|
TimWinter posted:I had an eventful Thursday night when I found out my only computer with a GPU had a conflicting linux kernel and nvidia driver version. I mean, it doesn't take that long to install W10 though? What did you spend the rest of the time doing?
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 22:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:25 |
|
|
TimWinter posted:I had an eventful Thursday night when I found out my only computer with a GPU had a conflicting linux kernel and nvidia driver version. next time check the log file and you will discover that immediately
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2019 01:44
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:dhcpv6 is a hosed up mess and the actual useful v6 autoconfig protocols (rd, nd) were not well supported in linux until like five minutes ago Yeah, firmware is current but apparently there are grumblings that it actually worked on older revs and then they broke it with a more current release. The whole thing should be native slaac and apparently from what I can see in the documentation their DHCPv6 option actually means slaac first then dhcpv6 as a failback. Which is what it seems to be doing, because the /64 is getting doled out the the lan. I just can't get it routed anywhere.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2019 16:27
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Yeah, firmware is current but apparently there are grumblings that it actually worked on older revs and then they broke it with a more current release. The whole thing should be native slaac and apparently from what I can see in the documentation their DHCPv6 option actually means slaac first then dhcpv6 as a failback. Which is what it seems to be doing, because the /64 is getting doled out the the lan. I just can't get it routed anywhere. if it makes you feel any better getting v6 working on my home equipment was also a nightmare and then once i actually got it working i discovered browsing the internet is horrendously slow because ipv6 has terrible routing for most v6-enabled domains so i ended up disabling ipv6 anyway
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
ive had ipv6 enabled on regular old comcast for like 5 years now and it never had a problem, sorry about your incompetence
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2019 22:19
|
|
|
legit question what do people use ipv6 for in a residential network?
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 00:51
|
|
|
getting your traffic routed to and from the internet generally
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 01:42
|
|
|
oh so that's what I was doing wrong
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 02:07
|
|
|
it gets rid of bullshit like nat, port forwarding, stun servers and dynamic ip addresses
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
sometimes i like the enforced demarcation point of having a NAT with a gateway, especially in my house i dont care if you give me a IPv6 at the router interface, im gonna nat it back to v4 RFC 1918 anyway. and you better have a drat good CGN
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 04:00
|
|
|
accidental double.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 04:01
|
|
|
Sniep posted:sometimes i like the enforced demarcation point of having a NAT with a gateway, especially in my house the nating chokes throughput on gigabit fiber on every piece of home-grade gear I have ever seen even with cut through forwarding. Route those same packets without the nat over native v6 and you're pretty much at lan speeds in terms of cpu overhead. Any home router is going to have a default deny inbound rule for v6 traffic to keep the network boundary, but my company has over a half-million public ips to work with so I'm used to not seeing private ip space
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:the nating chokes throughput on gigabit fiber on every piece of home-grade gear I have ever seen even with cut through forwarding. Route those same packets without the nat over native v6 and you're pretty much at lan speeds in terms of cpu overhead. Any home router is going to have a default deny inbound rule for v6 traffic to keep the network boundary, but my company has over a half-million public ips to work with so I'm used to not seeing private ip space this is why i bought a ubnt doohickey to act as my home router the firmware situation is very frustrating but it was cheap and it happily routes and nats at line speed
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:the nating chokes throughput on gigabit fiber on every piece of home-grade gear I have ever seen even with cut through forwarding. Route those same packets without the nat over native v6 and you're pretty much at lan speeds in terms of cpu overhead. Any home router is going to have a default deny inbound rule for v6 traffic to keep the network boundary, but my company has over a half-million public ips to work with so I'm used to not seeing private ip space good news though: media sucks and you are missing nothing by getting bottlenecked on the latest 4k stream from netflix of the latest trash show
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 05:00
|
|
|
just run your own plex server with enough media to last a lifetime obvs
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 06:02
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:good news though: media sucks and you are missing nothing by getting bottlenecked on the latest 4k stream from netflix of the latest trash show basically
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 09:28
|
|
|
i got like 900+ from my asus tomato router with ctf but i enabled qos instead because i don't have gigabit anymore. you can basically only get the full gigabit from microsoft and steam anyway, maybe blizzard too. no need for speeds over 200 honestly
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 09:56
|
|
|
I get full speed from steam too which is p deece Although my connection is "only" 500 meg e: you already said steam my bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 11:40
|
|
|
Ur Getting Fatter posted:legit question what do people use ipv6 for in a residential network? u get new public ip addresses every day so you can vandalize wikipedia with impunity
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2019 11:58
|
|
|
can you safely assume that an external hard drive will spin down when not in use now? or is it still a bit of a crapshoot?
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 00:08
|
|
|
the ones that spin anyway, yeah, default windows power settings make them do that after 20 minutes or something like that
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 00:22
|
|
|
in linux you can check what spindown time is set to with hdparm
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 12:32
|
|
|
Is there a way to make a website your background (so, like Active Desktop only not poo poo)? I'd love to have https://www.submarinecablemap.com/ up. Shouldn't be clickable but it should update?
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:i got like 900+ from my asus tomato router with ctf but i enabled qos instead because i don't have gigabit anymore. you can basically only get the full gigabit from microsoft and steam anyway, maybe blizzard too. no need for speeds over 200 honestly yeah gigabit's probably most useful in a multi-tenant scenario
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 18:05
|
|
|
Schadenboner posted:Is there a way to make a website your background (so, like Active Desktop only not poo poo)? I'd love to have https://www.submarinecablemap.com/ up. I've never used it but wallpaper engine should be able to do this
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:43
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:i got like 900+ from my asus tomato router with ctf but i enabled qos instead because i don't have gigabit anymore. you can basically only get the full gigabit from microsoft and steam anyway, maybe blizzard too. no need for speeds over 200 honestly no one needs more than 640kb
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 07:36
|
|
|
Let's say I have three monitors: a 24" 16:10, 21.5" 75Hz, and an old 1280x1024. The 24" 16:10 is obviously the primary monitor, the 21.5" is a gaming monitor, and the 1280 is there for terminal windows and hooking up to Pis. Is there a way to force games to launch on the 21.5" screen? Like an affinity setting or something? This seems like a dumb question that of course should be easy to do but I can't actually figure it out. Schadenboner fucked around with this message at 20:32 on Sep 4, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 20:11
|
|
|
i think you have to set your gaming monitor as primary
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
Sniep posted:just run your own plex server with enough media to last a lifetime obvs BUY A SYNOh
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 22:51
|
|
|
fastboot breaks gsync? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2019 01:54
|
|
|
hey why the gently caress would a user in the Local Administrators group not have file permissions to do something but BUILTIN\Administrator would
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 01:37
|
|
|
as far as i understand it BUILTIN\Administrator and BUILTIN\Administrators are treated specially by UAC. Administrator (the user) always runs with max privileges. Anything you do, like running explorer.exe, runs with the maximum admin context and thus you can access anything that administrators can access. For everyone else in the Administrators group, its different. They run in a reduced privilege mode most of the time and then require elevation to do admin stuff. Thats the UAC prompt. When a member of the administrators group runs explorer, they're running it without that special admin token so they cant access stuff that the Administrators group has privileges on. If you were to elevate explorer.exe to run with admin creds you'd get your token and be able to access that stuff. However, Microsoft tries to prevent this and afaik it doesn't work. So what will happen is you get a permission denied message and then a prompt to grant yourself privs. If you do that it will elevate via UAC, get your admin context, grant your specific user access, and then de-elevate. Then when you try to access its with your normal user level account which now has the access you just granted it. There are a few ways to deal with it other than granting yourself specific access. You can access the folder via a network share. When you connect to a remote computer you bypass those UAC protections and go straight in with max privs. You can also create a different group (aka not BUILTIN\Administrators or another built in group) and give that group the access you want and then add your user to that group. Since its not a special group your normal user context will have that membership so you get access.
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 02:13
|
|
|
Sniep posted:just run your own plex server with enough media to last a lifetime obvs honestly even streaming plex to gfs house from mine and thru her wifi produces bits of such high quality most people couldn’t differentiate them from blu-dvd it’s incredible and mostly a testament to plex our friend
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 07:13
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:hey why the gently caress would a user in the Local Administrators group not have file permissions to do something but BUILTIN\Administrator would If its not a super-sensitive/important file or directory then you can also modify the acls to either give your specific account modify or full control which will get rid of the need to elevate, or grant the entire users group those privs if you're feeling lazy. But yeah, it's what shaggar said
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 15:00
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:If its not a super-sensitive/important file or directory then you can also modify the acls to either give your specific account modify or full control which will get rid of the need to elevate, or grant the entire users group those privs if you're feeling lazy. But yeah, it's what shaggar said Oh ok right local Administrators isn't "do anything" it's "can elevate" thanks
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 15:38
|
|
|
is there an airprint driver for Windows? every search result is for enabling airprint sharing of a printer from a Windows PC but I want the opposite
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 16:05
|
|
|
I went to reschedule my Network+ exam for the second time and realized I was minutes into the 24-hour cutoff window, so looks like I'll be taking it tomorrow. Any advice? Do I need to memorize the subnet tables or can I wing it?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 17:22
|
|
|
netwerk23 posted:I went to reschedule my Network+ exam for the second time and realized I was minutes into the 24-hour cutoff window, so looks like I'll be taking it tomorrow. this is a joke right
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 18:41
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this is a joke right I've read a couple study guides and watched a bunch of Messer videos. Not a joke - been a CJ long enough to already know pretty much every concept.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 18:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:25 |
|
|
netwerk23 posted:I've read a couple study guides and watched a bunch of Messer videos. Not a joke - been a CJ long enough to already know pretty much every concept. i am sorry it was not a joke. but now that i know you were serious... well i have good news and bad news good news: a blind mule could pass network+ just by mashing buttons with his nose. you're not going to have any problems there bad news: for related reasons, network+ is completely worthless as a credential
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 20:15
|
|