|
numeracy This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| s*x n*mb*r |
|
69 | 0.22% |
| w@@d n_mb_r |
|
420 | 1.34% |
| Jeb! number |
|
538 | 1.72% |
| Biden numbr |
|
30330 | 96.72% |
| Total: | 31357 votes | ||
|
a.lo posted:Pete is going to win and face Trump lmao u think mayo pete will win bernie will win and then melt all nonbelievers down into fertilizer for the global antifa weed superfarm
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:20 |
|
|
the flesh is weak, but the bud is strong
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:15
|
|
|
Tetracube posted:why the loving poo poo would anyone be enthusiastic for mayor pete, the most completely useless sack of garbage with absolutely loving zero redeeming features i see you don't get this democratic party business
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:23
|
|
|
Tetracube posted:epstein didn't kill himself and the piss tape is real
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:25
|
|
|
lol at the succ coming from inside the thread millionaires will never be a part of the movement or a recruiting tool, they will always ally with fash when the rubber meets the road, and getting wrapped up in these stupid squabbles is a distraction, regardless of whatever liberal idpol you want to wrap it up in
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
Pete is going to decline in a few weeks and then it will be some other contender Even in a party which still respects its establishment, he is way too much of an establishment tool to go far
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:lol at the succ coming from inside the thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/simonnarode/status/1196117530726678529?s=21
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:42
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Pete is going to decline in a few weeks and then it will be some other contender Well he's seens to be pretty good at grifting the rich liberal voters so I doubt it means he will have Kamala like funding problems over the next few months.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:46
|
|
|
Addamere posted:Presented without identifying information, which of these responses seems better? Gimme door number two. EDIT: Actually, give me the start of number one and then transition in to number two for a bit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:55
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/willrk787/status/1195945586286944259
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:56
|
|
|
No Biden?
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:58
|
|
|
lol at Harris getting dumpstered so thoroughly in her own state every time
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:58
|
|
|
The Crotch posted:Gimme door number two.  
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:59
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:lol at Harris getting dumpstered so thoroughly in her own state every time She tried to do a presidency speedrun but forgot to enable the right hacks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 20:59
|
|
|
temple posted:No Biden? Anyone not listed got zero endorsement votes
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:00
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:millionaires will never be a part of the movement or a recruiting tool,
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:08
|
|
|
The Crotch posted:Gimme door number two. 2nd one was obviously Warren because she tries to way over explain poo poo while saying almost nothing. Alot of people fall for it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:12
|
|
|
The Crotch posted:Gimme door number two. Congratulations! You have been selected for the 1st CSPAM ideological purge! As we like to say in CSPAM, its bernoe, binch.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:16
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:lol at the succ coming from inside the thread It’s not idpol to analyze antagonisms within a class. If there’s a way to exploit divisions within the wealthy class to the benefit of the working class, it would be a missed opportunity to write them off as “distractions.”
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
Addamere posted:Congratulations! You picked: Elizabeth Warren. "Rigged code written by and for the corporate elite" is good, but "their fair share" is a deflating ending. You can tack on the "you pay more than them" and the "handout to Trump's rich friends" stuff from Warren's bit and come away with something better than either.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:The concept of IP is bad and focusing on making sure the right individuals own it ignores the real answer that all art and IP should be publicly controlled goods. this is the only correct answer
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:lol at the succ coming from inside the thread 
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
Addamere posted:Congratulations! You picked: Elizabeth Warren. 2 was very obviously Warren to the extent that it baffles me that anyone who has remotely been paying attention to this race wouldn't be able to identify it as being her style.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
the opportunity with taylor swift's thing isn't to ally with a multimillionaire it's to reach out to her literal millions of fans who otherwise never care or think about capitalism or politics or anything who have just suddenly been exposed to one of its bad consequences through one of their favorite stars being inconvenienced by finance bros basic recruiting 101
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:22
|
|
|
Reading anything Warren writes is like looking at a high school paper where you could succinctly cover the topic in less than 500 words but the teacher requires 1500 so you pad the poo poo out of it, saying absolutely nothing, just to meet that arbitrary word count. It's like she hasn't realized she isn't in academia and could just say what the gently caress she means with out padding it. edit: of course the problem is she has nothing to say
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:22
|
|
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:The problem with this is you're saying performance isn't an important part of art or art itself whicu lol performance is important but the performances aren’t what they are squabbling about, there also isn’t any money in reselling the performance. the auto-tuning and post-production are what they are selling. tl;dr Taylor swift is overpaid and exploiting the dozens of people who are more important to the art then the interchangeable white woman.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
in which Succ goes full reactionary to own the artists
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:28
|
|
|
kingcobweb posted:i can think of an exception He's the one, he's the only one Bernie's got the lanyards on the run Bernie Sanders has the nerves of steel Mess with him and you will know the feel Yuddham bedire sabdham – Bernie! Nippai ragile nethram – Bernie! Sathyam saripe yagnam – Bernie! Visvam yedalo dhairyam – Bernie!
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:34
|
|
|
silicone thrills posted:Reading anything Warren writes is like looking at a high school paper where you could succinctly cover the topic in less than 500 words but the teacher requires 1500 so you pad the poo poo out of it, saying absolutely nothing, just to meet that arbitrary word count. in high school its just padding to meet the 1500 word limit as a politician, its code speak to the corporate overlords and lanyard cucks. U say a few words that leftists like (and if ur real like bernie, u leave it at that), but then u wrap it up in 1488 extra words that say to the establishment "dont worry im on your side" 
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
Bernie is so successful that he got Obama to give us a smug lecture on leftist extremism.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:in which Succ goes full reactionary to own the artists I support the artists and am against their exploitation by the non-artist. #ImTooLeft.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I support the artists and am against their exploitation by the non-artist. #ImTooLeft. Nationalize Katy Perry
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
every day that passes where mike bloomberg and deval patrick fail to rise in the polls is another day closer to hillary clinton announcing and subsequently losing in a fashion that is not quite as spectacular as 2016, but close enough that it continues to destroy the horrible legacy of her and her pervert husband
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I support the artists and am against their exploitation by the non-artist. #ImTooLeft. #woke
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
classifying some people involved in music as "artist" and "not artist" is stupid and [extremely phiz posting voice] rockist, because it centers ~authenticity~ and is pretty much interchangeable with boomer-speak about "REAL musicians who WROTE THE SONGS and PLAYED THEIR INSTRUMENTS"
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
Whose "involved in music" that I'm classifying incorrectly?
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:56
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Whose "involved in music" that I'm classifying incorrectly? swift? i don't listen to her music, but she's credited with songwriting and production on all her current songs. and even if she wasn't- say a britney spears who has nothing to do with those things- britney spears a) owns, b) is a performer and singer. performing and singing are art and if you try to tell me that singing words someone else wrote for you isn't art i'm going to make the most massive fart noise and jerkoff motion at your boomer-rear end view of art
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 21:59
|
|
|
kingcobweb posted:swift? i don't listen to her music, but she's credited with songwriting and production on all her current songs. and even if she wasn't- say a britney spears who has nothing to do with those things- britney spears a) owns, b) is a performer and singer. performing and singing are art and if you try to tell me that singing words someone else wrote for you isn't art i'm going to make the most massive fart noise and jerkoff motion at your boomer-rear end view of art I would buy and listen to an entire LP of covers of 4'33", and each artist imo would deserve the money from it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 22:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:20 |
|
|
Addamere posted:I would buy and listen to an entire LP of covers of 4'33", and each artist imo would deserve the money from it. i'd buy an entire album of white noise called "Addamere's Posts"
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2019 22:06
|
|