|
Is that the first time SMP finished the race and now they're on the podium?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:05 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:02 |
|
Oh no the bird pattern shirt has become the dragon pattern shirt.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:14 |
|
Lmao did they just admit that they changed the wrong tyre on the other toyota?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:15 |
|
There is something stuck under the car or what?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:16 |
|
And that is why whenever they had actual competition they lost.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:17 |
|
GRATS TOYOTA, the plucky underdogs have done it yet again
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:28 |
|
spaceblancmange posted:And that is why whenever they had actual competition they lost.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:28 |
|
drgitlin posted:John Dagys says they changed the wrong tire first: https://twitter.com/johndagys/status/1140238256770048000
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:37 |
|
Shumagorath posted:Did they get hosed over by a Porsche driver waving them out of the pit into traffic in 2017? iirc Kobayashi got tricked into a false start or something and burnt his clutch out.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:37 |
|
Shumagorath posted:Did they get hosed over by a Porsche driver waving them out of the pit into traffic in 2017? Yup.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 14:45 |
|
Was it a Porsche or a P2 driver? I honestly forget. But yeah, after the dumb luck of 1999 and then 2016, to have that happen the following year... I don’t begrudge Toyota these two wins, because they’ve become the ones who stayed around. And even if they’re the only factory on the grid, they still have to go run 24 hours without breaking, or hitting a Ferrari, or getting hit by a Ferrari. 2017 was incredible because it seemed like all of the factory cars were going to drop out (and let’s not forget the Rebellion using a hammer to get the starter motor going every pit stop).
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 15:28 |
|
harperdc posted:Was it a Porsche or a P2 driver? I honestly forget. But yeah, after the dumb luck of 1999 and then 2016, to have that happen the following year... And then getting loving DQed for it because the ACO likes to follow the letter of the rules* rather than something 100% within the spirit of endurance racing. *Unless it's a French team.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 15:42 |
|
Endurance racing will be held back as long as the ACO exist.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 15:48 |
Not if it's about enduring ACO, which it seems to be.
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 16:21 |
|
Toyota is cool.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 18:04 |
|
Hell agreed. Remember back in 2005 and 2006 when it was just Audis versus Pescarolo that everyone was talking about how amazing Audi was so I'm assuming people are just being racist against Toyota. Very sad
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 18:11 |
|
I think the TS050 looks cool.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 19:22 |
|
Feels Villeneuve posted:Hell agreed. Remember back in 2005 and 2006 when it was just Audis versus Pescarolo that everyone was talking about how amazing Audi was so I'm assuming people are just being racist against Toyota. Very sad In all seriousness certain people seem to get extremely angry when they win.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 19:26 |
|
Their C-V series of cars remain my favourites.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 19:26 |
|
Fumble posted:iirc Kobayashi got tricked into a false start or something and burnt his clutch out. harperdc posted:(and let’s not forget the Rebellion using a hammer to get the starter motor going every pit stop).
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 20:08 |
|
Something like that. I forget the specific reason they got dinged but it might actually be for that.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 20:50 |
|
Dudley posted:Something like that. I forget the specific reason they got dinged but it might actually be for that. it was for sneaking into parc ferme to cover it back up
|
# ? Jun 16, 2019 21:52 |
|
Dudley posted:Something like that. I forget the specific reason they got dinged but it might actually be for that. I think by the letter they were supposed to pop the rear end bodywork off every time, so it was more for “unapproved aero” by cutting a hole in the panel than “survival instincts” and doing something [edit] vvvvvvvv "running with non-homologated bodywork," which, letter of the law but jeez also it was a P2 driver giving Kamui the thumbs up leading him to burn out the clutch. In retrospect, what a wild drat Le Mans. harperdc fucked around with this message at 11:31 on Jun 17, 2019 |
# ? Jun 17, 2019 00:29 |
|
Yeah that's what I remembered it being but I wondered if it contravened the "Start under their own power" rules.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2019 10:33 |
|
iirc, it was that reason. A hammer starter wasn’t homologated.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2019 14:19 |
|
They were dsq'd because the hole in the bodywork was not homologated and modifying it is not allowed.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2019 14:37 |
|
MazeOfTzeentch posted:They were dsq'd because the hole in the bodywork was not homologated and modifying it is not allowed. Yep, this. The modification to the bodywork (see: cutting it apart and putting a hole into it) was not allowed.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2019 14:46 |
|
Well this is sad to see. https://racer.com/2019/06/17/le-mans-gte-am-winning-no-85-ford-disqualified/ quote:The official reasoning behind the 55.2s penalty, which moved the No. 85 Riley Motorsports entry behind the No. 56 (after winning on Sunday by 44.9s) involved violations of the minimum refueling time set for the Pro-Am class. Here's a link to the ruling on the other Ford GT's penalty https://racer.com/2019/06/17/no-68-ford-disqualified-after-le-mans-gte-am-in-question/
|
# ? Jun 17, 2019 22:26 |
|
Just got home from the circuit, I am ruined and I just rocked up late on Friday. I can't imagine the state some people are in tonight, more than one person I chatted to today had a 10+ hour drive home.Shumagorath posted:I remember wondering how the gently caress that was even possible when it happened, and after a wheelspin penalty this year it astounds me that these cars have manual clutch engagement...? These cars are worth millions of dollars and should be all-electric up to 60km/h not the other way around. Yeah the clutch control is manual, bur the only time you use the clutch in these cars is when starting or stopping. The Toyota can start on electric power, and indeed does after every pit stop. I cannot remember the reason it tried to leave the pit lane under IC power instead in 2017, I feel like it was some sort of driver error but I am pretty sleep deprived at this point and my memory is poo poo. harperdc posted:Yep, this. The modification to the bodywork (see: cutting it apart and putting a hole into it) was not allowed. Yyyyyyyyup. That and taping over the hole in parc ferme afterwards. If anyone really cares the stewards decisions are available: http://fiawec.alkamelsystems.com/Results_NoticeBoard/06_2017/03_Le%20Mans/38_Stewards%20Decision%20Nr%2058.pdf http://fiawec.alkamelsystems.com/Results_NoticeBoard/06_2017/03_Le%20Mans/39_Stewards%20Decision%20Nr%2059.pdf jammyozzy fucked around with this message at 22:56 on Jun 17, 2019 |
# ? Jun 17, 2019 22:50 |
|
net work error posted:Well this is sad to see. ACO: I have the penalize the Fords, they gave themselves an unfair fuel stint advantage Also ACO: THIS TOYOTA GETS AN EXTRA LAP
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 04:24 |
|
net work error posted:Well this is sad to see. Sad, but it's a slam dunk penalty. I liked their somewhat bold strategy of building up a lead and holding back the Am for most of the last 8 hours too.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 05:16 |
|
With that penalty, the only positive thing for me from the race was removed. ACO has really hosed this thing up bad, fast.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 05:26 |
|
Cygni posted:With that penalty, the only positive thing for me from the race was removed. ACO has really hosed this thing up bad, fast. It doesnt make sense, either. How were those the only two Fords that had the issue? The other American CGR GT had a system that was unique or magically aligned to the euro cars? WEC/ACO/FIA can fluff a hog.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 05:58 |
|
They will only have checked the top 4 most likely, plus some randoms. Back in the day in BTCC I remember one driver parking up on the last lap because he knew he'd fail the ride height check (many were for some reason) but they only checked the top 10. He got promoted into the top 10 and was never checked, which is why series now do random checks too. It's a drat shame for Keating because this is 100% Ford's gently caress up. Well that and the ACO's policy of changing the BoP every 12 seconds.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 12:20 |
|
Why is it Ford’s fault? It’s up to each team to put the plastic balls in the fuel tank. Didn’t the Land Audi R8 get told after Daytona last year that they’d been too clever with the fuel tank volume restriction because the way they did it allowed them to fuel faster?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 13:23 |
|
It was definitely the teams fault, the pdf of the decision is in this DSC article and it looks like they got some calculations wrong:quote:The competitor explained that the team checked the Maximum Onboard Fuel Volume before the car was shipped from the USA and that they then rechecked the volume after the change in BOP, however this was done using the weight and density of the fuel rather than by measuring the volume directly. Also worth noting that while a lot of people (not ITT though) are throwing around "only 100ml" they stopped checking once they hit the reported 96.1litres, since it was already over the limit and actually found more than that when they fully emptied the tank during the 2nd check with a team rep present.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 16:59 |
|
If you gotta do spreadsheet math the day after a 24 hour race to determine if someone broke a rule, a) the rule sucks and b) the enforcement/scrutineering sucks. Not saying they didnt break it, but winners having wins taken away for this kinda stuff is just so bad.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 18:56 |
|
it really isnt
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 20:02 |
|
Cygni posted:If you gotta do spreadsheet math the day after a 24 hour race to determine if someone broke a rule, a) the rule sucks and b) the enforcement/scrutineering sucks. Not saying they didnt break it, but winners having wins taken away for this kinda stuff is just so bad. counterpoint: if you're in a race as big as the 24 hours of le mans and you get something as important as the capacity of your fuel tank wrong, intentionally or not, you deserve whatever penalty is coming. they either knowingly gave themselves an advantage or are bewilderingly incompetent.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 20:18 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:02 |
|
DEEP STATE PLOT posted:counterpoint: if you're in a race as big as the 24 hours of le mans and you get something as important as the capacity of your fuel tank wrong, intentionally or not, you deserve whatever penalty is coming. they either knowingly gave themselves an advantage or are bewilderingly incompetent. seriously, you spend enough money on this poo poo to just get it fuckin right
|
# ? Jun 18, 2019 20:22 |