Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tuxedo Gin
May 21, 2003

Classy.

Was talking to a Japanese guy yesterday and he asked me what the most expensive thing for me here. I told him the pension payments and he said I should stop paying because it’ll never pay out anyway.

So, youngish people know they’re hosed on that front. As the even younger generation hits the workforce they’ll feel it even more.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Munin
Nov 14, 2004


mystes posted:

Also, lots of older people haven't saved up enough money for retirement and they're going to be screwed over as the government raises pension ages and increases how much they have to pay for healthcare.

It is impossible to "save up enough money for retirement" in the system as it is since the underlying problem is a local undersupply of labor and the price for these limited resources will simply rise until the the retained savings are all allocated.

The higher prices should in theory be attracting lower priced supply from outside but...

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


mystes posted:

The problem isn't so much the fact that the population will be lower in the future as the stuff that happens while the population is shrinking (a smaller working age population having to support a larger elderly population, regional areas continuing to become depopulated, etc.).

Also, lots of older people haven't saved up enough money for retirement and they're going to be screwed over as the government raises pension ages and increases how much they have to pay for healthcare.

This is all standard neoliberal stuff though. Macron is literally slashing pensions right now as we’re posting and France has the best demographics of any develoepd country and healthy immigration. Japanese demographics are a crisis only if you simultaneously buy into an orthodox neoliberal frame of How Are They Going To Pay For It in terms of public finance and deficits, but also are deeply troubled by the human suffering that comes after social spending is cut in the name of fiscal austerity. Nobody is both of those things at once, and that’s the tell that the whole discourse is in fundamentally bad faith like basically everything written about Japan. Well, to be fair, I guess people ARE those things at once, and you do get an analogous discourse of public spending and austerity from liberals with other countries too, but the point is that it’s incoherent and self-contradictory. Unless you think there’s going to be a real, catastrophic social collapse in Japan, or that the engine of Japanese capitalism will grind to a halt, then there’s no true crisis beyond what neoliberal capitalism produces in dozens of countries both developing and developed. That’s possible, but I don’t think it’s that likely. They’ll just cut pensions, old people will be poor, the cities will continue to slowly become more multicultural by attrition and the countryside will continue to empty out as it’s been doing for decades. Things can continue as they are for the foreseeable future, no matter how mad this makes the liberal expat pundit class

icantfindaname fucked around with this message at 03:42 on Dec 27, 2019

prisoner of waffles
May 8, 2007

Ah! well a-day! what evil looks
Had I from old and young!
Instead of the cross, the fishmech
About my neck was hung.

I’m just a lazy poster but fwiw “Japanese retirees need to save more” sounded like neoliberal propaganda bullshit to me

AFancyQuestionMark
Feb 19, 2017

Long time no see.
Neoliberal or not neoliberal, having an ever increasing share of older people in a population is eventually going to put a larger strain on the younger portion to support them with their labor. There's no getting around this without massive automation.

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

AFancyQuestionMark posted:

Neoliberal or not neoliberal, having an ever increasing share of older people in a population is eventually going to put a larger strain on the younger portion to support them with their labor. There's no getting around this without massive automation.
Or just letting them die off. I have a hunch this will become semi-popular policy this century in several nations.

Flayer
Sep 13, 2003

by Fluffdaddy
Buglord

Grouchio posted:

Or just letting them die off. I have a hunch this will become semi-popular policy this century in several nations.
Depends who's in power. The right wing will want to keep them around as a voting bloc, the left shouldn't be so callous but the centre would happily kill them off.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

Flayer posted:

Depends who's in power. The right wing will want to keep them around as a voting bloc, the left shouldn't be so callous but the centre would happily kill them off.

lol, the "right wing" (also, centrists) have been waging a war on poors for a long rear end time now, and old poors are no exception. the people in power today doesn't give a poo poo about who's gonna vote for their successors. people are just stupid and keep voting for them anyway because racism ~are values~ right now is more important than survival in 10 years.

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


Boy, am I glad I don't live in Japan.

AceOfFlames
Oct 9, 2012

Dunno where else to post this so here it goes:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/31/business/carlos-ghosn-escape-japan.html

New York Times posted:

An official in Beirut said Mr. Ghosn had entered the country using a French passport, while at least one Lebanese outlet reported, without offering proof, that the former Nissan chairman had been spirited out inside a box meant for musical equipment.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.
So I watched this and apparently the Yakuza in Japan has their hand in nearly every major business in the country? Is that accurate? Just how common and powerful are the Yakuza?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6fm2JCrlMo

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Dr.Radical
Apr 3, 2011

punk rebel ecks posted:

So I watched this and apparently the Yakuza in Japan has their hand in nearly every major business in the country? Is that accurate? Just how common and powerful are the Yakuza?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6fm2JCrlMo

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

I dunno the answer to your question because I stopped being interested in poo poo like that a long time ago but man Enson Inoue’s stance on the yakuza being “sure they do child porn and human trafficking but they have HONOR and LOYALTY” is, uh... something. What a dumb piece of poo poo.

Heer98
Apr 10, 2009
Is the Ghosn escape getting a lot of attention in the Japanese media? Are people angry or indifferent about a foreign CEO fleeing Japanese justice?

Knowing very little about his case, my guess is that he was probably corrupt in some meaningful ways, but not necessarily more so than is the norm for senior executives in a Japanese company, and was essentially so fled out because he’s foreign. Am I really far off the mark here?

I feel like his story would be something the forums would be talking more about if Trump hadn’t almost started a war.

Negostrike
Aug 15, 2015


He seemed to be hailed as kind of a heroic figure in Japan but now they seem to make fun of his escape on Twitter, from what I saw.

harperdc
Jul 24, 2007

Heer98 posted:

Is the Ghosn escape getting a lot of attention in the Japanese media? Are people angry or indifferent about a foreign CEO fleeing Japanese justice?

Oh god yes. On the news every night. On the talk shows (both very staid news shows and also “let’s ask celebrities what they think of the news” ones).

Heer98 posted:

Knowing very little about his case, my guess is that he was probably corrupt in some meaningful ways, but not necessarily more so than is the norm for senior executives in a Japanese company, and was essentially so fled out because he’s foreign. Am I really far off the mark here?

So you need to know three things before you dive deeper into the story:

  • Renault and Nissan are allies, not joint companies. Renault has more of the stake of value, but Nissan — by volume and revenue — is a much bigger company.
  • Renault is partially owned by the French government
  • Japanese laws changed in the last two years regarding plea bargains

Ghosn is the CEO who brought Nissan into the alliance with Renault, and ran it as CEO of both for almost twenty years. As recently as mid-late 2018 he had been discussing a merger of Renault and Nissan. In early 2019, Ghosn was arrested on incredibly flimsy charges of financial impropriety regarding his pay, and almost immediately removed as CEO of Nissan.

Tl;dr IMO this was a palace coups because factions didn’t want Japan’s second-largest automaker to be owned by a foreign company, which in turn is partially owned by a foreign country.

It’s also bringing out questions of Japan and if the justice system needs reform, but what’s dominating conversation is Ghosn himself.

mystes
May 31, 2006

harperdc posted:

Tl;dr IMO this was a palace coups because factions didn’t want Japan’s second-largest automaker to be owned by a foreign company, which in turn is partially owned by a foreign country.
That's Ghosn's story, which may very well be true, but it's not really possible for us to know.

There have also been claims that Ghosn was embezzling money and IIRC even according to the first article in the Shuukan Bunshun after Ghosn's arrest they were reporting that it was actually suspicions of embezzlement that caused Nissan to launch an internal investigation initially. The prosecutors may only have charged him with understating his pay first because it was the easiest way to keep him in detention while looking into more serious charges, and we don't know what evidence prosecutors had about any other charges they hadn't indicted him for yet. Also, I think he is also under investigation for similar things in France now, although of course that investigation may also be purely political..

The negative foreign perception of the Japanese justice system had getting some attention before, but the coverage has become much more negative now that Ghosn has fled to Lebanon, with people saying that he shouldn't have been released on bail in the first place, so there is probably zero chance of any sort of justice reform now.

Heer98
Apr 10, 2009

harperdc posted:

Ghosn is the CEO who brought Nissan into the alliance with Renault, and ran it as CEO of both for almost twenty years. As recently as mid-late 2018 he had been discussing a merger of Renault and Nissan. In early 2019, Ghosn was arrested on incredibly flimsy charges of financial impropriety regarding his pay, and almost immediately removed as CEO of Nissan.

Tl;dr IMO this was a palace coups because factions didn’t want Japan’s second-largest automaker to be owned by a foreign company, which in turn is partially owned by a foreign country.


This is an interesting aspect of the story that I hadn’t heard elsewhere, thanks!

Unfortunately this awesome escape story hasn’t been present in the press at all, with the never ending trump/primary stories dominating the news cycle.

Tuxedo Gin
May 21, 2003

Classy.

No reason why it can't both be politically motivated and also him being a typical rich fucker that does money crimes.

harperdc
Jul 24, 2007

Tuxedo Gin posted:

No reason why it can't both be politically motivated and also him being a typical rich fucker that does money crimes.

It’s definitely a mix of this — Ghosn was very well respected for leading Nissan out of the shits in the 1990s, but was also viewed in recent years as taking “too much” for a CEO in compensation, which reflects right into this case. There was also talk that he would only want to talk with the very top of politicians in France — presidents, not ministers.

That just makes him an all-world ego case, but doesn’t necessarily make him incorrect.

IMO the more interesting and valuable legal case now is Scott McIntyre’s.

https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1217409660917112832

mystes
May 31, 2006

harperdc posted:


IMO the more interesting and valuable legal case now is Scott McIntyre’s.

https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1217409660917112832
This isn't an international abduction case or anything, right? They were both living in Japan and his wife just left with the kids when they separated?

harperdc
Jul 24, 2007

mystes posted:

This isn't an international abduction case or anything, right? They were both living in Japan and his wife just left with the kids when they separated?

International no, but stacked in one favor yes. The more interesting angle is how Japanese law does or does not comply with international treaties to which Japan is a party.

mystes
May 31, 2006

harperdc posted:

International no, but stacked in one favor yes.
What do you mean by "stacked in one favor"? Stacked in favor of the wife in the case of a divorce? Or something else?

quote:

The more interesting angle is how Japanese law does or does not comply with international treaties to which Japan is a party.
I guess they're technically in violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child by not allowing kids access to both parents, but nobody really cares about stuff like this when it's purely a question of domestic law. It's not like a situation where the parents have joint custody in another country and one parent illegally takes the child back to Japan, in which case Japan would be violating the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction if it didn't return the child.

In theory someone could try to sue the government on the basis of treaties being self-executing under Article 98 of the constitution but that's a joke at this point.

I suspect the Japanese government will eventually change the law to clarify how visitations work and enforce them, anyway. It would be better if they also added the idea of joint custody as an option but I wouldn't hold my breath on that happening any time soon.

Wittgen
Oct 13, 2012

We have decided to decline your offer of a butt kicking.
I mean, a parent can absolutely kidnap their own children. You see it sometimes, especially when an abusive parent uses their visitation rights as an opening to just disappear with them. It's a terrible thing.

I feel like this story is only really giving the guy's version of events. Maybe the wife just disappeared with the kids and is being really horrible through this divorce. Maybe she's protecting them and herself from a monster. Who knows. Given that he got fired for criticizing a national holiday and also is willing to make news of it, I would assume more towards the wife being kind of lovely. It does seem really bad that there is no recourse to make sure the kids are OK. Courts can mess up when deciding custody rights, but it seems pretty bad if one parent can just take the kids with impunity.

It also seems bad that a guy arrested for non-forceful unauthorized entry would be put in a cell with a convicted murderer. And also the lights never shut off? Gotta love the criminal justice system.

harperdc
Jul 24, 2007

mystes posted:

What do you mean by "stacked in one favor"? Stacked in favor of the wife in the case of a divorce? Or something else?

To my knowledge, one side can file papers and get a unilateral divorce in Japan. And in most cases the mother retains 100% custody of kids.

Mr. Fix It
Oct 26, 2000

💀ayyy💀


harperdc posted:

To my knowledge, one side can file papers and get a unilateral divorce in Japan. And in most cases the mother retains 100% custody of kids.

There's no such thing as shared custody in Japan, iirc, so whoever gets custody gets 100%.

LimburgLimbo
Feb 10, 2008

harperdc posted:

To my knowledge, one side can file papers and get a unilateral divorce in Japan. And in most cases the mother retains 100% custody of kids.

I thought it was more that one spouse could easily take the others hanko and do it without them knowing, rather than truly unilaterally being able to do so.

mystes
May 31, 2006

As Mr. Fix It said, there is no such thing as joint custody in Japan. In almost all cases the mother will get custody. As of the 2011 version of the civil code, visitation theoretically can/should be worked out in divorce mediation but it seems like there isn't any enforcement if the parent with custody doesn't allow the other parent access.

From the perspective of the Japanese legal system, it is totally normal for the mother to take the kids and leave in a separation and there is no obligation to provide the father access while the divorce in progress (and still virtually no obligation even if visitation is arranged in mediation).

Since the guy in this story has no right to access to his kids, in the eyes of the Japanese legal system, he's just a creep who broke into the common area of his soon-to-be ex wife's apartment building when she didn't want him there. If the cops got called it's not at all surprising that he was charged with trespassing.

Unfortunately, if his wife doesn't want to allow him visitations with his kids there's not really anything he can do, but saying that he should be able to go into his wife's apartment building when she doesn't want him there is absolutely not the solution.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





I feel like a regime that rips apart children and their parents doesn't really have the legitimacy to act when one of the parents takes matters into their own hands to try to confirm whether their children are even still alive after a natural disaster. If he kidnapped those kids back to his country of origin I can't say I'd have a problem with it - just by virtue of the parent denying their own children the ability to see their other parent, they have demonstrated they are unfit to raise them. The Japanese government is free to deal with these matters justly if they feel they have an interest in people not behaving like this. Until then, gently caress 'em.

I've got an acquaintance going through exactly this: his wife, who has a history of violence, just loving took off and instigated a divorce, and as far as the Japanese authorities are concerned he has no rights. He will probably not see his children again for many years, if ever.

MSDOS KAPITAL fucked around with this message at 11:16 on Jan 18, 2020

mystes
May 31, 2006

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

I've got an acquaintance going through exactly this: his wife, who has a history of violence, just loving took off and instigated a divorce, and as far as the Japanese authorities are concerned he has no rights. He will probably not see his children again for many years, if ever.
It may not be a great option, but apparently the one thing he can do short of trying to to fight her in court for custody based on her history of violence would be to arrange for visitations in the divorce procedures, wait for her to refuse the visitations, and then sue her. Courts can fine parents for refusing the visitations they are supposed to be providing, and the fines were apparently low before but it seems like they have been increasing in the last few years with cases like this: https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20170121/p2a/00m/0na/018000c

The main problems with this seem to be 1) having to go through the whole process and getting the court to arrange visitations, wait for the ex wife to refuse them, and then try to sue which will take a long time, 2) visitations are supposed to be based on the best interests of the child and the ex wife's lawyers will naturally try to argue that the child doesn't want to see his/her father and is upset by the visitations, and 3) even if this works, the frequency of visitations is usually extremely low anyway (like once per month).

I do think fact that the fines are increasing may be a sign that there is some awareness of this issue and something will eventually happen, but it will probably still be at least 5-10 years before any changes happen (since the civil code doesn't get revised that often and there is already a revision that was enacted a while ago and is scheduled to go into effect in a couple months).

Also, it appears that the spouse with custody will often state fear of abduction as a reason for not wanting to allow visitations, so if there are cases where spouses who aren't Japanese citizens actually use visitations to abduct the children this might lead to courts not wanting to grant visitations.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





mystes posted:

Also, it appears that the spouse with custody will often state fear of abduction as a reason for not wanting to allow visitations, so if there are cases where spouses who aren't Japanese citizens actually use visitations to abduct the children this might lead to courts not wanting to grant visitations.
I think saying to a person whose children have already abducted, effectively a state-sanctioned child abduction, not to take matters into their own hands because if they do, the state will sanction more child abductions, is going to be a hard sell.

mystes
May 31, 2006

Trying to abduct your children back also just seems like an extremely bad idea in all sorts of other ways, but what do I know.

prisoner of waffles
May 8, 2007

Ah! well a-day! what evil looks
Had I from old and young!
Instead of the cross, the fishmech
About my neck was hung.

mystes posted:

Trying to abduct your children back also just seems like an extremely bad idea in all sorts of other ways, but what do I know.

:emptyquote:

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Yeah it's definitely a bad situation all around no matter what you do. If only Japan could put together some kind of coherent legal framework in the best interests of justice for the children and their parents. If only there were examples they could draw upon to do this :thunk:

Like I said if you think there is a state and societal interest here in smoothing these things over I'm completely in agreement of course. If the position of the state is that first parent to kidnap wins, well then the state has effectively abdicated their responsibility here.

captkirk
Feb 5, 2010
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOJAxf9XpoQ

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1222076615783522304

CottonWolf
Jul 20, 2012

Good ideas generator

Yeah. Looks like there's secondary spread in multiple countries now.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
https://twitter.com/Buckeye_Blue/status/1227939317567381507

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
I think this comic was originally made to show Japan government and civilians being supportive of China, but feel free to make more jokes.

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.
Japan is about to be on the sick bed too. It seems like the government there is not doing a good job at containment, even compared to China. Maybe I'm wrong.

America Inc. fucked around with this message at 21:37 on Feb 18, 2020

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

EasternBronze
Jul 19, 2011

I registered for the Selective Service! I'm also racist as fuck!
:downsbravo:
Don't forget to ignore me!
As someone who pays into the pension system in Japan, I can't say I am overly worried about it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply