|
Blockade posted:There's a marketing agency trying to upset the whole 'influencer' market by using computer generated models. no loving way those aren't real 
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
Probably doxed myself w this one
larper has issued a correction as of 17:03 on Aug 15, 2019 |
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
Doctor Jeep posted:no loving way those aren't real its a mix iirc. There ARE real models, but the environment, the clothing, and the face itself is all fake, or CAN be faked if the ad agency requests. There were articles about these exact photos a few months back
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:22
|
|
|
Generating virtual faces isn't terribly hard, here's a site that does it whenever you refresh: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ The thing neural nets seem to have problems with is like, smaller stuff with fine detail, like hair, it always seems to gently caress up hair. I assume any company that wants to use it to make a virtual person follows up each image with a bunch of manual photoshopping to fix that poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
Also occasionally (like just now) it generates some Cronenberg horror just off to the side of the face, which is always fun:
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:36
|
|
|
Please don't post these, they really gently caress me up 
Rarity has issued a correction as of 21:52 on Aug 14, 2019 |
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
This isn't neural nets though, just good old CGI. Photorealism in static images hasn't been a problem for decades, it's motion that still suffers from uncanny valley. Check out any of the "scanned face in a void" animated SIGGRAPH demos from the past few years and focus on the blinking.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Please don't post these, they really gently caress me up I did a lot of acid when I was younger too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 22:21
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:Also occasionally (like just now) it generates some Cronenberg horror just off to the side of the face, which is always fun: With this one you can easily tell it's generated (besides the obvious cronenberg horror) by looking at the finer details in the face like eyelid folds, the whites of the eyes are blurry, the hair is weird, the teeth have some strange artefacts etc. The previous ones are no way fully generated, I don't believe that for a second. Seems like a good PR stunt using actual human models more than anything.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 22:57
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:With this one you can easily tell it's generated (besides the obvious cronenberg horror) by looking at the finer details in the face like eyelid folds, the whites of the eyes are blurry, the hair is weird, the teeth have some strange artefacts etc. I mean yeah but it was a random one I picked without specifically looking for high-quality ones, and it's done by a machine that's just made to spit out random faces built out of other faces rather than specific "really good" faces. Even with the thing I linked if you sit there re-rolling for a little bit you'll find a pretty convincing one that wouldn't require much manual work to clean up.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 23:02
|
|
|
D.Ork Bimboolean posted:They're right. They're not right, they're just making a simplistic take on the nature of voting and how it is designed to measure the aggregate, not the individual preference. Also I fixed your second paragraph for you. Please don't lump working* democracies in with your dumpster fire of a country. * In the context of electoral systems
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 23:02
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:I left my lovely job and have been looking for a new job. had a company say they liked my resume (for a specific skillset I’ve been doing for a decade now) and wanted me to come in for an interview, I said great and showed up 15 minutes before noon. i envy you
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 23:19
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JoshGerben/status/1161417568604827654
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2019 23:46
|
|
|
Please come learn at my new university, Technical Homosexuality Campus, located at 420 69th St, where you can get your degree in applied gender studies, underwater indigenous basket making, and rolling joints at the professional level. Our t-shirts are going to sell like munchies.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 00:41
|
|
|
just filled out an online job application where they had a 115 question survey and about 20 of the questions were variations of "do you think groups of similar backgrounds work better together" or what seemed to me "are you racist?" another dozen questions asked how lazy i was, and then there was a solid 15 about how much i'd be willing to sell out my personal life in exchange for working extremely long and unusual hours.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 01:10
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:I should qualify that: no porn company is using deep fakes yet that I know of. However, Reddit, being entirely perverts, naturally already has several subreddits where they deep fake various famous people or their friends and family or whatever into pornos. You're like a year out of date https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/21/17763278/deepfake-porn-custom-clips-naughty-america
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 01:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/zei_nabq/status...r%3D406%23pti15
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 02:49
|
|
|
this is how you know gorbachev betrayed the revolution
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 02:57
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:They're not right, they're just making a simplistic take on the nature of voting and how it is designed to measure the aggregate, not the individual preference. Ah yes, functional capitalist democracies, such as:
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 04:37
|
|
|
Tunicate posted:You're like a year out of date In fairness a year ago is about when I heard about this, yes 
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 04:49
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:They're not right, they're just making a simplistic take on the nature of voting and how it is designed to measure the aggregate, not the individual preference. Just lol if you believe the US is the only dysfunctional government half-pretending not to serve the interests of its wealthy class faking democratic and electoral clout to undercut and superficially mitigate the pleb's concerns Also, they're still right.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 05:43
|
|
|
I'm going to have a lot of fun with this IRL at work I'm going to start using "De" instead of de word that OSU has a pending copyright claim upon. If anyone asks, I'll warn them that they might be infringing on a multimillion dollar edifice's copyrights and insist they never use that word in my presence why yes, my boss does hate me, why do you ask
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 05:46
|
|
|
OnceAndFuture DILF posted:I'm going to have a lot of fun with this IRL Say 'el' instead.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 10:06
|
|
|
crosspostin from the dystopia thread because  bitterandtwisted posted:this whole thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 13:00
|
|
|
I read that twitter thread in real time as the hive minded drones were replying to her in turns like those creepy cacophony voices sci-fi horror producers use to make the audience feel the inhuman sentience closing in like a living abyss.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 13:03
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:crosspostin from the dystopia thread because Missed the best one: https://twitter.com/TheKenChilds/status/1161847717397696512
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 13:25
|
|
|
D.Ork Bimboolean posted:I read that twitter thread in real time as the hive minded drones were replying to her in turns like those creepy cacophony voices sci-fi horror producers use to make the audience feel the inhuman sentience closing in like a living abyss. lmao @ only after she points out that a different account replies to her every time a single account actually replies to her twice. it really is just a network of accounts operated by a single person appearing to come from different sources
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 13:27
|
|
|
bring back old gbs posted:lmao @ only after she points out that a different account replies to her every time a single account actually replies to her twice. it really is just a network of accounts operated by a single person appearing to come from different sources Their not even that clever really https://twitter.com/justkelly_ok/status/1161979032662974465?s=20
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 14:07
|
|
|
D.Ork Bimboolean posted:Their not even that clever really wtf is an Amazon ambassador? I know they're taking over but they aren't a sovereign country yet
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 14:18
|
|
|
The Nastier Nate posted:wtf is an Amazon ambassador? I know they're taking over but they aren't a sovereign country yet Employees paid to talk up the brand on Twitter and refute the various worker's rights violations that come up
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 14:23
|
|
|
Blockade posted:There's a marketing agency trying to upset the whole 'influencer' market by using computer generated models. Full body scan a bunch of people with different body types except their head. Make fake heads and plop them on these body, warts and stretch marks and all. Take that boomers - now you can show off a bunch of different clothing and body types without a torrent of ‘virtue signalling’ bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 14:58
|
|
|
The Nastier Nate posted:wtf is an Amazon ambassador? I know they're taking over but they aren't a sovereign country yet They're getting ready for Shiawase vs NRC
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 15:03
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:They're getting ready for Shiawase vs NRC I look forward to a haywire AI shutting down the Amazon Arcology in a couple of decades
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 15:10
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I look forward to a haywire AI shutting down the Amazon Arcology in a couple of decades Deus Was Right.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 16:39
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I look forward to a haywire AI shutting down the Amazon Arcology in a couple of decades l-l-l-look at you picker, a pathetic creature of meat and bone, p-p-panting and sweating as you run through my w-w-w-warehouse aisles - how can you ch-challenge a perfect, immortal retailer
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 16:53
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Employees paid to talk up the brand on Twitter and refute the various worker's rights violations that come up These aren't real employees any more than the Wendy's Twitter account is actually Wendy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 17:44
|
|
|
Enfys posted:These aren't real employees any more than the Wendy's Twitter account is actually Wendy. I'm sure that for legal reasons there is at least one Real Amazon Warehouse Employee writing tweets, so they can point to them when people call them out
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 17:52
|
|
|
D.Ork Bimboolean posted:Their not even that clever really https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-to-rule They WANT you to see through the bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
I'm just assuming that when hired, you sign away your legal name and likeness to their social media team in exchange for the privilege of all the bathroom breaks you need.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 17:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
Proteus Jones posted:LOL @GE. They're turbo-hosed.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 18:09
|
|