|
Mr. Nice! posted:He can’t dismiss his case. It has already been dismissed with prejudice. There’s no option to voluntarily dismiss and refile now. In fact, under the tcpa he couldn't dismiss the suit anyway as soon as the tcpa motion was in place. even if he did, the tcpa would move forward.
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2019 15:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 02:30 |
|
|
E the Shaggy posted:Nick apparently has a new strategy of.....this: That's not what's actually happening(it's from months ago), it's actually about how Beard was having Rekieta run litigation strategy by his fans. https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1181584165759864833?s=20 https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1181587439057543168?s=20
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2019 17:14
|
|
|
Oh. Pro tip. This language was ADDED to the Texas TCPA:Texas House Bill 2730 posted:
(Texas) PENAL CODE TITLE 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON CHAPTER 21. SEXUAL OFFENSES
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2019 18:20
|
|
|
Maera Sior posted:Also, using "autistic" as a slur. Really? Yeah, not really warming to these guys, one thing they did say that's interesting is that the lawyer with the youtube channel doesn't have malpractice insurance so doesn't look good for the Ty Beards finances, unless getting that when you have a client was the only lesson he learnt from law school.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2019 21:40
|
|
|
Hub Cat fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Oct 9, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
Baka-nin posted:Yeah, not really warming to these guys, one thing they did say that's interesting is that the lawyer with the youtube channel doesn't have malpractice insurance so doesn't look good for the Ty Beards finances, unless getting that when you have a client was the only lesson he learnt from law school. Yeah, but Rekieta isn't representing Vic in any way, he just connected Vic to Ty.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 01:29
|
|
|
Isn’t that Discord transcript evidence that Rekieta handled a lot of planning/strategy for the case?
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 01:35
|
|
|
Also wasn't part of their case that there was a secret discord server where Marchi and Rial conspired with their fellow SJWs to slander Vic? I suppose that's where that projection came from.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 01:39
|
|
|
Phobophilia posted:Also wasn't part of their case that there was a secret discord server where Marchi and Rial conspired with their fellow SJWs to slander Vic? I suppose that's where that projection came from. has any chud ever accused someone of doing a thing they were not themselves doing ever
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 01:44
|
|
|
Patware posted:has any chud ever accused someone of doing a thing they were not themselves doing "They just want women to rule the world and step on men" isn't something they are doing, just their personal fetish.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
i think "boy i sure hope a woman doesn't rule the world and step on me!" counts on a technicality
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 02:01
|
|
|
Nah, theirs is pretty clearly "They just want men to rule the world and step on women (and minorities)", so it still tracks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 02:14
|
|
|
Phobophilia posted:Also wasn't part of their case that there was a secret discord server where Marchi and Rial conspired with their fellow SJWs to slander Vic? I suppose that's where that projection came from. There was a badly photoshoped picture about that which got debunked quick as people pointed out where certain pieces were taken from.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 03:28
|
|
|
Patware posted:has any chud ever accused someone of doing a thing they were not themselves doing I always assumed it was something like "if we're doing it, then they must be as well if we dig hard enough!!  "
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 03:37
|
|
|
Doucette tweeted something ~*~mysterious~*~ in the twitter thread for Vic's lawsuit: https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1181780257919193088 https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1181780991603609600
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 06:49
|
|
|
Somehow an alligator has entered this fuckin case
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 07:29
|
|
|
They're probably trying to sue him or something.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 07:49
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:They're probably trying to sue him or something. When your first SLAPP fails, go somewhere with less anti-slapp protection and try again?
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 08:57
|
|
|
who the gently caress censors their own expletives
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 15:37
|
|
|
Elephant Parade posted:who the gently caress censors their own expletives Voice to text on Android automatically censors my cursing. It's terrible.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 15:54
|
|
|
Elephant Parade posted:who the f*ck censors their own expletives
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 16:29
|
|
|
SweetWillyRollbar posted:Voice to text on Android automatically censors my cursing. It's terrible. My voice to text will happily render "No, I wanted a full stop, not the words full loving stop, you bastard, delete that, delete, fucker"
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 19:38
|
|
|
TheDarkFlame posted:My voice to text will happily render "No, I wanted a full stop, not the words full loving stop, you bastard, delete that, delete, fucker" I'm jelly as heck over here.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 19:46
|
|
|
On iphones if you add your favorite swear words to your contacts list they'll stop being autocorrected away.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 21:03
|
|
|
I have autocorrect disabled on all my devices. I turned it off on iOS on 7 iirc because there was a big shift in its behavior then. I manually typed contractions, and it would do dumb things like we'lol and he'lol because it would think I was done with a word when I hit apostrophe. Turned it off and never looked back.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
Can Of Worms posted:Doucette tweeted something ~*~mysterious~*~ in the twitter thread for Vic's lawsuit: it turns out that the winner of the case is Jeb!
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 21:21
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:it turns out that the winner of the case is Jeb! The handgun finally paid off.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 22:49
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:On iphones if you add your favorite swear words to your contacts list they'll stop being autocorrected away. the saner way is if you go to settings->general->keyboard->text replacement, you can just set up a list of words you want to explicitly have (just fill in phrase, shortcut can be blank) and then when you yell “gently caress” siri won’t try to queue up a call or text message to a nonexistent contact
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 23:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Spacebird77/status/1183473803067875328?s=19
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 22:38
|
|
|
"Our friends at Kiwi Farms have been so wonderful" really says it all, doesn't it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 10:26
|
|
|
Looks like Migogna is loving stupid enough to appeal https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/s...566943665700864
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 14:14
|
|
|
How many people will still even be following this in the months it'll even take for the appeal to go through according to the lawyers own feed? Feels like interest would dry up quickly when the Vicstans inevitably get distracted by something else.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 14:32
|
|
|
ChaseSP posted:How many people will still even be following this in the months it'll even take for the appeal to go through according to the lawyers own feed? Feels like interest would dry up quickly when the Vicstans inevitably get distracted by something else. This is the bargaining phase
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 15:48
|
|
|
This should be a relatively fast appeal. It will still take a couple of months, but there’s no real error made by the lower court judge.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 16:29
|
|
|
Well yes they literally have no evidence for their claims at all given it was all thrown out due to being made up bullshit. It's not even like they have any remaiming evidence to make their case, it's literally goint "nuh-uh!" but in a long portracted legal battle.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 16:44
|
|
|
Can they eventually try and take it to the supreme court?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 17:07
|
|
|
Only if at least 4 justices on the supreme court want to hear it. So almost certainly no.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
Fangz posted:Can they eventually try and take it to the supreme court? Technically yes but the Supreme Court usually doesn't pick things up that haven't gone to the state supreme court. Also they're not going to pick this up, because it's a case with an obvious answer and no real precedent setting decisions to make/validate. THere's some rumblings of wanting to strike down Sullivan v. the NYT decision because Trumpers hate the "public figure" rules... this is a poor case because that's not the only or primary reason Vic lost.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
I can't loving imagine the state would take this, let alone Federal Court.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 02:30 |
|
|
I mean Brett kavanaugh is most certainly a yes
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2019 17:25
|
|