|
I didn't realize Rorschach was based on a real comic book hero.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 14:58 |
|
They all are. DC acquired the rights to a bunch of old Charleton comics characters in the early 80's (none of which you've heard of besides maybe Blue Beetle) and Moore wanted to use them, but DC balked and so he made characters based on them instead.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:15 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:You can choose things without free will. A story you tell yourself.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:17 |
|
zoux posted:Oh for sure, I get why it's frustrating, and it's that very frustration that shows the distance between Dr. M. and mortals, and why he is so alien to us and alienated from us. If he were perceiving time linearly and just lying about it, I think that would be a much more disappointing and less interesting character. Well you want to get really fancy pants about your funny papers: What if our Horny Blue Doctor is more than a metaphor for the comic medium. What if he picked up a set of pencils, pen, and paper and started writing his own Thrilling Tales of Atomic Science!!!! The comic book we pick up isn't written by this Alan Moore character but has a byline of Jon Osterman. We look up from the page and we are surrounded by several million Watchmen comics each one with a subtle variation from the last. We round a stack and find a Dr M composing yet another take on Earth 1959 and forward. Once he's done he takes it for a spin by hopping Gumby-like into it and experiencing his new story first-hand. He pops back out, makes some notes, and starts crafting the next. I think Doc knows how the story ends because he wrote it. He also isn't interested in altering it because what would be the point? He can account for that in the next volume he pens. It's not like alternate universes are an alien concept in comic books.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:20 |
|
rich thick and creamy posted:Well you want to get really fancy pants about your funny papers: What if our Horny Blue Doctor is more than a metaphor for the comic medium. What if he picked up a set of pencils, pen, and paper and started writing his own Thrilling Tales of Atomic Science!!!! The comic book we pick up isn't written by this Alan Moore character but has a byline of Jon Osterman. We look up from the page and we are surrounded by several million Watchmen comics each one with a subtle variation from the last. We round a stack and find a Dr M composing yet another take on Earth 1959 and forward. Once he's done he takes it for a spin by hopping Gumby-like into it and experiencing his new story first-hand. He pops back out, makes some notes, and starts crafting the next.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:23 |
|
Dang it that episode could have been cut to five minutes. Angela is a boring character whenever she is sitting down being confused. It works when she has something to do or investigate, or be Sister Night, but otherwise c’mon.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:28 |
|
Much like the TV show, I too am a work of fan fiction.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:30 |
|
zoux posted:Who amongst us didn't start dating an omniscient nigh-omnipotent 35 year old when they were HS juniors a/k/a the Jerry Seinfeld story
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:32 |
|
It was a fantastic episode, but I still wonder what it would have been like if the whole series had been about Sister Night and Looking Glass and so forth rather than "Clash of the Titans part 2" As much as I love Jeremy Irons.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:40 |
|
precision posted:A story you tell yourself. No, that's literally the definition of the terms. You're thinking about agency. You can't make choices without agency. That is literally the definition of agency, which you stubbornly refuse to google and educate yourself on. quote:Agency Free will is some nonsense concept that never existed in real life. We're all robots. We don't need free will to make choices. Neural Networks are unthinking, unfeeling machines but they make choices and learn over time. Are you arguing computers don't exist? Or are you arguing that computers can't calculate choices? Agh this conversation is infuriating because you refuse to engage with the proper terms so everything you say is backwards and everything you read you interpret the wrong way, so I'm just going to have to ignore you. Zaphod42 fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 18:59 |
|
TheCenturion posted:
It's the White Power symbol that 4chan meme'd into existence months ago: https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/okay-hand-gesture
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:10 |
|
The Question has a pretty major role in the animated series Justice League Unlimited, and you can really see the resemblance to Rorschach there.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:17 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:Agh this conversation is infuriating because you refuse to engage with the proper terms so everything you say is backwards and everything you read you interpret the wrong way, so I'm just going to have to ignore you. Now you understand how the rest of us feel every time you post
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:17 |
|
Is there any other literature that explores the "Man out of time" nature of our blue buddy's condition? Some sci-fi stuff in The Culture kinda goes there a bit. It just seems so horrible. Every worst pain you've had/most pleasurable moment/saddest moment/happiest moment all happening at the same time. It seems like either the dullest or most hellish experience i can imagine.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:32 |
|
Let's see if there is any sense to the difference between "Agency" and "Free Will." I suspect not and the person here constant harping on here is participating in a form of masturbatory philosophical grammar naziism to make himself feel better about having ooh such a big brainnnn. Agency According to Wikipedia, Agency in Sociology quote:In social science, agency is defined as the capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own free choices. By contrast, structure is those factors of influence (such as social class, religion, gender, ethnicity, ability, customs, etc.) that determine or limit an agent and their decisions.[1] The influences from structure and agency are debated—it is unclear to what extent a person's actions are constrained by social systems. According to Wikipedia, Agency in Philosophy quote:Agency is the capacity of an actor to act in a given environment. The capacity to act does not at first imply a specific moral dimension to the ability to make the choice to act, and moral agency is therefore a distinct concept. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy quote:In very general terms, an agent is a being with the capacity to act, and ‘agency’ denotes the exercise or manifestation of this capacity. According to Webster's Dictionary quote:agency noun Free Will According to Wikipedia quote:Free will is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action unimpeded. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy quote:As should be clear from this short discussion of the history of the idea of free will, free will has traditionally been conceived of as a kind of power to control one’s choices and actions. According to Webster's Dictionary quote:freewill adjective So I think it is clear when we are talking about free will it is the power to control your choices and actions and when we are talking about agency we are talking about the capacity to act. When we are talking about Free Will in this thread we are talking about the power to control our choices and actions. Not whether are not we are capable of making choices or actions. And if you ask me you can not have one without the other. It is completely impossible. If you are unable to control choice and actions, then you are not capable of making them. It is that simple. The only other alternative is you are literally a loving vegetable, and in that case, like with the case of our annoying friend here, the best option is to pull the loving plug.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:38 |
|
Fragmented posted:Is there any other literature that explores the "Man out of time" nature of our blue buddy's condition? Some sci-fi stuff in The Culture kinda goes there a bit. It just seems so horrible. Every worst pain you've had/most pleasurable moment/saddest moment/happiest moment all happening at the same time. It seems like either the dullest or most hellish experience i can imagine. Someone else in the thread mentioned the Tralfamadorians from Vonnegut, who have that going on.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:43 |
|
My god man
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:44 |
|
Fragmented posted:Is there any other literature that explores the "Man out of time" nature of our blue buddy's condition? Some sci-fi stuff in The Culture kinda goes there a bit. It just seems so horrible. Every worst pain you've had/most pleasurable moment/saddest moment/happiest moment all happening at the same time. It seems like either the dullest or most hellish experience i can imagine. The aliens in Arrival experience time that way. Leads to some interesting plot points.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:48 |
|
precision posted:Now you understand how the rest of us feel every time you post Except I had someone literally respond "this is correct" to each of my effort posts, unlike any garbage you've ever dumped in here Mandrel posted:this is the correct explanation Mandrel posted:this is also correct Kiss my rear end, Precision.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:52 |
|
ThanosWasRight posted:And if you ask me you can not have one without the other. It is completely impossible. If you are unable to control choice and actions, then you are not capable of making them. It is that simple. Right. There seem to me to be only three possibilities: 1. Everything obeys chemical and physical law. All choice is illusion. Even my choice to post this is an illusion and I am literally unable to override that. 2. Some kind of soul exists. This is ridiculous and weird, but the very existence of the universe is weird; no explanation for existence, well, existing, makes much sense. 3. Quantum outcomes. Not everything is entirely determined because there is what we perceive as a randomness. https://youtu.be/IYRB6qtqXz4 https://youtu.be/4arOKZvuZK4 precision fucked around with this message at 20:01 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:53 |
|
ThanosWasRight posted:Let's see if there is any sense to the difference between "Agency" and "Free Will." Lmao, are you loving serious? "lets see if these two major terms in philosophy aren't actually the same thing and the entire field of philosophy is just making poo poo up? Because I have a funny feeling they're the same thing and I'm smarter than literally everybody else on the planet" Goddamn Thanos, the irony here is killing me https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685516.001.0001/acprof-9780199685516 Read a book and educate yourself and your big brainnnn
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:55 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:Kiss my rear end, Precision. It's okay, I know you had to post that.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:55 |
|
precision posted:It's okay, I know you had to post that. Its okay, I knew you had to get the last word in Jesus christ what is wrong with you?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:56 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:Read a book and educate yourself and your big brainnnn Do you really think this tone helps your argument? Edit: Okay, sorry. It's just funny that we don't even disagree. The only difference between us is that you're certain of a belief, and I am way too narrow of a viewpoint to be certain of anything so big E2: Take some acid and educate your tiny human psyche! precision fucked around with this message at 19:59 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 19:56 |
|
Fragmented posted:Is there any other literature that explores the "Man out of time" nature of our blue buddy's condition? Some sci-fi stuff in The Culture kinda goes there a bit. It just seems so horrible. Every worst pain you've had/most pleasurable moment/saddest moment/happiest moment all happening at the same time. It seems like either the dullest or most hellish experience i can imagine. In one of Vonnegut's later books, Timequake, earth basically rewinds 10 years and restarts, and everyone lives out their exact same actions while also remembering having done them before. It's a different way of getting at a very similar idea. Someone else mentioned Dune, which...yeah. A guy takes a mega-hit of space acid, starts seeing through all possible futures, and just never comes down from it. Then his son does the same thing except he turns himself into a giant worm that rules the galaxy for 1,000 years. Dune is just so unabashedly insane that I love it. I want to say Heinlen had a few stabs at this kind of fiction, too, but I haven't read much of his stuff since I was a teenager. Did Stranger in a Strange Land or Number of the Beast ever get into this kind of thing? It's also been a while since I read Flatland, but didn't it try to speculate about a 4th-dimensional perspective? e: added some spoiler tags. AtraMorS fucked around with this message at 20:08 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:05 |
|
precision posted:Do you really think this tone helps your argument? I didn't start with the lovely tone, man. If you wanna have a reasonable discussion of the issues I'm all for it. I'm not gonna just sit here and be berated though, if you give it then you should be able to take it. When I said "You guys are trying to give me an aneurysm!" that was tongue in cheek and self-deprecating. I was trying to be jovial about this. precision posted:Edit: Okay, sorry. It's just funny that we don't even disagree. The only difference between us is that you're certain of a belief, and I am way too narrow of a viewpoint to be certain of anything so big I'm really not. If you'd be fair and talk to me like a human being then maybe you'd find that out. But its impossible to have a conversation like this, so you're jumping to conclusions about things I haven't even really said. AtraMorS posted:It's also been a while since I read Flatland, but didn't it try to speculate about a 4th-dimensional perspective? Yeah we talked about flatland a lot a few pages ago, along with all the other works you just mentioned. Wish people would read the thread so we didn't go in circles so much :/ for complex issues like this, just drive by posting doesn't work so well. Zaphod42 fucked around with this message at 20:11 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:08 |
|
rich thick and creamy posted:Well you want to get really fancy pants about your funny papers: What if our Horny Blue Doctor is more than a metaphor for the comic medium. What if he picked up a set of pencils, pen, and paper and started writing his own Thrilling Tales of Atomic Science!!!! The comic book we pick up isn't written by this Alan Moore character but has a byline of Jon Osterman. We look up from the page and we are surrounded by several million Watchmen comics each one with a subtle variation from the last. We round a stack and find a Dr M composing yet another take on Earth 1959 and forward. Once he's done he takes it for a spin by hopping Gumby-like into it and experiencing his new story first-hand. He pops back out, makes some notes, and starts crafting the next. An elaborate way of saying that Dr. Manhattan is the answer to the thread title. Edit: And Alan Moore is the Doc Manhattan to the in-comic DM hillaryous clinton fucked around with this message at 20:18 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:14 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:Yeah we talked about flatland a lot a few pages ago, along with all the other works you just mentioned.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:18 |
|
Zaphod, dude, I'm just giving you poo poo. This has happened several times, and not just with me, you're way too insecure or worked up or something to just chill out and post. I can't speak for anyone else but I assure you that i am the last person in the world who would purposefully be mean over the internet. I'm a goddamn hippie! But your misunderstandings of what other people say just pile up so fast that sometimes it's hard to make the choice to NOT rib you about it. You so easily and quickly default to "I understand you perfectly but YOU don't understand ME!" that it's hard to resist sometimes. I believe I have a soul and have choices and I believe I'm choosing to be nice right now. You may believe this isn't a choice. That's okay; you don't have to live in my head, I do.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:20 |
|
Well, there's only one episode left to see if the producers are bold enough to take advantage of their DC connections and give us a Gotham-Watchmen crossover. I want to see Balloon Man make a bad guy float away! GIVE US OUR HAM!!
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:23 |
|
I don't know about agency vs. free will but learning how synapses work sometime back really has me of the opinion that free will may very well not exist. But just like weather, there might just be too many variables for us to figure out.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:32 |
|
Whether or not it exists we'll never know, but it doesn’t matter because it feels like we have it and that's good enough
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:34 |
|
zoux posted:Whether or not it exists we'll never know, but it doesn’t matter because it feels like we have it and that's good enough Exactly!
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:35 |
|
Just to address the question of why Manhattan doesn’t deal with the ray gun. What is stopping him from noticing the ray gun guy is that’s the moment he falls in love with Angela. He’s looking at her with awe because she just risked her life for him despite him telling her she can’t save him. And he gets zapped because he’s distracted. Manhattan is essentially just a human being, walking through life making choices like anybody else. He just has a 10,000 ft view on events that we don’t have. So if we pretend he’s just a regular dude for a second, he made the “choice” in that moment not to look for more Kavalry guys and to look into Angela’s eyes instead. A very human moment. Colonel Whitey fucked around with this message at 20:40 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:35 |
|
precision posted:Zaphod, dude, I'm just giving you poo poo. This has happened several times, and not just with me, you're way too insecure or worked up or something to just chill out and post. I can't speak for anyone else but I assure you that i am the last person in the world who would purposefully be mean over the internet. I'm a goddamn hippie! Precision, dude, I'm just giving you poo poo. This happens to all kinds of goons on all kinds of threads because people argue past each other and text does not convey all the emotion of what a person is saying, and it is easy to read something a way they didn't intend and come to the wrong impression. I can't speak for everybody else but I assure you that I am the last person in the world who would be purposefully mean over the internet. I'm a goddamn hippie! I live in the hippie capitol of the world. But your misunderstandings of what I said just pile up so fast that sometimes it's hard to make the choice NOT to rib you about it. You so easily and quickly default to "You are always wrong!" that its hard to resist sometimes. I believe you can make choices even if you don't have a soul. I believe that those choices, devoid of a soul, are calculated by your brain and physics and you would always make the same decision in the same moment under the same circumstances, but life will never present you with the exact same circumstances so its effectively irrelevant. The whole point of humans is that we CAN learn. You don't need a soul to learn. If you believe in a soul that's cool, but I don't, and we can make choices either way, is an important point to make. E: your stance of "you need to chill, because its not okay to rib people, and I would never do that, but sometimes I have to do that" isn't consistent and is in fact hypocritical. Zaphod42 fucked around with this message at 20:43 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:39 |
|
Colonel Whitey posted:Just to address the question of why Manhattan doesn’t deal with the ray gun. That's not gonna satisfy the crowd that thinks he should've avoided it, because that's still a really dumb choice given all the information he is supposed to have access to. Why not make the choice to instead take the half second necessary to eliminate the ray gun and THEN you get to spend all the time you want looking into Angela's eyes? It's just not something that we can ever fully wrap our heads around and it's meant to be that way. As others have mentioned, the characters themselves react the same way. The only one who truly can understand the "why" of Dr. Manhattan's actions are Manhattan himself.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:40 |
|
AtraMorS posted:
I think you're remembering By His Bootstraps by Heinlein.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:41 |
|
Nail Rat posted:I don't know about agency vs. free will but learning how synapses work sometime back really has me of the opinion that free will may very well not exist. But just like weather, there might just be too many variables for us to figure out. Yeah that's basically where I'm at. If your brain can make a decision, what does the soul do? If your soul makes decisions, why have a brain at all? We know that if you damage someone's brain, you can fundamentally change their personality. That would at least diminish the power that a soul would meaningfully have over the life of a person. And note that quantum physics and randomness isn't enough to create free will. If your actions have a random chance of doing something you didn't intend, that isn't free will, that's actually LESS control, not more. Making decisions outside the universe... just doesn't make sense to me. But that's where we go from pure philosophy to religion, so any stance on souls is equally valid or likely, its all ineffable. But I think its real important to point out that you CAN totally have agency without free will. I think most people who argue pro free will do so under the false assumption that not having free will means they can't make decisions. But that's not true. zoux posted:Whether or not it exists we'll never know, but it doesn’t matter because it feels like we have it and that's good enough Whether or not it exists we'll never know, but we do know we can make choices, and that's good enough. (Agency) That's the point I keep trying to make, and if you guys would quit with the "lmao I don't think you even know what you're saying hur hur" for a few seconds, you'd see its a meaningful distinction. Zaphod42 fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Dec 12, 2019 |
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:41 |
|
Basebf555 posted:That's not gonna satisfy the crowd that thinks he should've avoided it, because that's still a really dumb choice given all the information he is supposed to have access to. Why not make the choice to instead take the half second necessary to eliminate the ray gun and THEN you get to spend all the time you want looking into Angela's eyes? It’s not supposed to be a smart choice, it’s supposed to convey what I wrote in my post. Characters in fiction don’t behave 100% rationally all the time and I feel like people get really hung up on that. The point is that Manhattan is not actually this foreign unknowable entity, he’s a human being. His arc in this show is that he found a new reason to reconnect with humanity.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 14:58 |
|
Colonel Whitey posted:Just to address the question of why Manhattan doesn’t deal with the ray gun. The gun shoots tachyons which Dr M is blind too. I imagine the gun's technically be irradiated by them so he literally has no idea where the shot will come from. He knows the outcome because of his timebrain, just not how to avoid it. At least thats what makes sense to me
|
# ? Dec 12, 2019 20:44 |