Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Thoguh
Nov 8, 2002

College Slice

VitalSigns posted:

If Billy opposes Medicare For All because having health care makes him feel superior to the poors, he's part of the problem and the persecution complex those people have about being told this fact is unbelievable

The person you're attacking because they said they make six figures did literally the exact opposite of that though and said they recognize how good they have it and how easily it could all go away.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ozmunkeh
Feb 28, 2008

hey guys what is happening in this thread

Mellow Seas posted:

Yeah, rather than saying “it’s INSANE for a household to have $120k of income” we should be pointing out that even people who are 90th percentile in this stupid country don’t have genuine financial security.

This should be the real focus instead of bickering over some arbitrary income cutoff.

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009

kidkissinger posted:

We need to do both

:hmmyes:

Although just gutting the military would easily pay for M4A and in-state tuition.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Thoguh posted:

The person you're attacking because they said they make six figures did literally the exact opposite of that though and said they recognize how good they have it and how easily it could all go away.

I'm not attacking that person (oxsnard), I'm pointing out the conversation exists because other people were arguing against Medicare For All by imagining unreasonable positions, attributing them to imaginary HENRYs who aren't even here, and then demanding these impossible concerns be placated

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Thoguh posted:

The person you're attacking because they said they make six figures did literally the exact opposite of that though and said they recognize how good they have it and how easily it could all go away.

eh, I don't feel attacked. It's ok. I think it's a healthy discussion to have

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

VitalSigns posted:

I'm not attacking that person (oxsnard), I'm pointing out the conversation exists because other people were arguing against Medicare For All by imagining unreasonable positions, attributing them to imaginary HENRYs who aren't even here, and then demanding these impossible concerns be placated

:hfive:

we're cool

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009
Also: https://www.laweekly.com/it-takes-nearly-100000-a-year-in-income-to-rent-an-average-l-a-house/

It takes almost 100k a year just to rent a house in LA. That's the real criminal act. Kill all real-estate vultures and use their bones as the foundations for rent-controlled housing.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003
real talk, if anyone itt is interested in making $80-100k at a union job within a few years and is ok with moving, PM me

joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012

Thoguh posted:

The person you're attacking because they said they make six figures did literally the exact opposite of that though and said they recognize how good they have it and how easily it could all go away.

This entire stupid derail started because Shbobdb was concern trolling that people making 200k a year in insurance would lose their jobs and that while he is *totally* for M4A we can't really propose without doing more to assuage the hurt feelings of people making 200k a year.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

ratbert90 posted:

Also: https://www.laweekly.com/it-takes-nearly-100000-a-year-in-income-to-rent-an-average-l-a-house/

It takes almost 100k a year just to rent a house in LA. That's the real criminal act. Kill all real-estate vultures and use their bones as the foundations for rent-controlled housing.

It’s almost like housing and food and clothing should be basic human rights and while Bernie’s policies are good they only scratch the surface of the problems with our world.

We’re here debating on how mean we can be to people making six figures while billions in the global south have nothing. Have some goddamn perspective please.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Lightning Knight posted:

It’s almost like housing and food and clothing should be basic human rights and while Bernie’s policies are good they only scratch the surface of the problems with our world.

We’re here debating on how mean we can be to people making six figures while billions in the global south have nothing. Have some goddamn perspective please.

I agree, but pitting everyone lower than them against each other is key tactic the capital class uses to maintain power, so it's an important discussion to have imo

Faustian Bargain
Apr 12, 2014


VitalSigns posted:

I'm not attacking that person (oxsnard), I'm pointing out the conversation exists because other people were arguing against Medicare For All by imagining unreasonable positions, attributing them to imaginary HENRYs who aren't even here, and then demanding these impossible concerns be placated
I wasn't trying to attack oxsnard either. I think the argument about being concerned with whatever the 200k/year insurance adjusters will do and we definitely need their support is idiotic, which I don't think oxsnard was this person.

Sorry oxsnard :shobon:

I want everyone to have M4A so there is reason to bring up standards instead of whoever has the most money gets the best care. I make over 100k a year and have good insurance on top of that. If I lost my job it would be a problem, but much less of a problem than someone making even half of what I make. No one should worry about losing everything because they got sick, and there shouldn't be tiers of care based on how much money you have.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008
I think part of the problem with the discussion is some people are using terms like "six figures" "over 100k" as an implied standard of living as opposed to absolute dollar amounts. Our goal should be to bring everyone *up* to that standard of living (financial security, good education for their kids, healthcare, etc), and I think people are interpreting certain comments as we need to bring people who have that down, which I don't think anyone is actually saying.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Faustian Bargain posted:

I wasn't trying to attack oxsnard either. I think the argument about being concerned with whatever the 200k/year insurance adjusters will do and we definitely need their support is idiotic, which I don't think oxsnard was this person.

Sorry oxsnard :shobon:

I want everyone to have M4A so there is reason to bring up standards instead of whoever has the most money gets the best care. I make over 100k a year and have good insurance on top of that. If I lost my job it would be a problem, but much less of a problem than someone making even half of what I make. No one should worry about losing everything because they got sick.

seriously, it's all good. I have thick skin and don't feel attacked

Bald Stalin
Jul 11, 2004

Our posts

Kraftwerk posted:

I don’t wanna defend anyone making 200k per year because it really is an obscene sum of money.
But generally the only places you make that kind of money are in places where 1Bedroom apartments rent for 2500/month.

Bolding mine.

My 1960s 1 bedroom apartment with no improvements or 'luxuries' (though we do have an on-site washer/dryer that is $4 per load...) is $3000 a month. My $120,000 gross a year salary immediately becomes $84,000. A previous poster 'joked' about guillotining anyone making over 100k; Not everyone lives in Ohio.

Wicked Them Beats posted:

though it might have a slight pay cut (everyone making over $100k should get a pay cut (via guillotine)).

Give me guaranteed quality healthcare and I'll quit my job, move somewhere else and fight for our climate. :toxx:

Bald Stalin fucked around with this message at 17:40 on Jan 7, 2020

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

oxsnard posted:

I agree, but pitting everyone lower than them against each other is key tactic the capital class uses to maintain power, so it's an important discussion to have imo

The problem with this view as applied to the PMC class is that most of them are fully willing to be henchmen for capital.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Cerebral Bore posted:

The problem with this view as applied to the PMC class is that most of them are fully willing to be henchmen for capital.

i posted this above, but a lot of that has to do with race as well. Rural chuds living at the poverty line are just as willing to do the same

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009
I'm beginning to think that Joe Biden's recent "I was against the Iraq invasion from the beginning!" gambit may not have been a wise one.:thunk:

https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1214529955637448704

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002



Functional social services would actually make life better for top few%ers anyways. Better public transit opens up more lanes for cybertrux or stretch limos or whatever it is they use, for example. Less crime. I suppose it would be harder to scrape the money for 50k+ private schools and personal MRI machines but thems the breaks

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008
It's bringing attention to the fact that he says things like "come to our milk" :barf:

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

oxsnard posted:

i posted this above, but a lot of that has to do with race as well. Rural chuds living at the poverty line are just as willing to do the same

Rurla chuds aren't in a position to be henchmen for capital on account of having no real power to speak of when compared to the PMC. This one of the reasons for why class analysis is absolutely critical.

Ornedan
Nov 4, 2009


Cybernetic Crumb

TVs Ian posted:

Probably some form of instant runoff voting. Keep the 15% threshold for the final delegate counts, but make sure something that shows x% of candidate 1's votes were the second choice of candidate 2 voters, or however it breaks down.

I'm sure there's still some flaw there, but at least it would let candidates who might be focusing on one issue be able to show support for it without making the final nomination to messy.

Why do you need to retain the delegate system for selecting the presidential candidate? Select the candidate directly using an instant runoff (or approval or similar) vote. Probably needs to be combined with just one voting period (vote day + early voting) rather than separate per-state election periods, otherwise the tactilol voting aspects just shift around.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Cerebral Bore posted:

Rurla chuds aren't in a position to be henchmen for capital on account of having no real power to speak of when compared to the PMC. This one of the reasons for why class analysis is absolutely critical.

I'm a member of the PMC. What powers do I have? I'm genuinely curious what you mean by this

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

oxsnard posted:

I'm a member of the PMC. What powers do I have? I'm genuinely curious what you mean by this

See, this is exactly why you and other liberals keep missing the point. You immediately think that power has to be held held by an individual rather that understanding that power is held by a class as a whole. And a class that holds more power and uses it to aid and protect the oligarchy should obviously be of a far greater concern that a class that has been deliberately relegated to near-powerlessness in society.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

oxsnard posted:

I'm a member of the PMC. What powers do I have? I'm genuinely curious what you mean by this

Your deep thoughts get posted on LinkedIn or Medium. Theirs go on Facebook. You have guides and books and courses and coaches that can help you perform the expectations society has for you. They have people calling them names if they do the wrong thing. You get training and advancement opportunities just showing up to work. They get voluntary unpaid overtime. Your concerns fit neatly in the mouths of legislators, or at least more neatly than theirs do. You speak the language that gets managers to understand your concerns and bend policy or kick it up the chain, their language only gets a finger pointing at a line in the employee manual as an answer.

I used to be poor, and now I'm not, and the main thing besides having more money that has changed is that I've noticed all the ways society coddles me and cushions me that it didn't used to.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Ornedan posted:

Why do you need to retain the delegate system for selecting the presidential candidate?

So the DNC can steal it if the voters vote wrong

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug

What the gently caress is PMC? Is it “professional middle class”? So you guys just hate anyone with a good job now?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Ogmius815 posted:

What the gently caress is PMC? Is it “professional middle class”? So you guys just hate anyone with a good job now?

Indeed, the "class" part of that phrase surely doesn't have anything to do with it. We hate them (even though many of us are in the PMC) for their jobs. And their freedoms.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

Ogmius815 posted:

What the gently caress is PMC? Is it “professional middle class”? So you guys just hate anyone with a good job now?

Professional Managerial Class. A proposed third class between Bourgeoise and proletariat.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Ogmius815 posted:

What the gently caress is PMC? Is it “professional middle class”? So you guys just hate anyone with a good job now?

If you’re a white collar worker with no self-awareness whatsoever of why blue collar workers, service workers, and other marginalized people might resent you and how that resentment is at least partially or mostly justified you are a fool.

I say this from my cubicle.

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Ogmius815 posted:

What the gently caress is PMC? Is it “professional middle class”? So you guys just hate anyone with a good job now?

Of course it would be you who gets real mad when the peons don't show enough deference to their betters.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Broadly speaking, people respond poorly to the "stop attacking people who make six figures" folks because it's literally the class equivalent of white people whining when minorities say negative things about them.

While there is a clear distinction between high-paid labor and capital in terms of the political power each group wields, there is also a clear distinction between high-paid labor and most of the working class in terms of their personal interests. Even if the former doesn't stand to lose much from socialism (or social democracy), they're generally going to end up on the wrong side because they have more to potentially lose than they do to gain and are risk averse as a result. It also doesn't help that their experiences are likely to isolate them from normal people.

Another way of putting things is that anyone making six figures who is capable of being driven away by people who say bad things about people making six figures is a bad person who never would have been any sort of ally in the first place. Again, the same logic as "white people who whine about minorities saying negative things about them."

Ranter posted:

My 1960s 1 bedroom apartment with no improvements or 'luxuries' (though we do have an on-site washer/dryer that is $4 per load...) is $3000 a month. My $120,000 gross a year salary immediately becomes $84,000. A previous poster 'joked' about guillotining anyone making over 100k; Not everyone lives in Ohio.

Part of the reason why the "cost of living is higher" argument doesn't really work is that it's more-or-less a flat deduction, and anyone making six figures is still going to be left with a very high income even after deducting the higher cost of living. Like, in your case, your post-housing salary is still extremely high.

The main difference it makes is that "mid-high 5 figure" incomes can become relatively low in places with high cost of living, but once you hit 6 figures you're still at least doing as well as a high 5-figure person in a low cost of living area (unless you're the only income raising a family or something).

Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 18:22 on Jan 7, 2020

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Cerebral Bore posted:

Rurla chuds aren't in a position to be henchmen for capital on account of having no real power to speak of when compared to the PMC. This one of the reasons for why class analysis is absolutely critical.

They have plenty of political power though. Considering Trump and countless terrible state Republicans wouldn't have gotten elected without them on his side.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

GlyphGryph posted:

They have plenty of political power though. Considering Trump and countless terrible state Republicans wouldn't have gotten elected without them on his side.

a Wyoming chud has voting power 4 times higher than I do for presidential elections and 30 times higher for the senate

Bushido Brown
Mar 30, 2011

It also takes a lot of intentional blindness to not see that a lot of political posturing is done directly to appeal to the six figures crowd. Look at Buttigieg and Warren's supporters, broadly. There's a reason that you see a certain type of well-credentialed, erudite politician, and it's not because that's the foremost care of the billionaire class. It's because those people speak to the six-figure crowd, which is the same group that helps fund their run, helps run and staff their campaigns, and so on.

Bushido Brown
Mar 30, 2011

oxsnard posted:

a Wyoming chud has voting power 4 times higher than I do for presidential elections and 30 times higher for the senate

People don't take efforts to cater to Wyoming chuds they way they do to people like you (or me) even if that's invisible to you.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Never get tired of people who have a billion ghoulish reasons why the working poor don't deserve healthcare, who melt down about being hated if someone says "no gently caress that, you're just a tool of capital and your reasons are bullshit propaganda billionaires fed to you to convince you you're a temporarily embarrassed member of their class"

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Bushido Brown posted:

People don't take efforts to cater to Wyoming chuds they way they do to people like you (or me) even if that's invisible to you.

Well by Wyoming chuds do you mean the wealthy conservative coal mining executives or do you mean the guy driving the truck at the coal mine?

rscott
Dec 10, 2009
Poor whites actually split about evenly between Trump and Clinton, FYI, Trump's base is people making 70-150k a year

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

GlyphGryph posted:

They have plenty of political power though. Considering Trump and countless terrible state Republicans wouldn't have gotten elected without them on his side.

This is tantamount to saying that black people actually have plenty of political power because a whole lot of Dems wouldn't have been elected without their votes. The fact of the matter is that political power in the US has been thoroughly decoupled from the wishes of the electorate. Granted, the GOP is more responsive to its voters on some issues, but still.

Also it bears repeating the GOP base is and always has been suburban middle class assholes. Hell, poor rural redneck caricatures most likely don't even vote in the first place.

oxsnard posted:

a Wyoming chud has voting power 4 times higher than I do for presidential elections and 30 times higher for the senate

Both you and the Wyoming chud as individuals are completely and utterly irrelevant, hth. Any individual vote is irrelevant. The only way that you can understand what's really going on in by realizing that political power is always wielded by groups.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply