|
https://twitter.com/SeanMcCarthyCom/status/1205487583746281472?s=19 What the gently caress is this take?
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 06:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 00:53 |
|
|
Fascism
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 06:28
|
|
|
AnEdgelord posted:https://twitter.com/SeanMcCarthyCom/status/1205487583746281472?s=19 he's a lesser getfiscal hint:"let people enjoy things"
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 06:52
|
|
|
there are some weirdo academics who want to abolish the family, atheism is tiresome, and uh well the nation state still isn't good
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 09:13
|
|
|
i uhh...love my family
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 14:45
|
|
|
Everything you learned unconsciously of how the world should be as a child is wrong and I want to abolish it
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 17:32
|
|
|
Religion might be the opium of the masses but atheism is undeniably cringe
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 17:35
|
|
|
Gripweed posted:Religion might be the opium of the masses but atheism is undeniably cringe Atheism is sleeping in on sunday.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 17:49
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:Atheism is sleeping in on sunday. oh wow did you get that from a bumper sticker you saw in 2003?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 17:50
|
|
|
Look I can understand trying to revive Liberation Theology as a way to make inroads into religious communities or aligning with persecuted minority religions but thats never what these people mean
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 17:53
|
|
|
Gripweed posted:oh wow did you get that from a bumper sticker you saw in 2003? huh
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 17:53
|
|
|
philosophy killed god and ate it's corpse get with the program religifailures
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 18:04
|
|
|
AnEdgelord posted:Look I can understand trying to revive Liberation Theology as a way to make inroads into religious communities or aligning with persecuted minority religions but thats never what these people mean Atheism was always gonna be a failure as far as political positions go and we've known it since Marx wrote The German Ideology. It's a substitute for actually understanding theology and all the ways you can attack it ideologically. People need to better understand how to attack prosperity theology and elevate the left wing tendencies in religion. Speaking as an atheist, I don't mean that in some cynical way to trick people into socialism. There's a genuine base of shared values that need to be emphasized if we're going to eradicate degenerate bourgeois thought. New Atheism is just prosperity theology without God. Economic "success" ends up being a marker of your own righteousness and validates your own existence. The outcome is all the same.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 18:07
|
|
|
T-man posted:Everything you learned unconsciously of how the world should be as a child is wrong and I want to abolish it thats why i type with only my two index fingers, touch typing is a cia op
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 18:19
|
|
|
the cringe of the masses
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 18:19
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Atheism was always gonna be a failure as far as political positions go and we've known it since Marx wrote The German Ideology. It's a substitute for actually understanding theology and all the ways you can attack it ideologically. People need to better understand how to attack prosperity theology and elevate the left wing tendencies in religion. Speaking as an atheist, I don't mean that in some cynical way to trick people into socialism. There's a genuine base of shared values that need to be emphasized if we're going to eradicate degenerate bourgeois thought. This is largely the conclusion Ive come to as well, especially once I realized that when Marx said Opium he meant it as a painkiller that numbs the masses to their exploitation rather than as a recreational narcotic that must be kicked. Im just very suspicious of those who talk about "preserving" or "embracing" traditional religion
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 18:30
|
|
|
AnEdgelord posted:This is largely the conclusion Ive come to as well, especially once I realized that when Marx said Opium he meant it as a painkiller that numbs the masses to their exploitation rather than as a recreational narcotic that must be kicked. so what’s you’re saying is we need a fentanyl of the masses it’s fentanyl
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 19:16
|
|
|
Dr. Killjoy posted:he's a lesser getfiscal The difference is that he humorlessly defends what he posts, and his takes are consistently workerist at best
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 19:45
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:thats why i type with only my two index fingers, touch typing is a cia op 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 20:08
|
|
|
The keyboard layout we all use on our flat glass rectangles was designed to moderate typing speed so typewriters wouldn’t jam, like whoa
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 20:52
|
|
|
everyone who doesn't practice homerow will have plenty of time to learn it in the re education camps
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2019 21:01
|
|
|
I installed Audm, which is audio news articles, and folks this is pain beyond pain. Oh my God people pay to read this poo poo in text let alone audio. I feel like I'm being flayed alive by a liberal katana
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 00:51
|
|
|
I'm understanding Matt at a visceral level here, this is intellectual carnage
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 00:58
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Atheism was always gonna be a failure as far as political positions go and we've known it since Marx wrote The German Ideology. It's a substitute for actually understanding theology and all the ways you can attack it ideologically. People need to better understand how to attack prosperity theology and elevate the left wing tendencies in religion. Speaking as an atheist, I don't mean that in some cynical way to trick people into socialism. There's a genuine base of shared values that need to be emphasized if we're going to eradicate degenerate bourgeois thought. As a religious person,  100%. One of the reasons I went full Commie was because at some point I couldn’t make the cognitive dissonance between my deeply-held humanitarian values and my shitlib politics anymore.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 01:04
|
|
|
T-man posted:Everything you learned unconsciously of how the world should be as a child is wrong and I want to abolish it ABOLISH SHARING
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 02:02
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:ABOLISH SHARING sharing requires the concept of a single owner who is willing to extend use to others. Starting from the perspective of <x> is mine is a bad way to change the way we understand value away from the way capitalism requires us to see it. Take, say, the way "sharing" information now means that you, someone who owned your data, are now extending it to some computertoucher for use - nothing is physically transferred, but the way we understand the idea in our social context is as a commodity. Think Marx's thoughts on commodity forms, but with 200 years of extra liberal brainworms. Can't do communism if your brain is doing capitalism. Burn it down. You're not sharing poo poo if you've gone beyond the concept of singular or groups of owners.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 02:38
|
|
|
T-man posted:sharing requires the concept of a single owner who is willing to extend use to others. Starting from the perspective of <x> is mine is a bad way to change the way we understand value away from the way capitalism requires us to see it. Take, say, the way "sharing" information now means that you, someone who owned your data, are now extending it to some computertoucher for use - nothing is physically transferred, but the way we understand the idea in our social context is as a commodity. Think Marx's thoughts on commodity forms, but with 200 years of extra liberal brainworms. no it doesn't lol animals share a watering hole that doesn't mean the hippo or the giraffe "owns" do you even think about what you're posting before you post
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 02:44
|
|
|
Ace of Baes posted:no it doesn't lol animals share a watering hole that doesn't mean the hippo or the giraffe "owns" do you even think about what you're posting before you post no, they don’t
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 02:50
|
|
|
"ownership" doesn't have a value, it's a social relationship that determines who has a title to claim value.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 03:00
|
|
|
T-man posted:sharing requires the concept of a single owner who is willing to extend use to others. Starting from the perspective of <x> is mine is a bad way to change the way we understand value away from the way capitalism requires us to see it. Take, say, the way "sharing" information now means that you, someone who owned your data, are now extending it to some computertoucher for use - nothing is physically transferred, but the way we understand the idea in our social context is as a commodity. Think Marx's thoughts on commodity forms, but with 200 years of extra liberal brainworms. easily top 10 cspam poster, there is no question
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 03:03
|
|
|
Ace of Baes posted:no it doesn't lol animals share a watering hole that doesn't mean the hippo or the giraffe "owns" do you even think about what you're posting before you post Thank you for your continued quality of contributions. Please note that neither hippos nor giraffes are humans living under capitalism. Pener Kropoopkin posted:"ownership" doesn't have a value, it's a social relationship that determines who has a title to claim value. I'm not sure what you mean by this? I agree. Ownership affects the we understand value. Homeless Friend posted:easily top 10 cspam poster, there is no question Thank you, I'm glad to see you've come around.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 04:30
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:easily top 10 cspam poster, there is no question Ill never forget when they went on a rant about how evil re-education camps are and suggested detaining and forcing people to take psych meds instead
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 04:32
|
|
|
T-man posted:I'm not sure what you mean by this? I agree. Ownership affects the we understand value. No, utility defines value. Ownership in itself isn't valuable. You could own a barren plot of rock and get practically 0 value from it, because values are socially determined. What I mean by ownership being a title to claim value is, owning something only entitles you to claim the extraction of value from the object being owned. It's a socially recognized claim to exclusive exploitation. You could exploit the value of something without even owning it. The value is still there regardless and it's not impacted by ownership - ownership is only a social relation that determines who can receive value. So you can possess something without any ownership involved and still share it. The example you came up with of sharing information being seen as a commodity is plain wrong. If that information isn't packaged for sale and traded for exchange value, then it's not a commodity. It's just plain shared.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 06:26
|
|
|
T-man posted:sharing requires the concept of a single owner who is willing to extend use to others. Starting from the perspective of <x> is mine is a bad way to change the way we understand value away from the way capitalism requires us to see it. Take, say, the way "sharing" information now means that you, someone who owned your data, are now extending it to some computertoucher for use - nothing is physically transferred, but the way we understand the idea in our social context is as a commodity. Think Marx's thoughts on commodity forms, but with 200 years of extra liberal brainworms. *taps the meme they posted again*
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 07:06
|
|
|
tman. i cant believe I'm saying this. for the love of god read a book. your posts smack of liberalism
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 09:48
|
|
|
T-man posted:sharing requires the concept of a single owner who is willing to extend use to others. Starting from the perspective of <x> is mine is a bad way to change the way we understand value away from the way capitalism requires us to see it. Take, say, the way "sharing" information now means that you, someone who owned your data, are now extending it to some computertoucher for use - nothing is physically transferred, but the way we understand the idea in our social context is as a commodity. Think Marx's thoughts on commodity forms, but with 200 years of extra liberal brainworms. i like podcasts
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 10:05
|
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:tman. i cant believe I'm saying this. for the love of god read a book. your posts smack of liberalism if they talk like a liberal and they walk like a liberal, well, you know
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 10:35
|
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:your posts smack of liberalism
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 12:12
|
|
|
Majorian posted:As a religious person, Same.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 16:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 00:53 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54ZrXo9jOiY 
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2019 16:20
|
|