Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

OwlFancier posted:

It's like if you boss couldn't actually fire you but came in threatening to stop telling you what to do, how would you react?

I would lmao, op

E: probably the worst snipe in UKMT history

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Pesmerga posted:

In which case the whip system is largely pointless, as is the idea of political parties, if anyone just votes whichever way.

Parties and the whip system are soft power, they work on aggregate, they do not work absolutely and if they did, jeremy corbyn would not be in politics because he would have got the sack decades ago.

DickEmery
Dec 5, 2004

josh04 posted:

Seems pretty straightforward that Jezza made a deal to allow MPs from leave areas to vote yes on the second reading so long as they voted down the timetable.

This.
Pretty telling that only those who vote consistently against the party on Brexit voted aye on the timetable.

Corbyn plays another blinder.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Pesmerga posted:

This isn’t some victory, at this rate, it’s just delaying defeat as Labour go from rearguard action to rearguard action, and unless something changes, the deal is going to get through at the third stage. All this talk of the wreckers somehow coming around between now and then is hubristic.

Delaying until the EU returns an extension is literally the game play right now, why... why exactly is delaying a bad play when it's the best thing to do?

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
Remove the whip from these wrecker cunts

Pesmerga
Aug 1, 2005

So nice to eat you
It’s a question of faith at this point. Some people have faith they’ll somehow come around when it counts, despite all the evidence to the contrary, whereas I don’t. Some are jumping ship out of politics altogether, or don’t care if Labour loses the next election so long as they get to say they voted against Brexit and get to keep their seats. This isn’t even about Brexit at this point, it’s about the fact I really think they’re loving Labour’s chances at the next election.

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

Brony Car posted:

So much of the appeal of Brexit at this point is the feeling that you’re moving somewhere and not just stuck in some bureaucratic limbo, right?

Can the Lib Dems and other organizations start selling “Remain” now as the best way to get over all this crap and move on?

“You got conned. Everyone makes mistakes. There’s no shame in backing out of a bad deal.”

I guess you still get stuck in the anti-democratic trap without the second referendum.

The irony is the only way to get it done and over with is to just not bother and Remain. I think people should really be pushing that idea because brexit fatigue is a thing, and actually passing a deal is just the beginning of this bullshit

Pochoclo
Feb 4, 2008

No...
Clapping Larry
Corbyn should have used the secret Psychic Dominator he's been building at an abandoned Nandos to mind-control all MPs and make them vote to institute the Socialist Social United Republic of Great Britain

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
If the Tories thought they could gently caress the DUP and get away with it like they did the Lib Dems they're in for a bad time. Those fuckers bear grudges for centuries :laugh:

peanut-
Feb 17, 2004
Fun Shoe
The Labour MPs have completely hosed this right? I don’t believe this isn’t exactly the outcome Johnson wanted.

He now gets an election where he’s both the man who delivered a Brexit agreement and had it stymied by the enemy-of-the-people Parliament. He gets to have his cake and eat it.

kecske
Feb 28, 2011

it's round, like always

the beeb posted:

"We are wallowing in the realms of metaphysical abstraction," says Speaker John Bercow.

"Very enjoyable," he adds.

lol

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Pochoclo posted:

Corbyn should have used the secret Psychic Dominator he's been building at an abandoned Nandos to mind-control all MPs and make them vote to institute the Socialist Social United Republic of Great Britain

He's saving the battery on that for his final strike against Israel

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Mmm haha...yes...

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

peanut- posted:

The Labour MPs have completely hosed this right? I don’t believe this isn’t exactly the outcome Johnson wanted.

He now gets an election where he’s both the man who delivered a Brexit agreement and had it stymied by the enemy-of-the-people Parliament. He gets to have his cake and eat it.

Everything johnson has suggested thus far is that he wanted to rush this thing through without scrutiny and have it agreed to by october 31st, and he does not appear like he's going to get that at all.

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

peanut- posted:

The Labour MPs have completely hosed this right? I don’t believe this isn’t exactly the outcome Johnson wanted.

He now gets an election where he’s both the man who delivered a Brexit agreement and had it stymied by the enemy-of-the-people Parliament. He gets to have his cake and eat it.

But it wasn't stymied, which is what Pesmerga et al are so wound up about. Parliament voted to take the bill to a second reading and the government are now sitting on it to prevent it from progressing.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I would heavily bet that as boris's intent is clearly no deal, he is furiously phoning everyone in the EU and asking them to vote down the extension or offer only a very short one, while he sits on the bill. In the hopes that he can rush it through under panic of no deal, and then no deal by default in a year once it lapses.

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer
ah yeah the "fantasist" school of thought.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


josh04 posted:

But it wasn't stymied, which is what Pesmerga et al are so wound up about. Parliament voted to take the bill to a second reading and the government are now sitting on it to prevent it from progressing.

u wot

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
https://twitter.com/eucopresident/status/1186737952313004032?s=21

Oh, neat, Tusk is doing the nice, predictable thing.

Alctel
Jan 16, 2004

I love snails


OwlFancier posted:

I would heavily bet that as boris's intent is clearly no deal, he is furiously phoning everyone in the EU and asking them to vote down the extension or offer only a very short one, while he sits on the bill. In the hopes that he can rush it through under panic of no deal, and then no deal by default in a year once it lapses.

Yeah pretty much

Debbie Does Dagon
Jul 8, 2005



*Boris trips and falls face-first into a pile of his own excrement*

"Clearly this shows how weak Corbyn is"

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Ms Fuchi posted:

*Boris trips and falls face-first into a pile of his own excrement*

"Clearly this shows how weak Corbyn is"

The real Pissflaps is the brainspiders we developed along the way

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013


Nice of him to point out whose fault it is, too :v:

mfcrocker
Jan 31, 2004



Hot Rope Guy

Once its granted, does something have to go through Commons to make it law?

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem

mfcrocker posted:

Once its granted, does something have to go through Commons to make it law?

not if it’s the three month extension to jan 31st, that’s already been voted on by the commons. any other date yes.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

mfcrocker posted:

Once its granted, does something have to go through Commons to make it law?

Benn act already thought of that, he has to accept it immediately if it's the one till january, otherwise it has to go to the commons or be accepted no less than two days from receiving it.

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

Pesmerga posted:

Why, to say that Labour wreckers are loving this, and if there were a time for Corbyn to start laying down party discipline it would be now? I think that the thread is too optimistic about all this somehow leading to a Labour government, rather than an amendment to have a customs union being voted down because it doesn’t end up with the support of the house, and you have people like Flint, Nandy, Fitzpatrick and Orr potentially voting against it for various reasons.

I think Corbyn should threaten to remove the whip from rebels, but only when it comes to the crunch. I.e. the third reading of an unamended bill, OR a confidence vote.

Like other people have said, it's a trick that only works once because if you remove the whip MPs have no further incentive to vote with you. It's also worth remembering that there is absolutely a core of five-ish Brexiteers who will vote with Johnson no matter what. So even though I'd be happy to be rid of them, the second reading would still have passed even if you turned around the other 14 rebels.

Personally I think Corbs is trying to love-bomb the rebels by allowing them to vote for the second reading in the hope that they will vote for amendments that'll wreck the bill anyway. But like I say if it comes to the crunch I do think it should be a removal of whip issue.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

The relevant text:

quote:

(2)If the European Council decides to agree an extension of the period in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union ending at 11.00pm on 31 October 2019, but to a date other than 11.00pm on 31 January 2020, the Prime Minister must, within a period of two days beginning with the end of the day on which the European Council’s decision is made, or before the end of 30 October 2019, whichever is sooner, notify the President of the European Council that the United Kingdom agrees to the proposed extension.

(3)But subsection (2) does not apply if the House of Commons has decided not to pass a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown within a period of two calendar days beginning with the end of the day on which the European Council’s decision is made or before the end of 30 October 2019, whichever is sooner, in the following form—

“That this House has approved the extension to the period in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union which the European Council has decided.”

(4)Nothing in this section shall prevent the Prime Minister from agreeing to an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union otherwise than in accordance with this section.

As far as I am aware there is absolutely nothing the PM can do to refuse an extension if it is offered.

Parliament should get a vote on it if it's a different date, but unless they decide not to pass the motion of acceptance boris has to inform the EU anyway that we accept.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 21:31 on Oct 22, 2019

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
This is also good because it means we likely have a very short turnaround before Labour can safely drop their VONC. Depending on how much they want to dig into Boris's deal first, of course.

NinpoEspiritoSanto
Oct 22, 2013




So everything appears to be transpiring as I recall the plan being stated in UKMT a while back (e.g. basically wreck Johnson at every turn until we get an extension then VONC the fucker) so what's with all the doomsaying?

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

Darth Walrus posted:

This is also good because it means we likely have a very short turnaround before Labour can safely drop their VONC. Depending on how much they want to dig into Boris's deal first, of course.

The important date will probably be getting us past October 31st, which is when most voters will wake up to the fact that we haven't left. Right up until then Johnson and the media will still be pretending there is no delay.

Teratrain
Aug 23, 2007
Waiting for Godot

Bundy posted:

So everything appears to be transpiring as I recall the plan being stated in UKMT a while back (e.g. basically wreck Johnson at every turn until we get an extension then VONC the fucker) so what's with all the doomsaying?

I think people are just a bit bummed that the second reading passed.

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

Bundy posted:

So everything appears to be transpiring as I recall the plan being stated in UKMT a while back (e.g. basically wreck Johnson at every turn until we get an extension then VONC the fucker) so what's with all the doomsaying?

It was completely unknown (to us) how the voting would go, it was drat tense and we're just reconstructing what we hope/presume the events were post hoc. If people are very unforgiving then this was a reckless gamble, otherwise it could be a plan still working.

DickEmery
Dec 5, 2004

Bundy posted:

So everything appears to be transpiring as I recall the plan being stated in UKMT a while back (e.g. basically wreck Johnson at every turn until we get an extension then VONC the fucker) so what's with all the doomsaying?

19 Labour rebels seemed a lot after the 2nd reading passed.
Turns out it was the right play not to go after them hard as it wouldn't have made a difference and then they may have voted for the timetable out of spite.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

The "plan" is less of a plan and more a series of contingencies that give every possible opportunity for boris to eat poo poo and be forced to extend past his deadline and give us space for an election.

And a distressing number of those contingencies are proving to be necessary.

RabidWeasel
Aug 4, 2007

Cultures thrive on their myths and legends...and snuggles!

peanut- posted:

The Labour MPs have completely hosed this right? I don’t believe this isn’t exactly the outcome Johnson wanted.

He now gets an election where he’s both the man who delivered a Brexit agreement and had it stymied by the enemy-of-the-people Parliament. He gets to have his cake and eat it.

Assuming that the next step is an election this is the first time ever where the public will actually have a vote where a non-Remain Brexit option is on the table as an entirely known quantity.

You can take every single negative thing about Boris' deal and turn it into a "if you vote for the Tories you definitely get this when Brexit happens" list, it's like the exact opposite of the original "just imagine whatever you like" referendum.

Yes this probably isn't the best possible outcome but I think that knowing exactly what's on the table makes a big difference in terms of being able to argue against it in an election.

OwlFancier posted:

Nice of him to point out whose fault it is, too :v:

It's amazing how you actually get significantly better coverage of Brexit news (in purely factual terms) from EU twitter than from any of the UK domestic media

jabby posted:

I think Corbyn should threaten to remove the whip from rebels, but only when it comes to the crunch. I.e. the third reading of an unamended bill, OR a confidence vote.

Like other people have said, it's a trick that only works once because if you remove the whip MPs have no further incentive to vote with you. It's also worth remembering that there is absolutely a core of five-ish Brexiteers who will vote with Johnson no matter what. So even though I'd be happy to be rid of them, the second reading would still have passed even if you turned around the other 14 rebels.

Personally I think Corbs is trying to love-bomb the rebels by allowing them to vote for the second reading in the hope that they will vote for amendments that'll wreck the bill anyway. But like I say if it comes to the crunch I do think it should be a removal of whip issue.

Agree with this, if there is a 3rd reading it needs to be nuclear (unless some amendment goes through to make it good but that seems ultra unlikely)

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
brexit is a super emotive issue, particularly for those with eg EU nationals as family members or similar. I think people can get a little frayed around it.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/1186742484258508800?s=21

Just extra confirmation that the EU will probably be cool with the Benn Act, taking the extension out of the PM's hands.

Pochoclo
Feb 4, 2008

No...
Clapping Larry
Lol that most of the tabloids still have their little counter widgets counting down the days to Brexit even though a delay is pretty much certain now

Are they just gonna keep adding days to them as the delays keep happening or what

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Pochoclo posted:

Lol that most of the tabloids still have their little counter widgets counting down the days to Brexit even though a delay is pretty much certain now

Are they just gonna keep adding days to them as the delays keep happening or what

Little do you know once they hit zero they underflow and it turns out we brexited several decades ago.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply