Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mandibular Fiasco
Oct 14, 2012

eXXon posted:

The Star gives out financial advice for grad students while totally not young millennial shaming:


#MillienialMoney

Sorry but I'm not going to paste the rest. He lives with his mom (and girlfriend!) and spends his meagre income on food and drink. For some reason they highlight cheap poo poo coffee from Timmy's instead of expensive meals out If he spent less he could maybe afford to split a one-bedroom apartment with his girlfriend, maybe. What's the lesson here? I don't know. What's the point of this column? Can I get paid money to tell other people to spend less?

Why not just tell him that he should really graduate and get a job before worrying about what to do with his poverty level earnings?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


half cocaine posted:

I'm not gonna click on that article but I bet it doesn't suggest that U of T sessional staff unionize and collectively bargain for higher wages.

That wouldn't be very free market would it?

U of T sessional staff are already unionized.

CUPE 3902 unit 3.

half cocaine
Jul 22, 2019


Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

U of T sessional staff are already unionized.

CUPE 3902 unit 3.

What a missed opportunity for them to join the United Steelworkers of America.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




half cocaine posted:

I'm not gonna click on that article but I bet it doesn't suggest that U of T sessional staff unionize and collectively bargain for higher wages.

That wouldn't be very free market would it?

He's a grad student.

And yes, grad students should unionise. But ... read the grad student thread if you wanna hear how that's going. Big universities across North America are fighting tooth and nail against it.

CRISPYBABY
Dec 15, 2007

by Reene
Also because students are students and tend to move on after a couple of years it's pretty hard to get any momentum, collective organization wise.

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002



Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

U of T sessional staff are already unionized.

CUPE 3902 unit 3.

Teaching assistants are Unit 1. That doesn't cover much outside of TA positions, though.

CRISPYBABY posted:

Also because students are students and tend to move on after a couple of years it's pretty hard to get any momentum, collective organization wise.

Uh, PhD students stay for quite a while longer than 2 years. The Grad Student Union is (or was, I haven't kept track) reasonably organized but the problem is usually that better-paid* students are unwilling to strike for the benefit of the poor as dirt humanities PhDs who take longer to finish but get paid even less and have guaranteed funding for 4 years or less.

None of this changes the fact that basically all grad students get poverty-level pay and focusing on a $3/day coffee habit isn't going to make a dent in that.

*:lol:

CRISPYBABY
Dec 15, 2007

by Reene
My grad student union had tremendous difficulty keeping people around cause of turnover even in the PhDs and overall lack of interest but I suppose it varies.

Anyways it's super hosed regardless, I just found that the population seemed even less interested because of the constant rotation of students but also that was my limited viewpoint as a two year masters guy. There's a reason unions are strongest for career type jobs, and it's not that they deserve it more or could use it more, it's just a real logistical challenge trying to organize with a temporary workforce.

CRISPYBABY fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Nov 19, 2019

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


eXXon posted:

None of this changes the fact that basically all grad students get poverty-level pay and focusing on a $3/day coffee habit isn't going to make a dent in that.

*:lol:

Poverty level pay that sometimes doesn't even get paid out! The first thing my supervisor told me when I started my masters at U of T was to carefully check my bank account each month because the university sometimes underpays or forgets to pay at all.

There's a lot of things I don't miss about grad school, but the overall sub-minimum wage pay was definitely the worst.

CRISPYBABY posted:

My grad student union had tremendous difficulty keeping people around cause of turnover even in the PhDs and overall lack of interest but I suppose it varies.

Anyways it's super hosed regardless, I just found that the population seemed even less interested because of the constant rotation of students but also that was my limited viewpoint as a two year masters guy. There's a reason unions are strongest for career type jobs, and it's not that they deserve it more or could use it more, it's just a real logistical challenge trying to organize with a temporary workforce.

That was my experience as well. Unless you've done something seriously wrong grad school is inherently a temporary thing so a lot of people just gravitate towards suffering through it.

Getting people involved when a huge chunk of them are two year masters students who likely won't see a contract negotiation is tough. Getting overworked PhD students who are there longer to spend time organizing and planning is also tough. Finding competent negotiators out of those who are left isn't exactly easy.

Mr Luxury Yacht fucked around with this message at 17:52 on Nov 19, 2019

CRISPYBABY
Dec 15, 2007

by Reene

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Poverty level pay that sometimes doesn't even get paid out! The first thing my supervisor told me when I started my masters at U of T was to carefully check my bank account each month because the university sometimes underpays or forgets to pay at all.

Sounds familiar. When I started at UW, I wasn't able to find a single person in my department other than the other students themselves who could tell me where, when, and how much I would get paid. The dept did know much I got in total, but the highly relevant info of "so you get this much in a lump sum grant at the start of each term, then you get this much per month for TA pay" was basically impossible to pry out from anybody I asked. The dept admin was near removed from the process, and it certainly wasn't on the profs radar aside from occasional handwaving towards a need for funding.

Academia is a very silly place. Most of the administration at the dept level is done by people who would rather be researching, so no one tends to know anything whatsoever about the actual day to day logistics and organization.

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


It's a nightmare. Tuition was covered at U of T as part of the funding package but instead of doing the sensible thing of just not charging you tuition, you had to go through this process to defer your fees each year until April, then pay U of T back with the money U of T parcelled out to you throughout the year.

I'm still dealing with poo poo from it because CUPE apparently messed up my T4s from TAing and a couple years later I got a letter with basically "oops due to massive clerical errors here's your actual T4s, have fun doing taxes this year". I didn't notice at the time because my pay was coming from so many different buckets with different T4s or T4As for each I figured it was all there.

TL;dr unless you have a clear career goal in mind from it I highly recommend people do not do grad school.

Bob Ross Nuke Test
Jul 12, 2016

by Games Forum

eXXon posted:

The Star gives out financial advice for grad students while totally not young millennial shaming:


#MillienialMoney

Sorry but I'm not going to paste the rest. He lives with his mom (and girlfriend!) and spends his meagre income on food and drink. For some reason they highlight cheap poo poo coffee from Timmy's instead of expensive meals out If he spent less he could maybe afford to split a one-bedroom apartment with his girlfriend, maybe. What's the lesson here? I don't know. What's the point of this column? Can I get paid money to tell other people to spend less?

OTOH, at least that's below the cutoff for paying taxes. OTOH, LMBAOOOoooo at "saving money for the future" on minimum wage. It's drat near impossible to do so on twice that salary in the current economy.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




THE BEATWEAVER posted:

OTOH, at least that's below the cutoff for paying taxes. OTOH, LMBAOOOoooo at "saving money for the future" on minimum wage. It's drat near impossible to do so on twice that salary in the current economy.

$23K/year is, unfortunately, not below the cutoff for paying taxes, even taking a tax deduction for fees.

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos
https://thebreaker.news/news/liaoning-muchang-lawsuit/

Oh Canada, home of criminals hoarding real estate.

I thought Harper signed a deal with China to seize and split the assets of Chinese criminals.

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002



Lead out in cuffs posted:

$23K/year is, unfortunately, not below the cutoff for paying taxes, even taking a tax deduction for fees.

You probably know this but for those who aren't aware, scholarships are not taxable, so non-sadistic departments try to pay their grad students with (mostly fictional) awards, leaving only TA income as taxable. You're screwed if your research work is paid as an RA instead and should complain endlessly.

Most of Europe treats graduate research positions as contract jobs, which has downsides (it's difficult to get extensions even with extenuating circumstances), but they finish sooner and generally come with better benefits and working conditions, if not necessarily pay.

Did the Liberals* even bother to do anything to change any of this over the last four years? I vaguely recall some reversals of Harper cuts and cancelling of pointless industry programs, as well as some announcements with gaudy numbers, but I don't remember how much of that was just reshuffling existing funding. I'm guessing not much of that had trickled down to basement-dwelling grad students yet either way.

*Not even going to bother to ask about conservative provincial governments.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




As a foreign student, I was ineligible for like 95% of scholarships, so was paid out of my supervisor's grants. Right around the time I started my PhD, the CRA brought in the rule/clarification that that would be taxable. I didn't pay much tax, but I did pay tax on my sub-minimum-wage grad school stipend.

And no, the Liberals have done nothing to fix grad students' situation in this country. Nor have they reversed the massive cuts the Conservatives made to Tri-agency fellowship funding.

All just part of the intergenerational wealth transfer, to be honest.

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos

Lead out in cuffs posted:

As a foreign student, I was ineligible for like 95% of scholarships, so was paid out of my supervisor's grants. Right around the time I started my PhD, the CRA brought in the rule/clarification that that would be taxable. I didn't pay much tax, but I did pay tax on my sub-minimum-wage grad school stipend.

And no, the Liberals have done nothing to fix grad students' situation in this country. Nor have they reversed the massive cuts the Conservatives made to Tri-agency fellowship funding.

All just part of the intergenerational wealth transfer, to be honest.

If Canada increased research funding then more grad students would just be hired at the same poverty wage since departments set the stipend amounts. The giant labs would also just suck up any increased funding in huge grants while grant success rate would continue to drop from the pathetic 15% funding rate. So wed just end up with more trainees in the system for no funding or jobs. The research system is broken in Canada.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




cowofwar posted:

The research system is broken.

FTFY

half cocaine
Jul 22, 2019


Maybe you should try harder next time and make sure your parents are rich mainland Chinese plutocrats?

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

half cocaine posted:

Maybe you should try harder next time and make sure your parents are rich mainland Chinese plutocrats?

Pretty sure this is the only way to get ahead in Canada.

Crow Buddy
Oct 30, 2019

Guillotines?!? We don't need no stinking guillotines!

McGavin posted:

Pretty sure this is the only way to get ahead in Canada.

Hey now, let's not discount the old fashioned technique of being the son or daughter of a Canadian politician and/or billionaire. It worked for my daddy, and his father before him.

CRISPYBABY
Dec 15, 2007

by Reene
https://www.therecord.com/news-story/9733733-buying-a-home-out-of-reach-for-half-of-kitchener-households/

I'd like to see the raw data, but this article is saying Kitchener house prices have risen by 88% over the last three years (rent by 35%).

We're so hosed.

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

Audits find 10% lying about their empty home status


quote:

Vancouver empty homes tax nets another $39M as number of vacant properties drop, city says

Vancouvers empty homes tax continues to be a revenue generator for the city despite drawing from a shrinking number of vacant homes, the latest report from the city finds.

Released Wednesday, the report reveals that $39.4 million in revenue was raised during the 2018 tax year, which was collected from the owners of 1,989 vacant properties.

Thats a 22 per cent drop from the number of vacant properties taxed in 2017, when 2,538 homes generated $38 million in revenue.

The revenue collected by the empty homes tax goes towards affordable housing projects and programs in Vancouver, including the creation of new housing and enhanced protections for renters.

The main objective of Vancouvers Empty Homes Tax is to influence property owners to put their empty properties on the rental market and the data shows that is happening, Mayor Kennedy Stewart said in a statement Wednesday.

For those who choose to keep their properties unoccupied, we appreciate their contributions to the funds that are supporting various, much-needed affordable housing initiatives across the city.

Another 892 property owners were charged the tax after non-compliance audits were performed on an additional 8,457 properties between Nov. 2, 2018, and Nov. 1, 2019. Those audits raised an additional $22.1 million.

Thats way up from the same period a year ago, when $6.2 million was raised from 331 property owners charged after audits on 6,231 homes.

In addition to the drop in vacant properties, the city found the number of properties tenanted went up by seven per cent from 2017 to 2018, from 46,770 to 50,102.

Properties declared as principal residences also shot up one per cent, from 131,347 to 132,815.

Vancouvers empty homes tax took effect in 2017 as a way to fight back against rampant speculation and foreign ownership that left many homes in the city empty during the recent housing crisis.

The policy requires homeowners to prove their homes are occupied for at least six months out of the year by either themselves or renters. Otherwise, theyre charged an additional one per cent tax on the propertys assessed value.

The city says $17 million from the 2018 revenue will go towards the Community Housing Incentive Program, which council approved to give grants to housing developers who provide social or co-op housing.

The city will also purchase the Ross House, a 24-unit single-room occupancy (SRO) building in the Downtown Eastside, for $3.8 million, while also contributing $1.7 million to revitalize other SRO housing projects.

A combined $5.83 million will be put towards supports for renters, including the citys renters advocacy and services team.

From securing safe, warm homes in the Downtown Eastside, to increasing support for renters and providing grants to non-profit housing providers, lives are being changed by the revenue generated from the Empty Homes Tax, said the citys general manager of arts, culture and community services, Sandra Singh.

The empty homes tax has not come without controversy. Multiple lawsuits have been filed by homeowners and developers after they were charged the tax and denied appeals by the city.

The city says council will debate proposed amendments to the empty homes tax at its next meeting on Nov. 26, including extending the deadline for homeowners to submit a challenge to the tax to 90 days.

Segue
May 23, 2007

CRISPYBABY posted:


I'd like to see the raw data, but this article is saying Kitchener house prices have risen by 88% over the last three years (rent by 35%).

We're so hosed.

It's all insane. I grew up in KW and seeing it transformed into yet another unaffordable place is so frustrating.

I'm currently in Toronto and actually contemplating buying a (older, non-glass) condo even at the inflated prices because the stock market is also hugely in a bubble so there's not much alternatives for my money to go, and my friends keep getting renovicted and the lack of stability in renting is horrifying.

I was talking to a friend and while we both love the city, if things keep New Yorkifying, we wonder how much of the city we love will be around.

But then as more of my friends price out to the suburbs, I realize how lonely they are since no one is going to be able to visit your nice fancy home in Galt.

The fact that this thread has been around so long and nothing has changed is so disheartening.

Bob Ross Nuke Test
Jul 12, 2016

by Games Forum

Segue posted:

It's all insane. I grew up in KW and seeing it transformed into yet another unaffordable place is so frustrating.

I'm currently in Toronto and actually contemplating buying a (older, non-glass) condo even at the inflated prices because the stock market is also hugely in a bubble so there's not much alternatives for my money to go, and my friends keep getting renovicted and the lack of stability in renting is horrifying.

I was talking to a friend and while we both love the city, if things keep New Yorkifying, we wonder how much of the city we love will be around.

But then as more of my friends price out to the suburbs, I realize how lonely they are since no one is going to be able to visit your nice fancy home in Galt.

The fact that this thread has been around so long and nothing has changed is so disheartening.

We escaped the impact of the 2008 economic crisis by the skin of our teeth, learned nothing, and long ago blew past the worst state the US ever hit immediately before that crash. The global economy right now is teetering in the worst state it's been since the roaring twenties, and its only going to take something like Brexit or a startup unicorn imploding, or China getting too handsy with a soveriegn nation post HK to set it off.

Only the insane would look at how lovely the economic stability is right now, look at the classical red flags such as the US Fed inverting, look at how Canada has no room left to cut on interest rates, and go "yeah, whatevs, time for a mortgage!". Yeah, it's lovely we all sat out the past decade of rampant speculation, that's no reason to commit financial suicide now.

Segue
May 23, 2007

THE BEATWEAVER posted:

We escaped the impact of the 2008 economic crisis by the skin of our teeth, learned nothing, and long ago blew past the worst state the US ever hit immediately before that crash. The global economy right now is teetering in the worst state it's been since the roaring twenties, and its only going to take something like Brexit or a startup unicorn imploding, or China getting too handsy with a soveriegn nation post HK to set it off.

Only the insane would look at how lovely the economic stability is right now, look at the classical red flags such as the US Fed inverting, look at how Canada has no room left to cut on interest rates, and go "yeah, whatevs, time for a mortgage!". Yeah, it's lovely we all sat out the past decade of rampant speculation, that's no reason to commit financial suicide now.

That's the irrationality of it. My brain is just stupidly latching on to these things because in these sorts of circumstances it's hard to just sit on yout hands. I've sat out and said the same thing for the last six years and things keep going apace.

As you watch society crumble in front of you and seniors on fixed incomes get kicked out of their rentals, it's hard not to latch on to shelter as the one thing I need. I doubt I'll buy because the market is insane but I've gone from never wanting to, to feeling the pull more and more as late stage capitalism upchucks everything.

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

Segue posted:

The fact that this thread has been around so long and nothing has changed is so disheartening.

What are you talking about? Prices are up at least 25% since then.

CRISPYBABY
Dec 15, 2007

by Reene

Segue posted:

It's all insane. I grew up in KW and seeing it transformed into yet another unaffordable place is so frustrating.

I'm currently in Toronto and actually contemplating buying a (older, non-glass) condo even at the inflated prices because the stock market is also hugely in a bubble so there's not much alternatives for my money to go, and my friends keep getting renovicted and the lack of stability in renting is horrifying.

I was talking to a friend and while we both love the city, if things keep New Yorkifying, we wonder how much of the city we love will be around.

But then as more of my friends price out to the suburbs, I realize how lonely they are since no one is going to be able to visit your nice fancy home in Galt.

The fact that this thread has been around so long and nothing has changed is so disheartening.

I moved out here in 2017 and was already feeling like rent was dumb compared to when I was a student (2009-14). In the meantime, my apartment has went from "Ok this is kinda grimy for the price but the location is good and all I've wanted all my life is a single bedroom place to myself so I guess I'll pay for it" to "I'm not moving and am sitting on this rent control unless I get a long term partner to split rent with or a six figure salary".

I feel you on the disheartening thing. I think that within my lifespan, if we're not already there yet, property transfers are gonna be almost entirely hereditary. The main cash windfall that's going to allow prople to actually afford a place is gonna be inherentance from the value of your parents property. And if your parent's don't have any intergenerational property value to pass onto you, you're straight up hosed.

My parents are rich. I'm lucky. They've said that at some point they'd be willing to help me out getting a place. But if they didn't, I'd probably have to make the choice of between saving up for retirement or saving up for a house. I make decent money, am paying under 30% of my income in housing costs, and still can't imagine how you could do both at the same time with current prices.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




So in local outrage-fuel, there's a City-owned parking lot off Hastings just east of Nanaimo Street in Vancouver, which local businesses have been using. The City donated the parking lot to an organisation to use for affordable housing.

https://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/housing-project-led-by-women-announced-for-hastings-sunrise-1.23848681

... and now the owners of the neighbouring business property on Hastings are suing the City, claiming it's actually their property.

https://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/hastings-sunrise-property-owner-sues-city-over-ownership-of-17-7-million-parking-lot-1.24013005


Because we really need a loving surface parking lot more than we need social housing right now. Yep.

Bob Ross Nuke Test
Jul 12, 2016

by Games Forum
Pretty sure that's the same group of chucklefucks who tried to rebrand the neighborhood from "Hastings Sunrise" to "East Village" to sell more condos.

half cocaine
Jul 22, 2019


THE BEATWEAVER posted:

Pretty sure that's the same group of chucklefucks who tried to rebrand the neighborhood from "Hastings Sunrise" to "East Village" to sell more condos.

Maybe that's just what the downtown eastside needs! A rebranding! DTES is a pretty sterile term.

tagesschau
Sep 1, 2006

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
THE SPEECH SUPPRESSOR


Remember: it's "antisemitic" to protest genocide as long as the targets are brown.

Segue posted:

the stock market is also hugely in a bubble so there's not much alternatives for my money to go

Stocks have basically no carrying cost and pay dividends without you having to do anything, which is something that can't be said for residential real estate.

Legit Businessman
Sep 2, 2007


half cocaine posted:

Maybe that's just what the downtown eastside needs! A rebranding! DTES is a pretty sterile term.

What about Dotoeasi? It rolls off the tongue.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




half cocaine posted:

Maybe that's just what the downtown eastside needs! A rebranding! DTES is a pretty sterile term.

I think you mean "Railtown"

James Baud
May 24, 2015

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
Decent reddit thread on why everything about affordable housing (for legit poor people) sucks:

https://www.reddit.com/r/vancouver/comments/e1bere/it_took_six_months_to_evict_this_tenant_his

(Landlord shouldn't own units this crappy either, burn it down and build something nice that costs 3-4x already.)

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001
Habitat for Humanity project for 24 low income houses in Oshawa stalls out from lack of funding, buildings are damaged by weather during the lull in construction. Meanwhile in the same region there are hundreds of units being built for 500k+.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/habitat-for-humanity-durham-project-stop-and-start-1.5367652

What a complete joke of a society where it's come down to using charities to build low-income housing, and even that's stalled out.

UnfortunateSexFart
May 18, 2008

𒃻 𒌓𒁉𒋫 𒆷𒁀𒅅𒆷
𒆠𒂖 𒌉 𒌫 𒁮𒈠𒈾𒅗 𒂉 𒉡𒌒𒂉𒊑


Segue posted:

The fact that this thread has been around so long and nothing has changed is so disheartening.

It did change. Vancouver crashed on the heels of speculation and foreign buyer tax so now all the money laundering has moved to Toronto.

I thought maybe the feds would care if what happened to Vancouver happened to Toronto but I guess not.

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

Some stats on Vancouver's Empty House tax from the city: https://council.vancouver.ca/20191126/documents/p2.pdf

quote:

Analysis of the types of properties currently subject to EHT indicates that the majority of properties paying the tax are high-value condominiums, with the bulk of the remainder made up of single family homes. Seventy-seven percent of properties paying EHT are condos with average assessed value of $1.4 million (average for all condos is $0.9 million), 19% are single family homes with average assessed value of $3.5 million (average for all single family homes is $2.4 million), and the remainder are a mix of other types of properties. For properties that declared vacant or were determined to be vacant after an audit, 34% of the owners also owned at least one other property in Vancouver, 13% of properties were worth over $3 million and 18% have mailing addresses outside of Canada.

Pied a terre city

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos
Went for a hike starting up at the top of British Properties. Lots of oversized ugly stucco houses clearly not maintained and with missing roof tiles or plastic covering sections. Hilarious.

Why not just hold the land? Why build an ugly poo poo mansion and then let it fall apart?

Mantle
May 15, 2004

Buying up all the land to hold is like making a short squeeze play except that anyone not in market becomes homeless

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Dreylad posted:

Habitat for Humanity project for 24 low income houses in Oshawa stalls out from lack of funding, buildings are damaged by weather during the lull in construction. Meanwhile in the same region there are hundreds of units being built for 500k+.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/habitat-for-humanity-durham-project-stop-and-start-1.5367652

What a complete joke of a society where it's come down to using charities to build low-income housing, and even that's stalled out.

I think this was more or less unavoidable considering how many economic hardships high earning Canadians have been suffering. The cupboard is bare and the people who give to philanthropic causes are tapped out, there's simply no money left to give.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply