Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
420 Gank Mid
Dec 26, 2008

WARNING: This poster is a huge bitch!

sincx posted:

edit: supporting any cop in any country for any reason in C-SPAM should be a probation at a minimum

DSA thread gonna be upset to hear it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

iceaim
May 20, 2001

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

yeah thats why social democracy has experienced a near total collapse across the entire developed world over the last 30 years, the electoral college. you are a moron

He mentioned first past the post and gerrymandering too you prick. Let’s add “money politics” into the pile too while we’re at it.

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


iceaim posted:

He mentioned first past the post and gerrymandering too you prick. Let’s add “money politics” into the pile too while we’re at it.

ah yes notable problems in Europe, where the social democratic decline is most clear, fptp and gerrymandering

Doc Neutral
Jan 31, 2014

420 Gank Mid posted:

DSA thread gonna be upset to hear it

I still can't believe they voted for that antifa wg thing, either they're playing 12D chess to honeypot cops or they're just incredible dumb


Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

ah yes notable problems in Europe, where the social democratic decline is most clear, fptp and gerrymandering

You know what's really funny, a lot of the austerity in europe was put in and is being enforced by social democratic parties, when capital truly tests succdems they'll buckle just like syriza did even when they overwhelmingly won the the anti-austerity refrendum

Doc Neutral has issued a correction as of 01:07 on Aug 12, 2019

iceaim
May 20, 2001

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

ah yes notable problems in Europe, where the social democratic decline is most clear, fptp and gerrymandering

yeah let’s just shove a communist dictatorship down everyone’s throat instead. That hasn’t failed in spectacular ways.

Let’s totally ignore countries like Sweden that managed to offer better social welfare than any communist state ever could.

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


the collapse of center left movements in basically every developed country in the world is because the rules are slightly wrong. please ignore the fact that all those countries have significantly different political systems. all we got to do is fix the rule book a bit and were right as rain.

*sad but firm narrator voice* this is your brain on liberalism

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


iceaim posted:

yeah let’s just shove a communist dictatorship down everyone’s throat instead. That hasn’t failed in spectacular ways.

Let’s totally ignore countries like Sweden that managed to offer better social welfare than any communist state ever could.

we need to do the first thing but make sure we do it everywhere this time instead of trying to pull it off with just poor war-torn countries, yeah. despite that we gave it a hell of a go last time

iceaim
May 20, 2001

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

we need to do the first thing but make sure we do it everywhere this time instead of trying to pull it off with just poor war-torn countries, yeah. despite that we gave it a hell of a go last time

Yeah it was one hell of a go. Millions of deaths. So your solution is to go full 1984! It’ll surely work then and not result in maladministration.

Grapplejack
Nov 27, 2007

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

ah yes notable problems in Europe, where the social democratic decline is most clear, fptp and gerrymandering

If anything the issues with Europe are more issues with the unwillingness of France and Germany to share any of their gains with the south, and a refusal to federalize meaning that there's no real way to force that if you're not in Germany or France. Europe also has a pretty severe issue with technocrats in the EU institutions that are almost totally without oversight or a way to boot them if they're loving things up. The lack of federalization is the biggest issue since it allows Germany and France to rent-seek from South Europe and the disparity in incomes causes nationalism to rise; in the south because they're being exploited, in the north because the exploitation of the south plus free movement leads to immigration, which is being exploited by nationalist factions within the north.

It's kinda the same thing you see in the US with Trump? An exploitation of the global south leading to etc etc. also how is this the most contentious thread in cpsam

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


iceaim posted:

Yeah it was one hell of a go. Millions of deaths. And your solution is to go full 1984!

Hundreds of millions of deaths are easily attributable to the capitalism of the past few centuries, plus a pending death toll of $EARTHS_POPULATION when the climate emergency goes unaddressed and the clathrate guns fire off.

THS
Sep 15, 2017

iceaim posted:

Yeah it was one hell of a go. Millions of deaths. So your solution is to go full 1984! It’ll surely work then and not result in maladministration.

lmao

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

iceaim posted:

Yeah it was one hell of a go. Millions of deaths. So your solution is to go full 1984! It’ll surely work then and not result in maladministration.

quote:

While in their reading of Russian history they pursue the repression of the Second Time of Troubles, for the great Asian country they skip over the Century of Humiliation (the period that stretches from the First Opium War to the seizure of power by the communists). Just as in Russia, in China it’s ultimately the revolution led by the communist party that saves the nation and even the state. In the biography of Mao Zedong earlier cited, not only do they ignore the historical background briefly restated here, but they blame the Chinese communist leader for most of the horrors caused by the starvation and famines that affected China. A rigorous silence is maintained with regard to the embargo imposed on that great Asia country after the communists came to power.

On that last point, it’s worthwhile to consult a book by an American author that sympathetically describes the primary role played by a Cold War policy of siege and economic strangulated carried out by Washington at the expense of the People’s Republic of China. In October of 1949, China finds itself in a desperate situation. It’s necessary to note, however, that the civil war hadn’t completely ended. The bulk of the Kuomintang army had taken shelter in Taiwan, and from there they continued to threaten the new state with air attacks and incursions, on top of the isolated spots of resistance that continued to operate on the continent. But that’s not the principal aspect: “After decades of civil wars and foreign invasions, the national economy was on the brink of total collapse”. The fall in agricultural and industrial production was followed by inflation. And that’s not all: “In those years, great floods had devastated a large part of the nation, and more than 40 million people had been affected by that natural calamity”.

The embargo quickly decreed by the United States makes this extremely serious economic and humanitarian crisis more catastrophic than ever. The United States objectives clearly emerge in the studies and plans by the Truman administration and the admissions or declarations by its leaders: make it so that China “suffers a plague” and “a standard of living at or below the level of subsistence”; provoke “economic backwardness”, “cultural backwardness”, a “primitive and uncontrolled birth rate”, “mass disorder”; inflict “a heavy and very prolonged cost on its internal social structure” and ultimately create “a situation of chaos”. It’s a concept that’s obsessively repeated: it’s necessary to reduce a country to “desperate necessity”, to a “situation of economic catastrophe”, “to disaster” and “collapse”. This “economic weapon” pointed at an overpopulated country is lethal, but for the CIA it’s not enough: the situation that was caused by “the measures of economic warfare and by the naval blockade” could be made even worse with a “naval and aerial bombing campaign against selected ports, railways, industrial structures and storage sites”; with US assistance, the Kuomintang bombing campaigns continued against industrial cities on continental China, including Shanghai.

One president after another takes office in the White House, but the embargo remains and expands to medicine, tractors and fertilizers. At the start of the 1960s, an advisor in the Kennedy administration, namely Walt W. Rostow, observes that, thanks to this policy, the economic development of China was delayed by at least “decades”, while CIA reports highlight “communist China’s grave agricultural situation”, now seriously weakened by “overwork and malnutrition”. Is it a question, then, of reducing the pressure on a people reduced to a state of hunger? On the contrary, it’s important not to loosen the embargo, “not even for humanitarian relief”. Taking advantage of the fact that “China doesn’t have key natural resources, particularly oil and fertile land”, and also exploiting the serious crisis occurring at the time between China and the USSR, they could try to land the definitive blow: “explore the possibilities of a total Western embargo against China” and block as much as possible the sale of oil and grain.

Does it make sense, then, to exclusively assign blame to Mao for the economic catastrophe that for a long time struck China and was intentionally and ruthlessly planned by Washington beginning in October of 1949? Committed as they are in making a caricature out of Mao and denouncing his crazy experiments, the authors of that successful monograph don’t ask that question. However, while they imposed their embargo, the leaders of the United States were well aware of the fact that it would be even more devastating due to “communist inexperience when it comes to the urban economy”. It’s no coincidence that we’ve seen them speak explicitly of “economic warfare'' and an “economic weapon”.

___

Grapplejack posted:

If anything the issues with Europe are more issues with the unwillingness of France and Germany to share any of their gains with the south

It's kinda the same thing you see in the US with Trump? An exploitation of the global south leading to etc etc. also how is this the most contentious thread in cpsam

I mean yeah as it turns out imperialism IS the highest form of capitalism

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


iceaim posted:

Yeah it was one hell of a go. Millions of deaths. So your solution is to go full 1984! It’ll surely work then and not result in maladministration.

yes, and yes.

iceaim
May 20, 2001

SKULL.GIF posted:

Hundreds of millions of deaths are easily attributable to the capitalism of the past few centuries, plus a pending death toll of $EARTHS_POPULATION when the climate emergency goes unaddressed and the clathrate guns fire off.

Yeah sure. Communist states past or present never have a disastrous environmental policy.

iceaim has issued a correction as of 01:57 on Aug 12, 2019

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


...as opposed to the endless environmental disasters caused by imperialist and capitalist states in the present?

Communism isn't automatically eco-Stalinism, no, but it sure isn't going to be any worse than capitalism in that regard.

BrokenGameboy
Jan 25, 2019

by Fluffdaddy

gradenko_2000 posted:

___


I mean yeah as it turns out imperialism IS the highest form of capitalism

Cool post, I've been curious about what the hell actually went on in maoist China. However, I'm still hesitant to go full "Mao did nothing wrong". Any good sources on a balanced take on the era?

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


BrokenGameboy posted:

Cool post, I've been curious about what the hell actually went on in maoist China. However, I'm still hesitant to go full "Mao did nothing wrong". Any good sources on a balanced take on the era?

70% good 30% bad

BrokenGameboy
Jan 25, 2019

by Fluffdaddy

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

70% good 30% bad

I know that's what Deng said. But I have to ask, do you agree with that, or is this just irony.

Side note, what was the argument for the Deng market reform anyway?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

BrokenGameboy posted:

Cool post, I've been curious about what the hell actually went on in maoist China. However, I'm still hesitant to go full "Mao did nothing wrong". Any good sources on a balanced take on the era?

to be clear, that excerpt doesn't even say "Mao did nothing wrong". It just says everything wrong couldn't possibly have been ALL of his fault.

BrokenGameboy
Jan 25, 2019

by Fluffdaddy

gradenko_2000 posted:

to be clear, that excerpt doesn't even say "Mao did nothing wrong". It just says everything wrong couldn't possibly have been ALL of his fault.

I know, I'm not saying you were pushing that. I just said it since while I did find it helpful in showing that not everything was his fault, I'm still very skeptical of him.

iceaim
May 20, 2001

SKULL.GIF posted:

...as opposed to the endless environmental disasters caused by imperialist and capitalist states in the present?

Communism isn't automatically eco-Stalinism, no, but it sure isn't going to be any worse than capitalism in that regard.

PRC isn’t causing endless environmental disasters? Cool thanks for schooling me on that.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


iceaim posted:

PRC isn’t causing endless environmental disasters? Cool thanks for schooling me on that.

This is neither an actual response to what I said, nor did I make the implied statement you're responding to.

iceaim
May 20, 2001

SKULL.GIF posted:

This is neither an actual response to what I said, nor did I make the implied statement you're responding to.

The reality is that communist states like the PRC are just as bad with making endless environmental disasters as capitalist states are.

You simply choose to be wilfully blind to it because it doesn’t confirm your bias.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


iceaim posted:

The reality is that communist states like the PRC is just as bad with making endless environmental disasters as capitalist states are.

You simply choose to be wilfully blind to it because it doesn’t confirm your bias.

As I'm so helpfully informed by the thread's authoritarians, the PRC is currently in a transitory stage of capitalism before fully achieving socialism :eng101:

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
"communism is as bad as capitalism" and "China isn't even communist"

two great tastes that taste great together

iceaim
May 20, 2001

SKULL.GIF posted:

As I'm so helpfully informed by the thread's authoritarians, the PRC is currently in a transitory stage of capitalism before fully achieving socialism :eng101:

I wonder when that’ll happen. PRC doesn’t even have universal health care lmao.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86i-uCNTpcM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI9MBMFleRg

Not sure about whether the footage is genuine.

Dante80 has issued a correction as of 02:12 on Aug 12, 2019

tino
Jun 4, 2018

by Smythe

iceaim posted:

I wonder when that’ll happen. PRC doesn’t even have universal health care lmao.

Still better and cheaper health care than the US.

Also what's the deal of aspiring to become one of those welfare northern european countries? Most of them export resources and make watches. HK don't make anything.

tino has issued a correction as of 02:17 on Aug 12, 2019

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


gradenko_2000 posted:

"communism is as bad as capitalism" and "China isn't even communist"

two great tastes that taste great together

yeah capitalism is much worse than communism, which is why china sucks

tino
Jun 4, 2018

by Smythe

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

yeah capitalism is much worse than communism, which is why china sucks

State Capitalism is upgraded Free Market Capitalism 2.0

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014



these were both posted 11 hours ago and theres been no news about a massive chinese deployment since. also the first video especially just seems off, though whoever made it did a pretty good job.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

these were both posted 11 hours ago and theres been no news about a massive chinese deployment since. also the first video especially just seems off, though whoever made it did a pretty good job.

many thanks. probably fake then.

iceaim
May 20, 2001

tino posted:

Still better and cheaper health care than the US.

Which is why you took your kids to be vaccinated in Hong Kong instead of PRC. I wonder why you didn’t choose to have them vaccinated in Guangzhou instead since it clearly has “better and cheaper” health care.

tino
Jun 4, 2018

by Smythe

iceaim posted:

Which is why you took your kids to be vaccinated in Hong Kong instead of PRC. I wonder why you didn’t choose to have them vaccinated in Guangzhou instead since it clearly has “better and cheaper” health care.

I already answered you once, because I wanted document in English. You are never letting it go are you?

Also because my wife wanted an excuse to go to SZ and HK. I wouldn't go if I was still in GZ at that time.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

tino posted:

Also what's the deal of aspiring to become one of those welfare northern european countries? Most of them export resources and make watches. HK don't make anything.

quote:

There's a tendency with so-called "progressives" to try and stretch the definition of "socialism" to make the case for Norway and the Scandinavian countries to be socialism, in order to show that socialism can work, while also distancing themselves from places like Cuba and Venezuela.

Because if you say "yes, Venezuela is socialist", then you have to make the case that Venezuela is not a failed state. Or if you say "yes, Cuba is socialist", then you have to make the case that Cuba isn't a poor country, and that Cuba isn't an authoritarian country. Or if you say "yes, the USSR was socialist", then you have to defend the USSR's collapse, you're going to get dragged into being a Stalin apologist, and so on and so forth.

By shifting the discussion towards Norway, you don't get into these allegations about genocide, or gulags, or invasions of Afghanistan, or political repression and so forth. You do have to make the case that socialism is "just" about "the government does stuff for the public good", and while actual Marxists are going to take issue with such a blatant oversimplification, most people aren't yet at a level of class consciousness that it would matter to them anyway.

The other side of this coin, of course, is that the conservatives don't care and they're going to call you a Maduro-loving Communist anyway, which makes "moderate socialism" kind of a dead-end in terms of pushing for a political program.

iceaim
May 20, 2001

tino posted:

I already answered you once, because I wanted document in English. You are never letting it go are you?

Also because my wife wanted an excuse to go to SZ and HK. I wouldn't go if I was still in GZ at that time.

Gotta love this face saving lol.

Yeah I bet all of the mainland people lining up to get vaccines in HK are just doing it because they need the document in English and not because there were fake vaccines being peddled in PRC.

You insult us but you always need us for untainted milk powder, banking, medical care, access to global markets, access to a passport that isn’t poo poo tier, etc.

iceaim has issued a correction as of 02:31 on Aug 12, 2019

Bro Dad
Mar 26, 2010


BrokenGameboy posted:

Side note, what was the argument for the Deng market reform anyway?

p r o d u c t i v e f o r c e s

tino
Jun 4, 2018

by Smythe

iceaim posted:

Gotta love this face saving lol.

Yeah I bet all of the mainland people lining up to get vaccines in HK are just doing it because they need the document in English and not because there were fake vaccines being peddled in PRC.

You insult us but you always need us for untainted milk powder, banking, medical care, access to global markets, access to a passport that isn’t poo poo tier, etc.

I am glad you are being a dick about it. So I won't feel bad when poo poo hits the fans.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin

iceaim posted:


You insult us but you always need us for untainted milk powder, banking, medical care, access to global markets, access to a passport that isn’t poo poo tier, etc.

This is what people in Hong Kong actually believe.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rabelais D
Dec 11, 2012

ts'u nnu k'u k'o t'khye:
A demon doth defecate at thy door
Almost everyone I know in China who isn't inexplicably rich due to grey income lives in perpetual fear of getting an illness they can't afford to treat, sounds a bit like the US I guess but it's loving weird to me coming from somewhere with actually good healthcare.

The state healthcare system has improved in recent years but it still isn't enough to help you if you get cancer or something that requires major surgery, and cancer rates are skyrocketing due to all the air pollution. My mother in law died from lung cancer in northern China, the hospitals were poo poo and the doctors worse. Everything is loving monetized to the worst degree, you can buy packages, fork out for ten radiation treatments and get one free! "Oh we have fancy imported instruments for this treatment but it costs three times the price as the domestic ones, you choose"

It's difficult to get my kid vaccinated here in HK because the clinics are choc-a-block with mainlanders and they often run out of vaccines because of it, the glorious socialist healthcare of the motherland obviously isn't that attractive to them?

I like China but trying to defend the Chinese legal system and now Chinese healthcare..., good luck to you tino

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply