Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
pigdog
Apr 23, 2004

by Smythe

Gaj posted:

I dont think its so much the "explosion" as it is the amount of radiotactive material being thrown into the atmosphere. Its three whole, and a half, of reactor cores being scattered around the greater part of the continent.

This bugged me. Steam and water doesn't create an explosion in the magnitude of megatons of TNT, the sheer amount (7000 tons) of water should give a hint that's impossible. Tons, perhaps hundreds of tons, okay, but I'm sure they were really meant the amount of dispersed radioactive material comparable to a 3-5 megaton nuke, not an actual bang of such magnitude.


On a positive note, the attention to detail to the environments, details, clothing, the garish wallpapers, everything that recreates live in the the 80ies Soviet Union is incredible. By far the most accurate depiction of the environment and era I've seen.

pigdog fucked around with this message at 09:06 on May 14, 2019

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eau de MacGowan
May 12, 2009

BRASIL HEXA
2026 tá logo aí
lot of bad writing in this show, these reactors were established as safe and benevolent for many years and now suddenly they're destroying cities and melting people???

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro

Eau de MacGowan posted:

lot of bad writing in this show, these reactors were established as safe and benevolent for many years and now suddenly they're destroying cities and melting people???

Reactor got mad at Cersei. It was totally foreshadowed... :asoiaf:
:goonsay:

Martian Manfucker posted:

The helicopter crash happened like 5 months after the explosion, in October. Not sure why they chose to move it up to where they did, considering there's plenty of drama going on already. Unless I'm misremembering my Chernobyl facts and there was a second crash. Which I could be.

Those three dudes who went in there to open that sluice gate and drain the tanks are probably up there with Norman Borlaug as far as true heroes go.

I thought the helicopter crashed during the sand drop operation, but after that crew had done several runs...

Eau de MacGowan
May 12, 2009

BRASIL HEXA
2026 tá logo aí
is it known what caused the helicopter to crash? was it the crew passing out from radiation, the radiation frying all their electronics, the sheer heat melting poo poo, or all of the above?

counterfeitsaint
Feb 26, 2010

I'm a girl, and you're
gnomes, and it's like
what? Yikes.

Eau de MacGowan posted:

is it known what caused the helicopter to crash?

Capitalism. :ussr: :colbert: :ussr:

Gonz
Dec 22, 2009

"Jesus, did I say that? Or just think it? Was I talking? Did they hear me?"

Eau de MacGowan posted:

is it known what caused the helicopter to crash? was it the crew passing out from radiation, the radiation frying all their electronics, the sheer heat melting poo poo, or all of the above?

I think it was a combo of the electronics shorting out and the blades hitting a steel support line of some kind, causing them to be sheared off.

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro

Eau de MacGowan posted:

is it known what caused the helicopter to crash? was it the crew passing out from radiation, the radiation frying all their electronics, the sheer heat melting poo poo, or all of the above?

quote:

In 2006, responding to persistent allegations that the official figure of 31 direct deaths during and immediately following the disaster omits other confirmed trauma and ARS deaths from the same period, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) revisited the issue.[8] Citing additional deaths from trauma or ARS directly attributable to the disaster during 1986 and 1987 -- including those of a physician and a journalist who arrived at the plant shortly after the reactor explosion and a helicopter crew of Chernobyl liquidators who died in an aerial attempt to pour a decontaminating acetate mixture on a liquidator work area in October 1986 -- UNSCEAR revised the accident's immediate death toll to 54, acknowledging in the process that some groups assessing the same data place the number as low as 49 or as high as 59.[8]

From what I can find, the crew became disoriented after too many runs and ran into the crane wires... :smith:

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

This show could have had The Terror label slapped on it and it would have fit perfectly

Martian Manfucker
Dec 27, 2012

misandry is real

Toxic Fart Syndrome posted:

I thought the helicopter crashed during the sand drop operation, but after that crew had done several runs...

Yup, you're right, my bad. Not sure what I confused it with.

RagnarokZ
May 14, 2004

Emperor of the Internet

Professor Shark posted:

This show could have had The Terror label slapped on it and it would have fit perfectly

The Terror was amazing, I'm perfectly happy to get more relentless horror and dread into my life.

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

pigdog posted:

On a positive note, the attention to detail to the environments, details, clothing, the garish wallpapers, everything that recreates live in the the 80ies Soviet Union is incredible. By far the most accurate depiction of the environment and era I've seen.

That bare hotel lobby gave me horrible flashbacks to lovely 80s locations I stayed in as a kid, and that was in the decadent Capitalist West! I can't imagine how miserable they must have been in the Soviet Union.

CeeJee
Dec 4, 2001
Oven Wrangler

Jerusalem posted:

That bare hotel lobby gave me horrible flashbacks to lovely 80s locations I stayed in as a kid, and that was in the decadent Capitalist West! I can't imagine how miserable they must have been in the Soviet Union.

There are probably plenty of places left in Lithuania that require only a minor effort to make them look like it's 1986 again.

Does anyone know the source for that mural at the institute Emily Watson worked at ?

Also that metal thing behind Shcherbina and Legasov was great, like something Eduard Khil would perform in front of.

CeeJee fucked around with this message at 11:23 on May 14, 2019

Minera
Sep 26, 2007

All your friends and foes,
they thought they knew ya,
but look who's in your heart now.

Martian Manfucker posted:

Yup, you're right, my bad. Not sure what I confused it with.

Nah, even the little citation TFS posted says it happened in October, which would have been during the massive clean up operation (and it mentions it was dropping material for Liquidators, so)

It's a relatively minor event in the scheme of things, and it helps to serve the narrative purpose for the audience of explaining why they didn't just dump some poo poo directly on the fire, since now you see a helicopter try it and immediately crash and kill everyone on board.

Minera fucked around with this message at 11:28 on May 14, 2019

algebra testes
Mar 5, 2011


Lipstick Apathy
The speech about "you'll do it because it has to be done and (we) have always been about sacrifice" was amazing. :ussr:

Wallrod
Sep 27, 2004
Stupid Baby Picture
Apparently that 3-5 megaton number was the real-life estimate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5GTvaW34O0&t=1931s

I don't know how exactly, but i suppose there is a lot of water and a humongous amount of heat, maybe they were using a worst case estimate of 'what happens if [maximum amount of water on-site and from fire trucks] flash-boils under a pile of white-hot nuclear sludge'.

CeeJee
Dec 4, 2001
Oven Wrangler
It's kind of far fetched that the core material entering the tank would instantly vaporize 7 million litres of water. With some quick math I got 4,5 kilotons TNT worth of energy needed to do that, no matter how hot that molten core is there is no way that much energy can get transferred into to the water by whatever amount gets into the water first after melting through the bottom. It would have been bad but not 'all of Europe dead' bad.

pigdog
Apr 23, 2004

by Smythe

Wallrod posted:

Apparently that 3-5 megaton number was the real-life estimate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5GTvaW34O0&t=1931s

I don't know how exactly, but i suppose there is a lot of water and a humongous amount of heat, maybe they were using a worst case estimate of 'what happens if [maximum amount of water on-site and from fire trucks] flash-boils under a pile of white-hot nuclear sludge'.

This might be where the number is coming from, but I still think it's a translation error and they were talking about the steam explosion creating pollution comparable to a hydrogen bomb in the megaton range, rather than actually exploding with such force. Unfortunately the narrator is speaking over that person, it's not possible to verify what it was that he said, verbatim.

bobfather
Sep 20, 2001

I will analyze your nervous system for beer money
Thinking back over that scene, massively inflating a number like that could have been that character’s reaction to the politician in Minsk that blew her off earlier.

Anne Whateley
Feb 11, 2007
:unsmith: i like nice words

pigdog posted:

On a positive note, the attention to detail to the environments, details, clothing, the garish wallpapers, everything that recreates live in the the 80ies Soviet Union is incredible. By far the most accurate depiction of the environment and era I've seen.
For some reason that really hit me when the scientist was trying to call Chernobyl. It was someone's job to figure out what an old Soviet dial tone and ringtone was. It's not like you even have photos to go on.

The one thing I don't like is that the scientist is a composite character meant to represent all the scientists who contributed. I want to see a horde of scientists descend and sperg and bicker and help.

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

pigdog posted:

This might be where the number is coming from, but I still think it's a translation error and they were talking about the steam explosion creating pollution comparable to a hydrogen bomb in the megaton range, rather than actually exploding with such force. Unfortunately the narrator is speaking over that person, it's not possible to verify what it was that he said, verbatim.

yeah that interpretation is the only thing that makes any sense to me

BigglesSWE
Dec 2, 2014

How 'bout them hawks news huh!

Anne Whateley posted:

For some reason that really hit me when the scientist was trying to call Chernobyl. It was someone's job to figure out what an old Soviet dial tone and ringtone was. It's not like you even have photos to go on.

The one thing I don't like is that the scientist is a composite character meant to represent all the scientists who contributed. I want to see a horde of scientists descend and sperg and bicker and help.

Apparently there were hundreds of them, and while it’d be pretty funny to see that represented on film, I understand the thought behind merging them into one.

Wallrod
Sep 27, 2004
Stupid Baby Picture

pigdog posted:

This might be where the number is coming from, but I still think it's a translation error and they were talking about the steam explosion creating pollution comparable to a hydrogen bomb in the megaton range, rather than actually exploding with such force. Unfortunately the narrator is speaking over that person, it's not possible to verify what it was that he said, verbatim.
I think you're right, the show script says it'd be a thermal explosion of "2-4 megatons"... which doesn't actually mean anything on its own, and trying to find english language sources for the size of the steam explosion or result of it only quote the megatons figure and link back to that documentary, if to anything at all. Incidentally the author of 'Chernobyl 01:23:40: The Incredible True Story of the World's Worst Nuclear Disaster' and that long imgur post, quotes it (who is active on reddit) and was apparently an invited guest to the production by the director writer, so possibly was treated as a trusted source/expert for the show.

CeeJee posted:

It's kind of far fetched that the core material entering the tank would instantly vaporize 7 million litres of water. With some quick math I got 4,5 kilotons TNT worth of energy needed to do that, no matter how hot that molten core is there is no way that much energy can get transferred into to the water by whatever amount gets into the water first after melting through the bottom. It would have been bad but not 'all of Europe dead' bad.
Thanks, i knew there'd be a way of getting some kind of meaningful numbers about the energy needed to make that much steam but it's been a long time since i've done any engineering homework. (another edit: is that 4.5kt for ~100 degree steam?)

edit: the wrier's active on reddit and answering questions too, it might be worth asking about the source/basis, though i'm listening to the second episode podcast now just in case it's talked about there. i don't know why i'm all obsessed about this, but here i am

Wallrod fucked around with this message at 14:49 on May 14, 2019

drunkill
Sep 25, 2007

me @ ur posting
Fallen Rib
Episode 2 of the HBO companion podcast is out as well, worth a listen as the show creator explains things and the differences to real life (mainly compressing multiple people or events down in one) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faQs2_hjNZk

Martian Manfucker posted:

The helicopter crash happened like 5 months after the explosion, in October. Not sure why they chose to move it up to where they did, considering there's plenty of drama going on already. Unless I'm misremembering my Chernobyl facts and there was a second crash. Which I could be.

Those three dudes who went in there to open that sluice gate and drain the tanks are probably up there with Norman Borlaug as far as true heroes go.

It shows that something as bad as a helicopter crashing is nothing in comparison to the task that has to be done.

"Oh well, keep going, acceptable losses."

drunkill fucked around with this message at 14:17 on May 14, 2019

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

It’s crazy how so much about Chernobyl is still a mystery because of Soviet attempts to bury as much as possible. Like how well never accurately know how many people really died.

comments like these make me wonder what people are gonna say about America when its dead and gone, seeing as how the US has committed more crimes of worse severity than the USSR could of ever had

Phi230 fucked around with this message at 15:06 on May 14, 2019

Anne Whateley
Feb 11, 2007
:unsmith: i like nice words

BigglesSWE posted:

Apparently there were hundreds of them, and while it’d be pretty funny to see that represented on film, I understand the thought behind merging them into one.
Imo it makes it look low-priority and amps up the cover-up atmosphere, that there are only two people working on remediation and they're just there by chance. In real life it was hundreds descending because it was so important nobody had anything better to do. I'm not saying they need hundreds, but give me like 20. She can still be their spokesperson

LesterGroans
Jun 9, 2009

It's funny...

You were so scary at night.

RagnarokZ posted:

The Terror was amazing, I'm perfectly happy to get more relentless horror and dread into my life.

I'm so psyched for season 2, even if the lack of Jared Harris is gonna suck.

Buller
Nov 6, 2010
Looking forward to the cleanup.

EvilBlackRailgun
Jan 28, 2007


Phi230 posted:

comments like these make me wonder what people are gonna say about America when its dead and gone, seeing as how the US has committed more crimes of worse severity than the USSR could of ever had

Lmao

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_mortality_in_the_Soviet_Union_under_Joseph_Stalin

Pham Nuwen
Oct 30, 2010




don't engage with tankies

BigglesSWE
Dec 2, 2014

How 'bout them hawks news huh!
Holy hell was that a scary ending. Like, genuinely frightening. It takes a lot for a TV show to affect my mood but Christ what a nightmare.

Ruflux
Jun 16, 2012

Anne Whateley posted:

Imo it makes it look low-priority and amps up the cover-up atmosphere, that there are only two people working on remediation and they're just there by chance. In real life it was hundreds descending because it was so important nobody had anything better to do. I'm not saying they need hundreds, but give me like 20. She can still be their spokesperson

Yeah I agree with this. I'd add it also kind of cheapens the overall message of what the writer wanted to showcase (Soviets having a fair amount of women scientists who were respected and the idea of a regular scientist type, not some super smart hero, being the one calling the shots) because it's injecting a fictional character that's clearly super competent into a real-world scenario who essentially only is involved because she forced her way in.

It also kind of cheapens the adherence to how real science is done since now it's just two people drawing the right conclusions on limited or nearly nonexistent data, instead of a roomful of highly trained specialists reaching something resembling a consensus by analyzing the available data and debating the right course of action. The way I'd do it is mostly how they showed it (including the Minsk institute scenes and even the fictional scientist being stonewalled at the local level) but have a team of scientists be put together and her be a part of it because she's earned that right.

The idea is obviously that she gets specifically called in because she is smart and respected, and maybe she is still the one to voice the concern over the water tank issue but she's not just a random, particularly dedicated person who seems to almost have the script on hand and knows the detailed situation without having confirmed any of it herself. She draws the right conclusions but gets filled in on the details and then comes to the realization they need to go in and drain the water tanks like, right now. It would not only feel more true to real life but it'd make for a more compelling story, imo.

Ruflux fucked around with this message at 16:05 on May 14, 2019

Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
there was a coverup at chernobyl but stuff like "the three guys who went into the reactor water to drain the pipes really died and were replaced" is the same kind of conspiratorial thought at the root of lost cosmonaut theories (and assange hiding in an embassy because the CIA must definitely want to murder him)

it is possible to get serious doses of radiation and survive with injury, for example irl dyatlov (paul ritter, the "you did not see graphite" guy in the control room) died in 1995 from heart failure, possibly because of his intense radiation exposure, possibly because of other causes - it's really not possible to say if any specific adult's ailments were caused by radiation sickness or not. a guy at the plant named gorbachenko, who is partially depicted in the first episode (the guy who found the other super hosed up dude on the floor and carried his body down the hallway until he met two other workers) was alive but injured when interviewed in 1996

The REAL Goobusters
Apr 25, 2008
Yeah if I’m disappointed by anything on this show is that I wish they had more scientists than literally only two (pay for more actors you goddamn cowards) and also the show to be in Russian. Subtitles are fine! I’ve been enjoying the show, but the podcast is definitely something you need to listen to just to know what they changed and what they kept.

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_of_indigenous_peoples#Colonialism_and_genocide_in_the_Americas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes

https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/us_atrocities.md

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States

death to america, american prisons are labor camps equivalent in severity to gulags, and I didn't even post about segregation nor america's fascist population, not did I mention how America has killed more people than even the USSR nor about how the United States is responsible for installing dozens of right wing dictators, nor did I post about how the US holds mass-trials or puts toddlers on trial

all in all the US still ranks 3rd in terms of modern evil empires, behind the UK at number 1 and nazi germany at number 2

the only people with the moral authority or legitimacy to rightfully criticize the ussr are other leftists, otherwise you keep its name out of your stupid lib mouth

Phi230 fucked around with this message at 16:58 on May 14, 2019

Anne Whateley
Feb 11, 2007
:unsmith: i like nice words

Ruflux posted:

Yeah I agree with this. I'd add it also kind of cheapens the overall message of what the writer wanted to showcase (Soviets having a fair amount of women scientists who were respected and the idea of a regular scientist type, not some super smart hero, being the one calling the shots) because it's injecting a fictional character that's clearly super competent into a real-world scenario who essentially only is involved because she forced her way in.

It also kind of cheapens the adherence to how real science is done since now it's just two people drawing the right conclusions on limited or nearly nonexistent data, instead of a roomful of highly trained specialists reaching something resembling a consensus by analyzing the available data and debating the right course of action. The way I'd do it is mostly how they showed it (including the Minsk institute scenes and even the fictional scientist being stonewalled at the local level) but have a team of scientists be put together and her be a part of it because she's earned that right.

The idea is obviously that she gets specifically called in because she is smart and respected, and maybe she is still the one to voice the concern over the water tank issue but she's not just a random, particularly dedicated person who seems to almost have the script on hand and knows the detailed situation without having confirmed any of it herself. She draws the right conclusions but gets filled in on the details and then comes to the realization they need to go in and drain the water tanks like, right now. It would not only feel more true to real life but it'd make for a more compelling story, imo.
agree 100% with all of this. Let's write a prestige miniseries together

The REAL Goobusters posted:

Yeah if I’m disappointed by anything on this show is that I wish they had more scientists than literally only two (pay for more actors you goddamn cowards)
I don't think that's the issue, since they had plenty of extras for the hospital and evacuation scenes. Just give them some lab coats and have them be debating in the background

Anne Whateley fucked around with this message at 16:23 on May 14, 2019

The REAL Goobusters
Apr 25, 2008

Anne Whateley posted:

agree 100% with all of this. Let's write a prestige miniseries together

I don't think that's the issue, since they had plenty of extras for the hospital and evacuation scenes. Just give them some lab coats and have them be debating in the background

I think the issue stems from the fact that yes they have extras, but they’re extras. They probably didn’t have the budget to pay for scenes of more actors. Or maybe they couldn’t afford more extras to be scientists. Anyway it’s lame

Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

The REAL Goobusters posted:

I think the issue stems from the fact that yes they have extras, but they’re extras. They probably didn’t have the budget to pay for scenes of more actors. Or maybe they couldn’t afford more extras to be scientists. Anyway it’s lame

i think it's a time crunch in that if you only have five hours to do all of chernobyl, you've got a certain screentime budget for talking about science stuff and you've got to spend it wisely. which is why the coded phone call scene did double duty in both informing scientist lady as to what the response was (dumping sand and boron) as well as indicating the sensitivity of the information

Martian Manfucker
Dec 27, 2012

misandry is real

Minrad posted:

Nah, even the little citation TFS posted says it happened in October, which would have been during the massive clean up operation (and it mentions it was dropping material for Liquidators, so)

It's a relatively minor event in the scheme of things, and it helps to serve the narrative purpose for the audience of explaining why they didn't just dump some poo poo directly on the fire, since now you see a helicopter try it and immediately crash and kill everyone on board.

Fine, I take it back. I was right all along.

I feel like they kind of explained why they couldn't just fly over the reactor earlier in the episode when the helicopter pilot disobeyed a direct order from a superior to fly over the core because a crazy scientist yelled at him not to, though. Either way, yeah, it was a relatively minor thing in the grand scheme of the disaster, which is awful to say considering 4 people died.

Martian Manfucker fucked around with this message at 17:32 on May 14, 2019

BigglesSWE
Dec 2, 2014

How 'bout them hawks news huh!
For those who bemoans (sometimes rightly) historical inaccuracy in popular media, I recommend this book on the subject:

https://www.amazon.com/Reel-History-Defense-Hollywood-Cultureamerica/dp/0700612009

It explains better than I can why certain liberties more often than not are vital for a product to see the light of day, not to mention to be successful.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro
It's not that the corium would flash boil the water: my understanding is that putting that much nuclear lava into that much water would be akin to throwing multiples of potassium into that much water. Also the potassium is irradiated. So is the water...

https://www.ne.anl.gov/capabilities/rsta/cci/index.shtml

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqMN3y8k9So&t=61s

So, a chemical reaction which generates heat is added to a nuclear pile already in a fission meltdown, which turns the whole thing into a 5 megaton bomb. I think?

If there's a nuclear scientist in the thread, please jump in! :v:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply