|
lol i thought it was a dumb joke by ross not actual indignation
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 13:07 |
|
|
LifeLynx posted:Food isn't a creature type. Gingerbrute is only allowed to have Food on its type line because Food is an artifact type, and Gingerbrute is an artifact. If its on a creature subtype line, its a creature type
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:51
|
|
|
9/11 is safe again
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:52
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:If its on a creature subtype line, its a creature type Forest is not a creature type either despite being on dryad arbor
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:53
|
|
|
If gingerbread said counts as a food, that would be different imo
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:53
|
|
|
cheetah7071 posted:Forest is not a creature type either despite being on dryad arbor Hmmm...
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:54
|
|
|
This is confusing
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:55
|
|
|
there sure are some brainworms in that twitter thread. How dare wotc not keep 9/11 in mind at all times and make a card that includes the word Tower. It's not even destroying a tower or something, jesus
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:55
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:lol i thought it was a dumb joke by ross not actual indignation Same, I just thought it was funny
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:57
|
|
|
ZeroCount posted:there sure are some brainworms in that twitter thread. How dare wotc not keep 9/11 in mind at all times and make a card that includes the word Tower. It's not even destroying a tower or something, jesus No you don't understand there were people who were TRAPPED in the tower as it burned around them this is inconsiderate!!!!! Yeah but seriously people need to chill.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:59
|
|
|
ZeroCount posted:there sure are some brainworms in that twitter thread. How dare wotc not keep 9/11 in mind at all times and make a card that includes the word Tower. It's not even destroying a tower or something, jesus The US lost it’s loving mind forever after 9/11
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:00
|
|
|
Inside Job 2WUR, Sorcery Gain control of target vehicle until end of turn. Untap that vehicle. It becomes an artifact creature until the end of the turn and gains haste and "[T], Sacrifice this card: destroy target artifact or land" until end of turn. Whenever an artifact or land with "Tower" in its name was destroyed this way, goad each creature its owner controls.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:04
|
|
|
if we get any cards about boats on december 7, especially if those boats sink, boy howdy let me tell you
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:04
|
|
|
Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake Tainen fucked around with this message at 23:12 on Sep 11, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:07
|
|
|
Mat Cauthon posted:What a dumb non-controversy. Congrats to the flaghumpers out there I guess. Speaking as a New Yorker who saw 9/11 happen 2 months after I joined the military and spent ten years dealing with the hosed up aftermath, anyone who's offended can loving suck it. I bet the Venn diagram of people up in arms about this and those screaming about the WUR wall from the commander precons is a loving circle.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:lol i thought it was a dumb joke by ross not actual indignation I'd hope the emoji gave that away, but WotC took it down an apologized lol.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:27
|
|
|
AlternateNu posted:Speaking as a New Yorker who saw 9/11 happen 2 months after I joined the military and spent ten years dealing with the hosed up aftermath, anyone who's offended can loving suck it. There was a nonzero number of people at my lgs saying I'M GONNA BUILD A TRUMP 2020 WALL DECK AND IT'S RED WHITE AND BLUE magic was a mistake
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:29
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake R for a hasted first-striker. Surely those other two abilities must contain some sort of drawback. Oh.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:30
|
|
|
You know, I could poo poo on that flavor text but I'd rather they feel free to tee off and occasionally trip over their dick into sub dad joke level humor than feel like they gotta play it straight.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:30
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake Oh, so that's why they unbanned stoneforge, so he'd have a friend.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:31
|
|
|
How could they post this on this, the day of towers that down, fell?!?!
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:32
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:How could they post this on this, the day of towers that down, fell?!?! Destroyed by "fervent champions" of wahhabism holy poo poo they are tripling down.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:33
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:How could they post this on this, the day of towers that down, fell?!?! Epic.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:34
|
|
|
never forget 
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:35
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake standard doesn't have great equipment for him atm to take advantage of his 3rd line
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:36
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake He looks like he's taking his senior yearbook photo That sorcery speed hurts me, so promising before that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:38
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake Think Knights might be pushed. Don't ask how I know this, just a hunch.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:39
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake  if you look closely his lightsaber there is the goofy championship trophyAlso a Hazoret reference, nice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake gonna jank it up with glaive of the guildpact, aw yeah
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Bringing back invitational cards was a mistake I doubt this would work, but does this equip ability stack? If I had 2 Fervent Champions on the field and wanted to do an equip, would it still be 3 less or would it now be 6 less?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Waffleopolis posted:I doubt this would work, but does this equip ability stack? If I had 2 Fervent Champions on the field and wanted to do an equip, would it still be 3 less or would it now be 6 less? No
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
So, that knight totally goes in Stoneforge decks, right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
Waffleopolis posted:I doubt this would work, but does this equip ability stack? If I had 2 Fervent Champions on the field and wanted to do an equip, would it still be 3 less or would it now be 6 less? No, because (card name) always means "this card".
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
Waffleopolis posted:I doubt this would work, but does this equip ability stack? If I had 2 Fervent Champions on the field and wanted to do an equip, would it still be 3 less or would it now be 6 less? The ability refers to this instance of Fervent Champion, not all cards named "Fervent Champion"
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:So, that knight totally goes in Stoneforge decks, right? ...eh? I would rather just equip a Giest of St. Traft.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:55
|
|
|
Owlbear Camus posted:Inside Job 2WUR, Sorcery 
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 23:59
|
|
|
GoutPatrol posted:...eh? I would rather just equip a Giest of St. Traft. i think the idea is you go turn 1 [whatever], turn 2 stoneforge, turn 3 activate stoneforge for a sword, play this guy, equip the sword for free, and swing Kurtofan posted:If its on a creature subtype line, its a creature type creature types are actually defined in comprehensive rule 205.3m.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 00:00
|
|
|
There better be at least one worthwhile equipment in this set
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 00:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 13:07 |
|
|
Kurtofan posted:also that variant is really pretty The little prince is kinda like a fairy tale.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 00:03
|
|
