|
Ither posted:What animal is this? Mink or sable, cousin to ferrets, weasels, badgers, martens, fishers and wolverines.
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 12:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 17:36 |
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:From a few pages ago: Don't see why it wouldn't just be conspiracy. But it's a misdemeanor, realistically no one's going to jail.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 12:47
|
|
|
Ice Phisherman posted:The right wing has a weird psycho-sexual hatred for activist women and what some of them have been doing for a while now and it's weird and gross. AOC and Greta Thunburg have been targets of this and I'll remind everyone that Greta is sixteen and the chuds don't give a single gently caress about sexualizing her. Thanks for this. Your posts are usually pretty enlightening, and I would happily subscribe to a YouTube channel or podcast if you had one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 12:52
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189506762904395776 https://mobile.twitter.com/NPR/status/1189509768269971456
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 12:55
|
|
|
eke out posted:Don't see why it wouldn't just be conspiracy. It does open the NRCC and others who shopped around the images to civil action, which can get pricey.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 12:58
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:She got caught screwing one of her subordinates, the fact that the way she got caught was scummy does not make her a victim. She is a victim of revenge porn though. She can be both a victim and guilty of inappropriate behavior.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:07
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189505265151991809
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:15
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:it’s also basically impossible to explain to normal people who aren’t into politics because most of them do have brain worms and concepts like political iconography as political statement just don’t register for them. A bunch of people on twitter saw a picture, made a bunch of assumptions about what led up to it, and said some horrible stuff about a kid. "BUT THE HAT!!!", the pro life rally, how rich his parents are just represent retroactive justifications for people to avoid admitting they were wrong. Stating this was about political iconography is moving the goalposts, and explaining why someone deserved the abuse anyway for these other reasons is actually victim blaming.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:17
|
|
|
Ironically I was clued into the real history of the labor movement and socialism in the United States by Unintended Consequences a libertarian take on The Turner diaries with less explicit racism. It’s got a rough summery of the labor “riots” of the 19th century, the Tulsa massacre, the bonus army etc from a very anti government, this is why we need guns libertarian perspective. Of corse it glosses over the socialist under pinnings behind those events but once you dig into them deeper (beyond what you read in that book) you’ll find the information.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:17
|
|
|
Awake, wet and mad all at once
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:17
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:She got caught screwing one of her subordinates, the fact that the way she got caught was scummy does not make her a victim. Her nodes are circulating around Washington, she is absolutely a victim, Jesus Christ That doesn't mean she is THE victim
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:17
|
|
|
Rupublicans
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:18
|
|
|
What a bunch of boring nonsense. I guess they realized that attacking the process is a losing pr argument but he doesn't really get that announcing your strategy change but not actually having anything to change is just pointless.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:19
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Rupublicans Infair
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:25
|
|
|
I love it Fox News says "they're now attacking the substance" so Trump goes YES, ATTACK THE SUBSTANCE! THIS WAS MY IDEA, I COMMAND IT
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:25
|
|
|
Data Graham posted:I love it He really thinks hes commanding things by telling at his TV It's unreal how insane all of this is
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:27
|
|
|
Other than the typo that will surely create a new frenzy of Q posts, what does "Republicans ... now are starting to go after the Substance even more than the very infair Process" refer to? pacerhimself posted:What a bunch of boring nonsense. I guess they realized that attacking the process is a losing pr argument but he doesn't really get that announcing your strategy change but not actually having anything to change is just pointless. "I declare BANKRUPTCYYYYY"
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:27
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Rupublicans Infair I expect these to be deleted shortly. Speaking of deleted words, I'm guessing the GOP is going to shamelessly pivot to "it already said on the document that it's not an exact transcript" even though they were the only ones who ever called it an exact transcript in the first place. Regardless, now that specific aspects of it are being called into question, I hope they'll be able to dig up the real thing soon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:27
|
|
|
Ah yes the Rupublicans, the drag queen branch of the GOP.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:28
|
|
|
canepazzo posted:Other than the typo that will surely create a new frenzy of Q posts, what does "Republicans ... now are starting to go after the Substance even more than the very infair Process" refer to? I actually literally heard this on npr this morning, without the "unfair" part. All of the news decided this morning the story is "Republicans are pivoting from complaining about process to talking about the substance"
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:32
|
|
|
AlBorlantern Corps posted:I actually literally heard this on npr this morning, without the "unfair" part. All of the news decided this morning the story is "Republicans are pivoting from complaining about process to talking about the substance" Well, other than the word 'substance' what are they talking about? I have yet to see any exculpatory testimony from the impeachment hearings, they're all one bombshell after another, and I'm sure if there were "good" news for Trump, the R's in the committees would be leaking left and right. e: for clarity
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:34
|
|
|
Numlock posted:Ironically I was clued into the real history of the labor movement and socialism in the United States by Unintended Consequences a libertarian take on The Turner diaries with less explicit racism. If not for the red scare in the mid 20th century, those gun clinging right wingers we have would probably be gun clinging socialists.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:34
|
|
|
 The only reason this thing hasn't exploded yet is because Republicans don't care about Armenians and the people who do care about them are mostly disappointed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:35
|
|
|
It's pretty simple. They know that process arguments are a loser in the court of public opinion, so they're "announcing" a shift in strategy that will amount to precisely dick as they will continue whining about the fact that the depositions are closed-door.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:36
|
|
|
That 1.9% growth is just....oooooppfff Didn’t the GOP promise that their tax cut (welfare for the wealthy) would pay for themselves with a ridiculous 4%+ growth rate for like 5 years?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:37
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:She got caught screwing one of her subordinates, the fact that the way she got caught was scummy does not make her a victim. Nice false dilemma
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:41
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:She got caught screwing one of her subordinates, the fact that the way she got caught was scummy does not make her a victim. The NRCC was openly distributing the photos, provided by her abusive ex. What she did was wrong, but she is the victim of a massive and vile smear campaign using revenge porn. That's loving disgusting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:44
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:The NRCC was openly distributing the photos, provided by her abusive ex.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:48
|
|
|
Solaris 2.0 posted:That 1.9% growth is just....oooooppfff Pre-tax-cut law passing: “Yes, this will increase economic growth and help all Americans!” Post-tax-cut law passing: “The gently caress are you talking about, we didn’t promise you poo poo. gently caress you, got mine, go die in a ditch you filthy poor.”
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:49
|
|
|
Solaris 2.0 posted:That 1.9% growth is just....oooooppfff they don't care. the ends (tax cuts for rich people) justify the means (make up whatever bullshit lies you need to to get it passed)
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:50
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:A bunch of people on twitter saw a picture, made a bunch of assumptions about what led up to it, and said some horrible stuff about a kid. "BUT THE HAT!!!", the pro life rally, how rich his parents are just represent retroactive justifications for people to avoid admitting they were wrong. Stating this was about political iconography is moving the goalposts, and explaining why someone deserved the abuse anyway for these other reasons is actually victim blaming. What loving abuse
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:53
|
|
|
Solaris 2.0 posted:That 1.9% growth is just....oooooppfff LOL and then everyone forgets the GOP immediately pivoted to 'hey lets destroy social services now to pay for it' and would probably have done so if the House hadn't flipped blue in 2018.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:54
|
|
|
Solaris 2.0 posted:That 1.9% growth is just....oooooppfff It was a misquote. What it was meant to say was that they (rich folks) would pay themselves with the tax cuts (which they did).
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:54
|
|
|
They hardly even push the tax cuts as a big positive thing anymore. I don’t know when it stopped, but there was a point where the average person just kind of realized it did jack poo poo to help them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:55
|
|
|
Well, Trump sure does. It's why he's OUR FAVORITE PRESIDENT (him!)
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 13:56
|
|
|
ewiley posted:LOL and then everyone forgets the GOP immediately pivoted to 'hey lets destroy social services now to pay for it' and would probably have done so if the House hadn't flipped blue in 2018. I forgot the GOPs genius plan if they won 2018 would have been a historic gutting of the social safety net so rich people could get even more money. That alone is reason enough for them to never be allowed in office, anywhere, ever again.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 14:00
|
|
|
RUpublicans
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 14:05
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:What loving abuse Oh no, the horrors of being a rich white kid at a private High School, and being prepped for an easy talking points career and a life of unimaginable luxury to the majority of the people in this country, because he had to do some interviews and Twitter said some mean things Truly Woe is him; all is lost
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 14:06
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:A bunch of people on twitter saw a picture, made a bunch of assumptions about what led up to it, and said some horrible stuff about a kid. "BUT THE HAT!!!", the pro life rally, how rich his parents are just represent retroactive justifications for people to avoid admitting they were wrong. Stating this was about political iconography is moving the goalposts, and explaining why someone deserved the abuse anyway for these other reasons is actually victim blaming. Seems you forgot to italicize 
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 14:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 17:36 |
|
|
This is just like perfect timing https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189527179425730560 https://mobile.twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1189527720683888642
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 14:10
|
|