|
Bundy posted:https://twitter.com/StewartL64/status/1196926131276046337 https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/11/19/who-won-itv-general-election-debate still appears to have that time as of 2019-11-20 00:02  wonder what's going on there - server running at different time zone or something? e: didn't see your edit, whoops, sorry 
CGI Stardust fucked around with this message at 01:07 on Nov 20, 2019 |
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 09:23 |
|
|
Bundy posted:
This is wonkier than Corbyn's glasses.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:05
|
|
|
Not a recording question but probably something someone might know I've just been trying to master a song (which may be irrelevant). I've played the song in a couple of media players and in both of them, the volume (and it SOUNDS to me like the quality too but I can't be sure) increases if I then open my browser. To be clear, I'm listening to a song in a media player, switching to my browser with the track still playing, and a split second later the volume (and possibly quality) jumps up. Why would that be? I'm especially curious because I've been trying to work out how to export a song and have it sound like it does in FL Studio, and then trying to master... it's a weird and confusing process already, and then this unexpected thing has confused me even more I've been messing with my audio drivers a bit but I didn't knowingly do anything that should make it switch like this I suppose a follow up is: how can I just make it like this all the time? It really seems to sound better and I don't think it's just volume. It sounds similar to when I change my driver in FL Studio from the default to ASIO4ALL, and that's what I kind of suspect it is although I have no idea why or how it would be happening Paperhouse fucked around with this message at 01:14 on Nov 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:10
|
|
|
Do you have any browser extensions installed that play/modify media or adjust your sound settings? Do you get the same volume jump if the only window that's open is incognito/private?
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:12
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/1196944318432501760 https://twitter.com/MartinSLewis/status/1196894881756729344 CORBYN FAILS TO WIN OVER MORE THAN HALF THE AUDIENCE
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:14
|
|
|
blunt posted:Do you have any browser extensions installed that play/modify media or adjust your sound settings? Do you get the same volume jump if the only window that's open is incognito/private? wow this is not the thread I meant to post that in, sorry!! thanks for responding no questions asked anyway! but no, I don't have anything like that in the browser. I closed everything, opened a new incognito window and the same thing happens
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:20
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:wow this is not the thread I meant to post that in, sorry!! thanks for responding no questions asked anyway! Have you tried seizing the means of production from the bourgeoisie? Then all music sounds a little sweeter with the knowledge that justice has been attained for the working class
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:26
|
|
|
Angepain posted:Have you tried seizing the means of production from the bourgeoisie? Then all music sounds a little sweeter with the knowledge that justice has been attained for the working class I'm working on it
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:28
|
|
|
51/49 is a draw. 52/48 is the will of the people.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:30
|
|
|
I did enjoy him describing the indyref as "a good margin"
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:31
|
|
|
Zalakwe posted:Her sister is my MP and at least one other goon's (Comrade Fakename maybe). Yeah, I met her at the CLP the other month. She was pretty good, though I wasn’t super impressed with how quickly she segued from me talking about my mum who’d died to her asking me to support her in a potential trigger ballot.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:54
|
|
|
a pipe smoking dog posted:I caught up on Watchmen instead, was this the correct choice?
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:55
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1196955598711140352
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 01:58
|
|
|
I would prefer if they operated on a footy system where you spend time in the penalty box.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 02:00
|
|
|
Decisive corrective action as in a sternly worded email lol who are they trying to fool
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 02:10
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:wow this is not the thread I meant to post that in, sorry!! thanks for responding no questions asked anyway! everything sounds better louder, which is why you gotta be careful to maintain your overall volume level when comparing mixes. bass and treble become more prominent, which might be why it sounds higher quality. Not sure why it's going up though - I'd open yr windows volume mixer and see if anything jumps when you open the browser
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 02:20
|
|
|
I did watch the debate but don't have anything else to add that hasn't been said; the format was poo poo, the questions were terrible, Corbyn flunked the first part by (for some reason) not providing a direct answer to a question he has publically answered before and then rallied for the rest. He was at his best when he got slightly riled up (waving the NHS papers and his answer to the AS question) and came across as witty and human in the awful quickfire bit. Johnson was...Johnson. Out of interest I checked the politics subforum of PistonHeads to see what all the gammony landlords, Randian small business owners and MRA tech nerds thought. Their 2019 Election poll currently has 55% Conservative, 5% Labour. There was a surprising amount of positivity about Corbyn. Even of the ones who hate is policies and will never, ever vote for him, some found him the most statesmen-like, the most eloquent, the most empathetic and the one who seemed to actually engage with the issues in the country. A lot liked his having the redacted NHS report to hand when hammering that point. Regardless of what they thought of Corbyn, the opinion of Johnson is near-universally terrible. The continued banging on about Brexit at irrelevant and crass moments, the lack of any positive vision and the bootlicking of the monarchy are the common themes. Of course it's all 'Boris is crap but I'll vote Conservative to keep out TurboMechaStalin Corbyn VENEZUELA!!!' and the poll speaks for itself but even a community that is fearsomely rich, old, racist, Europhobic and generally reactionary in every way thought Corbyn came out better.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
BalloonFish posted:the format was poo poo, the questions were terrible, That's ITV for you. They have had a terrible way of doing reporting for at least a decade nearly now. Since they intentionally cut their budgets on their news. Do they still do that fake insert during some sob story interview of the interviewer nodding in sympathy? Havent seen that in a long time
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:11
|
|
|
 I guess that means jose mourinho won the debate but corbyn came a close second.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:11
|
|
|
It wouldn't have mattered what Corbyn said to the Brexit question, the answer would have been used as an attack line or to piss off those in either leave or remain marginals. I thought it was pretty good strategy to just stay on message when pressed, the worst critique of that is "politician pivots and doesn't answer question" which is the least bad outcome. I mean LOOK at the obvious AS attack while completely ignoring anything on the Tories' record or Johnson's own, the deck was stacked. NinpoEspiritoSanto fucked around with this message at 03:15 on Nov 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:12
|
|
|
BalloonFish posted:I did watch the debate but don't have anything else to add that hasn't been said; the format was poo poo, the questions were terrible, Corbyn flunked the first part by (for some reason) not providing a direct answer to a question he has publically answered before and then rallied for the rest. He was at his best when he got slightly riled up (waving the NHS papers and his answer to the AS question) and came across as witty and human in the awful quickfire bit. Johnson was...Johnson. I don't see how small businesses and start ups wouldn't be down with Labour's broadband plan.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:12
|
|
|
Because people aren't rational. Businesspeople doubly so.Bundy posted:It wouldn't have mattered what Corbyn said to the Brexit question, the answer would have been used as an attack line or to piss off those in either leave or remain marginals. I thought it was pretty good strategy to just stay on message when pressed, the worst critique of that is "politician pivots and doesn't answer question" which is the least bad outcome. He answered the AS question much better, though, because he was declarative and responded directly to the question.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:15
|
|
|
Who wants to bet that the next round or two of Lib Dem leaflets heavily feature that pic of Johnson & Corbyn shaking hands? Probably also BXP, if you have one near you that can write.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:20
|
|
|
I was actually thinking that might be the point of getting them to do it to be honest.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:23
|
|
|
Chuka Umana posted:I don't see how small businesses and start ups wouldn't be down with Labour's broadband plan. Because these are the sort of short-sighted, self-aggrandizing wankers who can't see that paying an extra £1000/year in tax for a country with functional infrastructure and an educated, secure, content population with disposable income is in their own interest (leaving aside the broader moral aspect). Or, in other words: OwlFancier posted:Because people aren't rational. Businesspeople doubly so..
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
RockyB posted:Sorry but she's just a horrible moderator. Literally shouting down half the responses because they're only giving time for lovely soundbites. Just getting around to watch this and agree entirely. This ultrashort answer format is so dumb. They’re barely given time for 2 sentences in most cases.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 04:58
|
|
|
Cringed myself inside out at that loving host making the two of them make a pledge to make politics nicer or whatever poo poo that was. Thought jam-man did alright though, and Bogjob was a loving train wreck in comparison.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 05:14
|
|
|
The shaking hand poo poo was so absurd. It's like when there used to be fights at school and the teacher would make a big play of making the two children shake hands. Like that solves anything, especially if one of the kids was clearly the bigger dickhead in the scenario. But whatever, Corbyn clearly won for me. The factcheck scandal is shameless and atrocious but will probably be dismissed as some jovial bit of mischief and ignored in the coming weeks, instead of the transparent, and manipulative dog shite that it is. Karloff fucked around with this message at 05:44 on Nov 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 05:37
|
|
|
Why did they debate on the set from Tron?
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 06:28
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:Not a recording question but probably something someone might know Your sound driver settings are hosed up, because capital has exclusive control of the means of production, in this case referring to the tools you use to master this song, being your sound card and its drivers, possibly also because the application has exclusive control over the sound drivers until the browser also stakes a claim. The browser is not a member of the proletariat but rather is setting up a cartel situation, and you can solve this problem properly by dropping something sharp and heavy between the application and the driver, like the OS's audio handler and/or a guillotine blade.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 06:45
|
|
|
As an american I don't understand, why was the marshmallow defending the government death panels? Do you have two communist parties in Britain?
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 07:34
|
|
|
We've got The Bastards Party, The Jam Man Coalition, Squirrel Crushers United, and Those Bloody Scots.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 07:37
|
|
|
We do have at least two communist parties in britain though, the CPGB and the CPGB(ML) and also presumably the RCP, all largely in the purest form of the prolerian vanguard, two blokes in a shed sitting on a pile of pamphlets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 07:42
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:We do have at least two communist parties in britain though, the CPGB and the CPGB(ML) and also presumably the RCP, all largely in the purest form of the prolerian vanguard, two blokes in a shed sitting on a pile of pamphlets. I asked about communist parties, not liberal revisionists
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 07:56
|
|
|
I think most of the liberal revisionists actually work for the conservative party via the RCP and a mechanism I still don't fully understand.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 07:58
|
|
|
still lolling at the fact that like half the debate was taken up by a pledge to be nice to each other and a quick fire round where they wanted yes or no answers
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 08:08
|
|
|
The only authentic Communism is, of course, CPGB-Posadist-Cetian (gently caress those Posadist-Altairan splitters)
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 08:13
|
|
|
Ms Adequate posted:The only authentic Communism is, of course, CPGB-Posadist-Cetian (gently caress those Posadist-Altairan splitters) 
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 08:15
|
|
|
Sounds like I missed absolutely nothing last night then. Is it just me or does this fact check thing have Cummies' webbed hands all over it
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 08:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 09:23 |
|
|
The only correct communism is podcastism praxisism
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2019 08:17
|
|
