Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Voting Floater
May 19, 2019

Wow, that was a lot to process. It felt a little Moffat-lite and I'm not entirely sure I understood all of what was going on, but I enjoyed the experience and I'll put it down as the best episodes that Chibnall's written so far.

I'm surprised to see Chibnall lurching back so hard into deep continuity and I'm not sure how it'll go down with the general audience. I enjoyed it though and expect it'll play well with fans who criticised last series for being too simple.


Jerusalem posted:

Contact! When was the last time they used that? 3rd Doctor?

I watched the Three Doctors not too long ago, so I was very happy to have got that reference. "You're not the only one who can do Classic" was a terrible pun, but I kind of love it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cargohills
Apr 18, 2014

i thought it was a load of crap. the off-screen resolution was like a parody of doctor who, they've regressed back to the RTD status quo wrt Gallifrey for no apparent reason, and Sacha Dhawan struggles to make much of an impression as the Master through the very dull writing.

oh and the companions spend the whole time milling about doing nothing interesting. and the Doctor makes some famous friends!! who she likes a lot for no real reason and then get shoved away from the screen so Chibnall can reference the TCE or contact or logopolis or whatever. saw it compared to The Rise of Skywalker on twitter which i think is very apt

OldMemes
Sep 5, 2011

I have to go now. My planet needs me.
One of the things I thought about last season was that it felt a bit disconnected from the rest of the franchise, so it's nice to see a series a bit more grounded in continuity. I'm not a huge fan of a deep dive into the history of the Time Lords, since it's better left vague aside from a few bits of information.

I wasn't a big fan of John Simms' Master (except for the last episode, where he had a beard), but really liked Michelle Gomez. Sacha Dhawan really grew on me, but yeah trying to understand the Master's timeline except in broad strokes is madness. I guess he can just regenerate again, roll with it.

Harlock
Jan 15, 2006

Tap "A" to drink!!!

Last season - all new monsters dont think about the whole mythos.

This season two episodes in - let's do it all

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


:hellyeah: :f5:


That was great.



Also did anyone notice that The Master had a First Doc costume thing going on in the one shot we had of his full body hologram?

Also I realized watching this one that the Doctor's tuxedo has a lot of 11 in it, with the bowtie and long coat.

SimplyCosmic
May 18, 2004

It could be worse.

Not sure how, but it could be.
Season-long puzzle boxes never work as well as the writers think.

Especially when the implication is that the Time Lords did something terrible in their past and that's shocking. When, really, most of Time Lord history has alternated between being self-important, staid non-interventionalists and horrible, corrupt monsters worse than any of the Doctor's enemies.

Using time scoops to force untold numbers to fight in the Death Zone to killing everyone on Earth by transporting the planet across time and space to prevent a few minor secrets from being retrieved by spies.

Instead of killing the Time Lords one more time, I'd rather they brought them back to the background of Who and treated them like Lovecraftian Old Ones. An ancient race that rarely appears and that even most advanced civilizations hoped wouldn't notice them for their continued existence. I'd like for the Doctor to be afraid of their own people like they were when they arrived at the end of The War Games.

Mokinokaro
Sep 11, 2001

At the end of everything, hold onto anything



Fun Shoe

Harlock posted:

Last season - all new monsters dont think about the whole mythos.

This season two episodes in - let's do it all

Yeah we had both new (cool) monsters AND the Master in an episode that held together quite strongly.

In some ways, it really was The Last of the Timelords done better.

PriorMarcus
Oct 17, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT BEING ALLERGIC TO POSITIVITY

cargohills posted:

i thought it was a load of crap. the off-screen resolution was like a parody of doctor who, they've regressed back to the RTD status quo wrt Gallifrey for no apparent reason, and Sacha Dhawan struggles to make much of an impression as the Master through the very dull writing.

oh and the companions spend the whole time milling about doing nothing interesting. and the Doctor makes some famous friends!! who she likes a lot for no real reason and then get shoved away from the screen so Chibnall can reference the TCE or contact or logopolis or whatever. saw it compared to The Rise of Skywalker on twitter which i think is very apt

Between destroying Gallifrey and making the Master gleefully evil again Chibnail clearly decided he wasn't a fan of a lot of late game Moffat ideas.

And good for him, because Moffat clearly wasn't a fan on lots of Davis ideas and over ruled them too.

Gaz-L
Jan 28, 2009

PriorMarcus posted:

Between destroying Gallifrey and making the Master gleefully evil again Chibnail clearly decided he wasn't a fan of a lot of late game Moffat ideas.

And good for him, because Moffat clearly wasn't a fan on lots of Davis ideas and over ruled them too.

It does have the faint whiff of comic book retconning though. If all you do is undo the last person's story, then you never get around to telling your own. A much better strategy, in my eyes, is either to ignore what you don't want to deal with (which is SUPER easy with Who) or to "yes and" the last person's choices. Don't try to 'fix' them, use them as your springboard and build off them, because surely if you're better than the last guy, you can use their foundation to tell a way better story.

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


JacquelineDempsey posted:

I can't put it in those terms because I've only seen the first season of Sherlock, but...

If you've got wicked insomnia like I do, you could do worse than binge the whole thing until 6am. I've also read the original novel, and have a soft spot for the 1992 film (Gary Oldman can do no wrong, imo), so it was an interesting take on the subject. The ending saw a bit of me actually gasping, because I did not see that coming.

I'm no expert on tv/film reviews so I don't know how to convey my opinions without revealing too much, but my bottom line is: yeah it's cool and worth a few hours of your time.

Also: we started watching with an 8 year old in the room. It is is absolutely not appropriate for children, just putting that out. Not the gore, but a nun specifically asking "did you have sexual intercourse with X" was not a question Auntie JD wanted to answer if the kiddo asked what that meant. That's when my husband and I I said "WELP GOING TO BED NOW, GOODNIGHT"

An 8 year old asking what that means should be answered. Don’t be sex negative to your kid. The world is hosed up as it is.

SiKboy
Oct 28, 2007

Oh no!😱

PriorMarcus posted:

Between destroying Gallifrey and making the Master gleefully evil again Chibnail clearly decided he wasn't a fan of a lot of late game Moffat ideas.

And good for him, because Moffat clearly wasn't a fan on lots of Davis ideas and over ruled them too.

I dont think anyone (including Moffat) ever thought the Master not being evil was going to stick. You could even argue that its one of the reasons that Moffat killed off Missy; The next showrunner was free to then do whatever version of the Master they wanted.

OldMemes
Sep 5, 2011

I have to go now. My planet needs me.
The Master wiping out the Time Lords (even in their weakened, post war state) seems a little silly. I'm assuming they'll be more to that at some point.

Emerson Cod
Apr 14, 2004

by Pragmatica
There's a ton of stuff throughout the show and extended media that hints at some sort of special connection between the Time Lords and humanity beyond looking similar. If the big revelation is that Time Lords are descended from humans or vice versa that wouldn't be the craziest thing and would work pretty well as a season long mystery. Also the Citadel has been blown up plenty of times and come back. In one of the Gallifrey audios they even grafted a version from an alternative future onto the spot where the previous was one when it got blown up by, I want to say werewolves?

Though, that does seem to confirm that this Master is post-Missy.

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.
it me I liked the first and second episode

what of it :colbert:

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

Chokes McGee posted:

it me I liked the first and second episode

what of it :colbert:

Sounds like you're in good company then, many of us in this thread did too!

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

Jerusalem posted:

Sounds like you're in good company then, many of us in this thread did too!

but some do not

we usually agree on everything in this thread, I dun understaaaahnd it

Mokinokaro
Sep 11, 2001

At the end of everything, hold onto anything



Fun Shoe

OldMemes posted:

The Master wiping out the Time Lords (even in their weakened, post war state) seems a little silly. I'm assuming they'll be more to that at some point.

Yeah, even if he did wipe out Gallifrey he must've suckered some BIG support in to help him that's probably going to backfire in the long run as most of his plans do. Or he's being a shitter and taking credit for something he had no part in.

It does feel perfectly in character for the Master to do such a thing if the Time Lords tried to control him again though. Still, I wouldn't be surprised if a bunch of Gallifreyans survived by evacuating to a new safe spot to escape whatever happened.

Mokinokaro fucked around with this message at 02:50 on Jan 6, 2020

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

Mokinokaro posted:

Yeah, even if he did wipe out Gallifrey he must've suckered some BIG support in to help him that's probably going to backfire in the long run as most of his plans do. Or he's being a shitter and taking credit for something he had no part in.

somewhere a faint "exterminate" echoes across the universe

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

But it's high-pitched because the Master has pumped their casings with helium again like he did before the TV Movie.

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008

DroneRiff posted:

Yeah "The Timeless Child" thing will 100% turn out to be a wet fart. Not eveything needs to be the grand mutli-reality chess plan and saving the whole universe

At the moment it sounds like it’s heading in a “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” direction, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. And it’s interesting to think that both the Doctor and the Master would be furious at grounding an entire society upon the suffering of one being.

If we can get away from saving the universe and make it more about trying to right an eon’s-old wrong even if that means sacrifice, that could be interesting. Or, you know, a disaster. But Doctor Who is better when it’s trying and failing than when it’s playing everything safe.

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug
1. Ok, some good Bill and Ted time fixing stuff. Like that. However how did the Doc know to put the stickers for Ryan to see?
She would either have had to contact them again after she ran off to ask what they did EXACTLY, or she did it trial and error and watched them die a few times until it was perfected.
2. If he wasn't killed by the Nazis' was he sent off to a concentration camp?
3. Does the Master have his own TARDIS? If so, why didn't the evil TARDIS sentience keep out the Doctor from using it?

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer
I'm glad it's more ambitious than last season but I don't necessarily think that had to mean "Yet another enigmatic arc." Honestly parts of this felt repetitive- ANOTHER episode about phones-but-too-much, another episode where the companions are now hunted because the Master controls everything, a very Moffat-esque "we travelled in time to retroactively fix this" solution, and Gallifrey's gone again.

Mokinokaro
Sep 11, 2001

At the end of everything, hold onto anything



Fun Shoe

happyhippy posted:


3. Does the Master have his own TARDIS? If so, why didn't the evil TARDIS sentience keep out the Doctor from using it?

He hasn't had a TARDIS since back in the old series. He uses some kind of unrelated stolen time travel tech.

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

happyhippy posted:

1. Ok, some good Bill and Ted time fixing stuff. Like that. However how did the Doc know to put the stickers for Ryan to see?
She would either have had to contact them again after she ran off to ask what they did EXACTLY, or she did it trial and error and watched them die a few times until it was perfected.
2. If he wasn't killed by the Nazis' was he sent off to a concentration camp?
3. Does the Master have his own TARDIS? If so, why didn't the evil TARDIS sentience keep out the Doctor from using it?

1. the doctor has been time travelling for over a thousand years and is an expert at engineering events to unfold a certain way on the first shot. other than that, wibbly wobbly etc.
2. no, he had a really clever idea
3. he's had them before just not in the new series until now. also tardises aren't necessarily evil they just do whatever they're told. it's implied that the doctor's is potentially defective (and already a museum piece) which accounts for its quirks and personality

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


Doctor who is at its best when the episodes are ambitious at the expense of any wider continuity and at its worst when it tries really hard to make poo poo internally consistent at the expense of the immediate storytelling.

The former is the tone that I got from Spyfall, so I'm totally on board for series 12 (season 38).


Also did you notice that the Master's facial hair grew in over the two episodes? Dollars to donuts that he's sporting the full Roger next time we see him.

Astroman
Apr 8, 2001


SiKboy posted:

But I am EXTREMELY leery of them exploring any "origins of the time lords" stuff.



Diwan was great as the Master. I liked him in Adventure in Space and Time and it's good to see him back. The right mix of suave, menace, and unhinged glee. drat shame I was spoiled on it by my news feed and YouTube the day after airing. It's getting ridiculous.

HardKase
Jul 15, 2007
TASTY
Haven't watched part 2 yet but I just realised something watching the catch up part.

If Daniel Barton is 93% human, he is 5% less human than a chimpanzee.

howe_sam
Mar 7, 2013

Creepy little garbage eaters

a modern convenience threatening to doom humanity (and a companion's family) was some big time RTD energy.

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

That might have been a rare case of part 2 being better than part 1? That was really good, and I feel like the Eiffel Tower scene might have been Jodie’s best work as the Doctor so far. She was absolutely the Doctor there in a way I feel like she hadn’t previously hit at all. I loved her “I don’t like what you’re wearing.”

Sacha Dhawan has been a crush for a few years (and was my choice to replace Capaldi, honestly), so I feel a bit odd fancying the Master. I’ve rapidly come to terms with it though, because he’s some great casting. I’m going to call it that he’s almost certainly back this season.

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

I love that the Master brings up causing the 4th Doctor's death, asks if he ever apologized for it, and declares,"Good" when he learns he hasn't :allears:

Also the Master has a TARDIS but not in the same sense that the Doctor does. She's been using the same TARDIS for 1000s of years, treats it like a home AND a best friend (and kinda sorta a wife) and the two have a connection unheard of for other Time Lords. It was already "defunct" when she stole it, so it was already past the age that Time Lords usually allow them to live/operate, probably to avoid it developing anything remotely close to sentience and she's just piled on the miles onto it since then.

The Master by comparison uses his solely as a means of transport, certainly would never deign to allow a relationship to develop with a "machine" and this latest one is probably the latest in a long series he uses and discards at will, probably from Gallifrey when he went back recently.

Edit: I also like to think he's arrogant enough that he thought the perception filter would be enough and didn't even bother to lock the door when he landed in Paris, and when the Doctor went to "lockpick" it the door just swung open.

Astroman
Apr 8, 2001


howe_sam posted:

a modern convenience threatening to doom humanity (and a companion's family) was some big time RTD energy.

"Say my name" and the whole "we're watching you, you're public enemy numbers 1, 2, and 3--now RUN!" was very "Sound of Drums"

And, of course, the actual sound of drums from the Master's head.

HardKase
Jul 15, 2007
TASTY
Great start, but it ends the same way as bill and Ted's excellent adventure.

Also she's a telepath now?

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

HardKase posted:

Also she's a telepath now?

That's been a thing going back to the early 1970s.

HardKase
Jul 15, 2007
TASTY

Jerusalem posted:

That's been a thing going back to the early 1970s.

Yeah I just remembered, but it doesn't come up often.

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


Jerusalem posted:

That's been a thing going back to the early 1970s.

The three doctors!

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

HardKase posted:

Yeah I just remembered, but it doesn't come up often.

It came up in Doctors Wife when hr senses the other time lords.

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug
Why didn't the Master just then help the Nazis win WW2?
He doesn't give a poo poo about causality.

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

That 77 years of the Master living on Earth is a nice Big Finish opening.

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

The_Doctor posted:

That 77 years of the Master living on Earth is a nice Big Finish opening.

Nick Briggs thought of 4000 possible stories the moment that line came up. 150 of which don't even have Daleks in them!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

Avoiding tripping into his own plans around the 70s/80s must have been the hardest.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply