|
Chris leaving the office with dignity
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 09:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 01:02 |
|
TheAgent posted:hello Years of building those pipelines finally paid off! Pixelate posted:Chris leaving the office with dignity
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 09:45 |
|
Zzr posted:Nothing wrong with a tour of dick snacking. Tickler in black would want to have a word with you.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 09:55 |
|
PC gaming saved? Check. https://youtu.be/SvZVyf5mi08
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 11:29 |
|
MedicineHut posted:PC gaming saved? Check. https://youtu.be/SvZVyf5mi08?t=259 Star Citizen: I Can't Do This Anymore
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 12:18 |
|
https://youtu.be/O5BJVO3PDeQ It's interesting how an indie studio that got into more than they could chew and hosed up got universally trashed by the audience and the press alike (the very same press that put them in that impossible situation in the first place). Despite all that, in the end they actually fixed their product. On the other hand, you have a project lead by a two decades old forgotten has been, whose lying in plain sight has been documented from day one. One outrageous claim after the other. One JPG scam after the other. And yet, up until recently, the only criticism you could read in the gaming "press" was the usual "well they're late but it sure is innovative and never done before" BS. I wonder if Crobberts is gonna sell his house and operate on a loss to fix the farce that is gonna be whatever "final release" of SC/SQ54 is gonna be.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 12:45 |
|
Agony Aunt posted:That's the list it keeps getting pulled from by wikipedia editors isn't it? Because its only for release games? Yeah, but what I got from the Talk page, the financials published after the Calder investment has finally lead to SC being on it again.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 12:48 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:Yeah it feels pretty desperate. They haven't fundamentally done the work to make this an mmo yet. Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising had 150 player servers in 2004
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 13:32 |
|
Zzr posted:Nothing wrong with a tour of dick snacking. Pro-tip, try them with yogurt and pineapple.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 13:40 |
|
Hav posted:...........They’re getting *so close* now. 0 to 60 in seven years. Hey stop doxxing my '69 Beetle.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 13:54 |
|
Pixelate posted:Chris leaving the office with dignity Star Citizen: Bouncy Glaring Baboon
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 14:13 |
|
Had someone at work talk to me about SC. They just saw the stream with the new mining ship and said the game looked really cool. His impression was that you could get in a ship with five of your buddies, everyone had a separate station with the mining lasers, and next year they're going to have a refinery ship so you could spend your entire career just as a refinery operator. He also said it was super cool how the game was a "sim" because you could "unlock your gimbal" and fly backwards while shooting at the guy behind you. He also said the game looked gorgeous. He's not gonna buy in but that's what SC looks like to the only passively interested.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 14:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/RobertsSpaceInd/status/1215050258306207745
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 14:40 |
|
o-oops! w-we forgot to update it haha! e: what's up with all the deleted answers?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 14:44 |
|
lol it fess up time or no? "yeah so the guy who does our roadmap updates has totally been off sick for 6 months"
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 14:51 |
|
Are there any plans to make bed-logout optional, I think it should be rewarded when you do, but there are many cases where a bed-logout is not an option, and your character should still persist. I think a good way to promote bed-logout is by digesting your food slower for example, but it should not be punished like it is right now (no bed-logout, is back at station)
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 15:04 |
|
his nibs posted:Are there any plans?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 15:13 |
|
Games like The Witcher or Cyberpunk are showing how important the appearance of sexuality can be for the authenticity of a game world. How “sexy” will the world of Star Citizen and Squadron42 be? Will it be more like Skyrim where sexuality not really happens or will we get a “Witcher in Space” with red-light districts and explicit presentation of sex (or something in between like in Mass Effect)?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 15:15 |
|
his nibs posted:Are there any plans to make bed-logout optional, I think it should be rewarded when you do, but there are many cases where a bed-logout is not an option, and your character should still persist. I think a good way to promote bed-logout is by digesting your food slower for example, but it should not be punished like it is right now (no bed-logout, is back at station) that would make people who paid more for the privilege of being able to bed logout feel less special and thus more inclined to not buy more ships no
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:01 |
|
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:05 |
|
I already failed. Bought the Ares Inferno. I kinda made a mental pros/cons list: Cons: I Hate fixed weapons I Can't hit ANYTHING with fixed weapons I Have no use for an capital ship hunter I already have more than enough ships It's a concept sale and not even on the roadmap. It could be YEARS before it's flyable. I've already spent enough on the game Pros: The ship looks cool
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:09 |
|
Rugganovich posted:Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising had 150 player servers in 2004 to be fair, this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akwVVi6weKQ was posted here years ago and we determined it's using 3x or more than what bf1 uses so technically Star Citizen is already has a player cap of 150 fud lover.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:11 |
|
UnknownTarget posted:Had someone at work talk to me about SC. They just saw the stream with the new mining ship and said the game looked really cool. His impression was that you could get in a ship with five of your buddies, everyone had a separate station with the mining lasers, and next year they're going to have a refinery ship so you could spend your entire career just as a refinery operator. He also said it was super cool how the game was a "sim" because you could "unlock your gimbal" and fly backwards while shooting at the guy behind you. He also said the game looked gorgeous. This is an important point. This is exactly what CIG has been trying to do this whole time. Forget everyone in this thread, people following this from the beginning. If you're a casual game guy who has just now heard about Star Citizen, why on earth would you assume it's not a game in development? Studios, employees, videos, magazines, demos you can play yourself - obviously it's a game - who in their right minds would assume otherwise? This is one of those "devil in plain sight" situations that's almost impossible to explain to the uninitiated.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:15 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:This is an important point. This is exactly what CIG has been trying to do this whole time. Forget everyone in this thread, people following this from the beginning. If you're a casual game guy who has just now heard about Star Citizen, why on earth would you assume it's not a game in development? Studios, employees, videos, magazines, demos you can play yourself - obviously it's a game - who in their right minds would assume otherwise? seen it happen quite a few times in a lot of different companies, software related or no its a red flag that reveals hundreds of other red flags
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:20 |
|
Asmodai_00 posted:I already failed.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:21 |
|
the only reason they are trying to raise the server caps is for sean tracy's citizenfield 42 lol
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:25 |
|
where's the image where the guy gives tips on how to prevent divorce due to buying too many ships
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:28 |
|
Rugganovich posted:Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising had 150 player servers in 2004 Fidelity tho
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 16:58 |
|
A chance to put your important questions to the devs https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/3/thread/calling-all-devs-january-2020-question-thread/2712737
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:02 |
|
How “sexy” will the world of Star Citizen and Squadron42 be?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:03 |
|
UnknownTarget posted:Had someone at work talk to me about SC. They just saw the stream with the new mining ship and said the game looked really cool. His impression was that you could get in a ship with five of your buddies, everyone had a separate station with the mining lasers, and next year they're going to have a refinery ship so you could spend your entire career just as a refinery operator. He also said it was super cool how the game was a "sim" because you could "unlock your gimbal" and fly backwards while shooting at the guy behind you. He also said the game looked gorgeous. Tell him to do it
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:17 |
|
Someone asks a question about the Idris and how it's coming along, another backer attempts to quickly shut it down: BUY AN IDRIS (AND DON'T ASK QUESTIONS)
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:24 |
|
Let's tally up all the "where is SQ42" questions: What's up with SQ42? Why are so many chapters so far behind on the roadmap? Are the SQ42 chapters actually 9 months behind, or have they just not been updated? With the difficulties of AI and past delays, how will CIG complete the remaining 21 AI items on the SQ42 roadmap before June? The most relevant for 2020... what's going on with SQ42 development; what's its real status regarding percentage of the project's completion? With SQ42 due out the door sometime this year - will the extra devs moving over to the PU see a great jump in features and functions for the PU? Along with the stuff held back released to the PU on SQ42 release? SQ42, a PVE combat game with (presumably) PVE combat ranging from hand to hand, to fighter to fighter, to squad vs capital ship is due in beta by EOY. What steps will be taken to ensure this combat experience is deep, crisp, replayable and robust considering the decrepit or non-existent state of each of those offerings currently, and how will those offerings be tested when not the PU, nor AC or the upcoming AC modes are conducive to that kind of testing? (they are't conducive due to PU desync/lag/time commitment/p2w, or in AC because the game modes don't support some of those scenarios) In 2019, we received almost no information on SQ42, a teaser at the end of the year that was published also does not display sufficient information on the development of the project! Will this year's Insider Star Citizen programs be dedicated only to the SQ42 project? Is beta Q4 for 42 still planned or are we seeing that it's potentially pushed back? So how many of these questions do you think they'll answer? I'm putting my bet on none, they'll claim they all violate the "no when questions" rule TheAgent posted:the only reason they are trying to raise the server caps is for sean tracy's citizenfield 42 lol By the way, questions about Theaters of War? 2 total. No one cares at all about it. Rotten Red Rod fucked around with this message at 17:38 on Jan 9, 2020 |
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:32 |
|
Looks like CIG is now actively purging replies from almost every question in the thread. This means the sexy Star Citizen discussion is gone. Rotten Red Rod posted:By the way, questions about Theaters of War? 2 total. No one cares at all about it. And they share a total of 5 upvotes between them.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:40 |
|
TheAgent posted:hello I have to wonder if the new 3rd party and regs for cleaning up the codebase development is something the Calders have forced through.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:43 |
|
ErrEff posted:Looks like CIG is now actively purging replies from almost every question in the thread. That's more the fault of the posters that didn't read the OP, to be fair.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:50 |
|
backs care about the shiporn, they don't give a gently caress about this new gamemode poo poo lol its gonna star marine itself real hard
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:55 |
|
Bofast posted:
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:56 |
|
which I can see "oh hey that sq42 game thing we gave you $50m for, its like pretty much done right?" and you get a 3 minute teaser that shows some fancy lighting effects like at that point you'd be loving stupid not to get someone on the outside involved
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 17:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 01:02 |
|
TheAgent posted:supposedly there was a Q4 milestone that was missed which caused all this was the milestone "making 3.8 playable"
|
# ? Jan 9, 2020 18:00 |