|
UnknownTarget posted:Don't forget that about a third of the country is cool with all this. They'll be back. And much more than a third of their constituents. Freedom caucus nutbags tend to come from places where the GOP primary is the real election.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 13:56 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 17:01 |
|
https://twitter.com/girlsreallyrule/status/1186980592254115840
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 13:58 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/RidT/status/1187349255398330369 This isn't Bari or Bedbugs. This is from the news side of the business.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:00 |
|
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1187320846785888257
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:05 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:That seems a bit fast Clearly Democrats hate Thanksgiving, as nobody is going to want to visit their older relatives when this goes down. So unpatriotic.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:06 |
Paracaidas posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/RidT/status/1187349255398330369 I don't know which one I prefer, NYT going full QANON or WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached": https://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/1187347318347046913
|
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:07 |
|
Tax https://twitter.com/hourlyFox/status/1187326631033094144
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:08 |
|
canepazzo posted:I don't know which one I prefer, NYT going full QANON or WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached": drat that's some twisted logic. Like, very clearly they are NOT trying to impeach him for incompetence. If that were the case, they wouldn't have gone after him if he succeeded at getting Ukraine to aid his campaign. I cannot believe the dogshit that the "intellectual" right-wing publish regularly.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:09 |
|
Sir Lemming posted:Clearly Democrats hate Thanksgiving, as nobody is going to want to visit their older relatives when this goes down. So unpatriotic. C'mon now. No one wanted to visit their older relatives anyways. This just justifies it
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:12 |
|
canepazzo posted:I don't know which one I prefer, NYT going full QANON or WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached": Interesting new law angle. Pleading stupidity
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:13 |
|
OK, let's roll with that for a moment: Incompetence at that level warrants Article 25
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:14 |
|
canepazzo posted:I don't know which one I prefer, NYT going full QANON or WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached": Extremely Lionel Hutz Voice posted:And really, your honor, it’s not like there’s such a thing as attempted murder... Smash Cut, Behind Bars Now posted:Oh.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:15 |
|
"officer, I was only TRYING to rob this bank. Clearly I failed to do so. It's unconstitutional to arrest someone for incompetence!"
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:17 |
|
canepazzo posted:I don't know which one I prefer, NYT going full QANON or WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached": Maybe I read it wrong, but Ambassador Taylor's opening statements made it sound like President Zelenskyy was like 2 days from going on CNN and announcing the investigation into the Biden's before the news about the Ukraine aid dropped and shined a light on the whole thing.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:18 |
|
https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1187201572197023744?s=19
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:19 |
|
That's not a great joke, Eric.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:21 |
|
A Qanon "researcher/true believer's" hot take on Rep. Matt Gaetz's heroic stand yesterday: https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1187200821215186944
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:22 |
|
Ah good, Punisher avatar, that checks out
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:24 |
|
canepazzo posted:WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached"
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:25 |
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Ah good, Punisher avatar, that checks out For a medic. There isn't a big enough for these idiots.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:29 |
Robot Hobo posted:This makes perfect sense. After all, if I were to pull out a gun in front of multiple witnesses and video cameras and try to kill someone, but my poor aim causes me to miss, then I've committed no crime. I'd be totally innocent, the cops can't touch me. It's not like "attempted" murder is a crime, right? It depends: do you have an (R) or a (D) after your name?
|
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:29 |
canepazzo posted:I don't know which one I prefer, NYT going full QANON or WSJ going "he was too stupid to succeed at crime, thus can't be impeached": Whomst among us is not too incompetent to do our job??
|
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:30 |
|
https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1187324507905806338 They are so loving dumb it hurts
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:30 |
|
friendbot2000 posted:They are so loving dumb it hurts steve scalise is living proof that half a cisman's thoughts come from his dick
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:33 |
|
Data Graham posted:Whomst among us is not too incompetent to do our job?? Just loving lol if you are competent.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:35 |
|
https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1187198298811187201 Holy poo poo this is hot take. "If people dont have to work as much they will be happy and not slaves to capital! The horror!" Edit: I can't get past the paywall, but its the WSJ so I am guessing I am hitting the mark here friendbot2000 fucked around with this message at 14:49 on Oct 24, 2019 |
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:37 |
|
Now we know why she never retired. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1187361701085224962
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:37 |
|
SocketWrench posted:Interesting new law angle. Pleading stupidity There were similar arguments after the Mueller Report came out, regarding Trump ordering his lawyer to fire Mueller. I can't tell you the number of people I saw who argued that because the lawyer ignored Trump's order, it was not obstruction.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:39 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1187359431878742019 Someone is triggered
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:44 |
|
I’m pretty sure there are tons of jobs where you could cut 2 hours out of their workday and productivity would remain the same.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:45 |
|
canepazzo posted:It depends: do you have an (R) or a (D) after your name? Maybe that's enough to confuse them? I can't say I've tested this thoroughly.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:46 |
|
friendbot2000 posted:https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1187198298811187201 I mean, if the workweek were shortened, you don't think it would be better? 3 day weekends every week is a lot more life to live and I would love the hell out of it.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:46 |
|
bobjr posted:I’m pretty sure there are tons of jobs where you could cut 2 hours out of their workday and productivity would remain the same. Hell, I do that every weekday.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:46 |
|
https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1187031280380198912?s=20
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:46 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Stick a fork in Tillis If you follow through the link to the daily caller article, these aren't seven hard nos. Most of the statements are worded to give a huge amount of latitude to change their mind, and are, basically, saying they do not support the impeachment inquiry. Not one of the statements the Daily Caller cites are outright saying "i will not vote to remove." Hell, just look at the trapdoor in this statement: quote:Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe’s office also said that Inhofe had ruled out voting for Trump’s removal from office “at this time.” The Caller also reached out following Taylor’s testimony Tuesday, but did not receive a response by press time.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:47 |
ELO Musk posted:I mean, if the workweek were shortened, you don't think it would be better? 3 day weekends every week is a lot more life to live and I would love the hell out of it. France mandating a 35 hour work week was a HUGE talking point among the right in the early 2000s. Sign of laziness, decadence, hell in a handbasket, there but for the grace of God go we.
|
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:48 |
|
ELO Musk posted:I mean, if the workweek were shortened, you don't think it would be better? 3 day weekends every week is a lot more life to live and I would love the hell out of it. I was more being sarcastic that the WSJ appeared to be critical of it because the idea of people not being chained to their desks must be horrifying. I guess it didnt come across like that lol
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:48 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:That seems a bit fast This says they're going to "take it public" in mid-november: i.e. they'll be finished with depositions and start getting people to testify publicly. Not that they'll hold a vote to impeach immediately.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:49 |
|
Surprising https://twitter.com/JamesVGrimaldi/status/1187318632579325952
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:53 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 17:01 |
|
Data Graham posted:France mandating a 35 hour work week was a HUGE talking point among the right in the early 2000s. Sign of laziness, decadence, hell in a handbasket, there but for the grace of God go we. Yeah I can see that line of argument coming up but what greedy capitalist wants to admit that they're paying people for hours where they aren't productive? It's proven that people are more productive when they're happier and extending time to them to live their lives would go a long way towards that. friendbot2000 posted:I was more being sarcastic that the WSJ appeared to be critical of it because the idea of people not being chained to their desks must be horrifying. I guess it didnt come across like that lol Perhaps I misread then. Carry on, oh friendbot.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2019 14:54 |