|
ijyt posted:It’s just a model, no need to get upset. I'm laughing with all my friends.
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 10:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 15:39 |
|
|
TTerrible posted:I'm laughing with all my friends. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 12:03
|
|
|
Cancelled.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 12:05
|
|
|
I like the new tank.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 14:22
|
|
|
That tank looks like a Tonka truck with the yellow paint job.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
TTerrible posted:
This thing rules
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 19:13
|
|
|
Snake Dance posted:That tank looks like a Tonka truck with the yellow paint job. yep tallkidwithglasses posted:This thing rules yep
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 20:32
|
|
|
The rules suck poo poo tho
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 20:42
|
|
|
JcDent posted:The rules suck poo poo tho 140 points for a squadronable 4hp tank that can plausibly wipe multiple targets a turn seems bad, I agree.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 20:51
|
|
|
tallkidwithglasses posted:140 points for a squadronable 4hp tank that can plausibly wipe multiple targets a turn seems bad, I agree. Unironically this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 21:09
|
|
|
JcDent posted:Unironically this. It’s 25 points more than a Scorpius for a similar level of durability, a much higher damage ceiling and the ability to take squadrons. A Scorpius is already one of the most efficient tanks in the game.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2020 21:20
|
|
|
Boy this is an interesting one:
It can glance the hell out of armor, snipe small units, and obliterate MEQ blobs for less points than a plasma predator and more reliably than a scorpius or vindicator. Low cost, squadrons, and 4hp really take it over the top imo. Who cares about 24" when the main gun is so drat effective. 7" blast with BS4 will rarely miss the main target. I'd say the chassis itself is a bit schizophrenic, but the gun they put ontop is strongk. The cool thing? Autocannon sponsons. I hope these make their way into the rest of the legion arsenal because triple autocannon predators and sicarans would be badass. BULBASAUR fucked around with this message at 00:40 on Jan 11, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 00:34
|
|
|
BULBASAUR posted:
5+d6 str7 sundering shots hitting side armor will gently caress up most tanks very quickly.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 01:06
|
|
|
tallkidwithglasses posted:5+d6 str7 sundering shots hitting side armor will gently caress up most tanks very quickly. Good gravy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 02:06
|
|
|
tallkidwithglasses posted:5+d6 str7 sundering shots hitting side armor will gently caress up most tanks very quickly. It doesn't say it hits side-armor. So it will hit whatever facing is facing the Arquitor.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 02:09
|
|
|
No move and shoot is irredeemably bad
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 02:10
|
|
|
What?
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 02:11
|
|
|
Um... Tanks can definitely move and shoot with ordnance.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 02:16
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X6VoFBCE9k
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
Autocannon sponson predators 
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 03:00
|
|
|
Tbh. I would rather play against one of those new tanks than a scorpius as a BA. Atleast there is only an average of 8-9 hits once they poo poo on my deepstriking units 
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 05:17
|
|
|
Here's a size comparison of the two new tanks: And here's FW telling people lies: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 18:00
|
|
|
Why does GW social media people always default to gaslighting fans? all they had to do was say "yes, so what? it's from a STANDARD TEMPLATE CONSTRUCT design template, even if some fancy primarch put it together". Also why do they have to keep adding new alternative rules for weapons ~ why is it that this missile system can magically dump 5 missiles per squad under the template and yet, if there is only one squad it's five, but if there are four squads, each will get exactly five each. How does this work? - and if they're going to use the word "spiculum" why don't they make it similar in some sense to the other unit/s that use that teminology - like Custode spiculum launchers? (48" bolt launcher with S5 AP4 heavy 5 rending fire twice if you stay still) If they can't somehow reference or be similar to other spiculum weapons - maybe don't use the word? I don't have a problem with the art design, I don't have a problem with cool new tanks with interesting weapons - I do have a problem with the way GW treats customer feedback and the way that their design teams place low weight on consistency, and often make units that - since they often don't play - have weird rules or synergies that simply don't work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 19:56
|
|
|
How dare we deign to comprehend the face of GW and presume to know it’s motives? Let us praise the release and acknowledge it as the blessing that’s before us. Missiles good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 20:25
|
|
|
They look similar enough but also very different to me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2020 23:32
|
|
|
Kind of wished it was fast
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2020 04:28
|
|
|
Ghazk posted:Kind of wished it was fast 
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2020 12:43
|
|
|
Crossposting my daemons from the 40k thread, still need basing:
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2020 19:57
|
|
|
InsidiousMuppet posted:Crossposting my daemons from the 40k thread, still need basing: Pretty solid! Have you looked at the ruinstorm list at all and thought of how you want to take them?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2020 21:05
|
|
|
InsidiousMuppet posted:Crossposting my daemons from the 40k thread, still need basing: I dig it
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 16:51
|
|
|
Alright guys, it’s the week before LVO. Let’s see those secret army teasers! Here’s mine: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 16:56
|
|
|
Ghazk posted:Alright guys, it’s the week before LVO. Let’s see those secret army teasers! You will be chased from Vegas by a mob.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 17:06
|
|
|
Unrelated question: You can bring custodes allies in a xenos fandex ZM list right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 17:09
|
|
|
Behave yourself or you will taste my shoe
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
Ghazk posted:Unrelated question: You can bring custodes allies in a xenos fandex ZM list right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 17:14
|
|
|
Lol please bring the Mournival Xenos codex
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 18:01
|
|
|
Ghazk posted:Alright guys, it’s the week before LVO. Let’s see those secret army teasers! lamo I'm both triggered and excited
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 19:16
|
|
|
Lets get some "Let's go ghazk's eldar!" going in the chat for LVO.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 19:32
|
|
|
I like how the D-Cannon platforms are barrage and specifically say they can fire indirectly in ZM
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 19:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 15:39 |
|
|
BULBASAUR posted:lamo I'm both triggered and excited Wait until you see my heresy era necrons. Those aussie 30k folks are amazing, doing god's work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2020 19:57
|
|