Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Grevling
Dec 18, 2016

They didn't say he was masterminding it though, they agreed it wasn't a genocide, it was caused by the Bolsheviks but not intentionally to kill Ukrainians.

That jives well with what I learned when I took a university course on the Stalin era a few years ago.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

THS
Sep 15, 2017

stalin deserves blame in so far as the responsibility he had for setting up a system where lower level party members were too afraid to accurately report what was happening, and his lack of vigor in verifying reports and following up on the famine - and he probably didn’t because dude was notorious for believing what he wanted to hear and not believing what he didn’t want to hear, see: the clusterfuck at the start of the nazi invasion

stalin did some things wrong

Neurophage
Oct 11, 2012

Trash Ops posted:

no one denies a famine, just whether it was ebil stalin masterminding it vs just something terrible happening jfc

from the episode: In 1930, there was an exceptional harvest, 83.5 million tons. In '31, in '32, which is supposedly when this famine genocide is happening, it dropped to 69.5, so clearly not as great of a harvest, but it's also not starving in the streets low, and this is the point which they had to ration, but there was no mass famine.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
edit: im dumb

Venom Snake fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Dec 12, 2019

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES

Venom Snake posted:

Whats important to consider when discussing post ww-2 eastern europe is something like 90% or more of buildings had been destroyed in multiple cities across multiple countries. Logistical supply networks had to be completely rebuilt from the ground up. The famine that afflicted the Ukraine and it's surrounding states was an mistake in planning and strategy. Importantly afterwards it didn't happen again. Does this mean we shouldn't hold the people who made that mistake responsible? no. but at the same time it's another case of when bad poo poo happens in communist countries it's the goverments fault but when 30k people die every year from preventable illness thats the free market at work baby

...

the famine was well before ww2

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

THS posted:

stalin deserves blame in so far as the responsibility he had for setting up a system where lower level party members were too afraid to accurately report what was happening, and his lack of vigor in verifying reports and following up on the famine - and he probably didn’t because dude was notorious for believing what he wanted to hear and not believing what he didn’t want to hear, see: the clusterfuck at the start of the nazi invasion

stalin did some things wrong

also selling grain on the international market during the famine

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Trash Ops posted:

no one denies a famine

right, they just question whether six million people died from it. very telling that liberals can't tolerate any challenge to their official histories.

e: sorry, that figure isn't right. i think i've gotten my notes mixed up, but the general form of the critique is unchanged.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy
the 3-5 million figures quoted often include "people who haven't been born due to famine" or some amazing galaxy brained bullshit like that

nearly 2 loving million people died, why inflate it? isn't that terrible enough? i guess "almost twice the potato famine" doesn't sound bad enough or some poo poo

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
I didnt listen to the stalin episode but ive listened to a few revleft and even a few other lefty podcasts and they pretty much all suck because theyre all more interested in discussing "theory" in the abstract and not actually relating to or looking towards actually existing movements here and now.

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
its kind of like the radio version of all the people on twitter and online who describe themselves as marxist-leninists but are not in, have never been in, or have no desire to be in a revolutionary party. like people who have very strong opinions about how revolutionary organizing should work who have never even been to a meeting of a revolutionary party. not poo poo talking cause theyre uninvolved, in a lot of cases people wanna be they just dont know how to get started, but like if you arent involved and have no practical experience then maybe dont have rigid already defined ideas about how things should be done, instead keep an open mind and be open to ideas and practices of people who have been practicing the things you think you agree with

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
pod casts

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
for example: newspapers. write them, produce them, sell them.

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.


Operation Cast Pod

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

apropos to nothing posted:

I didnt listen to the stalin episode but ive listened to a few revleft and even a few other lefty podcasts and they pretty much all suck because theyre all more interested in discussing "theory" in the abstract and not actually relating to or looking towards actually existing movements here and now.
i think i tried listening to red menace, which is one of the same people who does revleft? i dunno. but i couldn't handle it because the podders seemed to be just jabbering from a script, and one had a che beard and a picture of che on the wall behind him

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

i think i tried listening to red menace, which is one of the same people who does revleft? i dunno. but i couldn't handle it because the podders seemed to be just jabbering from a script, and one had a che beard and a picture of che on the wall behind him



yeah, ive never seen any of them but i get strong communist larper energy from a lot of those podcasters

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

apropos to nothing posted:

yeah, ive never seen any of them but i get strong communist larper energy from a lot of those podcasters

it's a cottage industry, so it's to be expected

Trash Ops
Jun 19, 2012

im having fun, isnt everyone else?

starting a local red guards chapter brb :D

Terrorist Fistbump
Jan 29, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo

apropos to nothing posted:

for example: newspapers. write them, produce them, sell them.

I'm going to start the 21st century version of a newspaper: a Patreon blog

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003

Terrorist Fistbump posted:

I'm going to start the 21st century version of a newspaper: a Patreon blog

thats another classic, the lefty twitter account with a patreon in the bio asking for money so they can continue to do an organizing

Algund Eenboom
May 4, 2014

StashAugustine posted:

Operation Cast Pod

Terrorist Fistbump
Jan 29, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
For an extra 3 dollars a month, you can watch me do Twitch chats with my online friends! Tomorrow, I'm talking to a guy who discovered anarchism in college in 2017, but recently converted to Maoism after graduating and realizing how boring his office job is :D

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003

Terrorist Fistbump posted:

For an extra 3 dollars a month, you can watch me do Twitch chats with my online friends! Tomorrow, I'm talking to a guy who discovered anarchism in college in 2017, but recently converted to Maoism after graduating and realizing how boring his office job is :D

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
i love how easy it is to trick this thread into debating the holodomor

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
is it really a debate if everyone's position is that the soviets didn't engineer the famine but badly bungled the response to it

Serf
May 5, 2011


i wish people graduated to maoism. i know too many anarchists of the "violence is always bad, any expression of power or authority is unjustified" variety

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

apropos to nothing posted:

yeah, ive never seen any of them but i get strong communist larper energy from a lot of those podcasters
i'm not going to post pics of the dude because that gets helldumpy, but it was on a youtube channel. either way i agree wth you and i think it's like thinking of theory as casting down lightning bolts from the sky or something. like you pick up the short course and go, "here's the text..." and then the book rises into the air and then opens up by itself as the words fly out of the page and smack you in the face: KA-POW

here's a video of a chinese cult but it's kinda how i see it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6KtTaKDIG8

apropos to nothing posted:

its kind of like the radio version of all the people on twitter and online who describe themselves as marxist-leninists but are not in, have never been in, or have no desire to be in a revolutionary party. like people who have very strong opinions about how revolutionary organizing should work who have never even been to a meeting of a revolutionary party. not poo poo talking cause theyre uninvolved, in a lot of cases people wanna be they just dont know how to get started, but like if you arent involved and have no practical experience then maybe dont have rigid already defined ideas about how things should be done, instead keep an open mind and be open to ideas and practices of people who have been practicing the things you think you agree with
well i think it's kind of like a communism fandom, and they're often involved in groups but these are like dogmatic sects with the theorists being treated as like flawless super-gurus or geniuses or whatever. i think their underlying problem is their insistence on "upholding" various historical figures and states and having the correct "line" on these questions (you can tell i'm talking about the PSL here). stalin must be upheld, etc. and they build their organizational independence around these questions. but that doesn't really have much to do with strategy or practice. these questions might not have much practical value so it becomes an empty (albeit glorified) intellectual exercise. in actual practice they might not be any more revolutionary than the DSA is. paradoxically, they might be even less so because a dogmatic insistence on line doesn't allow you to grow or do very much, and they never really break out of that.

it turns marxism into a kind of special snowflake ideology rather than an anti-ideology aimed at changing the material conditions of society. or it becomes kind of like a personal identity / brand to distinguish yourself based on how you front and what you say (as opposed to what you do). this hold true for mainstream politics as well, like elizabeth warren saying she's going to take on wall street. but i'm not posting from a jungle bunker while i'm waging the revolution so it's not like i'm special or more radical than thou either.

but I think it's a shame when there are ML groups (often led by people who are significantly older, and savvier, than their rank and file) that know they're exploiting people like this. the kiddos "identify as" a marxist-leninist, and then hunt around for the party that has the "correct" line -- divorced from practice -- and then one of these groups scoops them up. but the sect-like structure ends up concealing the actual practice of the organization and smothers internal communication / debate of which the leadership does not approve of, but the kiddos can stay in provided they don't ask too many questions.

BrutalistMcDonalds fucked around with this message at 20:49 on Dec 12, 2019

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

Raskolnikov38 posted:

is it really a debate if everyone's position is that the soviets didn't engineer the famine but badly bungled the response to it

ok, not a debate, but seriousposting

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Serf posted:

i wish people graduated to maoism. i know too many anarchists of the "violence is always bad, any expression of power or authority is unjustified" variety

anarchists should graduate elementary school first probably

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

smarxist posted:

i love how easy it is to trick this thread into debating the holodomor

We need new material. Dubcek was right

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
interviewing someone who only goes by their twitter name, @rosa_cucksemburg, about their medium article on how league of legends players represent a separate but still revolutionary class

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Serf posted:

i wish people graduated to maoism. i know too many anarchists of the "violence is always bad, any expression of power or authority is unjustified" variety

my drawings, digital landscapes, and Etsy crafts will revolutionize the world, just ask my art commune

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
i'm reading hochschild's book on the abraham lincoln brigade and he has a throw-away describing anarachism as a pre-industrial ideology and its probably his best insight yet (in this book)

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

i'm not going to post pics of the dude because that gets helldumpy, but it was on a youtube channel. either way i agree wth you and i think it's like thinking of theory as casting down lightning bolts from the sky or something. like you pick up the short course and go, "here's the text..." and then the book rises into the air and then opens up by itself as the words fly out of the page and smack you in the face: KA-POW

here's a video of a chinese cult but it's kinda how i see it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6KtTaKDIG8

well i think it's kind of like a communism fandom, and they're often involved in groups but these are like dogmatic sects with the theorists being treated as like flawless super-gurus or geniuses or whatever. i think their underlying problem is their insistence on "upholding" various historical figures and states and having the correct "line" on these questions (you can tell i'm talking about the PSL here). stalin must be upheld, etc. and they build their organizational independence around these questions. but that doesn't really have much to do with strategy or practice. these questions might not have much practical value so it becomes an empty (albeit glorified) intellectual exercise. in actual practice they might not be any more revolutionary than the DSA is. paradoxically, they might be even less so because a dogmatic insistence on line doesn't allow you to grow or do very much, and they never really break out of that.

it turns marxism into a kind of special snowflake ideology rather than an anti-ideology aimed at changing the material conditions of society. or it becomes kind of like a personal identity / brand to distinguish yourself based on how you front and what you say (as opposed to what you do). this hold true for mainstream politics as well, like elizabeth warren saying she's going to take on wall street. but i'm not posting from a jungle bunker while i'm waging the revolution so it's not like i'm special or more radical than thou either.

but I think it's a shame when there are ML groups (often led by people who are significantly older, and savvier, than their rank and file) that know they're exploiting people like this. the kiddos "identify as" a marxist-leninist, and then hunt around for the party that has the "correct" line -- divorced from practice -- and then one of these groups scoops them up. but the sect-like structure ends up concealing the actual practice of the organization and smothers internal communication / debate of which the leadership does not approve of, but the kiddos can stay in provided they don't ask too many questions.

its definitely a case where people adopt some kind of left wing ideology as an identity and then shop around for others who also are part of that identity. then yeah, a lot of times they get recruited to groups which are sects or even sometimes political cults that basically manipulate people. its very sad and unfortunate. 9/10 times if im having a convo with someone and they ask "so what tendency/kind of socialist are you" or "so you guys are trotskyist right?" i just write it off and accept that theyre not going to get organized with us or anyone else in anyway cause theyre more interested in organizing as a thought exercise than a concrete task.

Serf
May 5, 2011


too often i run into people who are like "yeah i'm a socialist but the bolsheviks were wrong to do a violent revolution. also markets are good. sankara, who's that?"

SSJ_naruto_2003
Oct 12, 2012



Opposition to unjustified hierarchies, but WITHOUT violence. We'll talk them into giving up their power.

SSJ_naruto_2003
Oct 12, 2012



What do you mean social reform by passing laws is still the use of (a threat of) violence?

Captain Billy Pissboy
Oct 25, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice
I've never gotten a clear answer from proponents of non-violent revolution as to what happens when the bourgeois just says "no" and starts shooting you.

Serf
May 5, 2011


legit seen people say that the only defensible revolution was the carnation revolution

Terrorist Fistbump
Jan 29, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

i'm not going to post pics of the dude because that gets helldumpy, but it was on a youtube channel. either way i agree wth you and i think it's like thinking of theory as casting down lightning bolts from the sky or something. like you pick up the short course and go, "here's the text..." and then the book rises into the air and then opens up by itself as the words fly out of the page and smack you in the face: KA-POW

here's a video of a chinese cult but it's kinda how i see it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6KtTaKDIG8

well i think it's kind of like a communism fandom, and they're often involved in groups but these are like dogmatic sects with the theorists being treated as like flawless super-gurus or geniuses or whatever. i think their underlying problem is their insistence on "upholding" various historical figures and states and having the correct "line" on these questions (you can tell i'm talking about the PSL here). stalin must be upheld, etc. and they build their organizational independence around these questions. but that doesn't really have much to do with strategy or practice. these questions might not have much practical value so it becomes an empty (albeit glorified) intellectual exercise. in actual practice they might not be any more revolutionary than the DSA is. paradoxically, they might be even less so because a dogmatic insistence on line doesn't allow you to grow or do very much, and they never really break out of that.

it turns marxism into a kind of special snowflake ideology rather than an anti-ideology aimed at changing the material conditions of society. or it becomes kind of like a personal identity / brand to distinguish yourself based on how you front and what you say (as opposed to what you do). this hold true for mainstream politics as well, like elizabeth warren saying she's going to take on wall street. but i'm not posting from a jungle bunker while i'm waging the revolution so it's not like i'm special or more radical than thou either.

but I think it's a shame when there are ML groups (often led by people who are significantly older, and savvier, than their rank and file) that know they're exploiting people like this. the kiddos "identify as" a marxist-leninist, and then hunt around for the party that has the "correct" line -- divorced from practice -- and then one of these groups scoops them up. but the sect-like structure ends up concealing the actual practice of the organization and smothers internal communication / debate of which the leadership does not approve of, but the kiddos can stay in provided they don't ask too many questions.

Jokes aside, my first experience with left organizing was in one of these microsects, one with particularly culty aspects to it. It was one of the most unpleasant social experiences of my life, and it turned me off to doing more than showing up for the occasional march or rally for almost a decade. There seem to be fewer of them around these days and that's a good thing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019

Serf posted:

too often i run into people who are like "yeah i'm a socialist but the bolsheviks were wrong to do a violent revolution. also markets are good. sankara, who's that?"

I learned about sankara from POD CASTERS because the rest of the internet is irony poisoned, these forums included

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5