Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

Otteration posted:

All things are possible as a tax:


god that poor cat. its owners should be ashamed

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

duodenum
Sep 18, 2005


The Super-Id posted:

Obviously this nomination should be rejected on account of that this is clearly some sort of goblin and not a human being.

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

nine-gear crow posted:

I mean, she lost by about 100,000 votes across three states that would have propelled her to an Electoral College victory and that came out for Obama in far wider margins and then hit the snooze button on Election Day 2016 because She Just Didn't Inspire Me--OH FUC so yeah, it probably was a big factor.

That basically describes my dad. He could have voted absentee in Michigan (He was in Japan during the election itself), but didn't bother in part because he really didn't want to have vote for Clinton. And while I probably could have cajoled him to vote for her absentee, I didn't because... well, I expected Clinton to win, and thus it wouldn't have mattered.

WHOOPS.

Silly Burrito
Nov 27, 2007

SET A COURSE FOR
THE FLAVOR QUADRANT
Of course he retweeted this.



https://twitter.com/aldotcom/status/1192152133174468609

Wilbur Swain
Sep 13, 2007

These are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.

Dave Grool posted:

I hope he just keeps on rallying forever even after he's out of office, to smaller and smaller crowds.

The Trump Family Variety Show starring The Trump Family

singing, dancing, comedic skits recreating famous moments in trump history

maybe some ventriloquism

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





HonorableTB posted:

Checking in from Seattle: the socialist city council member representing my district managed to lose to an Amazon backed pro-business candidate in the most left leaning neighborhood in the city, filled with the perfect demographic for a socialist to get votes from

gently caress this poo poo, the public transit obliteration bill also was approved that bribes people with $30 car tag fees at the expense of cutting billions of dollars in public transportation funding
Actually I want to talk really quick about the loving car tabs. This might ruffle some feathers, so let me be clear on two things:
  • gently caress Tim Eyman
  • I voted to reject I-976
  • gently caress Tim Eyman
That said, car tab fees in this state are bullshit. They are a regressive tax - perhaps not as regressive as a sales tax, but they are regressive. And yeah, I know the more expensive your car, the more you will pay in fees, but the truth is a lot of people buy cars they can barely afford and then they get hit with this tax on top of that. Sure it may be irresponsible to do so, but frankly in this hellworld now I'm just out of the energy to begrudge people who want something nice. Most days I am, anyway.

Car tab fees should, at most, pay for the cost of maintaining the car registration system. They should not be a major source of funding for transportation projects. Jeff Bezos' bank account should be.

Bear in mind Washington state has the most regressive tax code in the US. It loving sucks. And people do hate it - though ironically it is exactly anti-tax energy that keeps it that way. It is also anti-tax energy that keeps Tim Eyman in the newspapers and sending initiatives to the ballot. And to be clear, Eyman's solution for this (which, to a first approximation, would boil down to "abolish taxes, set the state budget to $0") is dumb as dogshit. But the typical liberal response is nearly as stupid: nickel and dime everyone for every last loving thing. Public-private partnerships. Toll roads and toll bridges. The loving Discovery Pass bullshit. Sales tax of course. And the loving car tabs. And countless more little levies and fees that dot our tax code.

I do not hold out much hope that this initiative will prompt the libs in Olympia to develop a more progressive tax system. But I hope it does. And yeah, I do know that the prevailing interpretation of the state constitution forbids a progressive income tax. But frankly a flat income tax (which the constitution here does not, iirc, forbid) would be preferable to what we have now. Anyway they need to get creative. We have a trifecta here and the loving state Democrats need to start acting like it.

MSDOS KAPITAL fucked around with this message at 05:16 on Nov 7, 2019

Thaddius the Large
Jul 5, 2006

It's in the five-hole!

Kind of wish it would push the visiting LSU fans to boo their little hearts out. I know it won’t, but it’s nice to dream

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

Actually I want to talk really quick about the loving car tabs. This might ruffle some feathers, so let me be clear on two things:
  • gently caress Tim Eyman
  • I voted to reject I-976
  • gently caress Tim Eyman
That said, car tab fees in this state are bullshit. They are a regressive tax - perhaps not as regressive as a sales tax, but they are regressive. And yeah, I know the more expensive your car, the more you will pay in fees, but the truth is a lot of people buy cars they can barely afford and then they get hit with this tax on top of that. Sure it may be irresponsible to do so, but frankly in this hellworld now I'm just out of the energy to begrudge people who want something nice. Most days I am, anyway.

Car tab fees should, at most, pay for the cost of maintaining the car registration system. They should not be a major source of funding for transportation projects. Jeff Bezos' bank account should be.

Bear in mind Washington state has the most regressive tax code in the US. It loving sucks. And people do hate it - though ironically it is exactly anti-tax energy that keeps it that way. It is also anti-tax energy that keeps Tim Eyman in the newspapers and sending initiatives to the ballot. And to be clear, Eyman's solution for this (which, to a first approximation, would boil down to "abolish taxes, set the state budget to $0") is dumb as dogshit. But the typical liberal response is nearly as stupid: nickel and dime everyone for every last loving thing. Public-private partnerships. Toll roads and toll bridges. The loving Discovery Pass bullshit. Sales tax of course. And the loving car tabs. And countless more little levies and fees that dot our tax code.

I do not hold out much hope that this initiative will prompt the libs in Olympia to develop a more progressive tax system. But I hope it does. And yeah, I do know that the prevailing interpretation of the state constitution forbids a progressive income tax. But frankly a flat income tax (which the constitution here does not, iirc, forbid) would be preferable to what we have now. Anyway they need to get creative. We have a trifecta here and the loving state Democrats need to start acting like it.

gently caress you, computer-janitor parasite. Crush car culture. Tax your loving cages until it's untenable to drive these guzzlers.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

That said, car tab fees in this state are bullshit. They are a regressive tax - perhaps not as regressive as a sales tax, but they are regressive. And yeah, I know the more expensive your car, the more you will pay in fees, but the truth is a lot of people buy cars they can barely afford and then they get hit with this tax on top of that. Sure it may be irresponsible to do so, but frankly in this hellworld now I'm just out of the energy to begrudge people who want something nice. Most days I am, anyway.

They are only regressive if you think car ownership should be something that the government has an interest in promoting. The reality is that it costs far too little to drive in the US, and making car drivers pay for all the nasty externalities that come with private automobile ownership is a good thing.

As far as hurting the poor goes, enforced car ownership is far costlier for poor people than any government tax on automobiles ever could dream to be. Short of government directly subsidizing poor people by giving them EBT-style benefits to spend on car payments, insurance, and maintenance etc. automobile ownership will never be cost effective.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

SKULL.GIF posted:

gently caress you, computer-janitor parasite. Crush car culture. Tax your loving cages until it's untenable to drive these guzzlers.

you get the reason most people have to have cars is because the city doesn't have civil engineering that favors public transport, right?

PerniciousKnid
Sep 13, 2006

SKULL.GIF posted:

gently caress you, computer-janitor parasite. Crush car culture. Tax your loving cages until it's untenable to drive these guzzlers.

Most people don't have a choice in the matter.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

I do and I drive a car, bitch

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
I'm trying to imagine how stupid you'd have to be to read the countless stories of people in absurd, almost satire level, situations like 'well my current way to work is three bus transfers and me having to run to not be late a few blocks, but if I had a car it'd be like five minutes and I could maybe get some actual sleep or something' and go 'you loving parasite'.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

sexpig by night posted:

you get the reason most people have to have cars is because the city doesn't have civil engineering that favors public transport, right?

Chicken and egg problem. And no matter what anyone says, it will never be cost effective for poor people to drive, not in this country and not in any country on earth. The tax is the tip of the iceberg the corporate media has you laser focused on while ignoring the huge maintenance, insurance, fuel, etc. costs that funnel directly into private pockets.

Additionally, cities had to be radically reconfigured for autocentric transit. It's not like people crossed the bering strait land bridge and discovered I-90 built already. You could make that argument for a sprawlzone like Houston, but Chicago has an extensive system of public transit that gets neglected in favor of the 75% of households in the city that own an automobile. It's absurd showing up to ward meetings and the #1 topic of discussion is rear end in a top hat SUV owners complaining about the lack of street parking for their war wagons.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
if you understand the concept of mandatory car ownership as a class stratification tool and also support car tab taxes you are, and I mean this without any irony or joking, one of the dumbest people on earth. Car ownership being functionally required in most urban areas IS terrible but you don't fix it by loving the people already hurt by it.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

Chicken and egg problem. And no matter what anyone says, it will never be cost effective for poor people to drive, not in this country and not in any country on earth. The tax is the tip of the iceberg the corporate media has you laser focused on while ignoring the huge maintenance, insurance, fuel, etc. costs that funnel directly into private pockets.

Additionally, cities had to be radically reconfigured for autocentric transit. It's not like people crossed the bering strait land bridge and discovered I-90 built already.

well I'm glad we're focusing on the real cause of that insane money funnel into private pockets, rando people with no control over the fact that their city got paved to hell 80 years ago. It's not like there's a giant castle full of unearned wealth in the form of Bezos living in the city who could be taxed to support state supplement programs to help people who can't afford to drive, as well as fund public transportation reform, so we better focus on wringing that last 30 bucks out of some rando.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
You even admit it's a purely punitive sin tax, that 30 bucks from some dude trying to get to his lovely job won't fund the bus system but yea, maybe it'll price him out of having a car, and then what? What's step two of the brilliant reform system after that guy has been successfully punished for needing a car and still has to get to work?

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

sexpig by night posted:

You even admit it's a purely punitive sin tax, that 30 bucks from some dude trying to get to his lovely job won't fund the bus system but yea, maybe it'll price him out of having a car, and then what? What's step two of the brilliant reform system after that guy has been successfully punished for needing a car and still has to get to work?

The system doesn't care about "some dude" but the functioning of the city as a whole. It's shocking and appalling that Americans vehemently defend cheap car ownership as a human right.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

SKULL.GIF posted:

gently caress you, computer-janitor parasite. Crush car culture. Tax your loving cages until it's untenable to drive these guzzlers.

having working public transit is a necessity first

edit honestly i can't tell if you're being ironical here, i hope you were and my first glance was wrong

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

The system doesn't care about "some dude" but the functioning of the city as a whole. It's shocking and appalling that Americans vehemently defend cheap car ownership as a human right.

and how does pricing the lower classes out of cars, while making sure the rich idiots in theirs keep them, help the city as a whole? Don't try to spin this as collectivism when it's a punitive tax on the lowest rungs of society that won't do a drat thing for the city infrastructure.

It's not about car ownership as a 'right', it's about the fact that you can't make it magically not true that you DO need cars to get around most cities in America, and approaching that problem from 'we should get rid of cars, then' first is rear end backwards thinking.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
You see by letting Chet the trust fund idiot keep his SUV he modded to roll coal but pricing all his workers out of owning any car we're actually helping the city as a whole

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





SKULL.GIF posted:

gently caress you, computer-janitor parasite. Crush car culture. Tax your loving cages until it's untenable to drive these guzzlers.
Well I knew there would be at least one of these. That's cool, I'll take it that since you have nothing substantive to offer here and are just bitching and whining that I'm on to something.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





sexpig by night posted:

I'm trying to imagine how stupid you'd have to be to read the countless stories of people in absurd, almost satire level, situations like 'well my current way to work is three bus transfers and me having to run to not be late a few blocks, but if I had a car it'd be like five minutes and I could maybe get some actual sleep or something' and go 'you loving parasite'.
:liberalism:

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

They are only regressive if you think car ownership should be something that the government has an interest in promoting. The reality is that it costs far too little to drive in the US, and making car drivers pay for all the nasty externalities that come with private automobile ownership is a good thing.
Sure. And I'm sure the same Democratic state reps that keep our tax code here regressive would apply that same logic to Jeff Bezos' and Bill Gates, et al.

Somehow it's only when it comes to taxes on the poor that we break out the "externalities" argument.

Like I said, I did vote to reject I-976. But it wasn't out of a love of car tab fees it was because the programs they currently fund are important. But ideally they should be funded by other mechanisms that don't gently caress over working people.

Maybe the legal challenge will succeed. On the one hand, I hope it does, because the programs funded currently by that fee are important. On the other hand, I kind of hope it doesn't, because it will be a direct refutation of the will of the people and because it will hurt Democrats in this state who, as much as they suck, I would prefer to have power over WA GOP.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

As far as hurting the poor goes, enforced car ownership is far costlier for poor people than any government tax on automobiles ever could dream to be. Short of government directly subsidizing poor people by giving them EBT-style benefits to spend on car payments, insurance, and maintenance etc. automobile ownership will never be cost effective.
It doesn't help. And if you're right, then additional regressive taxation is not needed to discourage people from driving cars - only effective public transport would be. I believe this to be the case.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

I'm on your side in this argument but, uh, of you think the posters jumping on you are neolibs, uhhhhhhh

i am harry
Oct 14, 2003

Thaddius the Large posted:

Kind of wish it would push the visiting LSU fans to boo their little hearts out. I know it won’t, but it’s nice to dream

LSU fans are the kind of people who spend thousands of dollars to create an LSU-themed guest bathroom full of old trading cards and commissioned still-life art of football helmets on tables draped in yellow towels, having never attended any classes at the school and only setting foot near the campus for a game.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





theflyingorc posted:

I'm on your side in this argument but, uh, of you think the posters jumping on you are neolibs, uhhhhhhh
I only have passing familiarity with SKULL.GIF's body of work but if he's all about punishing poor and working class people for driving cars, he ain't that leftist.

Silly Burrito
Nov 27, 2007

SET A COURSE FOR
THE FLAVOR QUADRANT

Thaddius the Large posted:

Kind of wish it would push the visiting LSU fans to boo their little hearts out. I know it won’t, but it’s nice to dream

Wouldn’t matter anyway.

“They weren’t booing, they were saying LSUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.”

Unoriginal Name
Aug 1, 2006

by sebmojo
Maybe we could lessen the burden on poor without passing Tim Eyman's stupid loving bullshit

That way, it might even be possible to fund public transportation, rather than hamstringing it!

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

sexpig by night posted:

well I'm glad we're focusing on the real cause of that insane money funnel into private pockets, rando people with no control over the fact that their city got paved to hell 80 years ago. It's not like there's a giant castle full of unearned wealth in the form of Bezos living in the city who could be taxed to support state supplement programs to help people who can't afford to drive, as well as fund public transportation reform, so we better focus on wringing that last 30 bucks out of some rando.

tbf Amazon doesn't really make that much profit and Bezos' wealth is largely on paper lmao

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
I'm angry about the car tab poo poo because many of my friends, and myself, were relying on the continued expansion and build out of the light rail network to make it a tenable and viable alternative for my friends that were priced out of Seattle proper to live in cheaper areas and still have a reasonable commute to their jobs in the city. This directly threatens expansion into other neighborhoods that are cheaper, surrounding cheaper suburbs, and will directly make the already hellacious traffic problem here somehow even worse.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

This is literally insane.

Sessions has so much dirt on him that he could dish if Trump attacks him.

This would be like a nuclear exchange in the 50s between the US and USSR, totally lopsided annhilation in favor of Sessions.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Unoriginal Name posted:

Maybe we could lessen the burden on poor without passing Tim Eyman's stupid loving bullshit

That way, it might even be possible to fund public transportation, rather than hamstringing it!
You're agreeing with me, right? It's hard to tell in here sometimes.

HonorableTB posted:

I'm angry about the car tab poo poo because many of my friends, and myself, were relying on the continued expansion and build out of the light rail network to make it a tenable and viable alternative for my friends that were priced out of Seattle proper to live in cheaper areas and still have a reasonable commute to their jobs in the city. This directly threatens expansion into other neighborhoods that are cheaper, surrounding cheaper suburbs, and will directly make the already hellacious traffic problem here somehow even worse.
Yeah it loving sucks and I hate it too and I wish state Democrats could harness WA hatred of our current tax code to wrangle a better one into law rather than just cede rhetorical ground to the GOP on the issue and leave room for Tim Eyman to blow a multi billion-dollar hole in the transportation budget every few years.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

You're agreeing with me, right? It's hard to tell in here sometimes.

Yeah it loving sucks and I hate it too and I wish state Democrats could harness WA hatred of our current tax code to wrangle a better one into law rather than just cede rhetorical ground to the GOP on the issue and leave room for Tim Eyman to blow a multi billion-dollar hole in the transportation budget every few years.

What I don't understand is how Tim Eyman isn't in loving jail by now. From what I understand, he conjured up $500,000 for this car tab initiative after having declared bankruptcy, is being or was recently sued by the state for fraud, threatened with being banned from managing political organization and campaign finances, and oh yeah didn't he get arrested and convicted of theft for getting busted stealing a chair from Office Depot? How the gently caress is he still around?

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1192307362331119617
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1192307862204108800

Amazing Zimmo
Jan 27, 2006

That's quite a load you got in them diapers

Daniel Dale should have some fun with this tweet

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.
Well, someone's up and cranky.

Amazing Zimmo
Jan 27, 2006

That's quite a load you got in them diapers
https://twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1192267103245623296

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug


I mean as dumb as Seb is, it is worth remembering that after seven decades of communist rule not only was a stateless society not achieved, the two states that dominated the communist world grew to be far more oppressive and illiberal than any western regime.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





HonorableTB posted:

What I don't understand is how Tim Eyman isn't in loving jail by now. From what I understand, he conjured up $500,000 for this car tab initiative after having declared bankruptcy, is being or was recently sued by the state for fraud, threatened with being banned from managing political organization and campaign finances, and oh yeah didn't he get arrested and convicted of theft for getting busted stealing a chair from Office Depot? How the gently caress is he still around?
Well you see, he's a white guy, so

I don't know what else to say about it. The last I heard about him before this initiative was exactly what you describe, and I figured his fate would be pretty much what you expect. I guess I just momentarily forgot that he's useful to the GOP, and thus apparently immune to legal consequences for his actions.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply