|
Popeye's is better than KFC.
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2019 23:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 23:04 |
|
|
Popeye's is literally the only good chain chicken place, the rest are ok in various degrees and Chick-Fil-A is trash, this is the truth of the world.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2019 23:58
|
|
|
There's a local chicken place called Chicken USA. I've never eaten there, but I assume it's good because fights break out every night when they run out of chicken to serve.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 00:20
|
|
|
Oh you want good chicken? Go to a korean place.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 00:41
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Popeye's is better than KFC. Read this the other way around and got so heated.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 01:44
|
|
|
baw posted:He was also on the Harvard Law Review at the same time as Obama lol what a nerd(2nd row techincally 2nd from the left but he's behind two people). Good job you beta Andy. (Other Schlafly facts. Schlafly Brewing is like his cousin or something, they're okay beers, also the best fried chicken I had is from my local diner so whatev)
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 02:43
|
|
|
So the president is weighing one TV network against a younger, more attractive, newcomer? https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/jun/15/oan-oann-fox-news-donald-trump
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 02:46
|
|
|
My father has been jorped.  I can't seem to find the CSPAM thread for rebuttal stuff. The two things I'm definitely going to dig up: - the Slavoj Zizek Dunking, lol - that one guy who took apart Jordan Peterson's Maps of Meaning Any other recommendations off the top of your guys' heads?
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 04:41
|
|
|
https://www.patreon.com/posts/jordan-peterson-17972181
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 04:45
|
|
|
I wonder if Jorp still dreams about his naked grandma.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 04:47
|
|
|
Lycus posted:I wonder if Jorp still dreams about his naked grandma. Pfft, who doesn't?
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 04:52
|
|
|
https://art19.com/shows/larry-wilmore So Larry Wilmore apparently has a podcast and had on Ben Shapiro. It's a good discussion overall (though a bit too friendly for my tastes), but it got interesting when Ben brought up federal overreach and referenced some anti-gay flowershop. There was a moment in there where Larry tried to press Ben on why he was okay with the government not interfering with the flowershop, but seemed to be okay with the governments in the 50s telling businesses to segregate. I was initially confused at what Larry was getting at (Ben is against the government forcing a business to do something, so why was he okay with the government forcing businesses to segregate?) It then all came together when I realized that Larry was not talking about the government imposing Jim Crow, but rather the CRA (both Ben and I thought he was talking about former). In other words, Larry didn't realize that Ben doesn't support the CRA.  There was one weird part in there where Ben claimed he would support the CRA at the time, but...wouldn't do so today. Not sure how that works in his big brain exactly. edit: also seems like I'm the only one on the planet who prefers KFC over Popeye's. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 06:23
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:https://art19.com/shows/larry-wilmore Not supporting the CRA at the time was racist, but if you move it in time it becomes OK.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 06:29
|
|
|
Pirate Radar posted:Not supporting the CRA at the time was racist, but if you move it in time it becomes OK. The dumb argument is that by passing the CRA and VRA the USA fixed racism 100%, and so we don't need any government civil rights laws anymore because passing that law made everybody not racist anymore.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 10:15
|
|
|
ErIog posted:The dumb argument is that by passing the CRA and VRA the USA fixed racism 100%, and so we don't need any government civil rights laws anymore because passing that law made everybody not racist anymore. Right, in the 1960s the CRA was necessary but they argue that in 2019 America it wouldn't be necessary and therefore it's not racist to oppose it, they just like ~small government~ or whatever. Though of course "small government" is something I haven't been hearing recently, wonder why.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 10:21
|
|
|
"Small government" has been getting thrown back in their face over abortion a lot lately. Not that they give a gently caress the hypocrisy and cruelty is the point but it's getting noticeable to bystanders and that's what they care about.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 10:37
|
|
|
Another Conservapedia gem was when they thought they were being smart by asking for the full data from an experiment showing bacteria evolved, thinking it could call the scientists bluff that it was faked/contaminated. Schlafly's initial argument was that the paper did not have the full 20 years of data in it, therefore fake. Then the scientist offered all 20 years of data, including samples of all the stages of bacteria, and asked if Schlafly had a cold storage to handle them all. He didn't. Here is a great write up of it: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lenski_affair
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 14:18
|
|
|
ErIog posted:The dumb argument is that by passing the CRA and VRA the USA fixed racism 100%, and so we don't need any government civil rights laws anymore because passing that law made everybody not racist anymore. Ginsburg summed the whole thing up perfectly by saying it's like throwing away your umbrella because you don't need it now that you aren't getting wet. More to the point, I'm not sure how "we don't need it anymore" is even a legal argument. You could argue to change the law with that reasoning, but I don't see how it could become unconstitutional through the passage of time.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 20:08
|
|
|
Pirate Radar posted:Right, in the 1960s the CRA was necessary but they argue that in 2019 America it wouldn't be necessary and therefore it's not racist to oppose it, they just like ~small government~ or whatever. That still doesn't make sense because Shapiro says if a store/restaurant/whatever doesn't want to serve black people, they should go out of business. Implying that such a thing is racist, but regardless, it's not something that the government needs to be interfering with. It's like when Rand Paul said that the Clean Air Act was good when it was passed, but now that all the acid rain is gone, we don't need it anymore.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 20:14
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:That still doesn't make sense because Shapiro says if a store/restaurant/whatever doesn't want to serve black people, they should go out of business. Implying that such a thing is racist, but regardless, it's not something that the government needs to be interfering with. It's disingenuous and they know it, just just can't admit it out loud...yet. There's a market in exclusion. Like having a burger shop that boasts "No veggie pansy crap here, just RED MEAT" has a market share despite excluding people who want to eat healthier, excluding easy targets will attract and engage bigots, and people who want to remain friendly with bigots. Chick-fil-A is the early stage of that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 20:20
|
|
|
the media sucks but has anyone ever asked roberts why after he baselessly gutted the vra republicans went into hyperdrive with voter suppression efforts when he said they wouldn;t?
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:07
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:the media sucks but has anyone ever asked roberts why after he baselessly gutted the vra republicans went into hyperdrive with voter suppression efforts when he said they wouldn;t? We're about to get a SCOTUS ruling that says gerrymandering to make republicans win is fine
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
no doubt i'd just like to see how he tries to weasel out of the question. or see the media at least attempt to do their jobs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:the media sucks but has anyone ever asked roberts why after he baselessly gutted the vra republicans went into hyperdrive with voter suppression efforts when he said they wouldn;t? Generally SC Justices don’t do interviews while they are actively on the court
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
I’ve been looking for a Peterson all encompassing take down - thanks! I’ve got some reading to do!
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Ginsburg summed the whole thing up perfectly by saying it's like throwing away your umbrella because you don't need it now that you aren't getting wet. More to the point, I'm not sure how "we don't need it anymore" is even a legal argument. You could argue to change the law with that reasoning, but I don't see how it could become unconstitutional through the passage of time. Yes, we don't need laws against murder anymore either, because everyone KNOWS murder is wrong, so there are no more murders. QED, libs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:I can’t think of an interview Roberts has done with the media scalia definitely did but he was a gloryhound.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
 Thanks much.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1140350790550335501?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 03:35
|
|
|
Loomer: Jaw thrust forward, she's the mandible for the job.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 03:39
|
|
|
What's scary is wondering how many of those likes are the dozens of Loomer parachute accounts she's manage to squirrel away past the waves of bans. Right now, she's probably surrounded by an array of 15 disposable phones, each one with Twitter seared into the pixels.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 03:45
|
|
|
Florida’s crazy enough to elect anyone, so she actually stands a decent shot if she runs. Also lol @ Bumble Jack including the Pride flag in his twitter handle. If he had his way LGBT people would wouldn’t even exist.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 03:55
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:It's like when Rand Paul said that the Clean Air Act was good when it was passed, but now that all the acid rain is gone, we don't need it anymore. Rand says that Medicare for All (or any other form of federally mandated healthcare) is effectively slavery for doctors as well (he may have said this about the ACA too but I don't remember for sure). You can just find out what he thinks about an issue and take the other side if you're OK with being right 98% of the time. Groovelord Neato posted:scalia definitely did but he was a gloryhound. Ginsberg has done one or two  nine-gear crow posted:Florida’s crazy enough to elect anyone, so she actually stands a decent shot if she runs. There's been serious talk of Matt Gaetz running for Doug Jones' seat in Alabama since you only have to establish residence for 24 hours to get on the ballot. I'd say she might be even more annoying than Gaetz, but he's actually fairly sharp based on interviews I've seen. It might give her an open, safe R seat to run for though. What's Twitter's policy for elected officeholders? I know they've basically said they aren't kicking Trump off because he's the President but I don't know if that's part of some formal policy or if that's just Dorsey not wanting to be mean to one of his buddies. e: looks like Roberts did a sit-down interview with CSPAN about a year ago. Corsair Pool Boy fucked around with this message at 04:45 on Jun 17, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 04:42
|
|
|
does Loomer even live in FL, does FL even have laws about having to live there to run.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 05:05
|
|
|
I think the only “benefit” to Laura Loomer becoming a US Congresswoman would be the rematch between her and that one dude who chaos dunked her into oblivion during Jack Dorsey’s day of congressional hearings by breaking out into an auctioneer’s drawl when she started screaming from the gallery in order to shut her up. It will be slightly less funny when does something like attacks AOC with a can of mase in the hallway or chains herself to the Speaker’s podium when whoever replaces Nancy Pelosi in 2021 won’t legislate her Twitter account back to her.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 05:16
|
|
|
Corsair Pool Boy posted:Rand says that Medicare for All (or any other form of federally mandated healthcare) is effectively slavery for doctors as well (he may have said this about the ACA too but I don't remember for sure). You can just find out what he thinks about an issue and take the other side if you're OK with being right 98% of the time. I think she might be entitled to an official verified birdsite account which is the thing she longs for most in all the world.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 05:17
|
|
|
Feinne posted:I think she might be entitled to an official verified birdsite account which is the thing she longs for most in all the world. I think she thinks she already is - she even has a Wikipedia page!
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 05:30
|
|
|
nine-gear crow posted:I think the only “benefit” to Laura Loomer becoming a US Congresswoman would be the rematch between her and that one dude who chaos dunked her into oblivion during Jack Dorsey’s day of congressional hearings by breaking out into an auctioneer’s drawl when she started screaming from the gallery in order to shut her up. That was funny but that guy, Billy Long, is basically a Captain Planet villain he's such a comically evil Missouri Republican. It hurts to have enjoyed something he did.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 07:23
|
|
|
Did no one learn from Sargon of Akkad and Count Dankula? Those idiots got absolutely humiliated and so will Laura Loomer. I mean anything is possible in America because voting protections and rights here are poo poo as gently caress but I fully expect her to wind up a stain on the wall. It's almost as egotistical as all these Democrats running for President when they'd be more effective in other offices or just focusing on doing a better job where they're at. These social media dummies think outside their bubble they might gain some traction but they don't understand even if most of the country is as dumb and racist and as goosestepping as they are, they're also normies and the average Republican will balk at how loving weird these loving Twitter and YouTube jerkoffs come off as.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 09:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 23:04 |
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:the media sucks but has anyone ever asked roberts why after he baselessly gutted the vra republicans went into hyperdrive with voter suppression efforts when he said they wouldn;t? The first efforts started literally within 24 hours of the decision being handed down
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 12:11
|
|
