory Day, the Soviet version of VE Day.

The Soviets fought the Nazis on the Eastern Front, and for four years endured some of the harshest fighting in the war. That’s historical fact. But for those of us with a properly aligned moral compass and an understanding of that history, we rightly view the inclusion of Soviet forces in a ceremony celebrating our Western troops who fought for democracy and freedom, as an offensive attempt to create a false moral equivalency between the two societies.

Having signed a pact of non-aggression with the U.S.S.R. in 1939, Hitler felt secure enough to launch his blitzkrieg in Western Europe while the Soviet Union busied itself invading Eastern European countries, including Poland, where amongst other crimes it murdered 22,000 military officers and intellectuals in the Katyn Forest that same year. It was not until June 1941, when Hitler attacked Russia, that the Soviets joined in the battle with the Western allies. At the time Winston Churchill, in agreeing to support the tyrant Joseph Stalin, famously stated “If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.” There was no mistaking who the devil (Stalin) was in that statement; Churchill, and indeed all Western leaders, were under no delusions as to the evils of communism.

Upon the surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945, the U.S.S.R. quickly returned to its never-ending mission of imposing communism worldwide, through five decades of threatening nuclear war, invading susceptible countries, crushing rebellion in nations it oppressed (such as Hungary in 1956, and Czechoslovakia in 1968) and providing logistical or moral support to murderous communist regimes in Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia to name but a few.

Toronto’s combined VE Day and Soviet Victory Day ceremony was orchestrated in 2015 by Coun. James Pasternak in conjunction with a Toronto-based Soviet Committee formed to celebrate their victory in the Great Patriotic War (the name the Russians give to the Second World War), and once again, on Wednesday, Nathan Phillips Square was host to this disingenuous joint venture.

A review of the Soviet Victory Day website contains pictures of soldiers or actors marching down Toronto streets with Red Army uniforms, Soviet flags and banners flying, and an interesting description about how “… people of all nationalities and religions selflessly stood shoulder to shoulder in fighting the enemy of Civilization as we know it. It was this union of all Civilized Nations that led to the historic victory over fascism.” Of all the phrases one could accurately employ to describe the former Soviet Union, “Civilized Nation” is not one of them.

For all right thinking Canadians, especially those who are descendants of the millions whom the Communist Soviets oppressed and murdered, the participation of Soviet Red Army forces in a VE Day celebration is an abhorrent charade and a gross insult to our Canadian veterans, and those from our allied democracies.

The Swastika and the Hammer and Sickle both represent pure evil, the latter just had a longer run on flag poles. There ought to be no place for it on Toronto’s streets.

— Paul Philip Willis is a freelance writer living in Toronto

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/why-are-we-celebrating-red-army-conquests-in-the-streets-of-toronto#comments-area

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012


He thought they were clutching copies of Das Kapital.

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888
im also afraid of old people with books

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888

Postess with the Mostest posted:

who said journalism was dead

i guess this pasternak guy should stick to hockey!

Nine of Eight
Apr 28, 2011


LICK IT OFF, AND PUT IT BACK IN
Dinosaur Gum
Back in Quebec; this poo poo continues to perdure.

“It seems rather reasonable to lump primary school teachers in the same category as judges, prosecutors, prison guards and police”


(For the non Quebec people; this lady is an atheist of Algerian origin whose parents were hardcore communists there. She’s rabidly anti-Islam on the best of days )
“I’ve got an honorary PHD from the university of life in making GBS threads on muslims who aren’t atheist like me”


Enough PL-21 for one day

Constable 728 takes on astrophysics the only way a Cop known for excessive brutality can.


“Prince Harry and his Princess Consort Meghan présent the 7th place in the order of succession to be the next face on our currency.”

Juul-Whip
Mar 10, 2008

ARACHTION posted:

Would someone remind me why the Greens are bad again?

I know they are afraid of wifi, into homeopathy, don’t like nuclear, but what else?

Are they boomer neo-Liberal environmentalists who just think the right mix of carbon taxes will save the planet?

Because otherwise, I’m willing to have my taxes pay for diluted bee venom if it means I get a Green New Deal.

the federal green party is mostly a vehicle to keep Elizabeth May in parliament and she has been their ineffectual leader for loving ever

Juul-Whip
Mar 10, 2008

also lmfao if u take seriously anything jj mccullough has to say about politics

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
It is very easy to find a political party that makes some theoretically good sounding promises. The further from power any part is the easier it is for them to promise the moon to their supporters. The closer they get to power the more incentive they have to water down their promises, and the less ability voters have to monitor and potentially punish their chosen representatives.

So the key question in politics is how you actually constitute a party in such a way that it doesn't drift into the centre once it becomes successful enough. The Greens don't really have any solution to that problem. In fact, the nature of their social base is such that even when they offer policies to the left of the NDP they are more likely to be supported by people with economic interests to the right of the average NDP voter. And while it's not worth much, I put more faith in the NDP's historical link to labour and the weak but still existent connections between labour unions and the NDP's staffers.

I'm not sure if the NDP is currently worth supporting but if they aren't then that's doubly true of the other viable electoral parties.

Juul-Whip
Mar 10, 2008

oh wow, :iceburn:
https://twitter.com/Svend4MP/status/1126021245810511872
https://twitter.com/Svend4MP/status/1126237228802306048

also, didn't Liz threaten to purge a bunch of people from the Green party for criticizing Israel that year too? what's going on lol

Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 19:59 on May 9, 2019

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011
This exchange tells you everything you need to know about the Green Party:

https://twitter.com/GreenEconomyNow/status/1126243160890298368

https://twitter.com/Svend4MP/status/1126246590497247233

https://twitter.com/Jeff_Wheeldon/status/1126285043914223616

https://twitter.com/Jeff_Wheeldon/status/1126285627773915136

"we're not centrists, we just happen to be in the centre and think the truth is in the middle and everyone has some good ideas, but don't call us centrists!!!"



e: for the record those aren't just random old Greens either, that last guy claims to be the Green Party's International Affairs Critic

vyelkin fucked around with this message at 20:06 on May 9, 2019

Pinterest Mom
Jun 9, 2009

https://twitter.com/traceyram/status/1126228030869909504

Let's see if they back this talk up,

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Yeah, the NDP at least, on paper, has connections with unions and working people. The green's base are wealthy cabin owners who drive their hybrid SUV to whole foods to feel green and pure, young naive kids excited to vote for a fresh new party for the first time, and rural conspiracy theorist excited that someone is finally taking their concerns about wifi and fluoride seriously.

The greens seem to have no care or connection with actual working class people or their problems. They just don't talk about or give a poo poo about stuff like worker's rights and protections, affordable housing, homelessness, renter protections, income disparity and so on.

Even their actual environmental policies aren't that great or detailed. It's just super general good-sounding stuff and they never need to get into detail because they've never held any power. And they like to focus on the sort of "environmentalism" a rich suburban homeowner would agree with, like more street trees and green spaces in cities, tax cuts and subsidies for your next tesla, rebates for a solar system on your roof. Then when it comes to bigger stuff like region-wide land use policy which is a massive driver of greenhouse gas and transport costs, they shy away from talking about it or go full nimby. They're huge into decentralizing power, local government, which is generally code for letting rich folk run their neighbourhoods and towns like little gated communities.

More Tesla's, not more buses and trains and bike lanes. Solar panels on the roofs of mansions, not dense walkable communities. Let the market sort things out like in nature, not unnatural socialist policies. Massive income inequality? Abusive workplaces? *crickets* or crazy "a green economy would make everyone rich!" claims.

If the greens were suddenly just placed in Federal or Provincial power today I think we'd see a goverment practically identical to the Liberals but with some tax cuts and subsidies towards some well connected "green" corporations within their first couple terms. It would just be solar power or electric car companies rather then SNC Lavalin.

Baronjutter fucked around with this message at 20:11 on May 9, 2019

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply