Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
Wait, is it revenge porn for goons or involving goons?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Booourns
Jan 20, 2004
Please send a report when you see me complain about other posters and threads outside of QCS

~thanks!

WarpedNaba posted:

Wait, is it revenge porn for goons or involving goons?

"homegroan" had to be specifically banned for a reason

vanity slug
Jul 20, 2010

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/16/world/asia/china-xinjiang-documents.html

From the author on Twitter: "More than 400 pages of internal Chinese documents detail the origins and growth of the indoctrination program in Xinjiang. The material was brought to light by a member of the Chinese political establishment who requested anonymity and expressed hope that the disclosure would prevent party leaders, including Xi Jinping, from escaping culpability for the mass detentions
There are nearly 200 pages of speeches by Xi Jinping, XJ party secretary Chen Quanguo and security boss Zhu Hailun. There’s another 150+ pages of directives and orders on controlling the Muslim population. I’ve reported on China since 2003, and can’t recall a leak like this
It is stunning to hear party leaders in their own words ordering a drastic crackdown on extremism, including mass detentions, and the cold calculations with which they weigh the consequences
The speeches record Xi in 2014 ordering an all-out “struggle against terrorism, infiltration and separatism” using the “organs of dictatorship” and showing “absolutely no mercy”
Chen redistributes Xi’s speeches after he goes to Xinjiang in 2016, and calls for a “smashing, obliterating offensive” and issues a vague order to “round up everyone who should be rounded up”
But perhaps the most telling document is a guide for officials to explain the camps to children of detainees. It is full of veiled threats, pseudomedical language of psychological infection and assurances the party will take care of you

vincentpricesboner
Sep 3, 2006

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
So all those people defending China saying they no longer are slaughtering prisoners to steal their organs

https://gizmodo.com/china-may-be-concealing-organ-harvesting-through-fake-d-1839890120

distortion park
Apr 25, 2011


vincentpricesboner posted:

So all those people defending China saying they no longer are slaughtering prisoners to steal their organs

https://gizmodo.com/china-may-be-concealing-organ-harvesting-through-fake-d-1839890120

"Non-voluntary organ donors" is a great phrase.

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

Harik posted:

out of morbid curiosity, what are the final two signs of the apocalypse?

R. Guyovich demodded and banned (technically written out as 'no dumbshit tankie admins')
The other one is not yet fulfilled and can't be disclosed but it's honestly well on its way.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
Hot goon clams
Hot goon clams
One a penny
Two a penny
Hot goon clams

Give them to your friends
Give them to your babies
One a penny
Two a penny
Hot goon clams

Not So Fast
Dec 27, 2007


The NYT has published 400 pages of leaks on the Uighur concentration camps.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1195728248040087552?s=19

Tomoe Goonzen
Nov 12, 2016

"Too paranoid for you?"
"Not me, paranoia's the garlic in life's kitchen, right, you can never have too much."
It's looking really nasty at Hong Kong Polytechnic U right now

https://twitter.com/rachel_cheung1/status/1196120122877853696

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Kangxi posted:

It's looking really nasty at Hong Kong Polytechnic U right now

https://twitter.com/rachel_cheung1/status/1196120122877853696

I heard about that. :( Good luck to everybody.

Except the cops.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

According to my Guardian morning briefing plainclothes Beijing military personnel have been sent in to "tidy up the debris" which seems a little escalate-ery. Can't see it in the Live Blog but given a lot is happening it's probably lost in other events.

Porfiriato
Jan 4, 2016


https://twitter.com/HongKongFP/status/1196374201604526080

The military thing happened, but kind of got overshadowed by all the other events that took place after that. The official response to an organized group of dozens of PLA soldiers taking to the streets of HK was, "It's fine! Everything's fine! They're just helping! Why can't you just let them help and enjoy nice things??"

Which no doubt is the same response it will be next time when it's 50 soldiers "helping" to direct traffic around a protest situation, and the same response the time after that when it's 100 soldiers "helping" the HK police to maintain order...

RocknRollaAyatollah
Nov 26, 2008

Lipstick Apathy
Popular Front did a recent YouTube episode on the protests and interviewed a front line protester. https://youtu.be/MWh_EXPj9JI

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Tesseraction posted:

According to my Guardian morning briefing plainclothes Beijing military personnel have been sent in to "tidy up the debris" which seems a little escalate-ery. Can't see it in the Live Blog but given a lot is happening it's probably lost in other events.

Sincx did a halfway-effort post on this in The Other Thread that I think is about right:

sincx posted:

Chewing this over, the "PLA cleanup volunteers" might be the first not-dumb move from the PRC this entire sorry saga.

It's also a reminder that while (unlike Russia) the PRC sucks at international propaganda, (like Russia) the PRC is very good at salami slicing.

https://twitter.com/HongKongFP/status/1195691851677937664

The pan-dems are decrying this as illegal under the Basic Law. Let's take a look:

code:
Article 14

The Central People's Government shall be responsible for the defence of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region.

The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be responsible
for the maintenance of public order in the Region.

Military forces stationed by the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region for defence shall not interfere in the local affairs of the Region.
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region may, when necessary,
ask the Central People's Government for assistance from the garrison in the
maintenance of public order and in disaster relief.

In addition to abiding by national laws, members of the garrison shall abide by the laws
of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Expenditure for the garrison shall be borne by the Central People's Government. 
Here, the HKSAR government did not ask the PLA for cleanup help. Is what happened a violation of the Basic Law?

This is where salami slicing comes in. There are scenarios where the PLA cleaning up clearly wouldn't be in conflict with the Basic Law. For example: Private First Class Zhang decided to get dim sum on his day off, and while walking on the street from the barracks to the restaurant, saw an empty water bottle, which he picked up and tossed in a nearby trash can. No one can seriously argue that's interfering with the SAR's local affairs.

There are scenarios where the PLA cleaning up would clearly be a violation of Article 14. For example: 800 PLA troops drive down the Tolo Highway to Sha Tin in APCs, and use a molotov-resistant military grade bulldozer to remove the barricades under C.U.H.K. (lol) bridge no 2. No one can seriously argue that's not interfering with the SAR's local affairs.

Here, it's 50 PLA troops, cleaning up protestor barricades down the street from their barracks. Solidly in the gray zone. Personally, I'd argue this is probably a violation of Article 14, since it is clearly an organized deployment and the intention is to help the SAR recover from protestor damage, which is interfering in local affairs. But there is a colorable argument otherwise. And since all they did was move a bunch of bricks off the street and nothing else happened, the PLA will almost certainly get away with this.

And next time, the clean up will involve 60 troops, and 1 km away from the barracks. And then 100 troops. Then 200. And before you know it, the South China Sea has been completely paved over with runways.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Tesseraction posted:

According to my Guardian morning briefing plainclothes Beijing military personnel have been sent in to "tidy up the debris" which seems a little escalate-ery. Can't see it in the Live Blog but given a lot is happening it's probably lost in other events.

Okay "Plain clothes" is a little disengenious. They are wearing a uniform. Jusy because they arent in drab with flcs doesnt mean they are in "plain clothes" they are wearint PTs basically.



Pretty sure they lack embroidery due to cheapness. Not stealth.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Sincx did a halfway-effort post on this in The Other Thread that I think is about right:

Cheers for this, gives a good dive into the detail.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Okay "Plain clothes" is a little disengenious. They are wearing a uniform. Jusy because they arent in drab with flcs doesnt mean they are in "plain clothes" they are wearint PTs basically.



Pretty sure they lack embroidery due to cheapness. Not stealth.

Yeah, that is indeed disingenuous framing to call that plainclothes - they're not in body armour but that's hardly hiding their status.

Demiurge4
Aug 10, 2011

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3819595

Those kids are going to die in camps :(

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

And here is a picture of the suspects getting off at the Mung Kok East station that is one stop down the East Rail Line:

https://twitter.com/thetimeusedtobe/status/1196321755276558337

Munin
Nov 14, 2004


What will China use to paper things over if they are taking them into China?

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep
"An enemy of the state" -- account of torture.

https://m.facebook.com/notes/cheng-man-kit/for-the-record-an-enemy-of-the-state/2490959950941845/

Kill All Cops
Apr 11, 2007


Pacheco de Chocobo



Hell Gem

Read that account, then this:

https://twitter.com/EricCheungwc/status/1197153100441759744

Another HK Gov loon out of touch with the public, in charge of Justice no less. No wonder her police force has rape allegations every week and constantly find dead young women, ruling their deaths as not suspicious. HK is a Milgram Experiment with no repercussions right now

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1198789829305257985?s=19

Puppets, all of you!

SoggyBobcat
Oct 2, 2013

The C.I.A. rigged the results, it's the only explanation that fits my world view!!! Why would anyone want to reject the Chinese Communist Party's loving hugs?

RocknRollaAyatollah
Nov 26, 2008

Lipstick Apathy
Elections mean nothing, democracy is a sham!

[Goes to the South American country threads]

The people elected these leaders! No leader can lead without the will and consent of the people, the people have spoken!

Carrie Lam was elected by the people of Hong Kong and you should accept it and the electoral system in Hong Kong. There's nothing wrong with it you imperialist stooges.

[Goes to a US politics discussion]

The electoral college is a terrible and illegitimate system. I will never accept any official elected by any system like this.

RocknRollaAyatollah fucked around with this message at 05:07 on Nov 26, 2019

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

RocknRollaAyatollah posted:

.

[Goes to a US politics discussion]

The electoral college is a terrible and illegitimate system. I will never accept any official elected by any system like this.

Ok but everyone should do this tho.

whatever7
Jul 26, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
The people have spoken, democracy has won. congratulation Hong Kong.

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
Now we see what happens to a Democratic country without tanks or the protection of the US hegemony.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

WarpedNaba posted:

Now we see what happens to a Democratic country

HK is not a country, it is a part of china

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
China is not a country. It's a part of Taiwan.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

HK is not a country, it is a part of china

Does the CCP consider the Qing dynasty to be the legitimate deciders of what is china and what is not?

Hong Kong was part of China 100+ Years ago under a regime the CCP has deemed to be illegitimate etc. So For China to own HK it would be an imperialist act of annexing a new territory that never was owned by the CCP to begin with.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO fucked around with this message at 05:55 on Nov 26, 2019

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

CAPS LOCK BROKEN posted:

HK is not a country, it is a part of china

What is the impact of this landslide electoral denunciation of Lam and the PRC?

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

WarpedNaba posted:

China is not a country. It's a part of Taiwan.

:mad: China is a country, and Tsai Ing-wen is its rightful chief executive.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Does the CCP consider the Qing dynasty to be the legitimate deciders of what is china and what is not?

Hong Kong was part of China 100+ Years ago under a regime the CCP has deemed to be illegitimate etc. So For China to own HK it would be an imperialist act of annexing a new territory that never was owned by the CCP to begin with.

the ccp considers the qing to be legitimate-ish until they were overthrown by the Republic, so ehh

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Congrats, Jeb!

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Let me just say this. China gains some of my respect by not subverting the voting process with intimidation. 70% turnout is good for any future democracy.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Wistful of Dollars posted:

What is the impact of this landslide electoral denunciation of Lam and the PRC?

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1199258995904544768

Heithinn Grasida
Mar 28, 2005

...must attack and fall upon them with a gallant bearing and a fearless heart, and, if possible, vanquish and destroy them, even though they have for armour the shells of a certain fish, that they say are harder than diamonds, and in place of swords wield trenchant blades of Damascus steel...

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Let me just say this. China gains some of my respect by not subverting the voting process with intimidation. 70% turnout is good for any future democracy.

Indeed. I think it’s important to not overlook that. I also hope the result of the election wakes some people up in the CCP who have been drinking the ethno-nationalist kool-aid and they realize mainland China really needs to re-evaluate its image and the way it acts towards people outside the mainland, or even to minorities in China. Of course, that’s probably too much to hope for.

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

Heithinn Grasida posted:

Indeed. I think it’s important to not overlook that. I also hope the result of the election wakes some people up in the CCP who have been drinking the ethno-nationalist kool-aid and they realize mainland China really needs to re-evaluate its image and the way it acts towards people outside the mainland, or even to minorities in China. Of course, that’s probably too much to hope for.

Judging how these things normally go they're probably more likely to decide to get rid of what little democracy they have, and double-down on all of their most horrific policies.

Porfiriato
Jan 4, 2016


Yeah, the CCP is vastly more likely to interpret this as "The people of Hong Kong are :wrong: and need repression/further meddling in local government/mandatory 'patriotic' education in schools/other heavy-handed measures" than as a reason for self-introspection on the CCP's part.

whatever7
Jul 26, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Heithinn Grasida posted:

Indeed. I think it’s important to not overlook that. I also hope the result of the election wakes some people up in the CCP who have been drinking the ethno-nationalist kool-aid and they realize mainland China really needs to re-evaluate its image and the way it acts towards people outside the mainland, or even to minorities in China. Of course, that’s probably too much to hope for.

My theory is Beijing decided to let the election go ahead probably about 1 months before the election. There was almost no threatening talk of delaying the election from the HK officials and pro China newspaper (and Global News!) I remember watching a political show from Taiwan and most of the commentators thought the election was going to be delayed.

We will never know what the motive is. But I am glad the election happened just so people could use it to vend some frustration. If you look at the result, even some experienced councilmen who were against the extradition bill from the start lost. The election result is very "pro first timer, anti establishment". If the HKers think election can save them, let them have their election.

Also, this is basically Beijing not letting US have any excuse to sanction Hong Kong with the new human right bill. "Look, we let HK have their election, and we even lost!" That's Beijing's chess move. HK still lose some long term financing and investment opportunities just because the bill exist. But short term is a strategic ceasefire. And it's nothing compared to what London will go through.

whatever7 fucked around with this message at 14:12 on Nov 26, 2019

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Porfiriato
Jan 4, 2016


I wouldn't be so quick to give the CCP credit for playing 4-dimensional intergalactic chess over the elections when, based on how off-guard and flat-footed the reaction was, it seems they were genuinely convinced that the pro-Beijing side was going to win (or at least not lose nearly as badly as they did). They may have wanted to election to go forward simply because they were expecting a much better result than they got.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply