|
Shrapnig posted:It was a fantastic goal and he’s very good but I feel like he’ll end up a player who relishes being a big fish in a small pond like Wilf Zaha and won’t end up seeing his full potential Seems like a good fit for United
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 07:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 09:37 |
|
|
A Buff Gay Dude posted:Seems like a good fit for United A spine of De Gea, Maguire, Grealish, and Rashford you say?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 07:59
|
|
|
Shrapnig posted:It was a fantastic goal and he’s very good but I feel like he’ll end up a player who relishes being a big fish in a small pond like Wilf Zaha and won’t end up seeing his full potential Serious question - which "big club" would he thrive at better atm vs being the "big fish"/talisman at Villa and getting lots of playing time to allow him to develop?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 19:54
|
|
|
sticksy posted:Serious question - which "big club" would he thrive at better atm vs being the "big fish"/talisman at Villa and getting lots of playing time to allow him to develop? He’s 24, how much “developing” is he going to do?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 20:24
|
|
|
Grealish should stay at Villa. Most clubs that would buy him would tuck him in a drawer for safekeeping. He should embrace being a talisman
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
Shrapnig posted:He’s 24, how much “developing” is he going to do? I’m confused - you were the one who previously stated he wouldn’t realize his potential at Villa, implying he could develop further elsewhere?? So, which big club should he go to then to realize his potential? (Manchester United as a comedy answer doesn’t count.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 01:00
|
|
|
Grealish would absolutely be the talisman at Manchester United. Competing with Lingard, Mata and Pereira ffs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 11:05
|
|
|
That would hurt Lingard's development though. In a few years he could be world class.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 11:22
|
|
|
I hope grealish does a le tissier and never leaves villa
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 13:29
|
|
|
Grealish kinda looks like Cara Delevingne imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 13:36
|
|
|
TheBigAristotle posted:Grealish should stay at Villa. Most clubs that would buy him would tuck him in a drawer for safekeeping. He should embrace being a talisman lol what the gently caress are you on about
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 14:13
|
|
|
kcer posted:lol what the gently caress are you on about I think he feels that Grealish is good, but not CL-winning or League-winning starter good, so he’d be spending his time at a big club on the bench. I think the guy has a higher ceiling than that from what I’ve seen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 16:41
|
|
|
Brony Car posted:I think he feels that Grealish is good, but not CL-winning or League-winning starter good, so he’d be spending his time at a big club on the bench. I agree with all of this. My question is ultimately WHICH club could A) realistically afford him (and no doubt they'd have to be English because no foreign club would pay the silly money Villa would want) and B) actually utilize him properly to get the best out of him etc. If I'm looking at the top 6 (well, historically from the last 10 years or so):
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 17:14
|
|
|
Isn't this Silva's last season? Thought he was retiring.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 17:16
|
|
|
Cannon_Fodder posted:Isn't this Silva's last season? Thought he was retiring. There are two Silvas
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 17:50
|
|
|
sticksy posted:I agree with all of this. My question is ultimately WHICH club could A) realistically afford him (and no doubt they'd have to be English because no foreign club would pay the silly money Villa would want) and B) actually utilize him properly to get the best out of him etc. Spurs were in for him before. Why wouldn't they be in for him now? Is his workrate that low? I feel like players can "learn" that with proper coaching and motivation. If he keeps improving, I don't see why any of those teams wouldn't be in for him. Keep in mind that Silva's getting on in years. And Chelsea's ban is going to be up soon, right?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
sticksy posted:I agree with all of this. My question is ultimately WHICH club could A) realistically afford him (and no doubt they'd have to be English because no foreign club would pay the silly money Villa would want) and B) actually utilize him properly to get the best out of him etc. lol at leaving out Arsenal, a club in dire need of quality midfielders Ozil would be his only competition and he hasn't been arsed for two years or more
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 18:56
|
|
|
brasstassels posted:lol at leaving out Arsenal, a club in dire need of quality midfielders Villa would want like £80m
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 19:08
|
|
|
Big Huski Boi posted:Villa would want like £80m Arsenal seem to be conveniently finding money lately, including 80m for Pepe. Grealish does look unlikely, though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 19:15
|
|
|
blue footed boobie posted:Arsenal seem to be conveniently wasting money lately, including 80m for Pepe. Grealish would be worth it, so Arsenal won’t do it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:04
|
|
|
Lille allowed us to structure Pepe's payments in a very beneficial way, I don't think we'd get the same from Villa.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:10
|
|
|
Amazon UK makes their debut for the Premier League in the UK. They will stream all matches for this matchday and having dedicated studio team for each match. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-7750683/Amazon-Prime-Q-Ahead-live-Premier-League-broadcasts-answer-key-questions.html
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:15
|
|
|
psyer posted:Amazon UK makes their debut for the Premier League in the UK. They will stream all matches for this matchday and having dedicated studio team for each match. Easily better than Sky or BT Sport from the point of view of watching on a laptop, that isn’t running Windows. Also their website is generally competent, streams are top quality, doesn’t log you out every 2 hours etc. They do need to work on the haircut diversity in their pundit team though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:21
|
|
|
Grealish seems like a big, massive twat and thus a perfect United signing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
wooger posted:Easily better than Sky or BT Sport from the point of view of watching on a laptop, that isn’t running Windows. Looks like there is option for no commentary and just have stadium audio.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
lol at how easily zaha went down there
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:43
|
|
|
lmao sakho
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:50
|
|
|
Yeah that's a fair red
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:51
|
|
|
What a fuckin morron
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:52
|
|
|
Watching live football on Amazon, cor blimey
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 20:58
|
|
|
lol palace defenders dropping like flies
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:00
|
|
wooger posted:Easily better than Sky or BT Sport from the point of view of watching on a laptop, that isn’t running Windows. The Sky Go app for Mac is pretty good. As I'm forced into using a MacBook for work I'm glad that it exists.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:03
|
|
quote:Adam Smith is being booed for being kicked in the knees. If you're watching on a stream that challenge from Mamadou Sakho is probably just about connecting now. Lol
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:08
|
|
|
Prime player is pretty nifty 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:16
|
|
|
phwoar Jesus 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
Thassa nice goal
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:40
|
|
|
Some interesting challenges goin on here
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
I always let Burnley get my hopes up because I’m a sucker.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
Can watch replays at my leisure on the Prime player. Lol, Sky have been doing this how long now?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 22:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 09:37 |
|
|
Bournemouth are loving useless
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2019 22:08
|
|
