|
i feel like if hamilton is in heaven, he would already know we biffed it up and instead of asking would just be shaking his head all, n'awwww, n'aaaawwww, gently caress y'all, i'm out nothing would even need to be said
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 04:11 |
|
|
Random Stranger posted:What's the secret sign that they use for "I need to take a leak"? I want to start keeping an eye out for it. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
StrangersInTheNight posted:i feel like if hamilton is in heaven, he would already know we biffed it up and instead of asking would just be shaking his head all, n'awwww, n'aaaawwww, gently caress y'all, i'm out "And you didn't duel even once? Not even Jordan?"
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
okay I do not have it in me to spend 45 minutes with Doug Collins questioning Jon Turley go with god everyone
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:13
|
|
|
eke out posted:okay I do not have it in me to spend 45 minutes with Doug Collins questioning Jon Turley The 45 are for their legal representative to ask questions, Collins will get time before that
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:14
|
|
|
quote:An outsider – a cocksure academic invited to testify to the House Judiciary Committee by President Clinton's lawyers – threw down a challenge to House Republicans yesterday. I...... don't think anybody has been condemned for cravenness. Everybody's gone all-in on zealot-or-fanatic.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:14
|
|
|
eke out posted:okay I do not have it in me to spend 45 minutes with Doug Collins questioning Jon Turley I imagine their conversation will be like when you roll a 2 INT character in Fallout 2 and go bullshit with Torr in Klamath. You make a poo poo load of sense to one another but nobody else within earshot understands.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:17
|
|
|
eke out posted:hahahaha he's still doing it He will never stop committing crimes! YOU CANNOT STOP HIM!
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:17
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:The 45 are for their legal representative to ask questions, Collins will get time before that Collins can choose whatever allocation of time he wants, it's unclear to me whether they'll use counsel or not
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:17
|
|
|
NBC: Rudy just texted us that Hamilton is spinning in his grave
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:17
|
|
|
eke out posted:hahahaha he's still doing it "I spoke with them, and they're going to blow this impeechment thing wide open! Can't wait to get them to the senate where they say the president was right all along"
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:18
|
|
|
eke out posted:Collins can choose whatever allocation of time he wants, it's unclear to me whether they'll use counsel or not He probably will. Not doing so is just going to be asking for trouble. As bad as the last GOP counsel was, he was still sparing them from themselves by allowing Nunes to go at it for 45 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:19
|
|
|
I love how they cut off every Republican talking point at the knees already.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:19
|
|
|
Lol. "We heard from the Ranking Member, and we also heard from the governor,"  "that Doug Collins will not be the replacement for Sen. Isaakson" 
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
NBC: Pamela was on short list to replace Steyer on the Supreme Court by Obama
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:28
|
|
|
If Jonathan Turley were intellectually honest, his remaining testimony would be “Okay, they other 3 professors convinced me.”
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:30
|
|
|
"Eloquently argued, but there is always a phase two. And phase two is what is problematic here." ughhhhh nope I'll catch up on this thread later, bye
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:32
|
|
|
Continually QQing is the GOP
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:33
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:Continually QQing is the GOP MAH CHAIR 
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
zonohedron posted:"Eloquently argued, but there is always a phase two. And phase two is what is problematic here." ughhhhh nope I'll catch up on this thread later, bye This chair is TERRIBLE!
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
Ooooooffff
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
no, wait, I couldn't stay away: "they're holding the testimony because there's a secret in it! but we have places in this building to discuss secret things!" ...wasn't there a complaint about using the SCIF for these things??? am I misremembering a lot of whining about secret basement meetings?????
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
Lol this guy sucks
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
zonohedron posted:no, wait, I couldn't stay away: "they're holding the testimony because there's a secret in it! but we have places in this building to discuss secret things!" yeah they did it in a SCIF i have no idea what he even means
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
This is a...bizarre tangent on Turley's behalf.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
Turdley arguing that bribery is accepting physical rubles in hand.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
This dumb motherfucker is attempting to redefine English common law.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
BREAKING: dog won't hunt
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:39
|
|
|
Lol I don't think this is going to win over any hearts or minds. He lacks the charisma and he's ranting about 17h century history that no one will give a gently caress about.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
Don't talk poo poo about jazz, rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
"See we have this case about bribery where bribery actually was completed, there was no such completion in this instance, therefore ergo ipso facto free Donald now and heal the world. Thank you."
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
Is this story going to take 45 mins alone? No wonder the previous examiner cut him off with a simple yes or no.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:41
|
|
|
What is it with this jackass and dog references?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
Was the best the GOP could find a whiny rear end in a top hat law prof?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
Is this guy seriously saying it’s not a crime because Republicans say it isn’t?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:43
|
|
|
There Bias Two posted:What is it with this jackass and dog references? It's folksy!
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:43
|
|
|
It's absolutely mental that any academically educated person - a loving professor of law, no less - could possibly argue with a straight face that the sole fact that the Republicans deny that Trump has abused the power of his office in the manner described in the report means that the report's conclusions on the fact should be called into question.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
Brother Buer posted:Is this guy seriously saying it’s not a crime because Republicans say it isn’t? Yes
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
If you don’t have a picture of the President handing them a giant novelty check you can’t prove it was bribery.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 04:11 |
|
|
The Democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since before he even took office. Also, the impeachment process is flawed because the Democrats haven't spent enough time on it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2019 18:44
|
|