|
Trees before or after Christmas? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| before |
|
2 | 6.67% |
| after |
|
5 | 16.67% |
| during |
|
8 | 26.67% |
| happy holidays |
|
15 | 50.00% |
| Total: | 30 votes | ||
|
richardshermanreactstobutlerinterception.gif
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:37 |
|
|
Rodgers' face bounces off the turf and I'm instantly thinking of the other concussions he's had
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
Wow it wasn't for the qb hit
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
... why was that a penalty? I don't get it. It's legal to hit receivers when the QB leaves the pocket.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
HEEEEEYYYYY!!! POINTS!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:26
|
|
|
Are they not gonna show Sherman's penalty? I have no idea what it was actually for edit: there it is
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
That's legal by Sherman twice now right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Refs have the defibrillator out and are desperately dumping high voltage into this corpse of a game
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Well that’s what happens when you give the other team a shitload of free downs
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Kalli posted:NFL really needs a new Andy Dalton line to signify where the franchise QB line is. It's Dak Prescott OP.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
49ers had that play sniffed out the first time if they would have run it instead of using it as a fake, different defense on this play and it worked perfect.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Aaron Rodgers Bullshit: Engaged
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
So unless I see that replay, refs helped. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Kalli posted:... why was that a penalty? I don't get it. It's legal to hit receivers when the QB leaves the pocket. Blocking 30 yards from the play is a penalty now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Kalli posted:... why was that a penalty? I don't get it. It's legal to hit receivers when the QB leaves the pocket. He wasn't a receiver, wasn't in the area of the play, and hit him in the back
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:Are they not gonna show Sherman's penalty? I have no idea what it was actually for They showed it. He knocked a receiver down from the back. But people are saying it was legal 'cuz Rodgers was out of the pocket, so... 
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
LaFleur flexing on McCarthy and his Cobb plays with that toss to Adams
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Its Rinaldo posted:That's legal by Sherman twice now right? I thought the first one was a foul. And I guess theoretically they can call unsportsmanlike on any vicious hit/cheapshot/whatever
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
awrong rodger
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
LabyaMynora posted:They showed it. He knocked a receiver down from the back. But people are saying it was legal 'cuz Rodgers was out of the pocket, so... I didn't realize there were instances where blocks from the back were legal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
Two more and packers win!
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
Kalli posted:... why was that a penalty? I don't get it. It's legal to hit receivers when the QB leaves the pocket. I been watching football most of my life, but why is that legal?
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
I cannot imagine the depth of pessimism of 49ers fans who have watched this game and thought to themselves, "yes, this is definitely the prelude to the Packers going on a 24-0 run in the remaining third of this game"
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
jimmy needs to hand off like he's never handed off before
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
Hot Diggity! posted:He wasn't a receiver, wasn't in the area of the play, and hit him in the back Unless the hit came after Rodgers crossed the line of scrimmage he was a receiver, your second point doesn't matter if the quarterback is out of the pocket, and I also don't think the third does.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:I didn't realize there were instances where blocks from the back were legal. I'm saying I honestly have no idea. Seems lovely to me if defenders can literally push offensive players off their feet. Hot Diggity! posted:He wasn't a receiver, wasn't in the area of the play, and hit him in the back Yeah, that makes sense to me. Sherman's a cheapshot artist, don't @ me.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
That was fun! Glad to see some tiny signs of life in this losing effort.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
LabyaMynora posted:Sherman's a cheapshot artist I don't disagree with this. Just that might have been a legal cheap shot.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:30
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I don't disagree with this. Just that might have been a legal cheap shot. Well, it hosed him and his team, so I'm happy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
hold my breath everytime I see Bourne and the ball
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
jimmy G should be able to smash as many pornstars as he wants, IMHO
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
DR AIDS posted:I been watching football most of my life, but why is that legal? Once the QB leaves the pocket, Defensive holding doesn't exist and you can knock receivers to the ground. They become blockers once the QB crosses the line of scrimmage and that's when the away from play hit would come into play, but if Rodgers isn't past the LOS there, it's perfectly legal to gently caress the receiver up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
Oh boy the packer suck.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
Jesus, maybe consider covering the best weapon the 49ers have offensively.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
GET THAT TD KITTLE YOU SEXY BEAST
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
Anybody coulda made that throw with Kittle that open.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
Lol sorry about your comeback Packers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
GORGEOUS GEORGE!
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
Lol fuckin wide open
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:37 |
|
|
Pretty good having Kittle back
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2019 04:32
|
|