|
The Management posted:insert 3000 character error message from a c++ compiler complaining that type “giant template expansion” is not compatible with type “another giant template expansion” this but rust deeply nested traits
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 00:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:54 |
|
guru meditation
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 00:17 |
|
yeah wtf
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 01:41 |
|
"I can't download license file" I work at license activation support and people can be incredibly stupid and lazy, from what I heard the worst are NASA employees. Also at least once a day I get somebody who is to lazy to access computer in another building so thinks it's ok to give them free activation because "I delete it later, its fine!"
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 02:00 |
|
RustyKnight posted:"I can't download license file" i think you should give them free licenses
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 02:16 |
|
as long as they delete within 24 hours i don't see the issue
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 02:20 |
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:as long as they delete within 24 hours i don't see the issue there is no real way we can verify that other than going there and inspecting every computer they have, and we already got tons of calls from people who can’t return activations because the one they want to return is already listed as inactive in our system, license activation files are independent and will work even when you deactivate them in database, because most of the industrial automation machines are not connected to internet it only seems logical that you cannot make a reliable way to verify it via internet, so if we were to give people new activations there is nothing stopping them from using old ones effectively duplicating $30k software entitlement.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 11:28 |
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 14:09 |
|
i remember getting irl spooked by this sort of message in system 7 I thought I broke computer and committed a crime
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 15:45 |
|
RustyKnight posted:there is no real way we can verify that other than going there and inspecting every computer they have, and we already got tons of calls from people who can’t return activations because the one they want to return is already listed as inactive in our system, license activation files are independent and will work even when you deactivate them in database, because most of the industrial automation machines are not connected to internet it only seems logical that you cannot make a reliable way to verify it via internet, so if we were to give people new activations there is nothing stopping them from using old ones effectively duplicating $30k software entitlement. lmao
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 16:02 |
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 16:11 |
|
my least favorite is this type: - absolutely no useful info - something cutesy like a smiley to soften the blow - "there's nothing you can do", aka. "we're working on it" or "contact an administrator" my favorite is this: Sham bam bamina! posted:guru meditation it didn't crash, it just gave me an opportunity to meditate! i wish i had a joyboard!
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 18:53 |
|
RustyKnight posted:most of the industrial automation machines are not connected to internet oh well there's your problem. spin up a telnet daemon on those things and you'll be checking activation licenses in no time
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 22:51 |
|
RustyKnight posted:there is no real way we can verify that other than going there and inspecting every computer they have, and we already got tons of calls from people who can’t return activations because the one they want to return is already listed as inactive in our system, license activation files are independent and will work even when you deactivate them in database, because most of the industrial automation machines are not connected to internet it only seems logical that you cannot make a reliable way to verify it via internet, so if we were to give people new activations there is nothing stopping them from using old ones effectively duplicating $30k software entitlement.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 23:07 |
|
helm is my favorite source of nonsense errors this somehow means "you defined a key twice": code:
also line 102 doesn't correspond to any real line, it's in the rendered yaml template that isn't shown. the render changes size dramatically depending on what you configure so it's basically impossible to determine the problem line in the template
|
# ? Dec 9, 2019 23:30 |
|
Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:oh well there's your problem. spin up a telnet daemon on those things and you'll be checking activation licenses in no time It's not problem of machines not being connected because they are often hosted on servers with internal connection, but connecting them to internet is a big no no with nearly every local it, and even if the file is listed as inactive in system it can still work normally, when you try to connect to release it it will give you an error message about it but wont do nothing, so if you know this you can just copy files, return them, copy them back to activation folder and have extra activation. Also if you have another license for newest version of software and download it on machine with old license it will activate itself. Don't ask my why I don't know poo poo about technical side of this, i only know where to move your mouse cursor to make it work most of the time.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:45 |
|
when my cat just meows really loudly for no discernable reason while staring at me
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:13 |
|
the cat wants lunchmeat for gods sake, just give it some ham
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:23 |
|
honestly how is that even the tiniest bit inscrutable
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:23 |
|
just outright making a mockery of the inscrutable error message thread
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:23 |
|
smdh
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:24 |
|
rekt by rotor
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:27 |
|
rotor posted:the cat wants lunchmeat for gods sake, just give it little a salami
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:32 |
|
2
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:33 |
|
RustyKnight posted:there is no real way we can verify that other than going there and inspecting every computer they have, and we already got tons of calls from people who can’t return activations because the one they want to return is already listed as inactive in our system, license activation files are independent and will work even when you deactivate them in database, because most of the industrial automation machines are not connected to internet it only seems logical that you cannot make a reliable way to verify it via internet, so if we were to give people new activations there is nothing stopping them from using old ones effectively duplicating $30k software entitlement. seems worth it to have a cj walk around and act as the licence police and shut people down who don’t comply
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:34 |
|
you want a license? here you go. but in 24 hours your password gets changed unless you return it.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:41 |
|
did anybody say PC LOAD LETTER yet
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:45 |
|
echinopsis posted:seems worth it to have a cj walk around and act as the licence police and shut people down who don’t comply Our company actualy does that!
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:45 |
|
Poopernickel posted:did anybody say PC LOAD LETTER yet The Management posted:PC LOAD LETTER sorry chief looks like so
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:45 |
|
quote:Not ready reading drive B like seriously, what's the difference between abort and fail
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:46 |
|
Poopernickel posted:like seriously, what's the difference between abort and fail if you do it before the deadline the abort won't affect your GPA
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:50 |
|
Poopernickel posted:like seriously, what's the difference between abort and fail one's nigh-illegal in half the country
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:57 |
|
Captain Foo posted:one's nigh-illegal in half the country https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Aborting-a-Program.html
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 02:09 |
|
my cat was meowing again. i remembered that the dinner portion of wet food was a little smaller than usual because the breakfast portion was a little larger.i took rotor's advice and gave him some dead bird slices. he's been asleep in the closet for like 2 and a half hours ticket closed
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 04:30 |
|
lp0 on fire
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 04:35 |
|
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 04:52 |
|
quote:The message did not reliably indicate whether the printer in question was actually on fire.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 14:22 |
|
docker-compose:code:
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 14:48 |
|
TheFluff posted:docker-compose:
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 15:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:54 |
|
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 18:23 |