|
numeracy This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| s*x n*mb*r |
|
69 | 0.22% |
| w@@d n_mb_r |
|
420 | 1.34% |
| Jeb! number |
|
538 | 1.72% |
| Biden numbr |
|
30330 | 96.72% |
| Total: | 31357 votes | ||
|
spacemang_spliff posted:if they can't pass impeachment she should immediately resign there’s a difference between some defections and everybody bails out, there’s an actual chance the Dems won’t gently caress this up entirely and they’ll let X number of them break away in a pathetic attempt at triangulation before they get beat by a republican anyway and the impeachment still goes through it cannot be overstated how bad loving up impeachment would be and while I don’t put it past the Dems to do it it would basically kill their chances of holding into the house even if Bernie wins the nom
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 20:46 |
|
|
That's why they're doing it man, they don't want Bernie to have the house and the senate when he's president, they want to knee cap him now, if they're controlled opposition, they're going to do everything they can to depress dem turnout.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:34
|
|
|
if biden wins it is everyone's duty to vote for mcafee in the general
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:40
|
|
|
if biden wins the nomination im writing in bernie
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:42
|
|
|
I don’t think I can emphasize enough how much of a goddamn bloodbath it would be if impeachment didn’t clear the house
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:44
|
|
|
Well we're in the dumbest timeline soooooo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:45
|
|
|
Smash posted:Well we're in the dumbest timeline soooooo. I choose to believe good things are still possible and flubbing the impeachment vote would be a Tremendously Bad Thing
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:46
|
|
|
Chokes McGee posted:I choose to believe good things are still possible and flubbing the impeachment vote would be a Tremendously Bad Thing how would it be bad? the GOP isn't going to vote to remove him, it's an empty gesture. trump gets exonerated because the GOP won't push the "remove trump and also feed me to the qanon wolves" button, he gets to crow about it endlessly, the libs get to be upset and mad at the GOP but they won't actually vote for someone who would get rid of them, nothing changes until 2020. to loosely quote felix, "they're telling me this is the worst attack on democracy and the constitution, and when i started paying attention to politics, they were throwing people into guantanamo for no reason without a trial, so if trying to dig up dirt on biden from ukraine is the worst thing ever, then what the gently caress was that other stuff"
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:50
|
|
|
there is no difference between a biden presidency and a second trump presidency
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:50
|
|
|
redneck nazgul posted:how would it be bad? Failing to pass articles of impeachment would be the biggest possible own goal, I can see it backfiring on the Dems hard. Obviously, no one reasonable expects Trump to be removed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:52
|
|
|
redneck nazgul posted:how would it be bad? because to anyone who isn’t a crack pinged broke brain like us the only thing people are going to see is Dems talking a swing at the king and missing. they will be laughingstocks. no one will vote for them. the ones that don’t get primaries by better candidates, and that’s a significant chunk, will have their base demoralized and lose what should be a layup there is no world where the Dems fail to impeach that ends with anything except a massive depression in turnout as people finally, thoroughly give up on them
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:54
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/status/1204998682954719232
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:55
|
|
|
if they flub impeachment will pelosi resign in disgrace
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:55
|
|
|
remember how in 2008 the dems promised to fix healthcare and rein in wall street and then won bigly then didnt actually do what they promised to do and then ate poo poo in 2010? well in 2018 the dems promised to fight trump and won because of it
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 08:56
|
|
|
i'd say that swinging for the king and only hitting themselves in the junk would be sufficiently demoralizing to allow the actual left to step in and start picking off succ libs but that's probably optimistic as hellUncle Wemus posted:if they flub impeachment will pelosi resign in disgrace there is a higher chance of trump being removed from office than pelosi resigning
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:00
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:if they flub impeachment will pelosi resign in disgrace pelosi feels no such thing approaching shame
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:00
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:if they flub impeachment will pelosi resign in disgrace she won’t, that’s the problem she does not give one single poo poo about impeachment and has wanted those to go away since day one, pretty much all of this is schiff’s baby and he’ll have to be the one to twist arms if it fails she will go “  well we tried, moving on” which is an insanely bad read of the electorate
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:01
|
|
|
i wouldn't be surprised if schiff is forced to step down in lieu of pelosi if it fails
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:02
|
|
|
if biden wins i will run for office and i will win on the platform of ‘Gas The Olds’
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:02
|
|
|
ScrubLeague posted:there is no difference between a biden presidency and a second trump presidency the difference is dems will act like they've won forever until Trump But Marginally Competent and Motivated steamrolls in 2024
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:03
|
|
|
Biden is like trump in that when I think about him too much bile starts to raise in the back of my throat and i need to chew a tums for my tummy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:03
|
|
|
redneck nazgul posted:i'd say that swinging for the king and only hitting themselves in the junk would be sufficiently demoralizing to allow the actual left to step in and start picking off succ libs but that's probably optimistic as hell the problem isn’t picking off succ Dems, that’s already very possible. the problem is a ton of unremarkable Dems getting beat out of nowhere due to people not giving a poo poo about their useless asses and the house, the one part of Congress that is actually proportional and not filled with fossilized ghouls who will never go away, being lost for at least a decade I assume I don’t need to continue as to why this would be bad but am prepared to
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:04
|
|
|
soon i'll be able to weaponize it like a Dilophosaurus.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:05
|
|
|
redneck nazgul posted:how would it be bad? everything from when leadership finally backed impeachment, to the scope of the inquiry, to the number of articles of impeachment finally drafted has been decided based upon what leadership thought would get the moderates on board. if the moderates bail and can't even push the ultimately symbolic house vote to a majority, then all of the justification for how dems have played this out dissolves instantly, and the blame will lie squarely on pelosi and the moderates
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:07
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:if they flub impeachment will pelosi resign in disgrace pelosi absolutely does not want impeachment to succeed, because then she will be responsible for governing, which she has never once in her life wanted.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:07
|
|
|
Finicums Wake posted:everything from when leadership finally backed impeachment, to the scope of the inquiry, to the number of articles of impeachment finally drafted has been decided based upon what leadership thought would get the moderates on board. if the moderates bail and can't even push the ultimately symbolic house vote to a majority, then all of the justification for how dems have played this out dissolves instantly, and the blame will lie squarely on pelosi and the moderates also anyone who would float voting no to get something out of a deal should immediately be told they will be blackballed out of anything the house does or will ever do for that amateur hour bullshit but lol Dems
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:08
|
|
|
Al! posted:K is thinking "buh?"  (one of ur best works btw, timing is sublime i keep cracking up)
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:10
|
|
|
Chokes McGee posted:the problem isn’t picking off succ Dems, that’s already very possible. the problem is a ton of unremarkable Dems getting beat out of nowhere due to people not giving a poo poo about their useless asses and the house, the one part of Congress that is actually proportional and not filled with fossilized groups who will never go away, being lost for at least a decade the house democrats just gave away literally everything the administration asked for in the NDAA and the republicans still didn't vote for it can you show me some daylight between "unremarkable democrat" and "republican" because while the succ dems control the house, i sure as hell don't see any
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:11
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:
thx
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:11
|
|
|
LORD OF BOOTY posted:someone in QCS posted about the possibility of Russians loving the site up and got dogpiled, but honestly that's probably worth genuinely looking at even if it doesn't turn out to be what happened The russians are coming, FROM INSIDE THE FORUMS!?!?!?!
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:23
|
|
|
ScrubLeague posted:there is no difference between a biden presidency and a second trump presidency There's one huge difference: four more years of poo poo vs eight. Maybe up to sixteen if he's such a waste that by the end of his second term the Republicans rally.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:54
|
|
|
neither of them will have able bodies in 8 years
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 09:55
|
|
|
also biden said if elected he wouldn't seek reelection so
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:00
|
|
|
they forced the question when they should have kept it more vague
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:01
|
|
|
Loel posted:And she knew it was a lie! Its even better than you imagined! She really needs to get her rear end knocked out of Congress: https://shahidforchange.us/
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MenshevikM/status/1204953362501980160 Lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:50
|
|
|
Even if that dude's numbers are right, he's suggesting that we can get away with reducing our military budget to less than 2% of the FY2019 budget. That's loving insane, and dumbasses like Pelosi and Schumer keep handing out loving military budget increases.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 20:46 |
|
|
No one's saying it has to be $10 billion https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2019-06/54667-budgetoptions-2.pdf We have this thing called the Congressional Budget Office which presents information about how policies that could be considered by Congress will affect the budget, and they offer plenty of options for slimming the size of the military starting on page 123, but Congress never seems to take them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2019 10:57
|
|
