|
DJExile posted:https://twitter.com/darrenrovell/status/1186854609383579648
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2019 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 02:42 |
|
|
Crazy Ted posted:Not gonna lie all his Tweet did was make me click on the larger version of the picture to try to figure out what game the kiddo was playing. Elixir Capture according to a reply.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 00:11
|
|
|
That looks like Clash Royale.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 22:30
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/jon_bois/status/1187904593147117570
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 02:34
|
|
|
KNEW he was a goon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 03:41
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:KNEW he was a goon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 03:53
|
|
|
Crazy Ted posted:Even money he only posted in Trad Games and BYOB Definitely CityName SportsTeam, even if Moof Wear was better. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/1188195840583712772?s=19 never mind the glaring obvious fact that Oklahoma gave up almost 50 points to an unranked team, we've got video replay to continue whining about, dammit! This also continues deadspin's new tradition of whining about video replay (and especially VAR) even when the call was made or proven correct thanks to the replay.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 22:18
|
|
|
VAR is good, the implementation of it in the Premier League is loving abysmal
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 23:04
|
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:VAR is good, the implementation of it in the Premier League is loving abysmal aso for NFL pass interference calls
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 23:05
|
|
|
DJExile posted:
Because it loving sucks and makes the experience of watching sports way worse.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 02:27
|
|
|
DJExile posted:https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/1188195840583712772?s=19
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 02:28
|
|
|
If they want to complain about unnecessary video interfering with people's entertainment, they had better start with deadspin dot com ohohohohoho But seriously it's almost startling how quickly it became an ad-infested hellscape even while running an adblocker, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not around in a year or two as the vultures that took it over squeezed it for every last cent
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 03:01
|
|
|
yeah I'd really hate for my football game to get interrupted by a video replay (sits through 5 minutes of commercials after every loving play)
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 04:49
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:yeah I'd really hate for my football game to get interrupted by a video replay (sits through 5 minutes of commercials after every loving play) We all hate that aspect too?
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 05:19
|
|
|
I think video replay is generally pretty bad but deadspin's argument that it is a bigger tragedy because Oklahoma is higher ranked is entitled bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 06:33
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:We all hate that aspect too? i mean you're the guys willing in the water bitching its wet
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 07:05
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:yeah I'd really hate for my football game to get interrupted by a video replay (sits through 5 minutes of commercials after every loving play) it sucks rear end in other sports too Lockback posted:I think video replay is generally pretty bad but deadspin's argument that it is a bigger tragedy because Oklahoma is higher ranked is entitled bullshit. In college football a single loss can eliminate you from championship contention so that seems kind of relevant to their point? MourningView fucked around with this message at 08:15 on Oct 27, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 08:09
|
|
|
The alternative outcome is "Oklahoma's undefeated season remains intact through bullshit non-call" so which one do you prefer?
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 08:23
|
|
|
skaboomizzy posted:The alternative outcome is "Oklahoma's undefeated season remains intact through bullshit non-call" so which one do you prefer? probably the one that didn't force me to watch someone pour over two frames of ultra slow mo for 20 minutes with no real clarity gained
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 08:26
|
|
|
That's the exact type of complete marginal poo poo that replay shouldn't be used for. There should be a real time timer. If an official doesn't see conclusive evidence either way in a minute, let the call on the field stand. Even let the challenging team keep their timeout if it's a 50/50. The rules were designed to be officiated by people on a field, not people doing Zapruder analysis. I felt the same way about the World Seires play a few years back where a runner was called out because his foot lifted a millimeter off the base for a tenth of a second. Who cares. If a reasonable umpire couldn't have seen it in real time what's the point of reversing the call? Feels Villeneuve fucked around with this message at 08:35 on Oct 27, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 08:26
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:i mean you're the guys willing in the water bitching its wet You’re doing the “you participate in society” thing but for sports.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 13:43
|
|
|
MourningView posted:it sucks rear end in other sports too Except tennis. The only sport where replay is super quick and super accurate every time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 13:55
|
|
|
Don't bring back football replay until you can use Atari graphics to determine whether or not there was a catch within 10 seconds.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 14:00
|
|
|
skaboomizzy posted:The alternative outcome is "Oklahoma's undefeated season remains intact through bullshit non-call" so which one do you prefer? an official not calling a failed onsides kick where the ball skimmed against someone's elbow at 9.5 yards wouldn't have been a "bullshit non-call", lol I mean fundamentally Oklahoma sucked rear end and should have lost but come on with that poo poo
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 14:11
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:You’re doing the “you participate in society” thing but for sports. you're doing the "bad posting" thing but for everywhere
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 15:20
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:you're doing the "bad posting" thing but for everywhere Consider workshopping that one
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 15:27
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:Consider workshopping that one I mean you're the guy bitching about replay when the replay was justified, which is pretty bad posting!
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 15:28
|
|
|
I feel like plenty of people have explained why they don't like replay for that kind of very borderline stuff but I guess continue getting very angry every time someone mentions watching football
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 15:30
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:I mean you're the guy bitching about replay when the replay was justified, which is pretty bad posting! I haven't even mentioned replay? I was responding to your post about commercials in football.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 15:31
|
|
|
MourningView posted:I feel like plenty of people have explained why they don't like replay for that kind of very borderline stuff but I guess continue getting very angry every time someone mentions watching football i'm old enough to remember the backlash to vinny testaverde and am convinced that sports fans like complaining no matter what
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 16:15
|
|
|
MourningView posted:In college football a single loss can eliminate you from championship contention so that seems kind of relevant to their point? The larger context shouldn't matter. Replay is a rule, and rules shouldn't apply differently if a team is undefeated or not. You can't say "It's fine to use replay to preserve a undefeated season, but not ok if it ruins it". A team that didn't manage to lose to Kansas St should get that playoff berth instead. MourningView posted:probably the one that didn't force me to watch someone pour over two frames of ultra slow mo for 20 minutes with no real clarity gained This is fine and I'm all for removing/reducing replay, but I don't really care if Oklahoma feels like they deserve the win just because they are Oklahoma.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 17:03
|
|
|
MourningView posted:I feel like plenty of people have explained why they don't like replay for that kind of very borderline stuff but I guess continue getting very angry every time someone mentions watching football Thanks for your permission! People who bitch about replay should be exiled to some dumpster country like syria or canada
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 17:14
|
|
|
that is a sensationally bad post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 17:58
|
|
|
OJ MIST 2 THE DICK posted:i'm old enough to remember the backlash to vinny testaverde and am convinced that sports fans like complaining no matter what No one likes bad calls but you still get plenty of those with replay and I personally don't think the benefit is really worth breaking up the flow of the game to spend huge chunks of time watching every borderline play frame by frame to rules lawyer out whether a guy came a fraction of an inch off the bag or if the ball moved too much to whatever.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 18:17
|
|
|
Replay is a thing that should only be used for calls that are pretty clearly mistakes in real time. Really I think that's all a lot of us are asking for. If something needs to be given a frame-by-frame analysis over the course of 4-5 minutes, it was a 50-50 call to begin and it more than likely didn't need to be scrutinized.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 19:44
|
|
|
Crazy Ted posted:Replay is a thing that should only be used for calls that are pretty clearly mistakes in real time. Really I think that's all a lot of us are asking for. give replays a time limit; if you can’t solve it in 1 minute the call stands but any challenges used are retained by the coach
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2019 19:51
|
|
|
Have two people separated from one another upstairs or at a headquarters somewhere and give them one minute to look at the video. If they both decide the same, it’s overturned. If it’s split, it stands. If they both feel it was a correct call, it’s confirmed. If you can’t decide in a minute, it shouldn’t be overturned anyway.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 00:21
|
|
|
Declan MacManus posted:give replays a time limit; if you can’t solve it in 1 minute the call stands but any challenges used are retained by the coach I'm very pro-replay but I agree with this. If you can't change the call after watching replay for a minute, then at worst it was a razor-thin mistake, not a blown call.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 00:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 02:42 |
|
|
The NHL actually accidentally blundered into the right idea, just let coaches challenge whenever they want but penalize them when they make a bogus challenge. Now it's a penalty in the NHL to challenge a call and fail. Other sports should do the same thing: technical foul on the coach in the NBA (so 2 free throws plus the ball, and if he challenges unsuccessfully twice in a game he's gone), 15-yard penalty in the NFL.... OK, MLB is more complicated because everyone is so viscerally sickened by the idea of awarding free outs or bases. But gently caress MLB anyway. Point is, if you make it actually hurt to challenge a call that wasn't obviously wrong, coaches will mostly stop doing it and we won't have to deal with that bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 01:33
|
|
